Abstract
I am commenting on Moore's book from the perspective of philosophy of science, i. e. I concentrate on his conceptual framework and its formal features. There are two such features which will immediately attract the attention of any philosopher: first, the use of quotation marks, which I take to indicate that the author does not really wish (or dare, perhaps) to say what he actually says and, second, claims of necessity or counterfactual conditionals, which demand especially robust argumentation. These two features are directly related to each other: (1) Moore places the category of unpaid work, at least occasionally, in quotation marks; this concept is fundamental to his approach and he uses it in a much broader sense than is commonly done; and (2) he claims that capitalism depends necessarily on inputs of unpaid work. In my comment, I will discuss a number of conceptual problems linked to Moore's extension of the notion of unpaid work and will analyze the extent to which these problems affect his claim that capitalism is necessarily dependent on unpaid work.
Literature
Augustín, Laura (2012): “Sex as Work & Sex Work”. The Commoner 15, pp. 262–272.Search in Google Scholar
Barnes, Barry (1974): Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Bowles, Samuel (2011): “Is Liberal Society a Parasite on Tradition?”. Philosophy & Public Affairs 39 (1), pp. 46–81.10.1111/j.1088-4963.2011.01201.xSearch in Google Scholar
Folbre, Nancy (1982): “Exploitation Comes Home: A Critique of the Marxian Theory of Family Labour”. Cambridge Journal of Economics 6, pp. 317–329.Search in Google Scholar
Folbre, Nancy/Julie A. Nelson (2000): “For Love or Money – Or Both?”. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (4), pp. 123–140.10.1257/jep.14.4.123Search in Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy (2014): “Can Society be Commodities All the Way Down? Post-Polanyian Reflections on Capitalist Crisis”. Economy and Society 43 (4), pp. 541–558.10.1080/03085147.2014.898822Search in Google Scholar
Harrison, John (1977): “The political economy of housework”. Bulletin of the Conference of Socialist Economicst III (3), pp. 35–52.Search in Google Scholar
Himmelweit, Susan/Simon Mohun (1977): “Domestic Labour and Capital”. Cambridge Journal of Economics 1, pp. 15–31.10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035348Search in Google Scholar
Himmelweit, Susan (1995): “The Discovery of ʻUnpaid Workʼ: The Social Consequences of the Expansion of ʻWorkʼ”. Feminist Economics 1 (2), pp. 1–19.10.1080/714042229Search in Google Scholar
Luxemburg, Rosa (1951), The Accumulation of Capital [1913], translated by Agnes Schwarzschild. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul10.4324/9780203361863Search in Google Scholar
Meillassoux, Claude (1981): Maidens, Meal and Money: Capitalism and the Domestic Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Moore, Jason W. (2015): Capitalism in the Web of Life. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar
National Research Council (2005), Beyond the Market: Designing Nonmarket Accounts for the United States. Panel to Study the Design of Nonmarket Accounts, K. G. Abraham and C. Mackie, eds. Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Search in Google Scholar
Raymond, Christopher M., et al. (2013): “Ecosystem Services and Beyond: Using Multiple Metaphors to Understand Human-Environment Relationships”. BioScience 63 (7), pp. 536–546.10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7Search in Google Scholar
Metaphors to Understand Human-Environment Relationships”. BioScience 63 (7), pp. 536–546.10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7Search in Google Scholar
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
