Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter October 17, 2017

Marx in the Anthropocene: Value, Metabolic Rift, and the Non-Cartesian Dualism

  • Kohei Saito EMAIL logo

Abstract

Characteristic to the Anthropocene is global ecological crisis that humans have created without knowing any effective solution. Beyond the division of humanities, social sciences and natural sciences, there thus emerged a series of serious attempts to figure out an adequate theoretical framework for comprehending the formation, development and future of the Anthropocene. Ecological Marxists also actively participate in this discussion to problematize the relationship between the Anthropocene and capitalism, which results in a new debate. While second-stage ecosocialists such as John Bellamy Foster and Paul Burkett are trying to connect the general issues of the Anthropocene to the concept of the ‘metabolic rift’, Jason W. Moore not only replaces the concept of the Anthropocene with the ‘Capitalocene’ and rejects the metabolic rift approach as falling into the ‘Cartesian division’, which cannot aptly theorize the nature of today’s crisis. Critically analyzing Moore’s ‘monist’ understanding of the history of capitalist development, this paper examines why Marx used apparently ‘dualist’ terminologies in his analysis. Moore claims that his post-Cartesian approach is the correct interpretation of Marx’s political economy, but a closer examination of Marx’s method reveals his non-Cartesian dualism, which functions as a basis for a radical critique of today’s ecological crisis. Furthermore, this paper argues that Marx’s theory of metabolism must be understood in relation to his intensive research on natural sciences and non-Western societies to envision possibilities of the revolutionary subjectivity.

Literature

Akashi, Hideto (2016): ‘The Elasticity of Capital and Ecological Crisis’. In: Marx-Engels-Jahrbuch 2015/16. Berlin: De Gruyter: 45–58.10.1515/mejb-2016-0104Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Kevin, and Alice Bows (2011): ‘Beyond ‘Dangerous’ Climate Change: Emission Scenarios for a New World’. In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 369: 20–44.10.1098/rsta.2010.0290Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Kevin B. (2015): ‘Entretien avec Kevin B. Anderson’. In: Contretemps: Revue de critique communiste 27: 143–55.Search in Google Scholar

Angus, Ian (2016): Facing the Anthropocene. New York: Monthly Review Press, 2016Search in Google Scholar

Benton, Ted (1989): ‘Marxism and Natural Limits’. In: New Left Review 178: 51–86.Search in Google Scholar

Brenner, Robert (2006): ‘What is, and What is Not, Imperialism’. In: Historical Materialism 14 (2006): 79–106.10.1163/156920606778982464Search in Google Scholar

Burkett, Paul (1999): Marx and Nature: A Red and Green Perspective. New York: Palgrave.10.1057/9780312299651Search in Google Scholar

Burkett, Paul (2005): Marx and Ecological Economics: Toward a Red and Green Political Economy. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789047408567Search in Google Scholar

Crutzen, Paul J. (2002), ‘Geology of Mankind’. In: Nature 415: 23.10.1007/978-3-319-27460-7_10Search in Google Scholar

Crutzen, Paul J. (2006): ‘Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections’. In: Climate Change 77: 211–19.10.1007/s10584-006-9101-ySearch in Google Scholar

Fischer-Kowalski, Marina (1997): ‘Society’s Metabolism’. In: Michael Redclift and Graham Woodgate (Ed.): International Handbook of Environmental Sociology. Northampton: Edward Elgar: 119–37.Search in Google Scholar

Foster, John Bellamy (2000): Marx’s Ecology: Materialism and Nature. New York: Monthly Review Press.Search in Google Scholar

Foster, John Bellamy (2014): ‘Paul Burkett’s Marx and Nature Fifteen Years After’. In: Monthly Review 66 no 7: 56–62.10.14452/MR-066-07-2014-11_5Search in Google Scholar

Foster, John Bellamy (2016): ‘Marxism in the Anthropocene: Dialectical Rifts on the Left’. In: International Critical Thought 6 no. 3:393–421.10.1080/21598282.2016.1197787Search in Google Scholar

Foster, John Bellamy, and Burkett, Paul (2016): Marx and the Earth: An Anti-Critique. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004288799Search in Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy (2014): ‘Behind Marx’s Hidden Abode’. In: New Left Review 86 (March-April): 55–72.Search in Google Scholar

Harvey, David (2009): ‘The “New” Imperialism: Accumulation by Dispossession’: Socialist Register 40: 63–87.10.4324/9781315251196-10Search in Google Scholar

Heinrich, Michael (2012): An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx’s Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.Search in Google Scholar

Klein, Naomi (2014): This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate. New York: Simon & Schuster.Search in Google Scholar

Lebowitz, Michael A. (2005): Following Marx: Method, Critique and Crisis. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004149427.i-372Search in Google Scholar

Longo, Stefano B. et al. (2015): The Tragedy of the Commodity. New Brunswick, Rutgers University Press.10.36019/9780813565798Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Malm, Andreas, and Hornborg, Alf (2014): ‘The Geology of Mankind? A Critique of the Anthropocene Narrative’. In: The Anthropocene Review 1 no 1: 62–69.10.1177/2053019613516291Search in Google Scholar

Malm, Andreas (2014): Fossil Capital: The Rise of Steam Power and the Roots of Global Warming. New York: Verso.Search in Google Scholar

Marx, Karl, and Engels, Friedrich (1987): Collected Works. New York: International Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Marx, Karl (1976): Capital vol. 1. London: Penguin Books.Search in Google Scholar

Marx, Karl (1993): Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy. London: Penguin Books.10.1002/9780470755679.ch2Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Marx, Karl (2015): Manuscript of 1864–1865. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, Carolyn (1990): The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. San Francisco: HaperOne.Search in Google Scholar

Moore, Jason W. (2000): ‘Environmental Crises and the Metabolic Rift in World-Historical Perspective’. In: Organization & Environment 13, no 2: 123–157.10.1177/1086026600132001Search in Google Scholar

Moore, Jason W. (2015): Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. New York: Verso.Search in Google Scholar

Raupach, Michael R., and Josep G. Canadell (2010): ‘Carbon and the Anthropocene’. In: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2: 210–18.10.1016/j.cosust.2010.04.003Search in Google Scholar

Rockström, Johan et al. (2009): ‘A Safe Operating Space for Humanity’. In: Nature 461: 472–75.10.1038/461472aSearch in Google Scholar

Saito, Kohei (2017): Karl Marx’s Ecosocialism: Capital, Nature, and the Unfinished Critique of Political Economy. New York: Monthly Review Press. 10.2307/j.ctt1gk099mSearch in Google Scholar

Salleh, Ariel, Goodman, James, and Hosseini, S. A. Hamed (2015): ‘From Sociological Imagination to “Ecological Imagination”’. In Marshall, J., and Linda Connor (Eds.): Environmental Change and the World's Futures: Ecologies, Ontologies, Mythologies. London: Routledge 96–109.10.4324/9781315776552-7Search in Google Scholar

Smith, David Norman (2002): ‘Accumulation and the Clash of Cultures: Marx’s Ethnology in Context’. In: Rethinking Marxism 14, no. 4: 73–83.10.1080/008935690212331340961Search in Google Scholar

Steffen, Will et al. (2015): ‘Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet’. In: Science 347, no. 6223: 736–46.10.1126/science.1259855Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-10-17
Published in Print: 2017-10-10

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 21.2.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/zksp-2017-0013/html
Scroll to top button