Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter February 3, 2021

Wittgenstein and Dilthey on Scientism and Method

  • Thomas J. Spiegel
From the journal Wittgenstein-Studien


While Wittgenstein’s work has been extensively investigated in relation to many other important and influential philosophers, there is very little scholarly work that positively investigates the relationship between the work of Wittgenstein and Wilhelm Dilthey. To the contrary, some commentators like Hacker (2001a) suggest that Dilthey’s work (and that of other hermeneuticists) simply pales or is obsolete in comparison to Wittgenstein’s own insights. Against such assessments, this article posits that Wittgenstein’s and Dilthey’s thought most crucially intersects at the related topics of scientism on the one hand and scientific and philosophical method on the other. In reconstructing Dilthey’s conceptions of understanding versus explaining and central points of Wittgenstein’s Remarks on Frazer’s Golden Bough, it becomes apparent that they share a staunch rejection of scientism and use the notion of understanding as a means to prevent methodologies from the natural sciences encroaching onto the human sciences (in Dilthey’s case) and philosophy (in Wittgenstein’s case). Notwithstanding a number of central ways in which these thinkers differ, this article closes by suggesting that there is some evidence according to which Wittgenstein, like Dilthey, can reasonably be understood as championing some central tenets of the hermeneutical tradition.


Beale, Jonathan: Wittgenstein’s Anti-Scientistic Worldview, in: Jonathan Beale & Ian James Kidd (eds.): Wittgenstein and Scientism, London/New York 2018, 59 – 80.10.4324/9781315276199-5Search in Google Scholar

Beale, Jonathan: Scientism and Scientific Imperialism, in: International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 27 (2019), 73 – 102.10.1080/09672559.2019.1565316Search in Google Scholar

Beale, Jonathan & Kidd, Ian James (eds.): Wittgenstein and Scientism, London/New York 2018.10.4324/9781315276199Search in Google Scholar

Bell, Richard: Wittgenstein’s Anthropology. Self-Understanding and Understanding other Cultures, in: Philosophical Investigations, 7 (1984), 295 – 312.10.1111/j.1467-9205.1984.tb00052.xSearch in Google Scholar

Braver, Lee: Dilthey and Wittgenstein: Understanding Understanding, in: Eric Nelson (ed.): Interpreting Dilthey, Cambridge 2019, 235 – 251.10.1017/9781316459447.013Search in Google Scholar

Brusotti, Marco: Wittgenstein, Frazer und die “ethnologische Betrachtungsweise”, Berlin/Boston 2014.10.1515/9783110366112Search in Google Scholar

Cahill, Kevin & Raleigh, Thomas (eds.): Wittgenstein and Naturalism, London/New York 2017.10.4324/9781315301594Search in Google Scholar

Child, William: Wittgenstein, Scientism, and Anti-Scientism in the Philosophy of Mind, in: Kevin Cahill & Thomas Raleigh (eds.): Wittgenstein and Naturalism, London/New York 2017, 81 – 100.10.4324/9781315276199-6Search in Google Scholar

Comte, August: The Positive Philosophy of August Comte, transl. Harriet Martineau, Cambridge 2009.10.1017/CBO9780511701467Search in Google Scholar

Da Col, Giovanni & Palmié, Stephan (eds.), The Mythology in Our Language, Chicago 2020.Search in Google Scholar

Das, Veena: Wittgenstein and Anthropology, in: Annual Review of Anthropology, 27 (1998), 171 – 195.10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.171Search in Google Scholar

Dennett, Daniel: Darwin’s Dangerous Idea, London 1995.Search in Google Scholar

Detel, Wolfgang: Hermeneutik und Erklärung, 1/25, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Dupré, John: Against Scientific Imperialism, in: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers (1994), 374 – 381.10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1994.2.192948Search in Google Scholar

Dupré, John: Human Nature and the Limits of Science, Oxford 2001.10.1093/0199248060.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Follesdal, Dagfinn: Hermeneutics and the hypothetico-deductive method, in: Dialectica, 33 (2007), 319 – 336.10.1111/j.1746-8361.1979.tb00759.xSearch in Google Scholar

Forster, Michael: Dilthey’s Importance for Hermeneutics, in: Eric Nelson (ed.): Interpreting Dilthey, Cambridge 2019, 61 – 81.10.1017/9781316459447.004Search in Google Scholar

Frazer, James: The Golden Bough, New York 1922.10.1007/978-1-349-00400-3Search in Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans Georg: Truth and Method, transl. Joel Weinsheimer & Donald Marshall, London/New York 1975.Search in Google Scholar

Gallagher, Shaun: Dilthey and Empathy, in: Eric Nelson (ed.), Interpreting Dilthey, Cambridge 2019, 145 – 158.10.1017/9781316459447.008Search in Google Scholar

Glock, Hans-Johann: A Wittgenstein Dictionary, Oxford 1996.10.1111/b.9780631185376.1996.00007.xSearch in Google Scholar

Goldfarb, Warren: Wittgenstein, Mind, and Scientism, in: The Journal of Philosophy, 86 (1989), 635 – 642.10.5840/jphil1989861111Search in Google Scholar

Haack, Susan: Six Signs of Scientism, in: Logos and Episteme, 3 (2011), 75 – 95.10.5840/logos-episteme20123151Search in Google Scholar

