Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter January 20, 2020

„Eine irreführende Parallele“

Wittgenstein über Begriffsverwirrung in der Psychologie und die Semantik psychologischer Begriffe

  • Stefan Majetschak
From the journal Wittgenstein-Studien


“A Misleading Parallel”. Wittgenstein on Conceptual Confusion in Psychology and the Semantics of Psychological Concepts. After the Philosophical Investigations, except for details, were largely finished in 1945, Wittgenstein, in his final years, undertook an intensive study of the grammar of our psychological concepts and the philosophical misinterpretations we often assign to them. Anyone looking through these extensive collections of philosophical remarks will probably quite often find it difficult to understand which questions Wittgenstein was addressing with individual remarks or groups of remarks and where the philosophical problems lay for which he was trying to find a solution, whether therapeutic or otherwise appropriate.

In the article at hand I do not claim to fathom the full range of Wittgenstein’s thoughts on the philosophy of psychology even in the most general way. Rather it is my intention to shed some light on a diagnosis which he made for the psychology of his time. In part 1 of this paper I would like to provide a brief sketch of what Wittgenstein considered to be the conceptual confusion prevalent in psychology and to suggest why he did not expect the methods of an experimental (natural) science to be successful in solving the problems that concern us in psychology. In part 2 I’ll attempt to analyze how psychological concepts, according to Wittgenstein, might be construed in order to avoid any type of conceptual confusion.

In: Richard Raatzsch (Hrsg.), Spezialsektion: Wittgenstein über das Psychische, Wittgenstein-Studien Bd. 11 (2020).


Hacker, Peter & Joachim Schulte: The Text of the Philosophische Untersuchungen, in: PU 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Majetschak, Stefan: Lebensformen und Lebensmuster: Zur Deutung eines sogenannten Grundbegriffs der Spätphilosophie Ludwig Wittgensteins, in: Volker Munz, Klaus Puhl & Joseph Wang (Hrsg.), Language and World. Part One: Essays on the Philosophy of Wittgenstein (Proceedings of the 32th International Ludwig Wittgenstein Symposion in Kirchberg am Wechsel 2009), Heusenstamm 2010, 265 – 290.10.1515/9783110330595.265Search in Google Scholar

Majetschak, Stefan: Übersicht, übersichtliche Darstellung und Beweis. Bemerkungen zu einigen zentralen Begriffen in der Spätphilosophie Ludwig Wittgensteins, in: Fynn Ole Engler & Matthias Iven (Hrsg.), Große Denker, Leipzig 2013, 105 – 123.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Christian (Ed.), Language, Form(s) of Life, and Logic. Investigations after Wittgenstein, Berlin/Bosten 2018.10.1515/9783110518283Search in Google Scholar

Moyal-Sharrock, Danièle: Wittgenstein on Forms of Life, Patterns of Life, and Ways of Living, in: Nordic Wittgenstein Review (special issue) 2015.10.15845/nwr.v4i0.3362Search in Google Scholar

Rothhaupt, Josef G.F.: Recherchen zu „Teil II“ der Philosophischen Untersuchungen und zur von Wittgenstein erstellten „C-Sammlung“ im Nachlass, in: Wittgenstein-Studien 9 (2018), 155 – 201.10.1515/witt-2018-0009Search in Google Scholar

Savigny, Eike von: Wittgensteins „Philosophische Untersuchungen“. Ein Kommentar für Leser, Bd. 1: Abschnitte 1 bis 315, Frankfurt/Main 1988.Search in Google Scholar

Online erschienen: 2020-01-20

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 31.3.2023 from
Scroll to top button