Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton April 8, 2021

Compositional mechanisms and selectional constraints in syntax and word formation

  • Olga Batiukova EMAIL logo
From the journal The Linguistic Review

Abstract

This study compares compositional processes involved in syntax on the one hand and word formation on the other hand within the Generative Lexicon framework. It first shows how semantic types incorporated in a structured lexical entry are acted on by different compositional mechanisms in predicates headed by verbs and in modification constructions, and then analyzes non-evaluative suffixation in Spanish in order to determine how the head suffix interacts with the meaning of the base word. It is concluded that different parts of the lexical entry of the selected component (syntactic argument or morphological base) can be accessed in both phrase construction and word formation, but the mechanisms underlying complex syntactic and morphological structures differ in significant ways.


Corresponding author: Olga Batiukova, Dpto. de Filología Española (Spanish Philology Department), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid/Autonomous University of Madrid, Campus de Cantoblanco, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, c/ Francisco Tomás y Valiente 1, 28049 Madrid, Spain, E-mail:

Funding source: BBVA Foundation

Acknowledgments

The core ideas discussed in this paper were first presented at the Workshop “Morphology and Syntax”, held at Universitat de Girona in July 2017. I would like to thank Josefa Martín and the anonymous reviewers of this journal for their many insightful comments on an earlier version of this paper, which contributed to improve it significantly. I am also grateful to James Pustejovsky for useful remarks on the material presented here and related issues, and to Núria Bel and Marta Villegas for giving me access to the Spanish PAROLE-SIMPLE lexicon. Special thanks go to Isabel Pujol and Elisabeth Gibert for their continued support and their effort as editors. All remaining errors and inconsistencies are, of course, my own. This research was partially supported by a Leonardo fellowship (2019) from the BBVA Foundation.

Appendix: Analyzed derivatives

1. Noun derivatives

Meaning of the suffix or suffix cluster Suffixes Words derived from dots Words derived from artifactuals
Blow or other sudden action performed with N -ada Guantada, gorrada, campanada
-(et)azo: librazo (phys_obj), botellazo (container), ventanazo (phys_obj), portazo (phys_obj) pincelazo, hachazo, llavazo, zapatazo, guantazo, cucharetazo, pistoletazo, bocinazo
Unit of measurement or content of N -ado/-ada cestada (phys_obj) nidada, cucharada, hornada, lanchada, esquifada, camionada
Quality, state or condition of N (+place of N or group of N in some cases), activity sector of N, doctrine of N -ía maestría, abogacía, carpintería, alcaldía
-ería hechicería (event•proposition) albañilería
-ato/-ado alumnado, consulado, rabinato
-dura/-tura colegiatura (organization•human group) jefatura
-ismo colorismo (attribute) motorismo, mosaicismo, abogadismo, rabinismo
Sickness or addiction related to N -ismo cafeísmo (liquid)
Place (of production, sale, consumption, containment, adjacency) of N, set of N, condition of N, service of N -ería librería (phys_obj•info), mensajería (phys_obj/ phys_obj•info), bolsería (container), cestería (container), cafetería (liquid), retratería (phys_obj•info), barrilería (container), coctelería (food), pulpería (food) jabonería, papelería, zapatería, ropería, cervecería, silería, mueblería, litería, guantería, gorrería, joyería, armería, quesería, chocolatería, mantequería, vinería, vinatería, licorería, sidrería, whiskería
-ía acería
-ero/-era botellero (container), cartelera (phys_obj), fichero (phys_obj), copero (container), merendero (event), cancionero (info), pollero (animal), conejera (animal), atunara (animal•food) jabonera, pincelero, hachero, llavero, papelera, zapatero, ropero, leñera, sillera, pantalonero, guantera, cucharero, pistolera, cochera, joyero, armero, panera, sopera, quesera, chocolatera, mantequera, tortero, licorera
-ario leccionario (info), sermonario (info) campanario
-ar conejar (animal)
Occupation related to N (producer of N, seller of N), [regular] user of N, instrument related to N, place (of production, sale, containment) of N -(ic/at/ad/ot)ero hospitalero (organization•location), banquero (organization), iglesiero (location), librero (phys_obj•info), cartero (phys_obj), mensajero (phys_obj•info), bolsero (container), botillero (container•content), cafetera (liquid), tetera (liquid), pinero (product), ventanero (phys_obj•aperture/ phys_obj), cafetero (aggregate•liquid•plant), almuercero (food), escudero (phys_obj), cartelero (phys_obj), botero (container), cestero (container), saquero (container), barrilero (container), remolachero (producer• product), ajero (producer• product), cacaotero (aggregate•plant), portero (phys_obj•aperture), coctelera (food), consejero (event• proposition), coplero (sound•info•event), pollero (animal•food), conejero (animal), atunero (animal•food), atunera (animal) jabonero, papelero/a, pincelero, llavero, zapatero, ropero, cervecero, acequiero, leñero, sillero, literero, cunera, faldera, pantalonero, guantero, gorrero, cucharero, pistolero, campanero, hornero, bocinero, barquero, lanchero, cochero, balsero, canoero, camionero, armero, panadero, chocolatero, mantequero, tortero, vinatero, licorero, sidrero
-dor/-dora tuneladora
Occupation related to N (producer of N, seller of N), [regular] user of N, someone/something aimed at N, someone/something inclined to N, supporter of N, worker of N -ista colorista (attribute), leccionista (event•info), oficinista (organization), clubista (organization•human group), congresista (organization•human group), folletista (info), retratista (phys_obj•info), cartelista (info), diccionarista (info), ebanista (product), cancionista (sound•info•event), baladista (sound•info•event), sinfonista (sound•info•event) pianista, cementista, papelista, acerista, mueblista, motorista, tanquista, canoísta, mosaicista, licorista
Set of N (+place of N in some cases) -(at/ot/et)al/ar platanar (producer), pinar (producer), pinatar (producer), cafetal (producer), maizal (producer), pepinar (producer), ajar (producer), hayal (producer), cacaotal (plant)
-edo/-eda pineda/o (producer), robleda/o (producer)
-ado/-ada poblada (human_group), pollada (animal) bancada
-aje ventanaje (phys_obj•aperture), corderaje (animal) ropaje, mueblaje
-amen botamen (container) papelamen
-ería saquería/o (container), barrilería (container) sillería, licorería
-dura armadura, brochadura
-ero medallero
Substance related to N -ina cafeína (aggregate•liquid•plant), teína (aggregate•liquid•plant), corderina (animal)
-eno cedreno (producer)
Entity containing N -ado/-ada mantecado, chocolatada
Tax for using N -azgo pontazgo, portazgo
-aje acequiaje, barcaje, lanchaje
Time period related to N -dad hospitalidad (location)
Action related to production, use or consumption of N -eo cerveceo
-ción/-zón pollazón (animal) nidación
-aje barcaje, lanchaje, canotaje
Action typical of an N -ada payasada, alcaldada

2. Adjectival derivatives

Qualifying (Q) or relational (R) Meaning of the suffix or suffix cluster Suffixes Words derived from dots Words derived from artifactuals
Q Having (a lot of) N -oso pinoso (producer), populoso (human_group), sentencioso (proposition) jabonoso, mantecoso, zumoso
-ado ajado (product) acerado, chocolateado
-udo zapatudo, faldudo
Q Having the characteristics of N -oso cementoso, felposo, panoso, mantecoso, vinoso, licoroso
-izo roblizo (producer•product)
-ado, -udo acerado, felpudo, campanudo
Q Fond of N -ero panero, sopero, quesero, chocolatero
-(l)ento/-(l)iento vinolento
R Relating to (production, sale, consumption, constitution, etc.) of N -ístico pianístico,
-ico sinfónico (sound•info•event), rítmico (attribute or value), dramático (event•info) asfáltico, vínico, rabínico
-ario hospitalario (organization•location), bancario (organization), sermonario (event•info) portuario, vinario
-ero cafetero (aggregate•liquid•plant), platanero (producer•product), cartelero (phys_obj •info), maicero (producer•product), remolachero (producer•product), hechicero (event•proposition), atunero (animal•food), pulpero (animal•food), jabonero, cementero, papelero, zapatero, cervecero, camisero, faldero, campanero, sopero, quesero, mantequero, tortero, vinatero, licorero, sidrero
-eo, -áceo platáneo (producer), platanáceo (producer), pináceo (producer), ebenáceo (producer), teáceo (plant)
-al municipal (location•organizaton•human_group), senatorial (location•organizaton•human_group), colegial (location•organizaton•human_group), teatral (location•organizaton•human_group), congresual (location•organizaton•human_group), colonial (location• human_group), documental (phys_obj•info), dimensional (attribute), posicional (attribute), formal (attribute) magistral, maestral
-ar escolar (location•organizaton•human_group), popular (human_group) consular
-ano/ -eno/-ino/ -eño ciudadano (location•human_group), aldeano (location•human_group), paisano (location•human_group), hayeno (producer•product), cedrino (producer•product), corderino (animal) porteño, huertano
-ense circense (location•organizaton•human_group) hortense
Q/R Relating to N, having properties of N, being similar to N -esco libresco (info), oficinesco (organizaton) abogadesco
-uno ajuno (product), conejuno (animal)
-il corderil (animal) abogadil, carpinteril

3. Verbal derivatives

Meaning of the suffix or suffix cluster Suffixes Words derived from dots Words derived from artifactals
Act using N (usually as an instrumental) -ar escudar (phys_obj) pincelar, bocinar
-ear cacear (container) llavear, zapatear, hachear, guantear, cucharear, campanear, hornear, barquear, cochear, balsear
Consume N regularly or heavily -ear cafetear (liquid), copear (content) cervecear
Put N onto something (locatum) -ear colorear (attribute/ value), cartelear (phys_obj) puentear
-ar poblar (human group), documentar (info), ritmar (value), dimensionar (value), posicionar (value), formar (value) jabonar, cementar, techar, acerar, felpar, barnizar, asfaltar, mitrar, armar
-izar colonizar (human group) motorizar, caramelizar
Put something into N (location) -izar hospitalizar (organization•location)
-ar colegiar (organization•human group), retratar (phys_obj•info), agendar (phys_obj•info), catalogar (info), fichar (phys_obj•info), esquifar
-ear mapear (info)
Subject someone to N, bring about N -ar examinar (event), merendar (event•food), ordenar (event•proposition), sentenciar (event•proposition), hechizar (event•proposition)
-ear sermonear (event•proposition)
Create N, turn into N -ar acequiar, sopar, merengar
-ear coplear (sound•event•info) quesear
-izar caramelizar
-ificar nidificar, panificar
Act as N -ear maestrear, payasear, albañilear, carpinterear

References

Anderson, Stephen R. 1982. Where’s morphology? Linguistic Inquiry 13(4). 571–612.Search in Google Scholar

Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Asher, Nicholas & James Pustejovsky. 2000. The metaphysics of words in context. Unpublished manuscript. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.34.7510 .Search in Google Scholar

Batiukova, Olga. 2016. Restricciones léxico-semánticas y mecanismos composicionales en la morfología derivativa: el caso de -iza(r). In Cristina Buenafuentes, Gloria Clavería & Isabel Pujol (eds.), Cuestiones de morfología léxica, 101–165. Frankfurt am Main: Iberoamericana – Vervuert.10.31819/9783954878567-005Search in Google Scholar

Batiukova, Olga & James Pustejovsky. 2013. Informativeness constraints and compositionality. In Roser Saurí, Nicoletta Calzolari, Chu-Ren Huang, Alessandro Lenci, Monica Monachini & Pustejovsky James (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Generative Approaches to the Lexicon, 92–100. Pisa: Istituto di Linguistica Computazionale “Antonio Zampolli”.Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie, Rochelle Lieber & Ingo Plag. 2013. The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747062.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie & Salvador Valera. 2015. Sense inheritance in English word-formation. In Laurie Bauer, Lívia Körtvélyessy & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), Semantics of complex words, 67–84. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-14102-2_5Search in Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. 1996. Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In Geert Booij & Jaap Van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1995, 1–16. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-017-3716-6_1Search in Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction morphology. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Booij, Geert & Jenny Audring. 2018. Category change in construction morphology. In Kristel Van Goethem, Muriel Norde, Evie Coussé & Gudrun Vanderbauwhede (eds.), Category change from a constructional perspective, 209–228. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.20.08booSearch in Google Scholar

Borer, Hagit. 2005. In name only. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bouillon, Pierrette. 1997. Polymorphie et sémantique lexicale: le cas des adjectifs. Lille: Presse du Septentrion.Search in Google Scholar

Busa, Federica. 1996. Compositionality and the semantics of nominals. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University doctoral dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 184–221. Waltham, MA: Ginn & Co.Search in Google Scholar

Cruse, Alan. 2000. Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

De Miguel, Elena. 2004. La formación de pasivas en español: análisis en términos de la Estructura de Qualia y la Estructura Eventiva. Verba Hispanica 12(1). 107–129. https://doi.org/10.4312/vh.12.1.107-129.Search in Google Scholar

Demonte, Violeta. 1999. El adjetivo: clases y usos. La posición del adjetivo en el sintagma nominal. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (dirs.), Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, vol. 1, 129–215. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Search in Google Scholar

Di Sciullo, Anne Marie & Edwin Williams. 1987. On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fradin, Bernard. 2008. On the semantics of denominal adjectives. In Geert Booij, Angela Ralli & Sergio Scalise (eds.), Online proceedings of the 6th Mediterranean Morphology Meeting, 84–98. Patras: University of Patras.Search in Google Scholar

Gaeta, Livio. 2015. Lexeme formation in a conscious approach to the lexicon. In Laurie Bauer, Lívia Körtvélyessy & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), Semantics of complex words, 115–141. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-14102-2_7Search in Google Scholar

Grupo de estructuras de datos. Relaciones morfoléxicas. Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. http://www.gedlc.ulpgc.es/investigacion/scogeme02/relmorfo.htm (accessed April 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20. Essays in linguistcs in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1975. Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language 51(3). 639–671. https://doi.org/10.2307/412891.Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lenci, Alessandro, Federica Busa, Nilda Ruimy, Elisabetta Gola, Monica Monachini, Nicoletta Calzolari, Antonio Zampolli, Pustejovsky James, Emilie Guimier, Gaëlle Recourcé, Humphreys Lee, Ursula Von Rekovsky, A. Antoine Ogonowski, Clare McCauley, Wim Peters, Ivonne Peters, Robert Gaizauskas & Marta Villegas. 2000. SIMPLE linguistic specifications. Deliverable 2.1. Available at: http://www.ub.es/gilcub/SIMPLE/simple.html#Specifications .Search in Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle. 1980. On the organization of the lexicon. Cambridge, MA: Massachussetts Institute of Technology doctoral dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle. 2016. English nouns: The ecology of nominalization. Oxford & New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316676288Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania working papers in linguistics 4(2). 201–225.Search in Google Scholar

Moortgat, Michael. 1987. Compositionality and the syntax of words. In Jeroen Groenendijk, Dick de Jongh & Stokhof Martin (eds.), Foundations of pragmatics and lexical semantics, 41–62. Dordrecht & Providence: Foris.10.1515/9783111405933-004Search in Google Scholar

Namer, Fiammetta & Evelyne Jacquey. 2013. Word formation rules and the generative lexicon: Representing noun-to-verb versus verb-to-noun conversion in French. In James Pustejovsky, Pierrette Bouillon, Hitoshi Isahara, Kyoko Kanzaki & Chungmin Lee (eds.), Advances in generative lexicon theory, 385–413. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-5189-7_17Search in Google Scholar

Pena, Jesús, María José Rodríguez Espiñeira, Francisco Javier Carreras Riudavets, Zenón José Hernández Figueroa & Gustavo Rodríguez Rodríguez. Base de datos morfológica del español (BDME TIP). Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. https://bdme.iatext.es/acceso.jsp (accessed April 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Piera, Carlos & Soledad Varela. 1999. Relaciones entre morfología y sintaxis. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (dirs.), Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, vol. 3, 4367–4422. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Search in Google Scholar

Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pustejovsky, James. 2005. A survey of dot objects. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University Unpublished manuscript.Search in Google Scholar

Pustejovsky, James. 2011. Coercion in a general theory of argument selection. Linguistics 49(6). 1401–1431. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.039.Search in Google Scholar

Pustejovsky, James. 2013. Type theory and lexical decomposition. In James Pustejovsky, Pierrette Bouillon, Hitoshi Isahara, Kyoko Kanzaki & Chungmin Lee (eds.), Advances in generative lexicon theory, 9–38. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-5189-7_2Search in Google Scholar

Pustejovsky, James & Olga Batiukova. 2019. The lexicon. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9780511982378Search in Google Scholar

Real Academia Española. 1992. Diccionario de la lengua española, 21st edn. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Search in Google Scholar

Real Academia Española & Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española. 2009. Nueva gramática de la lengua española (NGLE). Madrid: Espasa.Search in Google Scholar

Real Academia Española & Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española. 2014. Diccionario de la lengua española. online version 23.3, 23rd edn. https://dle.rae.es ((accessed March and April 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Rifón Sánchez, A. 2020. Las relaciones semánticas en la sufijación del español. Revista de filología 40. 247–273. https://doi.org/10.25145/j.refiull.2020.40.12.Search in Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1982. The syntax of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Starke, Michal. 2014. Cleaning up the lexicon. Linguistic Analysis 39(1–2). 245–255.Search in Google Scholar

Villegas, Marta & Nuria Bel. 2015. PAROLE/SIMPLE ‘lemon’ontology and lexicons. Semantic Web 6(4). 363–369. https://doi.org/10.3233/sw-140148.Search in Google Scholar

Whaley, C. P. 1978. Word-nonword classification time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 17(2). 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(78)90110-x.Search in Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna. 1985. “Oats” and “wheat”: The fallacy of arbitrariness. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax, 311–342. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.6.16wieSearch in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-04-08
Published in Print: 2021-06-25

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 2.6.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/tlr-2021-2062/html
Scroll to top button