Abstract
Consonant cluster simplification in Tundra Nenets coexists with other consonantal alternations, such as fricative strengthening, lenition of stops, and a variety of NC-effects, which all apply within the same phrasal domain. These processes interact with each other, suggesting an opaque ordering within the same post-lexical domain and thus presenting a challenge not only for inherently parallel theories like classical Optimality Theory, but also for the cyclic derivational approaches such as Stratal OT. We analyze all instances of Tundra Nenets cluster simplification as coalescence and show that a variety of apparently opaque alternations accompanying cluster simplification can be seen as transparent on this account. We also argue that strengthening in consonant clusters is caused by an intermediate stage where coda obstruents lose their place and turn into a glottal stop.
References
Amelina, Maria K. 2011. Akcentnye kharakteristiki neproizvodnykh imen v tundrovom narechii neneckogo jazyka, Chast’ 1. Jamal’skij i kaninskij dialekty. Ural-Altaic Studies 5. 7–38.Search in Google Scholar
Amelina, Maria K. 2012. Akcentnye kharakteristiki neproizvodnykh imen v tundrovom narechii neneckogo jazyka, Chast’ 2. Gydanskij dialekt. Ural-Altaic Studies 6. 7–54.10.31826/9781463234942-001Search in Google Scholar
Baković, Eric. 2007. A revised typology of opaque generalisations. Phonology 24(2). 217–259.10.1017/S0952675707001194Search in Google Scholar
Baković, Eric. 2013. Blocking and complementarity in phonological theory. London: Equinox.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199735471.013.002Search in Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 2001. Voicing and continuancy in Catalan: a nonvacuous Duke-of-York gambit and a Richness-of-the-Base paradox. University of Manchester Ms.Search in Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 2011. Cyclicity. In Marc Van Oostendorp, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The blackwell companion to phonology, vol. 4, 2019–2048. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0085Search in Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 2014. Stratal phonology: Arguments for cyclic containment, morphological implications. University of Manchester Ms.Search in Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. forthcoming. Stratal optimality theory. Oxford: OUP.Search in Google Scholar
Bessell, Nicola. 1993. Towards a phonetic and phonological typology of post-velar articulation. University of British Columbia PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Bessell, Nicola & Ewa Czaykowska-Higgins. 1992. Interior salish evidence for placeless laryngeals. NELS 22 Proceedings, 35–49. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Search in Google Scholar
Castrén, Matias. 1854. Grammatik der samojedischen Sprachen. (Nordische Reisen Und Forschungen, Herausgegeben von A. Schiefner 5). St. Petersburg: Buchdruckerei der Kaiserlichen Akademieder Wissenschaften.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Morris Halle & Fred Lukoff. 1956. On accent and juncture in English. In Morris Halle, Horace G Lunt, Hugh McLean & Cornelis H Van Schooneveld (eds.), For Roman Jakobson: Essays on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, 65–80. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Clements, George N. 1987. Phonological feature representation and the description of intrusive stops. In A. Bosch, B. Need & E. Schiller (eds.), Parasession on autosegmental and metrical phonology, 29–50. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar
Clements, George N. & Elizabeth Hume. 1995. The internal organization of speech sounds. In John Goldsmith (ed.), Handbook of phonological theory, 245–306. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Davis, Stuart & Seung-Hoon Shin. 1999. The syllable contact constraint in Korean: An optimality-theoretic analysis. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8(4). 285–312.10.1023/A:1008335414055Search in Google Scholar
De Haas, Wim. 1988. A formal theory of vowel coalescence: A case study of Ancient Greek. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110869248Search in Google Scholar
De Lacy, Paul. 2002. The formal expression of markedness. Umass Amherst PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
