Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 6, 2020

Invocations of Indigeneity in the Colonial Red/White/Black Triad

Carsten Junker

Abstract

This essay takes as its assumptive backdrop the “Red/White/Black demographic triad” in the sense of Stam and Shohat that resulted from the European colonial conquest and settlement of, and the transatlantic enslavement of Africans in, the Americas. It homes in on the ambivalent functions and effects of different evocations of Indigeneity in early abolitionist discourse, considering this very discourse as a specific strand of settler colonial knowledge production during the era of the Enlightenment. While Euro-American abolitionists around 1800 centrally and critically focused on relations between the positions marked by “Black” and “White,” they also made recourse to the position of “Red.” Paradigmatic readings highlight that abolitionists mobilized Red as a trope in contradictory ways according to their argumentative needs, substantiating the hegemonic character of White self-referential knowledge practices in the early US republic and abetting the justification of settler colonialism.


Corresponding author: Prof. Dr. Carsten Junker, Institute of English and American Studies, TU Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany

Works Cited

Allen, John? (1773). An Oration, Upon the Beauties of Liberty, or The Essential Rights of the Americans […]. Boston, MA: D. Kneeland and N. Davis. <https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/evans/N10250.0001.001?view=toc> (May 27, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Bekkaoui, Khalid (2011). White Women Captives in North Africa: Narratives of Enslavement, 1735–1830. Basingstoke and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230294493Search in Google Scholar

Cameron, Christopher (2014). To Plead Our Own Cause: African Americans in Massachusetts and the Making of the Antislavery Movement. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Davis, David Brion (1975). The Problem of Slavery in the Age of Revolution, 1770–1823. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Davis, David Brion and Steven Mintz, eds. (1998). The Boisterous Sea of Liberty: A Documentary History of America from Discovery through the Civil War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Deloria, Vine, Jr. (1999). “The American Revolution and the American Indian: Problems in the Recovery of a Usable Past.” Barbara Deloria et al., eds. Spirit & Reason: The Vine Deloria, Jr., Reader. Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing, 206–222.Search in Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel (2004). Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège De France, 1975–1976. trans. David Macey. London et al.: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Franklin, Benjamin (1760 [1751]). “Observations Concerning the Increase of Mankind, Peopling of Countries, &C. Written in Pensylvania, 1751.” The Interest of Great Britain Considered with Regard to Her Colonies and the Acquisitions of Canada and Guadaloupe. Boston, MA: B. Mecom, 52–57.Search in Google Scholar

Gilroy, Paul (1993). The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hartman, Saidiya V. (2008). Lose Your Mother: A Journey Along the Atlantic Slave Route. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Search in Google Scholar

Horne, Gerald (2014). The Counter-Revolution of 1776: Slave Resistance and the Origins of the United States of America. New York, NY: New York University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Kendall (2016). “Captivity Narratives.” Oxford Bibliographies Online. <doi:10.1093/OBO/9780199827251-0115> (September 14, 2018).10.1093/OBO/9780199827251-0115Search in Google Scholar

Junker, Carsten (2016). Patterns of Positioning: On the Poetics of Early Abolition. Heidelberg: Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Klarer, Mario (2020). Mediterranean Slavery and World Literature: Captivity Genres from Cervantes to Rousseau. New York, NY: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Mignolo, Walter (2000). Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Paine, Thomas (1987 [1775]). “African Slavery in America.” Michael Foot and Isaac Kramnick, eds. Thomas Paine Reader. London et al.: Penguin, 52–56.Search in Google Scholar

Paine, Thomas (1995 [1780]). “Public Good.” Eric Forner, ed. Thomas Paine: Collected Writings. New York, NY: Library of America, 253–286.Search in Google Scholar

Pease, Donald E. (1993). “New Perspectives on US Culture and Imperialism.” Amy Kaplan and Donald E. Pease, eds. Cultures of United States Imperialism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 22–37.Search in Google Scholar

Shoemaker, Nancy (1997). “How Indians Got to Be Red.” The American Historical Review 102.3, 625–644.10.2307/2171504Search in Google Scholar

Sinha, Manisha (2017). The Slave’s Cause: A History of Abolition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stam, Robert and Ella Shohat (2012). Race in Translation: Culture Wars around the Postcolonial Atlantic. New York, NY: New York University Press.10.18574/nyu/9780814798379.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Wesley, John (1774). Thoughts Upon Slavery. London, printed: re-printed in Philadelphia, with notes, and sold by Joseph Crukshank.Search in Google Scholar

Wilderson III, Frank B. (2010). Red, White & Black: Cinema and the Structure of U.S. Antagonisms. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wolfe, Patrick (1999). Settler Colonialism and the Transformation of Anthropology: The Politics and Poetics of an Ethnographic Event. London and New York, NY: Cassell.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-06-06
Published in Print: 2020-06-25

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston