Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton December 1, 2022

Experimental linguistics: bridging subregular linguistics and cognitive neuroscience

  • Enes Avcu ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Ryan Rhodes ORCID logo
From the journal Theoretical Linguistics

Corresponding author: Enes Avcu, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA, E-mail:
Enes Avcu and Ryan Rhodes contributed equally.


Anderson, John R. 1978. Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological Review 85. 249–277. in Google Scholar

Aslin, Richard N., Jenny R. Saffran & Elissa L. Newport. 1998. Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological Science 9. 321–324. in Google Scholar

Avcu, Enes. 2019. Using cognitive neuroscience to understand learning mechanisms: Evidence from phonological processing. Newark, DE: University of Delaware dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Avcu, Enes & Arild Hestvik. 2020. Unlearnable phonotactics. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5. 1–22. in Google Scholar

Bach, Emmon, Colin Brown & William Marslen-Wilson. 1986. Crossed and nested dependencies in German and Dutch: A psycholinguistic study. Language & Cognitive Processes 1. 249–262. in Google Scholar

Bahlmann, Jörg, Ricarda I. Schubotz & Angela D. Friederici. 2008. Hierarchical artificial grammar processing engages Broca’s area. NeuroImage 42. 525–534. in Google Scholar

Chambers, Kyle E., Kristine H. Onishi & Cynthia Fisher. 2003. Infants learn phonotactic regularities from brief auditory experience. Cognition 87. B69–B77. in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1956. Three models for the description of language. IRE Transactions on Information Theory 2. 113–124. in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783112316009Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1993. Lectures on government and binding. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110884166Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2014. The minimalist program. MIT press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262527347.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Christiansen, Morten H. & Nick Chater. 1999. Toward a connectionist model of recursion in human linguistic performance. Cognitive Science 23. 157–205. in Google Scholar

Dell, Gary S., Kristopher D. Reed, David R. Adams & Antje S. Meyer. 2000. Speech errors, phonotactic constraints, and implicit learning: A study of the role of experience in language production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26. 1355–1367. in Google Scholar

De Vries, Meinou H., Karl Magnus Petersson, Sebastian Geukes, Pienie Zwitserlood & Morten H. Christiansen. 2012. Processing multiple non-adjacent dependencies: Evidence from sequence learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367. 2065–2076. in Google Scholar

Ding, Nai, Lucia Melloni, Hang Zhang, Xing Tian & David Poeppel. 2016. Cortical tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech. Nature Neuroscience 19. 158–164. in Google Scholar

Embick, David & David Poeppel. 2015. Towards a computational(ist) neurobiology of language: Correlational, integrated and explanatory neurolinguistics. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30. 357–366. in Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas & Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32. 429–448. in Google Scholar

Evers, Arnold. 1975. The transformational cycle in Dutch. Utrecht: University of Utrecht dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Finley, Sara. 2011. The privileged status of locality in consonant harmony. Journal of Memory and Language 65. 74–83. in Google Scholar

Finley, Sara. 2012. Testing the limits of long-distance learning: Learning beyond a three-segment window. Cognitive Science 36. 740–756. in Google Scholar

Finley, Sara. 2017. Locality and harmony: Perspectives from artificial grammar learning. Linguistics and Language Compass 11. 1–16. in Google Scholar

Finley, Sara & William Badecker. 2009. Artificial language learning and feature-based generalization. Journal of Memory and Language 61. 423–437.10.1016/j.jml.2009.05.002Search in Google Scholar

Fitch, W. Tecumseh & Marc D. Hauser. 2004. Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate. Science 303. 377–380. in Google Scholar

Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2014. Toward a computational framework for cognitive biology: Unifying approaches from cognitive neuroscience and comparative cognition. Physics of Life Reviews 11. 329–364. in Google Scholar

Gentner, Timothy Q., Kimberly M. Fenn, Daniel Margoliash & Howard C. Nusbaum. 2006. Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds. Nature 440. 1204–1207. in Google Scholar

Gibson, Edward. 1998. Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68. 1–76. in Google Scholar

Gold, E. Mark. 1967. Language identification in the limit. Information and Control 10. 447–474. in Google Scholar

Goldrick, Matthew. 2004. Phonological features and phonotactic constraints in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language 51. 586–603. in Google Scholar

Hale, Mark & Charles Reiss. 2000. “Substance abuse” and “dysfunctionalism”: Current trends in phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 31. 157–169. in Google Scholar

Hansson, Gunnar. 2001. Theoretical and typological issues in consonant harmony. Berkeley: University of California dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Heinz, Jeffrey. 2010. Learning long-distance phonotactics. Linguistic Inquiry 41. 623–661. in Google Scholar

Heinz, Jeffrey, Chetan Rawal & Herbert G. Tanner. 2011. Tier-based strictly local constraints for phonology. ACL 49. 58–64.Search in Google Scholar

Heinz, Jeffrey, Anna Kasprzik & Timo Kötzing. 2012. Learning in the limit with lattice-structured hypothesis spaces. Theoretical Computer Science 457. 111–127. in Google Scholar

Heinz, Jeffrey & William Idsardi. 2013. What complexity differences reveal about domains in language. Topics in Cognitive Science 5. 111–131. in Google Scholar

Jardine, Adam & Kevin McMullin. 2017. Efficient learning of tier-based strictly κ-local languages. In Proceedings of language and automata theory and applications, 64–76. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-53733-7_4Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Douglas C. 1972. Formal aspects of phonological description. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110876000Search in Google Scholar

Joshi, Aravind K. 1990. Processing crossed and nested dependencies: An automation perspective on the psycholinguistic results. Language & Cognitive Processes 5. 1–27. in Google Scholar

Kaplan, Ronald M. & Martin Kay. 1994. Regular models of phonological rule systems. Computational Linguistics 20. 331–378.Search in Google Scholar

Koo, Hahn & Lydia Callahan. 2012. Tier-adjacency is not a necessary condition for learning phonotactic dependencies. Language & Cognitive Processes 27. 1425–1432. in Google Scholar

Lai, Regina. 2012. Domain specificity in learning phonology. Newark, DE: University of Delaware dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Lai, Regina. 2015. Learnable vs. unlearnable harmony patterns. Linguistic Inquiry 46. 425–451. in Google Scholar

Marcus, Gary F., Sugumaran Vijayan, S. Bandi Rao & Peter M. Vishton. 1999. Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science 283. 77–80. in Google Scholar

Marr, David. 1982. The philosophy and the approach. Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information, 104–123. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Marr, David & Tomaso Poggio. 1976. Cooperative computation of Stereo disparity: A cooperative algorithm is derived for extracting disparity information from stereo image pairs. Science 194. 283–287. in Google Scholar

Matchin, William & Gregory Hickok. 2020. The cortical organization of syntax. Cerebral Cortex 30. 1481–1498. in Google Scholar

McMullin, Kevin & Gunnar Ólafur Hansson. 2019. Inductive learning of locality relations in segmental phonology. Laboratory Phonology 10. 1–53. in Google Scholar

Moreton, Elliott. 2008. Analytic bias and phonological typology. Phonology 25. 83–127. in Google Scholar

Moreton, Elliott & Joe Pater. 2012a. Structure and substance in artificial-phonology learning, part I: Structure. Language and Linguistics Compass 6. 686–701. in Google Scholar

Moreton, Elliott & Joe Pater. 2012b. Structure and substance in artificial-phonology learning, part II: Substance. Language and Linguistics Compass 6. 702–718. in Google Scholar

Murphy, Elliot, Oscar Woolnough, Patrick S. Rollo, Zachary J. Roccaforte, Katrien Segaert, Peter Hagoort & Nitin Tandon. 2022. Minimal phrase composition revealed by intracranial recordings. Journal of Neuroscience 42. 3216–3227. in Google Scholar

Nelson, Matthew J., Imen El Karoui, Kristof Giber, Xiaofang Yang, Laurent Cohen, Hilda Koopman, Sydney S. Cash, Lionel Naccache, John T. Hale, Christophe Pallier & Stanislas Dehaene. 2017. Neurophysiological dynamics of phrase-structure building during sentence processing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114. E3669–E3678. in Google Scholar

