Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 17, 2014

Negative and Personalized Campaign Rhetoric: Party Communication and Media Coverage of Danish Parliamentary Elections 1994–2011

Christian Elmelund-Præstekær and Helle Mølgaard-Svensson
From the journal World Political Science

Abstract

The Danish 2011 national election campaign was allegedly characterized by the toughest political rhetoric ever in contemporary Danish politics. The political parties and the candidates apparently decided to “go negative” to a greater extent than usually. But was the 2011 campaign rhetoric actually the most negative in modern history? We seek the answer by means of quantitative content analysis of parties’ newspaper ads, party leaders’ letters to the editor and statements in party leader debates. We first compare the 2011 campaign with the five preceding campaigns and conclude that it was indeed the least negative of them all. We then compare the parties’ communication and the media coverage of the campaign to discover that the media strongly – and increasingly – emphasize the parties’ negative campaign messages relative to the positive messages. In sum: Danish parties were not especially prone to engage in negative campaigning in the 2011 election, but the media made the parties look more negative than in earlier campaigns.


Corresponding author: Christian Elmelund-Præstekær, Department of Political Science and Public Management, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark, e-mail:

Appendix – Coding Categories and Empirical Examples

  1. Positive, politics: “We want top notch public transportation that can motivate people to ride busses and trains, but we do not want to force the Danes” (Per Stig Møller, Conservative People’s Party, Berlingske, September 11, 2011). Per Stig Møller clarifies what type of policy the Conservatives favor.

  2. Positive, person: “I was interested in social justice – that’s why I became a socialist” (Villy Søvndal, Socialist People’s Party, TV2’s final party leader debate, 2011). Villy Søvndal draws attention to his own personal values in the form of social justice.

  3. Negative, person: “If he (Villy Søvndal) becomes Secretary of State, the other countries will quickly stop listening to him when they find out that he can’t control his polemic fantasies” (Per Stig Møller, Berlingske, September 13, 2011). Per Stig Møller here talks about another politician and this candidate’s ability to control his imagination.

  4. Negative, politics: “S-SF [Social Democrats-Socialist People’s Party] want to build a Berlin Wall around Copenhagen to be completed in 2014. After that, a regular commuter will have to pay DKK 11,000 extra per year to go to work in the city” (Anders Samuelsen, Liberal Alliance, newspaper add, 2011). Anders Samuelsen blatantly focuses on other parties and is clearly talking about one of their policy proposals.

  5. Ambiguous tone, politics: “As far as the sabbatical schemes, we do not accept mandatory refilling, which has also been proposed by the Liberals and the Conservatives” (The Christian People’s Party’s presentation program, 1994). The party states its position on the sabbatical schemes and criticizes the Liberal and Conservative positions on the matter. However, the message cannot be divided into a positive and a negative part since neither makes sense on its own.

  6. Positive, ambiguous focus: “In a very informal conversation with a journalist from the newspaper, I tried, to the best of my ability, to explain why I had not given up faith in progress for the Social Democrats at the election despite depressing polls and what I thought we could do to reach important but yet undecided voters” (Svend Auken, Social Democrat, Jyllands-Posten, February 1, 2005). Svend Auken talks about himself and his party, but it is not clear whether he is talking about his own indomitable spirit or the party’s strategy.

  7. Ambiguous tone, person: “Politics is about more than entering contracts and being in constant sync with opinion polls. It is also about courage and leadership; courage to introduce a vision to the voters; and leadership to implement it” (Naser Khader, Social Liberal, Berlingske Tidende, January 19, 2005). Naser Khader emphasizes his own courage and his party’s will to leadership and talks about other things than concern concrete political content. The statement is a barely concealed reference to the bourgeois government, which is basically exposed as populists.

  8. Negative, ambiguous focus: “I’m sure I know best what I know and I also know a little bit about society, Villy Søvndal – you’re not the only one who does” (Pia Kjærsgaard, Danish People’s Party, DR’s final party leader debate, 2011). Pia Kjærsgaard talks about her adversary, Villy Søvndal, but it is unclear whether she is referring to his political standpoint or his personality.

  9. Residual category: “Globalization is nothing new. From my office I have a view of the lovely Eigtveds Pakhus, which was built in the mid-1700s to support the thriving foreign trade” (Per Stig Møller, Conservative People’s Party, Jyllands-Posten, January 21, 2005). Per Stig Møller outlines historical conditions in his letter to the editor about his position on globalization and growth. However, they say nothing about his or others’ political standpoint or character. This type of messages are excluded from the analyses.