Hacker, Peter M. S.: Wittgenstein and the Autonomy of Human Understanding, in: Peter M. S. Hacker: Wittgenstein: Connections and Controversies, Oxford 2001a, 34 – 37.10.1093/019924569X.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Hacker, Peter: Developmental Hypotheses and Perspicuous Representations: Wittgenstein on Frazer's Golden Bough, in: Peter M. S. Hacker: Wittgenstein: Connections and Controversies, Oxford 2001b, 74 – 93.10.1093/019924569X.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Hacker, Peter M. S.: Wittgenstein’s Anthropological and Ethnological Approach, in: Peter M. S. Hacker: Wittgenstein: Comparisons and Context, Oxford 2013, 111 – 127.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674824.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Henderson, David: Wittgenstein’s Descriptivist Approach to Understanding, in: Dialectica, 42 (1988), 105 – 115.10.1111/j.1746-8361.1988.tb00908.xSearch in Google Scholar

Hopkins, Jim: Wittgenstein, Davidson, and Radical Interpretation, in: Lewis Hahn (ed.): The Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Chicago 1999, 256 – 284.Search in Google Scholar

Horwich, Paul: Wittgenstein’s Metaphilosophy, Oxford 2012.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588879.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Hutto, Daniel: Wittgenstein and the End of Philosophy: Neither Theory nor Therapy, Basingstoke 2003.10.1057/9780230503205Search in Google Scholar

Hutto, Daniel: Philosophical Clarification, Its Possibility and Point, in: Philosophia, 37 (2009), 629 – 652.10.1007/s11406-009-9196-2Search in Google Scholar

Lawn, Chris: Wittgenstein and Gadamer. Towards a Post-Analytic Philosophy of Language, London/New York 2004.Search in Google Scholar

Majetschak, Stefan: Die anthropologische Betrachtungsweise. Zum Einfluss von James George Frazers The Golden Bough auf die Entwicklung der Spätphilosophie Ludwig Wittgensteins, in: Wittgenstein-Studien, 3 (2012), 217 – 232.10.1515/wgst.2012.217Search in Google Scholar

Majetschak, Stefan: Survey and Surveyability. Remarks on two central notions in Wittgenstein’s later philosophy, in: Wittgenstein-Studien, 7 (2016), 65 – 80.10.1515/witt-2016-0106Search in Google Scholar

Makkreel, Rudolf: Dilthey: Philosopher of the Human Sciences, Princeton 1975.Search in Google Scholar

Makkreel, Rudolf: Wilhelm Dilthey, in: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.),, last viewed 08. 10. 2020.Search in Google Scholar

McDowell, John: Wittgenstein on Following a Rule, in: Synthese, 58 (1984), 325 – 363.10.1007/BF00485246Search in Google Scholar

McDowell, John: Meaning and Intentionality in Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy, in: Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 17 (1992), 40 – 52.10.1111/j.1475-4975.1992.tb00141.xSearch in Google Scholar

Monk, Ray: Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius, London 1990.Search in Google Scholar

Monk, Ray: Wittgenstein’s Forgotten Lesson, in: Prospect Magazine,, last viewed 02. 04. 2020, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

Moyal-Sharrock, Daniéle: Introduction to Wittgenstein and Naturalism, in: American Philosophical Quarterly, 48 (2011), 95 – 96.Search in Google Scholar

Peels, Rik: Ten Reasons to Embrace Scientis, in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 63 (2017), 11 – 21.10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.04.001Search in Google Scholar

Rickmann, Hans: Wilhelm Dilthey. Pioneer of the Human Studies, Berkeley 1979.Search in Google Scholar

Rorty, Richard: Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton 1979.Search in Google Scholar

Scharff, Robert: Heidegger becoming Phenomenological, Interpreting Husserl through Dilthey, New York/London 2019a.Search in Google Scholar

Scharff, Robert: More than One ‘Kind’ of Science? Implications of Dilthey’s Hermeneutics for Science Studies, in: Eric Nelson (ed.), Interpreting Dilthey, Cambridge 2019b, 120 – 141.10.1017/9781316459447.007Search in Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, Friedrich: Hermeneutik, ed. H. Kimmerle, Heidelberg 1959.Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, Hans Julius: Wittgenstein’s Later Theory of Meaning: Imagination and Calculation, Oxford 2013.10.1002/9781118642375Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, Hans Julius: Horizontverschmelzung, Inkommensurabilität und sprachliche Bilder, in: Wittgenstein-Studien 8 (2017), 211 – 238.10.1515/witt-2017-009Search in Google Scholar

Schulte, Joachim: The Pneumatic Conception of Thought, in: Grazer philosophische Studien, 71 (2006), 39 – 55.10.1163/18756735-071001005Search in Google Scholar

Schütz, Alfred: On Multiple Realities, in: Collected Papers I, ed. Maurice Natanson, 1962, 207 – 259.10.1007/978-94-010-2851-6_9Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Benedict: Wittgenstein, Naturalism, and Scientism, in: Jonathan Beale & Ian James Kidd (eds.): Wittgenstein and Scientism, London/New York 2018, 209 – 224.10.4324/9781315276199-13Search in Google Scholar

Spengler, Oswald: The Decline of the West, ed. Arthur Helps and Helmut Werner, trans. Charles Atkinson, New York/Oxford 1991.Search in Google Scholar

Spiegel, Thomas J.: Ist der Naturalismus eine Ideologie?, in: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 68 (2020), 51 – 71.10.1515/dzph-2020-0003Search in Google Scholar

Whitaker, Mark: Ethnography as Learning: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Writing Ethnographic Accounts, Anthropological Quarterly, 69 (1996), 1 – 13.10.2307/3317135Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Bernard: Philosophy as a Humanistic Discipline, in: Bernard Williams: Philosophy as a Humanistic Discipline, ed. Adrian Moore, Princeton 2006, 180 – 199.10.1515/9781400827091Search in Google Scholar

Online erschienen: 2021-02-03

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.2.2024 from
Scroll to top button