De Lacy, Paul. 2006. Markedness: Reduction and preservation in phonology. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511486388Search in Google Scholar
Duanmu, San. 2009. Syllable structure. The limits of variation. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267590.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Fourakis, Marios & Robert Port. 1986. Stop epenthesis in English. Journal of Phonetics 14. 197–221.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30658-8Search in Google Scholar
Gietz, Frederick, Peter Jurgec & Maida Percival. 2015. Linguistic shift work: not so strange after all (shifting in Harmonic Serialism). Paper presented at NELS 46.Search in Google Scholar
Gouskova, Maria, Elizabeth Zsiga & One Tlale Boyer. 2011. Grounded constraints and the consonants of Setswana. Lingua 121(15). 2120–2152.10.1016/j.lingua.2011.09.003Search in Google Scholar
Halpert, Claire. 2012. Overlap-driven consequences of nasal place assimilation. In Philip Hoole, Lasse Bombien, Marianne Poulpier, Christine Mooshammer & Barbara Kühnert (eds.), Consonant clusters and structural complexity, 345–368. Berlin, NY: De Gruyter.10.1515/9781614510772.345Search in Google Scholar
Helimski, Eugene A. 1984. Phonological and morphonological properties of quantity in Samoyed. In Péter Hajdú & László Honti (eds.), Studien zur phonologischen Beschreibung uralischer Sprachen, 13–17. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Search in Google Scholar
Herbert, Robert K. 1986. Language universals, markedness theory, and natural phonetic processes. Berlin, New York, Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110865936Search in Google Scholar
Hirst, Daniel. 1985. Linearisation and the single segment hypothesis. In Jacqueline Guéron, Hans Obenauer & Jean-Yves Pollock (eds.), Grammatical representation, 87–99. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783112328064-005Search in Google Scholar
Hume, Elizabeth. 1995. Representing the duality of glides. In George Tsoulas & Lea Nash (eds.), Actes du congrès: Langues et grammaire. Paris: Université, Paris VIII.Search in Google Scholar
Itô, Junko. 1986. Syllable theory in prosodic phonology. Umass Amherst PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Itô, Junko. 1989. A prosodic theory of epenthesis. NLLT 7(2). 217–259.10.1007/BF00138077Search in Google Scholar
Itô, Junko & Armin Mester. 2003. On the sources of opacity in OT: Coda processes in German. In Caroline Féry & Ruben van de Vijver (eds.), The syllable in optimality theory, 271–303. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511497926.012Search in Google Scholar
Itô, Junko, Armin Mester & Jaye Padgett. 1995. Licensing and underspecification in optimality theory. Linguistic Inquiry 26(4). 571–613.Search in Google Scholar
Janhunen, Juha. 1984. Problems of Nenets phonology. In Péter Hajdú & László Honti (eds.), Studien zur phonologischen Beschreibung uralischer Sprachen, 19–28. (Bibliotheca Uralica 7). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Search in Google Scholar
Janhunen, Juha. 1986. Glottal stop in Nenets. (Mémoires de La Société Finno-Ougrienne 196). Helsinki: Nimilehti painettu Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seuran kirjapainossa.Search in Google Scholar
Janhunen, Juha. 1993. Options for Tundra Nenets vowel analysis. In Marianne Bakró-Nagy & Enikő Szíj (eds.), Hajdú Péter 70 Éves, 143–147. Budapest: Nyelvtudományi Intézet.Search in Google Scholar
Jarosz, Gaja. 2014. Serial markedness reduction. Proceedings of AMP 1. LSA.10.3765/amp.v1i1.40Search in Google Scholar
Jones, Patrick Jackson. 2014. Tonal interaction in Kinande: cyclicity, opacity, and morphosyntactic structure. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Kavitskaya, Darya & Peter Staroverov. 2010. When an interaction is both opaque and transparent: The paradox of fed counterfeeding. Phonology 27. 255–288.10.1017/S0952675710000126Search in Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Lexical Phonology and Morphology. In Yang In-Seok (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin.Search in Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1985. Some consequences of lexical phonology. Phonology Yearbook 2. 85–138.10.1017/S0952675700000397Search in Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2000. Opacity and cyclicity. The Linguistic Review 17(2–4). 351–366.10.1515/tlir.2000.17.2-4.351Search in Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. forthcoming. Paradigm effects and opacity. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Kirchner, Robert. 1993. Turkish vowel harmony and disharmony: An optimality theoretic account. University of Alberta Ms. ROA-4.Search in Google Scholar
