Abstract
The present article examines the new position of social movements in constitutional settings. It argues that social movements – both structured and unstructured – have rearranged themselves both normatively and spatially to create new means to influence law and politics. The article sketches out new forms in which social movements have understood their ways of organizing and the possibilities for advancing legal and political change in constitutional settings. Using Judith Butler’s theory of assemblage and Bruno Latour’s concept of terrestriality, the article examines how social movements read constitutional settings, such as domestic constitutional apparatuses and international institutions, to advance their political and legal agendas. The article does not limit itself to a pure public law perspective but also incorporates insights from public international law.
Zusammenfassung
Der vorliegende Artikel untersucht die neue Bedeutung sozialer Bewegungen in verfassungsrechtlichen Kontexten. Es wird argumentiert, dass strukturierte wie auch unstrukturierte soziale Bewegungen sich sowohl normativ als auch räumlich neu aufgestellt haben, um auf Recht und Politik Einfluss zu nehmen. Der Artikel skizziert die neuen Formen, in denen sich soziale Bewegungen organisiert haben, um rechtliche und politische Veränderungen in einem verfassungsmäßigen Rahmen voranzutreiben. Mithilfe von Judith Butlers Theorie der Assemblage und Bruno Latours Konzept der Terrestrialität untersucht der Artikel, auf welche Art und Weise soziale Bewegungen verfassungsrechtliche Kontexte, Instrumente und Institutionen auf nationaler und internationaler Ebene für ihre politischen und rechtlichen Ziele nutzen. Der Artikel beschränkt sich nicht auf eine rein öffentlich-rechtliche Perspektive, sondern bezieht auch Erkenntnisse aus dem Völkerrecht mit ein.
About the author
Assistant Professor
References
Alfinito Vieira, Aline (2018) Social Movements and Institutional Change: the Pro-Indigenous Struggle for Land Tenure and Citizenship in Brazil (1968–2016), PhD thesis, Universität zu Köln, 22.01.2018 (available at https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/7997/).Search in Google Scholar
Alter, Karen et al. (2016) ‘Backlash against International Courts in West, East and Southern Africa: Causes and Consequences’, European Journal of International Law, 27:2, 293–328.10.1093/oso/9780198868477.003.0008Search in Google Scholar
Andersen, Ellen Ann (2006) Out of the Closets and into the Courts. Legal Opportunity Structure and Gay Rights Litigation, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar
Arato, Andrew; Cohen, Jean (1992) Civil Society and Political Theory, Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bastid, Paul (1985) L’Idée de Constitution. Paris : Economica.Search in Google Scholar
Beijerman, Martine (2018) Conceptual confusions in debating the role of NGOs for the democratic legitimacy of international law, Transnational Legal Theory, 9: 147–173.10.1080/20414005.2018.1547956Search in Google Scholar
Berger, Stefan & Nehring, Holger (2017) The History of Social Movements in Global Perspective. A Survey, London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-30427-8Search in Google Scholar
Borbath, Endre & Hutter, Swen (2020) ‘Protesting Parties in Europe: A comparative analysis, Party Politics, 27: 896–908.10.1177/1354068820908023Search in Google Scholar
Braw, Elisabeth (2019) ‘2020 for the Future,’ Foreign Policy, 30 December 2019.Search in Google Scholar
Butler, Judith (2015) Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674495548Search in Google Scholar
Cichowski, Rachel, Civil Society and the European Court of Human Rights, in Christoffersen, Jonas, and Madsen, Mikael Rask (eds) (2011), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694495.003.0005Search in Google Scholar
Cobbs, Charles E. (2016) This Non-Violent Stuff’ll Will Get You Killed. How Guns Made the Civil Rights Movement Possible, Durham: Duke University Press.Search in Google Scholar
D’Almeida, Paul (2007) Defensive Mobilization: Popular Movements against Economic Adjustment Policies in Latin America, Latin American Perspectives, 34: 123–139.10.1177/0094582X07300942Search in Google Scholar
Delmas, Candice (2018) A Duty to Resist. When Disobedience Should be Uncivil, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190872199.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Dewey, John (2011) [1927] The Public and its Problems, Athens: Swallow Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dryzek, John (2013) Climate-challenged Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199660100.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Dryzek, John et al. (2003) Green States and Social Movements, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199249024.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Fisher, William F. (1997), ‘Doing Good? The Politics and Antipolitics of NGO Practices, Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 1997. 26:439–64.10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.439Search in Google Scholar
Frankenberg, Günther (2018), Comparative Constitutional Studies. Between Magic and Deceit, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781782548980.00005Search in Google Scholar
Gardels, Nathan, ‘Social Movements Make Change. Law Codifies It. Noema, 22 March 2020, available at https://www.noemamag.com/social-movements-make-change-law-codifies-it/.Search in Google Scholar
Gómez, Veronica ‘The Interaction Between the Political Actors of the OAS, the Commission and the Court’, in Harris, David; Livingstone, Stephen (eds) (2004), The Inter-American System of Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Harcourt, Bernard ‘Critical Praxis’, in Harcourt, Bernard; Fassin, Didier (2019) A Time for Critique, New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/harc19126Search in Google Scholar
Kaleck, Wolfgang (2021) Die Konkrete Utopie der Menschenrechte. Ein Blick zurück in die Zukunft, Frankfurt am Main: S Fischer.Search in Google Scholar
Kamat, Sangeeta (2004) ‘The privatization of public interest: theorizing NGO discourse in a neoliberal era,’ Review of International Political Economy, 11: 155–176.10.1080/0969229042000179794Search in Google Scholar
