Abstract
This article studies how the presence of the supported minority government Rutte-I affected patterns of legislative behavior. On the basis of the literature on minority cabinets, one would expect that during supported minority cabinets parliamentary parties cooperate more often across the division between coalition and opposition than under multiparty majority cabinet rule. Examining almost 30,000 parliamentary votes between 1994 and 2012, this study finds that on a host of indicators of coalition-opposition-cooperation, there was less cooperation “across the aisle” during the Rutte-I cabinet than during any cabinet before it. We explain this with reference to the encompassing nature of the support agreement as well as the impact of the cabinets’ ideological composition.
References
Alemán, E., E. Calvo, M. P. Jones and N. Kaplan (2009) “Comparing Cosponsorship and Roll-Call Ideal Points,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 34(1):87–116.10.3162/036298009787500358Search in Google Scholar
Andeweg, R. B. (1992) “Executive-Legislative Relations in the Netherlands: Consecutive and Coexisting Patterns,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 17(2):161–182.10.2307/440056Search in Google Scholar
Andeweg, R. B. (2004) “Parliamentary Democracy in the Netherlands,” Parliamentary Affairs, 57(3):568–580.10.1093/pa/gsh045Search in Google Scholar
Andeweg, R. B. (2006) “Towards a Stronger Parliament? Electoral Engineering of Executive-Legislative Relations,” Acta Politica, 41(3):232–248.10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500162Search in Google Scholar
Andeweg, R. B. (2011) “Purple Puzzles: The 1994 and 1998 Government Formations in The Netherlands and Coalition Theory.” In: (R. B. Andeweg, L. De Winter and P. Dumont, eds.) Puzzles of Government Formation: Coalition Theory and Deviant Cases. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 147–164.10.4324/9780203007815-15Search in Google Scholar
Andeweg, R. B., L. De Winter and P. Dumont, eds. (2011) Government Formation: Coalition Theory and Deviant Cases. Abingdon: Routledge.10.4324/9780203007815Search in Google Scholar
Bale, T. and C. Dann (2002) “Is the Grass Really Greener?: The Rationale and Reality of Support Party Status: A New Zealand Case Study,” Party Politics, 8(3):349–365.10.1177/1354068802008003005Search in Google Scholar
Bale, T. and T. Bergman (2006a) “A Taste of Honey Is Worse Than None at All?: Coping with the Generic Challenges of Support Party Status in Sweden and New Zealand,” Party Politics, 12(2):189–202.10.1177/1354068806061337Search in Google Scholar
Bale, T. and T. Bergman (2006b) “Captives No Longer, but Servants Still? Contract Parliamentarism and the New Minority Governance in Sweden and New Zealand,” Government and Opposition, 41(3):422–449.10.1111/j.1477-7053.2006.00186.xSearch in Google Scholar
Boston, J. and D. Bullock (2010) “Multi-party Governance: Managing the Unity-distinctiveness Dilemma in Executive Coalitions,” Party Politics, 18(3):349–368.10.1177/1354068810382937Search in Google Scholar
Christiansen, F. J. and R. B. Pedersen (2012) “The Impact of the European Union on Coalition Formation in a Minority System: The Case of Denmark,” Scandinavian Political Studies, 35(3):179–197.10.1111/j.1467-9477.2011.00285.xSearch in Google Scholar
De Vries, C. and S. de Lange (2010) “Minderheidskabinet kan zegen zijn,” De Volkskrant, August 7.Search in Google Scholar
Field, B. N. (2009) “Minority Government and Legislative Politics in a Multilevel State: Spain Under Zapatero,” South European Society and Politics, 14(4):417–434.10.1080/13608740903503829Search in Google Scholar
Godbout, J. F. and B. Høyland (2011) “Legislative Voting in the Canadian Parliament,” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 44(2):367–388.10.1017/S0008423911000175Search in Google Scholar
Hall, P.A. and R. C. R. Taylor (1996) “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms,” Political Studies, 44(5):936–957.10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.xSearch in Google Scholar
Herman, V. and J. Pope (1973) “Minority Governments in Western Democracies,” British Journal of Political Science, 3(2):191–212.10.1017/S000712340000778XSearch in Google Scholar
Hix, S. and A. Noury (2011) “Government-Opposition or Left-Right? The Institutional Determinants of Voting in Legislatures.” In: EPSA Conference. June 16–18, Dublin, Ireland.Search in Google Scholar
Holzhacker, R. (2002) “National Parliamentary Scrutiny Over EU Issues: Comparing the Goals and Methods of Governing and Opposition Parties,” European Union Politics, 3(4):459–479.10.1177/1465116502003004004Search in Google Scholar
Kim, Y. (2008) “Intra-Party Politics and Minority Coalition Government in South Korea,” Japanese Journal of Political Science, 9(3):367.10.1017/S1468109908003186Search in Google Scholar
Koninklijke Bibliotheek (2010) Staten-Generaal Digitaal. http://www.statengeneraaldigitaal.nl/ Last accessed September 2, 2013.Search in Google Scholar
Laver, M. J. (2006) “Legislatures and Parliaments in Comparative Context.” In: (B. Weingast and D. Wittman, eds.) Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 121–140.Search in Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in 36 Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Louwerse, T. (2011) Political Parties and the Democratic Mandate. Comparing Collective Mandate Fulfilment in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. PhD Thesis Leiden University.Search in Google Scholar
Louwerse, T. (2012) “Mechanisms of Issue Congruence: The Democratic Party Mandate,” West European Politics, 35(6):1249–1271.10.1080/01402382.2012.713745Search in Google Scholar
Mair, P. (1997) Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198295499.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
March, J. G. and J. P. Olsen (1984) “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life,” The American Political Science Review, 78(3):734–749.10.2307/1961840Search in Google Scholar
Martin, L. W. and G. Vanberg (2008) “Coalition Government and Political Communication,” Political Research Quarterly, 61(3):502–516.10.1177/1065912907308348Search in Google Scholar
Officiële Bekendmakingen (2013) “Officiële Bekendmakingen. https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/. Last accessed September 2, 2013.Search in Google Scholar
Otjes, S. (2011) “The Fortuyn Effect Revisited: How Did the LPF Affect the Dutch Parliamentary Party System?,” Acta Politica, 46(4):400–424.10.1057/ap.2011.12Search in Google Scholar
Otjes, S. (2012) Imitating the Newcomer. How, When and Why Established Political Parties Imitate the Policy Positions and Issue Attention of New Political Parties in the Electoral and Parliamentary Arena: the Case of the Netherlands. PhD Thesis Leiden University.Search in Google Scholar
Pedrazzani, A. (2012) “Looking Beyond the Aggregate Figures. An Investigation of the Consensual Approval of Italian Government Bills (1988–2006),” Paper presented at the 26th Annual Conference of the Italian Political Science Association (SISP), Rome.Search in Google Scholar
Strøm, K. (1984) “Minority Governments in Parliamentary Democracies – The Rationality of Nonwinning Cabinet Solutions,” Comparative Political Studies, 17(2):199–227.10.1177/0010414084017002004Search in Google Scholar
Strøm, K. (1990). Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Strøm, K. (1997) “Democracy, Accountability, and Coalition Bargaining,” European Journal of Political Research, 31(1):47–62.10.1023/A:1006856818727Search in Google Scholar
Timmermans, Arco and Rudy B. Andeweg (2000) “Coalition Cabinets in the Netherlands: Still the Politics of Accommodation?,” In: (W. C. Müller and K. Strøm, eds.) Coalition Governments in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Valen, H. and H. M. Narud (2007) “The Conditional Party Mandate: A Model for the Study of Mass and Elite Opinion Patterns,” European Journal of Political Research, 46(3):293–318.10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00702.xSearch in Google Scholar
Van Aelst, P. and T. Louwerse (2013) “Parliament without Government: The Belgian Parliament and the Government Formation Processes of 2007–2011,” West European Politics, 37(3):475–496.10.1080/01402382.2013.832953Search in Google Scholar
©2014 by De Gruyter
