Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter August 5, 2014

A Special Majority Cabinet? Supported Minority Governance and Parliamentary Behavior in the Netherlands

Simon Otjes and Tom Louwerse
From the journal World Political Science

Abstract

This article studies how the presence of the supported minority government Rutte-I affected patterns of legislative behavior. On the basis of the literature on minority cabinets, one would expect that during supported minority cabinets parliamentary parties cooperate more often across the division between coalition and opposition than under multiparty majority cabinet rule. Examining almost 30,000 parliamentary votes between 1994 and 2012, this study finds that on a host of indicators of coalition-opposition-cooperation, there was less cooperation “across the aisle” during the Rutte-I cabinet than during any cabinet before it. We explain this with reference to the encompassing nature of the support agreement as well as the impact of the cabinets’ ideological composition.


Corresponding author: Simon Otjes, Groningen University – Documentation Centre Dutch Political Parties, Groningen, Netherlands, e-mail:

References

Alemán, E., E. Calvo, M. P. Jones and N. Kaplan (2009) “Comparing Cosponsorship and Roll-Call Ideal Points,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 34(1):87–116.Search in Google Scholar

Andeweg, R. B. (1992) “Executive-Legislative Relations in the Netherlands: Consecutive and Coexisting Patterns,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 17(2):161–182.Search in Google Scholar

Andeweg, R. B. (2004) “Parliamentary Democracy in the Netherlands,” Parliamentary Affairs, 57(3):568–580.Search in Google Scholar

Andeweg, R. B. (2006) “Towards a Stronger Parliament? Electoral Engineering of Executive-Legislative Relations,” Acta Politica, 41(3):232–248.Search in Google Scholar

Andeweg, R. B. (2011) “Purple Puzzles: The 1994 and 1998 Government Formations in The Netherlands and Coalition Theory.” In: (R. B. Andeweg, L. De Winter and P. Dumont, eds.) Puzzles of Government Formation: Coalition Theory and Deviant Cases. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 147–164.Search in Google Scholar

Andeweg, R. B., L. De Winter and P. Dumont, eds. (2011) Government Formation: Coalition Theory and Deviant Cases. Abingdon: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Bale, T. and C. Dann (2002) “Is the Grass Really Greener?: The Rationale and Reality of Support Party Status: A New Zealand Case Study,” Party Politics, 8(3):349–365.Search in Google Scholar

Bale, T. and T. Bergman (2006a) “A Taste of Honey Is Worse Than None at All?: Coping with the Generic Challenges of Support Party Status in Sweden and New Zealand,” Party Politics, 12(2):189–202.Search in Google Scholar

Bale, T. and T. Bergman (2006b) “Captives No Longer, but Servants Still? Contract Parliamentarism and the New Minority Governance in Sweden and New Zealand,” Government and Opposition, 41(3):422–449.Search in Google Scholar

Boston, J. and D. Bullock (2010) “Multi-party Governance: Managing the Unity-distinctiveness Dilemma in Executive Coalitions,” Party Politics, 18(3):349–368.Search in Google Scholar

Christiansen, F. J. and R. B. Pedersen (2012) “The Impact of the European Union on Coalition Formation in a Minority System: The Case of Denmark,” Scandinavian Political Studies, 35(3):179–197.Search in Google Scholar

De Vries, C. and S. de Lange (2010) “Minderheidskabinet kan zegen zijn,” De Volkskrant, August 7.Search in Google Scholar

Field, B. N. (2009) “Minority Government and Legislative Politics in a Multilevel State: Spain Under Zapatero,” South European Society and Politics, 14(4):417–434.Search in Google Scholar

Godbout, J. F. and B. Høyland (2011) “Legislative Voting in the Canadian Parliament,” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 44(2):367–388.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, P.A. and R. C. R. Taylor (1996) “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms,” Political Studies, 44(5):936–957.Search in Google Scholar

Herman, V. and J. Pope (1973) “Minority Governments in Western Democracies,” British Journal of Political Science, 3(2):191–212.Search in Google Scholar

Hix, S. and A. Noury (2011) “Government-Opposition or Left-Right? The Institutional Determinants of Voting in Legislatures.” In: EPSA Conference. June 16–18, Dublin, Ireland.Search in Google Scholar

Holzhacker, R. (2002) “National Parliamentary Scrutiny Over EU Issues: Comparing the Goals and Methods of Governing and Opposition Parties,” European Union Politics, 3(4):459–479.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Y. (2008) “Intra-Party Politics and Minority Coalition Government in South Korea,” Japanese Journal of Political Science, 9(3):367.Search in Google Scholar

Koninklijke Bibliotheek (2010) Staten-Generaal Digitaal. Last accessed September 2, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Laver, M. J. (2006) “Legislatures and Parliaments in Comparative Context.” In: (B. Weingast and D. Wittman, eds.) Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 121–140.Search in Google Scholar

Lijphart, A. (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in 36 Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Louwerse, T. (2011) Political Parties and the Democratic Mandate. Comparing Collective Mandate Fulfilment in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. PhD Thesis Leiden University.Search in Google Scholar

Louwerse, T. (2012) “Mechanisms of Issue Congruence: The Democratic Party Mandate,” West European Politics, 35(6):1249–1271.Search in Google Scholar

Mair, P. (1997) Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

March, J. G. and J. P. Olsen (1984) “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life,” The American Political Science Review, 78(3):734–749.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, L. W. and G. Vanberg (2008) “Coalition Government and Political Communication,” Political Research Quarterly, 61(3):502–516.Search in Google Scholar

Officiële Bekendmakingen (2013) “Officiële Bekendmakingen. . Last accessed September 2, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Otjes, S. (2011) “The Fortuyn Effect Revisited: How Did the LPF Affect the Dutch Parliamentary Party System?,” Acta Politica, 46(4):400–424.Search in Google Scholar

Otjes, S. (2012) Imitating the Newcomer. How, When and Why Established Political Parties Imitate the Policy Positions and Issue Attention of New Political Parties in the Electoral and Parliamentary Arena: the Case of the Netherlands. PhD Thesis Leiden University.Search in Google Scholar

Pedrazzani, A. (2012) “Looking Beyond the Aggregate Figures. An Investigation of the Consensual Approval of Italian Government Bills (1988–2006),” Paper presented at the 26th Annual Conference of the Italian Political Science Association (SISP), Rome.Search in Google Scholar

Strøm, K. (1984) “Minority Governments in Parliamentary Democracies – The Rationality of Nonwinning Cabinet Solutions,” Comparative Political Studies, 17(2):199–227.Search in Google Scholar

Strøm, K. (1990). Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Strøm, K. (1997) “Democracy, Accountability, and Coalition Bargaining,” European Journal of Political Research, 31(1):47–62.Search in Google Scholar

Timmermans, Arco and Rudy B. Andeweg (2000) “Coalition Cabinets in the Netherlands: Still the Politics of Accommodation?,” In: (W. C. Müller and K. Strøm, eds.) Coalition Governments in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Valen, H. and H. M. Narud (2007) “The Conditional Party Mandate: A Model for the Study of Mass and Elite Opinion Patterns,” European Journal of Political Research, 46(3):293–318.Search in Google Scholar

Van Aelst, P. and T. Louwerse (2013) “Parliament without Government: The Belgian Parliament and the Government Formation Processes of 2007–2011,” West European Politics, 37(3):475–496.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-8-5
Published in Print: 2014-10-1

©2014 by De Gruyter