Legendre, Géraldine, Antonella Sorace & Paul Smolensky. 2006. The optimality theory-harmonic grammar connection. In Paul Smolensky & Géraldine Legendre (eds.), The harmonic mind: From neural computation to optimality theoretic grammar, vol. 2, 339–402. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lehtisalo, Toivo. 1956. Juraksamojedisches Wörterbuch. Lexica Societatis Fenno-Ugricae 13. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Search in Google Scholar
Levi, Susannah V. 2004. The representation of underlying glides: A cross-linguistic study. University of Washington PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Levi, Susannah V. 2008. Phonemic vs. derived glides. Lingua 118(12). 1956–1978.10.1016/j.lingua.2007.10.003Search in Google Scholar
Lombardi, Linda. 2001. Why place and voice are different: Constraint interactions and feature faithfulness in Optimality Theory. In L. Lombardi (ed.), Segmental phonology in optimality theory: Constraints and representations, 13–45. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511570582.002Search in Google Scholar
Lombardi, Linda. 2002. Coronal epenthesis and markedness. Phonology 19(2). 219–251.10.1017/S0952675702004323Search in Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1994. The phonetics and phonology of Semitic pharyngeals. In Patricia Keating (ed.), Papers in laboratory phonology III: Phonological structure and phonetic form, 191–233. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511659461.012Search in Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 2003. Sympathy, cumulativity, and the Duke-of-York gambit. In Caroline Féry & Ruben van de Vijver (eds.), The syllable in optimality theory, 23–77. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511497926.003Search in Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 2007. Hidden generalizations: Phonological opacity in optimality theory. London: Equinox.Search in Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 2008. The gradual path to cluster simplification. Phonology 25(2). 271–319.10.1017/S0952675708001486Search in Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Alan Prince. 1993. Prosodic morphology: Constraint interaction and satisfaction. UMass Amherst and Rutgers University Ms.Search in Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Alan Prince. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. UMass Amherst and Rutgers University Ms.Search in Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Alan Prince. 1999. Faithfulness and identity in Prosodic Morphology. In René Kager, Harry Van Der Hulst & Wim Zonneveld (eds.), Prosody-morphology interface. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511627729.008Search in Google Scholar
Mohanan, Karuvannur. 1986. The theory of lexical phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-3719-2Search in Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew & Ioana Chitoran. 2008. Phonological representations and the variable patterning of glides. Lingua 118. 1979–1997.10.1016/j.lingua.2007.10.006Search in Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina. 2014. A grammar of tundra nenets. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110320640Search in Google Scholar
Padgett, Jaye. 1994. Stricture and nasal place assimilation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 12(3). 465–513.10.1007/BF01118137Search in Google Scholar
Padgett, Jaye. 2008. Glides, vowels, and features. Lingua 118. 1937–1955.10.1016/j.lingua.2007.10.002Search in Google Scholar
Pater, Joe. 1996. *NC. In Jill Beckman (ed.), Proceedings of NELS 26, 227–239. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Search in Google Scholar
Pater, Joe. 1999. Austronesian Nasal Substitution and Other NC Effects. In René Kager, Harry van der Hulst & Wim Zonneveld (eds.), The prosody morphology interface, 310–343. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511627729.009Search in Google Scholar