Kay, Tamara & Evans, Richard (2018) Trade Battles: Activism and the Politicization of International Trade Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190847432.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret and Sikking, Kathryn (2014) [1998], Activists Beyond Borders. Advocacy Networks in International Politics, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9780801471292Search in Google Scholar
Kitschel, Herbert, ‘Movement Parties, in Katz, Richard S; Crotty, William (2006), Handbook of Party Politics, Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Knox, Robert (2010) ‘Strategy and Tactics’, Finnish Yearbook of International Law 21: 193–229.10.2139/ssrn.1921759Search in Google Scholar
La Hovary, Claire (2013), Showdown at the ILO? A Historical Perspective on the Employers’ Group’s 2012 Challenge to the Right to Strike, Industrial Law Journal, 42: 338–68.10.1093/indlaw/dwt020Search in Google Scholar
Laplante, Lisa, Entwined Paths to Justice: The Inter-American Human Rights System and the Peruvian Truth Commission, in Dembour, Marie-Benedicte; Kelly, Tobias (eds) (2007), Paths to International Justice. Social and Legal Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno (2017), Où Atterrir? Comment s’orienter en politique, Paris : La Decouverte.Search in Google Scholar
Lindahl, Hans (2012) ‘Legal Orders and the ‘Globality’ of Global Law,’ Tilburg Law Review, 17:168–176.10.1163/22112596-01702005Search in Google Scholar
Nassehi, Armin (2020), Das grosse Nein, Hamburg: Kursbuch.edition.10.5771/0023-5652-2019-200-49Search in Google Scholar
Obrien, Robert et al. (2000) Contesting Global Governance. Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511491603.002Search in Google Scholar
Ogrodnik, Corinne & Staggenborg, Suzanne (2016) The Ebb and Flow of Environmentalism, Sociology Compass 10: 218–229.10.1111/soc4.12353Search in Google Scholar
della Porta, Donatella (2017) Late Neoliberalism and its Discontents, in della Porta, Donatella et al. (ed), Late Neoliberalism and its Discontents in the Economic Crisis, London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-319-35080-6Search in Google Scholar
Prentoulis, Marina & Thomassen, Lasse (2019) Movement Parties. A New Form of Hybrid Politics? in Flesher Fominaya, Cristina; Feenstra, Ramon (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Contemporary European Social Movements, London: Routledge.10.4324/9781351025188-25Search in Google Scholar
Puar, Jasbir (2017) Terrorist Assemblage. Homonationalism in Queer Times, Durham: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822371755-006Search in Google Scholar
Rajagopal, Balakrishnan (2003) International Law from Below, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511494079Search in Google Scholar
von Redecker, Eva (2020) Revolution für das Leben. Philosophie der neuen Protestformen, Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Search in Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M, ‘Populism, Social Movements, and Popular Subjectivity’, in Della Porta, Donatella and Diani, Mario (eds) (2015), The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Rone, Julia (2018) Contested international agreements, contested national politics: how the radical left and the radical right opposed TTIP in four European countries, London Review of International Law, 6: 233–253.10.1093/lril/lry018Search in Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald (2008) The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226726687.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
de Sousa Santos, Boaventura (2019) O Fim do Império Cognitivo. A Afirmação das Epistemologias do Sul, São Paulo: Autentica.Search in Google Scholar
Staggenborg, Suzanne (1998) Social Movement Communities and Cycles of Protest: The Emergence and Maintenance of a Local Women’s Movement, Social Problems, 45: 180–204.10.2307/3097243Search in Google Scholar
Staggenborg, Suzanne (2015) Social Movements, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan (2020) ‘Are Protests Good or Bad for Democracy?’, in Schwartzberg, Melissa, Protest and Dissent, New York: NOMOS LXII.10.18574/nyu/9781479810512.003.0011Search in Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sydney (2012) Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511973529Search in Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles & Tarrow, Sydney (2015) Contentious Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Tsutsui, Kyoteru; Whitlinger, Claire & Lim, Alwyn (2012) International Human Rights Law and Social Movements: States’ Resistance and Civil Society’s Insistence, Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 8: 367–96.10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173849Search in Google Scholar
Tufekci, Zeynep (2017) Twitter and Tear Gas. The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest, New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa (2011) Making Rights a Reality? Disability Rights Activists and Legal Mobilization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511976506Search in Google Scholar
Wahlström, Mattias et al. (eds.) (2019) ‘Protest for a future: Composition, mobilization and motives of the participants of Fridays For Future climate protests on 15 March, 2019 in 13 European cities,’ Retrieved from http://cosmos.sns.it/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/20190709_Protest20for20a20future_GCS20Descriptive20Report.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
de Wilde, Pieter (2019) ‘Mapping Policy and Polity Contestation about Globalization: Issue Linkage in the News,’ in de Wilde, Pieter et al., The Struggle over Borders. Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108652698.004Search in Google Scholar
Wood, Lesley J. (2013) Anti-World Bank and IMF Riots, in Snow, David A et al. (eds) The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, 2013, accessed online at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm247.10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm247Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