References

Albæk, Erik, David Nicolas Hopmann and Claes de Vreese (2010) Kunsten at holde balancen: Dækningen af folketingsvalgkampe i tv-nyhederne på DR1 og TV2 1994-2007. Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.Search in Google Scholar

Ansolabehere, Stephen and Shanto Iyengar (1995) Going Negative: How Attack Ads Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: The Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, Lance W. and Robert M. Etman (2001) “Mediated Politics: An Introduction.” In: (Lance W. Bennett and Robert M. Etman, eds.) Mediated Politics. Communication in the Future of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Benoit, William L. (1999) Seeing Spots: A Functional Analysis of Presidential Television Advertisements, 1952–1996. Westport: Greenwood Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brooks, Deborah Jordan (2006) “The Resilient Voter: Moving Towards Closure in the Debate over Negative Campaigning and Turnout,” The Journal of Politics, 68(3):684–696.10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00454.xSearch in Google Scholar

Brooks, Deborah Jones and John G. Geer (2007) “Beyond Negativity: The Effects of Incivility on the Electorate,” American Journal of Political Science, 51(1):1–16.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00233.xSearch in Google Scholar

Buell, Emmett H. and Lee Sigelman (2008) Attack Politics: Negativity in Presidential Campaigns since 1960. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.10.1111/j.1741-5705.2009.03718.xSearch in Google Scholar

Clinton, Joshua and John Lapinski (2004) “‘Targeted’ Advertising and Voter Turnout: An Experimental Study of the 2000 Presidential Election,” The Journal of Politics, 66(1):69–96.10.1046/j.1468-2508.2004.00142.xSearch in Google Scholar

Elmelund-Præstekær, Christian (2008) “Negative Campaigning in a Multiparty System,” Representation, 44(1):27–39.10.1080/00344890701869082Search in Google Scholar

Elmelund-Præstekær, Christian (2009) ”Folketingsvalg og blokretorik: Negative kampagner og partikonkurrence 1994-2007,” Tidsskriftet Politik, 12(2):42–55.Search in Google Scholar

Elmelund-Præstekær, Christian (2010) “Beyond American Negativity: Toward a General Understanding of the Determinants of Negative Campaigning,” European Political Science Review, 2(1):137–156.10.1017/S1755773909990269Search in Google Scholar

Elmelund-Præstekær, Christian and David Nicolas Hopmann (2008) Teflon og Bullshit? Ti myter om politik, journalistik og valgkampe. Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.Search in Google Scholar

Elmelund-Præstekær, Christian, Louise Müller and Louise Nowak Rasmussen (2010) ”Soft news i 2007-valgkampen: Balanceret, men ukritisk snak om mennesker i politik,” Journaistica, 2010(1):88–139.10.7146/journalistica.v4i1.2138Search in Google Scholar

Esaiasson, Peter and Nicklas Håkansson (2002) Besked ikväll! Valprogrammen i svensk radio och tv. Värnamo: Fälth & Hässler.Search in Google Scholar

Esser, Frank (1999) “‘Tabloidization’ of News – A Comparative Analysis of Anglo-American and German Press Journalism,” European Journal of Communication, 14(3): 291–324.10.1177/0267323199014003001Search in Google Scholar

Finkel, Steven and John Geer (1998) “Spot Check: Casting Doubt on the Demobilizing Effect of Attack Advertising,” American Journal of Political Science, 42(2):573–595.10.2307/2991771Search in Google Scholar

Galtung, Johan and Mari Ruge (1965) “The Structure of Foreign News. The Presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus Crises in Four Norwegian Newspapers,” Journal of Peace Research, 2(1):64–90.10.1177/002234336500200104Search in Google Scholar

Geer, John (2006) In Defence of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226285009.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Hamilton, James T. (2004) All the News That’s Fit to Sell – How the Market Transforms Information into News. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400841417Search in Google Scholar

Hansen, Kasper Møller and Rasmus Tue Pedersen (2008) “Negative Campaigning in a Multiparty System,” Scandinavian Political Studies, 31(4):408–427.10.1111/j.1467-9477.2008.00213.xSearch in Google Scholar

Haynes, Audrey and Staci Rhine (1998) “Attack Politics in Presidential Nomination Campaigns: An Examination of the Frequency and Determinants of Intermediated Negative Massages Against Opponents,” Political Research Quarterly, 51(3):691–721.10.1177/106591299805100307Search in Google Scholar

Håkansson, Nicklas (1999) Valretorik. Om politiskt språk i partipropagandan. Göteborg: Statsvetenskapliga institutionen Göteborgs universitet.Search in Google Scholar

Holtz-Bacha, Christina and Lynda Lee Kaid (2006) “Political Advertising in International Comparison.” In: (Lynda Lee Kaid, and Christina Holtz-Bacha, eds.) The Sage Handbook of Political Advertising. London: Sage Publications, pp. 3–14.10.4135/9781412973403.n1Search in Google Scholar

