Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 13, 2021

Religion: Historical Fact or Interpretive Theory? A Response to Hubert Seiwert

  • Perry Schmidt-Leukel EMAIL logo


Davis, Carolin Franks. 1989. The Evidential Force of Religious Experience. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Saler, Benson. 2000. Conceptualizing Religion. Immanent Anthropologists, Transcendent Natives, and Unbounded Categories. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt-Leukel, Perry. 2016. “Modern Historical Consciousness and the Challenge to Religion.” In History as a Challenge to Buddhism and Christianity, ed. by E. J. Harris and J. O’Grady, 23–43. St. Ottilien: EOS-Editions.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt-Leukel, Perry. 2020. “Interreligious Theology and Truth Seeking.” In Interreligious Studies. Dispatches from an Emerging Field, ed. by H. Gustafson, 141–146. Waco: Baylor University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Seiwert, Hubert. 2020. “Theory of Religion and Historical Research. A Critical Realist Perspective on the Study of Religion as an Empirical Discipline.” Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft 28(2):207–236.10.1515/zfr-2020-0001Search in Google Scholar

Smart, Ninian. 1996. Dimensions of the Sacred. An Anatomy of the World’s Beliefs. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Wilfred Cantwell. 1979. Faith and Believe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stuckrad, Kocku von. 2010. “Reflections on the Limits of Reflection: An Invitation to the Discursive Study of Religion.” Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 22:156–169.10.1163/157006810X512347Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-09-13
Published in Print: 2021-10-08

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 22.2.2024 from
Scroll to top button