Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton August 2, 2016

Ellipsis: licensing, structure and identity

  • Evelyn Gandón-Chapela EMAIL logo and Javier Pérez-Guerra
From the journal The Linguistic Review


Following an introduction to ellipsis and its consequences both for communication and for the theory of grammar, this paper addresses a number of issues which have been debated in the linguistic literature on ellipsis, namely structure, identity and licensing. This study brings to the readers’ attention the effects which such conditions have for the study of ellipsis in different languages as well as their constraints within the generative framework. As case studies on the conditions and the characterisation of the linguistic strategy under scrutiny, this paper also summarises the main approaches to ellipsis in the studies embodied in this special issue.

Funding statement: We are grateful to the following institutions for generous financial support: the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and the European Regional Development Fund (grant no. FFI2013-44065-P), and the Autonomous Government of Galicia (grant no. GPC2014/060).


Abeillé, Anne, Gabriella Bîlbîie & François Mouret. 2011. A romance perspective on gapping constructions. In Hans Boas & Francisco Gonzálvez-García (eds.), Romance in construction grammar, 227–265. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.15.07abeSearch in Google Scholar

Aelbrecht, Lobke. 2009. You have the right to remain silent. The syntactic licensing of ellipsis. Brussels: Catholic University of Brussels dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Aelbrecht, Lobke. 2010. The syntactic licensing of ellipsis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.149Search in Google Scholar

Bîlbîie, Gabriela. 2011. Grammaire des constructions elliptiques. Une étude comparative des phrases sans verbe en roumain et en français. Paris: Université Paris Diderot-Paris 7 dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Chung, Sandra. 2006. Sluicing and the lexicon: The point of no return. In Rebecca T. Cover & Yuni Kim (eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 31 (BLS), 73–91. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.10.3765/bls.v31i1.896Search in Google Scholar

Chung, Sandra. 2013. Syntactic identity in sluicing: How much, and why. Linguistic Inquiry 44. 1–39.10.1162/LING_a_00118Search in Google Scholar

Chung, Sandra, William Ladusaw & James McCloskey. 1995. Sluicing and logical form. Natural Language Semantics 3. 239–282.10.1007/BF01248819Search in Google Scholar

Coppock, Elizabeth. 2001. Gapping: In defense of deletion. In Mary Andronis, Christopher Ball, Heidi Elston & Sylvain Neuvel (eds.), Proceedings of Chicago linguistic society 37, 133–148. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar

Culicover, Peter & Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Dalrymple, Mary. 2005. Against reconstruction in ellipsis. In Reinaldo Elugardo & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), Ellipsis and nonsentential speech, 31–55. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-2301-4_2Search in Google Scholar

Dalrymple, Mary, Stuart M. Shieber & Fernando C. N. Pereira. 1991. Ellipsis and higher-order unification. Linguistics and Philosophy 14. 399–452.10.1007/BF00630923Search in Google Scholar

Fiengo, Robert & Robert May. 1994. Indices and identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gallego, Ángel Jesús. 2011. Sobre la elipsis. Madrid: Arco Libros.Search in Google Scholar

Gengel, Kirsten. 2009. Phases and ellipsis. Linguistic Analysis 35. 21–42.Search in Google Scholar

Ginzburg, Jonathan & Ivan A. Sag. 2000. Interrogative investigations. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Hardt, Daniel. 1993. Verb phrase ellipsis: Form, meaning, and processing. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Hartmann, Katharina. 2000. Right node raising and gapping. Interface conditions on prosodic deletion. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.106Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Kyle. 2001. What VP ellipsis can do, and what it can’t, but not why. In Martin Baltin & Chris Collins (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, 439–479. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756416.ch14Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Kyle (ed.). 2008. Topics in ellipsis, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Kyle. 2013. Licensing ellipsis. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 34(2). 71–98.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Jeong-Seok. 2006. Gapping: Movement or deletion? Studies in Generative Grammar 16(4). 595–614.Search in Google Scholar

Kennedy, Christopher. 2002. Comparative deletion and optimality in syntax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20(3). 553–621.10.1023/A:1015889823361Search in Google Scholar

Lobeck, Anne. 1995. Ellipsis. Functional heads, licensing and identification. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, Jason. 2004. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(6). 661–738.10.1007/s10988-005-7378-3Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, Jason. 2013a. Ellipsis: A survey of analytical approaches. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Ms.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198712398.013.2Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, Jason. 2013b. Voice and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 44(1). 77–108.10.1162/LING_a_00120Search in Google Scholar

Potts, Christopher. 2002. The syntax and semantics of as-parentheticals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20(3). 623–689.10.1023/A:1015892718818Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Ian. 2010. Agreement and head movement. Clitics, incorporation, and defective goals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262014304.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Sag, Ivan A. 1976. Deletion and logical form. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Thoms, Gary. 2010. Tolerated lexical mismatches in ellipsis. Glasgow: Strathclyde University Ms.Search in Google Scholar

Thoms, Gary. 2011. ‘Verb floating’ and VP-ellipsis: Towards a movement account of ellipsis licensing. In Jeroen van Craenenbroeck (ed.), Linguistic variation yearbook 2010, 252–297. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/livy.10.07thoSearch in Google Scholar

Thoms, Gary. 2013. Lexical mismatches in ellipsis and the identity condition. In Stefan Keine & Shayne Sloggett (eds.), Proceedings of the Forty-Second Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistics Society (NELS 42). Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications. in Google Scholar

van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen. 2010. The syntax of ellipsis: Evidence from Dutch dialects. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195375640.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen & Jason Merchant. 2013. Ellipsis phenomena. In Marcel den Dikken (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of generative syntax, 701–745. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804571.025Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Edwin. 1977. Discourse and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 8(1). 101–139.Search in Google Scholar

Winkler, Susanne. 2005. Ellipsis and focus in generative grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110890426Search in Google Scholar

Zagona, Karen. 1982. Government and proper government of verbal projections. Seattle, WA: University of Washington dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-8-2
Published in Print: 2016-11-1

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 8.6.2023 from
Scroll to top button