Pater, Joe. 2009. Weighted constraints in generative linguistics. Cognitive Science 33(6). 999–1035.10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01047.xSearch in Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky. 2004. Optimality theory. Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756171.ch1Search in Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1976. The Duke of York gambit. Journal of Linguistics 12(1). 83–102.10.1017/S0022226700004813Search in Google Scholar
Ramsammy, Michael. 2012. The realisation of coda nasals in Spanish. University of Manchester PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Rose, Sharon. 1996. Variable laryngeals and vowel lowering. Phonology 13(1). 73–117.10.1017/S0952675700000191Search in Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 2000. Glide and glottal stop insertion in slavic languages: A DOT analysis. Linguistic Inquiry 31(2). 271–317.10.1162/002438900554361Search in Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 2003. Duke-of-york derivations in Polish. Linguistic Inquiry 34(4). 601–629.10.1162/002438903322520160Search in Google Scholar
Salminen, Tapani. 1993a. A phonemization of Tundra Nenets long vowels. In Marianne Bakró-Nagy & Eniko Szíj (eds.), Hajdú Péter 70 Éves, 347–352. (Linguistica, Series A, Studia et Dissertationes 15). Budapest: MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézet.Search in Google Scholar
Salminen, Tapani. 1993b. On identifying basic vowel distinctions in Tundra Nenets. Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen 51. 177–187.Search in Google Scholar
Salminen, Tapani. 1997. Tundra Nenets inflection. Mémoires de La Société Finno-Ougrienne 227. Helsinki: Société Finno-Ougrienne.Search in Google Scholar
Salminen, Tapani. 1998a. Nenets. In Daniel Abondolo (ed.), The Uralic languages, 516–547. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Salminen, Tapani. 1998b. A morphological dictionary of tundra nenets. Helsinki: Finno-Ugric Society.Search in Google Scholar
Salminen, Tapani. 2012. Tundra Nenets grammatical sketch. University of Helsinki Ms. http://www.helsinki.fi/~tasalmin/sketch.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Shih, Stephanie & Sharon Inkelas. 2014. A subsegmental correspondence approach to contour tone (dis)harmony patterns. Proceedings of Phonology 2013. LSA.10.3765/amp.v1i1.22Search in Google Scholar
Smolensky, Paul. 1993. Harmony, markedness, and phonological activity. Johns Hopkins University Ms. ROA-87.Search in Google Scholar
Staroverov, Peter. 2014. Splitting theory and consonant epenthesis. Rutgers University PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 1993. Closure, release, and nasal contours. In Rena A. Krakow & Marie K. Huffman (eds.), Nasals, Nasalization, and the Velum. (Phonetics and Phonology). New York: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-360380-7.50018-1Search in Google Scholar
Struijke, Caro. 2000. Existential faithfulness. A study of reduplicative TETU, feature movement, and dissimilation. University of Maryland PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Tatevosov, Sergei. 2016. Struktura i interpretatsiya nenetskogo glagola. Aktantno-aktsionalniye klassi i tipy spr’azheniya. Voprosy Iazykoznaniya.Search in Google Scholar
Tereshchenko, Natal’ya M. 1947. Ocherk grammatiki nenetskogo (iurako-samoedskogo) iazyka. Leningrad: Uchpedgiz.Search in Google Scholar
Tereshchenko, Natal’ya M. 1956. Materialy i issledovaniya po yazyku nentsev. Moskva & Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo AN SSSR.Search in Google Scholar
Tereshchenko, Natal’ya M. 1965. Nenetsko-Russkii Slovar’. Moskva: Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya.Search in Google Scholar
Tesar, Bruce. 2008. Output-driven maps. Rutgers University Ms.Search in Google Scholar
Tesar, Bruce. 2013. Output-driven phonology. Theory and learning. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511740039Search in Google Scholar
Wolf, Matthew. 2008. Optimal interleaving: serial phonology-morphology interaction in a constraint-based model. Umass Amherst PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Zoll, Cheryl. 1996. Parsing below the segment in a constraint based framework. UC Berkeley PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston