Abstract
One of the main discussions about the interaction between morphology and syntax revolves around the richness or poverty of features and wherever this richness/poverty is found either in the syntactic structure or the lexical items. A phenomenon subject to this debate has been syncretism, especially in theories that assume late insertion such as Distributed Morphology. This paper delves into the syncretism observed between the first person plural and the third person in the clitic domain in some Spanish dialects. Our analysis will lead to a revision of the distribution of person features and their relationship with plural number, while at the same time it will shed light on other morphological alternations displayed in Spanish dialects; that is, subject-verb unagreement and mesoclisis in imperatives. In order to explain the behavior of the data under discussion, I propose that lexical items are specified for all the relevant features at the moment of insertion, although the values of these features can be neutralized. I argue that the distribution proposed allows for some fundamental generalizations about the vocabulary inventories in Spanish varieties, and shows that the variation pattern exhibits an *ABA effect, i.e., only contiguous cells in a paradigm are syncretic.
Acknowledgements
I thank the useful suggestions of two anonymous reviewers and the editors of this Special Issue. I would also like to thank the invaluable help of Juanjo Arias.
References
Acuña, Leonor & Andrea Menegotto. 1998. Dialecto y sistema pronominal del área mapuche. In Goluscio Lucía & Kuramochi Yosuke (eds.), Lingüística y literatura mapuche. Aproximaciones desde ambos lados de los Andes, 51–59. Buenos Aires: Universidad Católica de Temuco y Universidad de Buenos Aires.Search in Google Scholar
Arregi, Karlos & Andrew Nevins. 2018. Beware Occam’s syntactic razor: Morphotactic analysis and Spanish mesoclisis. Linguistic Inquiry 49(4). 1–125. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00286.Search in Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan. 2012. Universals in comparative morphology, suppletion, superlatives, and the structure of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9069.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Bonet, Eulàlia. 1991. Morphology after syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT doctoral dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Bonet, Eulàlia. 1995. Feature structure of Romance clitics. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 13. 607–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00992853.Search in Google Scholar
Caha, Pavel. 2009. The nanosyntax of case. Tromsø: University of Tromsø doctoral dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Caha, Pavel. 2016. GEN.SG = NOM.PL: A mystery solved? ČLÁNKY 64. 25–40.Search in Google Scholar
De Benito, Carlota. 2015. Pero se escondíamos como las ratas: syncretism in the reflexive paradigm in Spanish and Catalan. Isogloss 1(1). 95–127.10.5565/rev/isogloss.1Search in Google Scholar
De Jong, Bob, Dorien Nieuwenhuijsen, & Concepción Company Company. 2009. Formación del paradigma pronominal de las formas de tratamiento. In Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Segunda Parte: La frase nominal, 1595–1671. México: FCE: UNAM.Search in Google Scholar
Di Tullio, Ángela. 2017. La primera persona del plural y la variación: entre la hipercaracterización y el sincretismo. In Paper presented at the Encuentro de dialectos del español, 20–21 April. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid.Search in Google Scholar
Embick, David. 2015. The Morpheme. A theoretical introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781501502569Search in Google Scholar
Enrique-Arias, Andrés. 2011. El sincretismo de persona en el plural de los pronombres clíticos del español (os, nos y los). In Elisabeth Stark & Natascha Pomino (eds.), El sincretismo en la gramática del español, actas del XVII Congreso de la Asociación Alemana de Hispanistas, 99–118. Frankfurt/Madrid: Vervuert/Iberoamericana.10.31819/9783865278746-005Search in Google Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio. 2008. Variación en forma morfológica de los pronombres de primera y segunda persona de plural. Revista Espanola de Linguistica 38(1). 155–184.10.31810/rsel.v38i1.41Search in Google Scholar
Fernández, César. 2005. Hablar paisano. Estudios sobre el español de la Patagonia. Buenos Aires: Honorable Senado de la Nación.Search in Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and pieces of inflection. In Ken Hale & Samuel Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1994. Some key features of distributed morphology. In Carnie Andrew & Harley Heidi (eds.), MITWPL 21: Papers on Phonology and Morphology, 275–288. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1997. Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and Fission. In Benjamin Bruening, Yoonjung Kang & Martha McGinnis (eds.), MITWPL 30: Papers at the Interface, 425–449. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.10.1075/cilt.202.07halSearch in Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2008. When is syncretism more than a syncretism? Impoverishment, metasyncretism and underspecification. In Daniel Harbour, David Adger & Susana Bejar (eds.), Phi theory: Phi-features across modules and interfaces, 251–294. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Harris, Alice. 2017. Analogy and extension. In Ledgeway Adam & Ian Roberts (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of historical syntax, 92–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781107279070.006Search in Google Scholar
Harris, James & Morris Halle. 2005. Unexpected plural inflections in Spanish: Reduplication and metathesis. Linguistic Inquiry 36(2). 195–222. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389053710710.Search in Google Scholar
Harris, James. 1991. Exponence of gender in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 22. 65–88.Search in Google Scholar
Harris, James. 1994. The syntax-phonology mapping in Catalan and Spanish Clitics. In Carnie Andrew & Harley Heydi (eds.), MITWPL 21: Papers on Phonology and Morphology, 321–353. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar
Harris, James. 1995. The morphology of Spanish clitics. In Campos Hector & Kempchinsky Paula (eds.), Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Carlos Otero, 168–197. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hurtado, Alfredo. 1985. The unagreement hypothesis. In Larry D. King & Catherine A. Maley (eds.), Selected papers from the thirteenth linguistic symposium on romance languages, 187–211. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.36.12hurSearch in Google Scholar
Kany, Charles. 1945. American-Spanish Syntax. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 2010. Toward a syntactic reinterpretation of Harris & Halle (2005). In Reineke Bok-Bennema, Kampers-Manhe Brigitte & Hollebrandse Bart (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2008: Selected papers from ’Going Romance’ Groningen 2008, 145–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/rllt.2.09kaySearch in Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 2006. On the Plurality of Verbs. In Dölling Johannes, Tatjana Heyde-Zybatow & Martin Schäffer (eds.), Event structures in linguistic form and interpretation, 251–276. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110925449.269Search in Google Scholar
Malvestiti, Marisa. 1993. Castellano mapuchizado en la línea Sur. Aproximaciones. In Proceedings of the Primeras Jornadas de Etnolingüistica, 137–144. Rosario: Universidad Nacional de Rosario.Search in Google Scholar
Mare, María. 2018. Una nueva mirada sobre la concordancia inesperada en español. Revista de Filología Española 98(2). 397–422. https://doi.org/10.3989/rfe.2018.014.Search in Google Scholar
Minkoff, Seth. 1993. Plurality, clitics, and morphological merger in Caribbean Spanish. In MITWPL 20: Papers from the 5th Student Conference in Linguistics In Vern M. Lindblad & Michael Gamon (eds.), 177–192. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar
Noyer, Rolf. 1998. Impoverishment theory and morphosyntactic markedness. In Steven G. Lapointe, Diane K. Brentari & Patrick M. Farrell (eds.), Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax, 264–285. Stanford: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar
RAE-ASALE. 2009. Nueva Gramática de la Lengua Española, vol. 2. Madrid: Espasa.Search in Google Scholar
Rosenblat, Ángel. 1946. Notas de morfología dialectal. In Aurelio Espinosa (ed.), Estudios del español de Nuevo México. Parte II: Morfología. Buenos Aires: Biblioteca de dialectología Hispanoamaricana.Search in Google Scholar
Saab, Andrés. 2013. Anticoncordancia y sincretismo en español. Linguistica 29(2). 191–229.10.31819/9783954871971-015Search in Google Scholar
Siddiqi, Daniel. 2019. Distributed morphology. In Audring Jenny & Francesca Masini (eds.), The Oxford handbook of morphological theory, 143–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199668984.013.15Search in Google Scholar
Silva Garcés, José. 2019. El canto de la meseta. Prosodia, sintaxis y estructura de la información en el español del sur de Río Negro. Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional del Comahue Master Thesis, Maestría en Lingüística.Search in Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldor A. 2000. The locus of case and agreement, vol. 65, 65–108. Lund: Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax.Search in Google Scholar
Spinelli, Silvia. 2005. Contacto ranquel-español: transferencia de la lengua sustrato a la lengua dominante. In Yolanda Hipperdinger (ed.), Contacto de lenguas en el sur argentino, 59–74. Bahía Blanca: EDIUNS.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
