Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 13, 2021

Allies in the Fullness of Theory

Mark Q. Gardiner EMAIL logo and Steven Engler

Bibliography

Bhaskar, Roy. 1978. A realist theory of science. 2nd ed. Hemel Hempstead, Hertf.: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Search in Google Scholar

Bhaskar, Roy. 1979. The possibility of naturalism : a philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.Search in Google Scholar

Boyer, Pascal. 2001. Religion explained : the evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald. 1984. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Engler, Steven, and Mark Q. Gardiner. 2010. “Ten Implications of Semantic Holism for Theories of Religion.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 22/4:283–292.10.1163/157006810X531067Search in Google Scholar

Engler, Steven, and Mark Q. Gardiner. 2013. “‘God(s)’ As a Comparative Concept.” Din; Tidsskrift for Religion Og Kultur 2/1:120–132.Search in Google Scholar

Engler, Steven, and Mark Q. Gardiner. 2017. “Semantics and the sacred.” Religion 47/4:616–640. doi:10.1080/0048721X.2017.1362784.10.1080/0048721X.2017.1362784Search in Google Scholar

Frankenberry, N.K. 2014. “The Study of Religion after Davidson and Rorty.” American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 35/3:195–210.10.5406/amerjtheophil.35.3.0195Search in Google Scholar

Gardiner, Mark Q. and Steven Engler. 2010. “Charting the map metaphor in theories of religion.” Religion 40/1:1–13.10.1016/j.religion.2009.08.010Search in Google Scholar

Gardiner, Mark Q. and Steven Engler. 2012. “Semantic holism and the insider-outsider problem.” Religious Studies 48/02:239–255. doi:10.1017/S0034412511000205.10.1017/S0034412511000205Search in Google Scholar

Gardiner, Mark Q. and Steven Engler. 2016 a. “The Philosophy and Semantics of the Cognitive Science of Religion.” Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion 3/1:7–35. doi: 10.1558/jcsr.v3i1.21003.Search in Google Scholar

Gardiner, Mark Q. and Steven Engler. 2016 b. “Semantics.” In The Oxford handbook of the study of religion, 195–207. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198729570.013.14Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, Jeppe Sinding. 2014. What is Religion? Durham: Acumen Publishing.10.4324/9781315729466Search in Google Scholar

Lawson, E. Thomas, and Robert N. McCauley. 1990. Rethinking religion: connecting cognition and culture. Cambridge [England]/New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schilbrack, Kevin. 2014. Philosophy and the Study of Religions; A Manifesto. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Seiwert, Hubert. 2020. “Theory of Religion and Historical Research. A Critical Realist Perspective on the Study of Religion as an Empirical Discipline.” Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft 28/2:207–236.Search in Google Scholar

Stausberg, Michael. 2009. “There is life in the old dog yet.” In Contemporary theories of religion: a critical companion, ed. by Michael Stausberg, 1–21. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203875926Search in Google Scholar

Stausberg, Michael, and Steven Engler. 2016. “Theories of Religion.” In The Oxford handbook of the study of religion, ed. by Michael Stausberg, and Steven Engler, 52–72. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198729570.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-09-13
Published in Print: 2021-10-08

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 7.12.2022 from frontend.live.degruyter.dgbricks.com/document/doi/10.1515/zfr-2021-0015/html
Scroll Up Arrow