Johansson, Bengt (2008) “Popularized Election Coverage? News Coverage of Swedish Parliamentary Elections 1979–2006” In: Jesper Strömbäck, Torild Aalberg and Mark Ørsten, eds.) Communicating Politics: Political Communication in the Nordic Countries. Gothenburg: Nordicom.Search in Google Scholar

Kahn, Kim Fridkin and Patrick Kenney (1999) The Spectacle of U.S. Senate Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691227924Search in Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky (1979) “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,” Econometrics, 47(2):263–291.10.2307/1914185Search in Google Scholar

Kaid, Lynda Lee and Anne Johnston (1990) “Negative versus Positive Television Advertising in U.S. Presidential Campaigns, 1960–1988,” Journal of Communication, 41(3):53–64.10.1111/j.1460-2466.1991.tb02323.xSearch in Google Scholar

Keeter, Scott (1987) “The Illusion of Intimacy: Television and the Role of Candidate Personal Qualities in Voter Choice,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 51(3)344–658.10.1086/269040Search in Google Scholar

Lau, Richard (1982). “Negativity in Political Perception,” Political Behavior, 4(4):353–377.10.1007/BF00986969Search in Google Scholar

Lau, Richard and Gerald Pomper (2001) “Negative Campaigning by US Senate Candidates,” Party Politics, 7(1):69–87.10.1177/1354068801007001004Search in Google Scholar

Lau, Richard, Lee Sigelman and Ivy Brown Rover (2007) “The Effects of Negative Political Advertisements: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment,” The Journal of Politics, 69(4):1176–1209.10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00618.xSearch in Google Scholar

Mazzoleni, Gianpietro and Winfried Schulz (1999) “‘Mediatization’ of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy?” Political Communication, 16(3):247–261.10.1080/105846099198613Search in Google Scholar

Min, Young (2002) “Intertwining of Campaign News and Advertising: The Content and Electoral Effects of Newspaper Ad Watches,” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(4):927–944.10.1177/107769900207900410Search in Google Scholar

Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis (2012) Ground Wars: Personalized Communication in Political Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400840441Search in Google Scholar

Reinemann, Carsten, James Stanyer, Sebastian Scherr and Guido Legnante (2012) “Hard and Soft News: A Review of Concepts, Operationalizations and Key Findings,” Journalism, 13(2):221–239.10.1177/1464884911427803Search in Google Scholar

Ridout, Travis N. and Michael Franz (2008) “Evaluating Measures of Campaign Tone,” Political Communication, 25(2):158–179.10.1080/10584600801985409Search in Google Scholar

Schrøder, Kim Christian (2010) “Danskernes brug af nyhedsmedier: et nyt landkort – En pejling af danskernes navigation i nyhedsuniverset,” Journalistica, 2010(1):8–37.10.7146/journalistica.v4i1.1975Search in Google Scholar

Schweitzer, Eva Johanna (2012) “Normalization 2.0: A Longitudinal Analysis of German Online Campaigns in the National Elections 2002–9,” European Journal of Communication, 26(4):310–327.10.1177/0267323111423378Search in Google Scholar

Shoemaker, Pamela and Stephen Reese (1996) Mediating the Message – Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content. New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Skaperdas, Stergios and Bernard Grofman (1995) “Modelling Negative Campaigning,” American Political Science Review, 89(1):49–61.10.2307/2083074Search in Google Scholar

Skovsgaard, Morten, Erik Albæk, Peter Bro and Claes de Vreese (2013) “A Reality Check: How Journalists’ Role Perceptions Impact their Implementation of the Objectivity Norm,” Journalism, 14(1):22–42.10.1177/1464884912442286Search in Google Scholar

Soroka, Stuart (2006) “Good News and Bad News: Assymetric Responses to Economic Information,” Journal of Politics, 68(2):372–385.10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00413.xSearch in Google Scholar

van Aelst, Peter, Tamir Sheafer and James Stanyer (2012) “The Personalization of Mediated Political Communication: A Review of Concepts, Operationalizations and Key Findings,” Journalism, 13(2):203–220.10.1177/1464884911427802Search in Google Scholar

van Heerde-Hudson, Jennifer (2011) “The Americanization of British Party Advertising? Negativity in Party Election Broadcasts, 1964–2005,” British Politics, 6(1):52–77.10.1057/bp.2011.2Search in Google Scholar

Walter, Annemarie S. (2012) Negative Campaigning in Western Europe: Beyond the Vote-Seeking Perspective Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Search in Google Scholar

Walter, Annemarie S. and Rens Vliegenthart (2010) “Negative Campaigning across Different Communication Channels: Different Ball Games?” International Journal of Press/Politics, 15(4):441–461.10.1177/1940161210374122Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-9-17
Published in Print: 2014-10-1

©2014 by De Gruyter

Scroll Up Arrow