Newport, Elissa L. & Richard N. Aslin. 2004. Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies. Cognitive Psychology 48. 127–162. in Google Scholar

Ohala, John J. 1993. The phonetics of sound change. In Charles Jones (ed.), Historical linguistics: problems and perspectives, 237–278. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Onishi, Kristine H., Kyle E. Chambers & Cynthia Fisher. 2002. Learning phonotactic constraints from brief auditory experience. Cognition 83. B13–B23. in Google Scholar

Onnis, Luca, Padraic Monaghan, Korin Richmond & Nick Chater. 2005. Phonology impacts segmentation in online speech processing. Journal of Memory and Language 53. 225–237. in Google Scholar

Petersson, Karl-Magnus, Vasiliki Folia & Peter Hagoort. 2012. What artificial grammar learning reveals about the neurobiology of syntax. Brain and Language 120. 83–95. in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven & Ray Jackendoff. 2005. The faculty of language: What’s special about it? Cognition 95. 201–236. in Google Scholar

Pulvermüller, Friedemann. 2010. Brain embodiment of syntax and grammar: Discrete combinatorial mechanisms spelt out in neuronal circuits. Brain and Language 112. 167–179. in Google Scholar

Pycha, Anne, Pawel Nowak, Eurie Shin & Ryan Shosted. 2003. Phonological rule-learning and its implications for a theory of vowel harmony. WCCFL 22. 423–435.Search in Google Scholar

Pylyshyn, Zenon W. 1974. Minds, machines and phenomenology: Some reflections on Dreyfus’ what computers can’t do. Cognition 3. 57–77. in Google Scholar

Rambow, Owen & Aravind K. Joshi. 1994. A processing model for free word order languages. In Charles CliftonJr., Lyn Frazier & Keith Rayner (eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing, 267–301. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Reber, Arthur S. 1967. Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 6. 855–863. in Google Scholar

Rose, Sharon & Rachel Walker. 2004. A typology of consonant agreement as correspondence. Language 80. 475–531. in Google Scholar

Saffran, Jenny R., Richard N. Aslin & Elissa L. Newport. 1996. Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274. 1926–1928. in Google Scholar

Saffran, Jenny R., Elizabeth K. Johnson, Richard N. Aslin & Elissa L. Newport. 1999. Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition 70. 27–52. in Google Scholar

Saffran, Jenny R., Seth D. Pollak, Rebecca L. Seibel & Anna Shkolnik. 2007. Dog is a dog is a dog: Infant rule learning is not specific to language. Cognition 105. 669–680. in Google Scholar

Sapir, Edward & Harry Hoijer. 1967. The phonology and morphology of the Navajo language. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schabes, Yves. 1990. Mathematical and computational aspects of lexicalized grammars. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Shieber, Stuart M. 1985. Evidence against the context-freeness of natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 8. 333–345. in Google Scholar

Sonnweber, Ruth, Andrea Ravignani & W. Tecumseh Fitch. 2015. Non-adjacent visual dependency learning in chimpanzees. Animal Cognition 18. 733–745. in Google Scholar

ten Cate, Carel & Kazuo Okanoya. 2012. Revisiting the syntactic abilities of non-human animals: Natural vocalizations and artificial grammar learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367. 1984–1994. in Google Scholar

Uddén, Julia, Martin Ingvar, Peter Hagoort & Karl M. Petersson. 2012. Implicit acquisition of grammars with crossed and nested non-adjacent dependencies: Investigating the push-down stack model. Cognitive Science 36. 1078–1101. in Google Scholar

Westphal-Fitch, Gesche, Beatrice Giustolisi, Carlo Cecchetto, Jordan S. Martin & W. Tecumseh Fitch. 2018. Artificial grammar learning capabilities in an abstract visual task match requirements for linguistic syntax. Frontiers in Psychology 9. 1210. in Google Scholar

Wilson, Colin. 2003. Experimental investigation of phonological naturalness. WCCFL 22. 533–546.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-06-20
Accepted: 2022-07-03
Published Online: 2022-12-01
Published in Print: 2022-10-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 30.9.2023 from
Scroll to top button