Skip to content
Publicly Available Published by De Gruyter January 7, 2019

The reaction of a particularly electrophilic acyclic diaminocarbene with carbon monoxide: formation of β- and γ-lactams

  • Lars Wallbaum , Tim Schulz , Clemens Bruhn and Ulrich Siemeling EMAIL logo

Abstract

The reaction of carbon monoxide with the acyclic diaminocarbene iPr2N–C–TMP (TMP=2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidino), generated in situ from the formamidinium salt [(iPr2N)CH(TMP)][PF6] and NaN(SiMe3)2, unexpectedly afforded a mixture of β- and γ-lactams.

1 Introduction

Acyclic diaminocarbenes (ADACs) [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9] exhibit a much higher electrophilicity and nucleophilicity than NHCs and are superior even to cyclic (alkyl)(amino)carbenes (CAACs) [10], [11], [12], [13], [14] in this respect [15]. Owing to their ambiphilic profile, CAACs are suitable for the activation of fundamentally important small molecules like ammonia and carbon monoxide at room temperature or below [16], [17]. We recently found that ADACs, too, react with CO under very mild conditions [18], [19], [20], [21], which is perfectly plausible in view of the similar electronic profiles of CAACs and ADACs [15], [22]. The primary carbonylation product of an ADAC is the corresponding diaminoketene (R2N)2C=C=O, which is a transient species too unstable for isolation [23], [24], [25]. It is usually trapped through nucleophilic addition of unreacted ADAC, affording a betainic oxyallyl compound of the type [(R2N)2C]2CO, which is a “2:1 product” of the ADAC with CO [20]. This process is hindered in sterically encumbered cases such as, for example, the iconic “Alder carbene” (iPr2N)2C [26], where a “1:1 product” is observed instead, because a retro-Wolff rearrangement of the diaminoketene takes place and the resulting transient (amido)(amino)carbene R2N–C–C(O)NR2 subsequently undergoes an intramolecular C–H insertion, affording a β-lactam derivative [20], [21]. We recently described the ADAC iPr2N–C–TMP (TMP=2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidino), which is sterically significantly more encumbered and exhibits a substantially higher electrophilicity than (iPr2N)2C, or indeed any other ADAC known to date [27]. In view of these unique properties, we surmised that iPr2N–C–TMP would react with CO in a way different from that of (iPr2N)2C. We here report that this indeed turned out to be the case.

2 Results and discussion

The ADAC iPr2N–C–TMP (TMP=2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidino) was generated in situ as described before from the formamidinium salt [(iPr2N)CH(TMP)][PF6] (easily available in three steps from the secondary amines iPr2NH and TMPH) and NaN(SiMe3)2 in THF at low temperatures [27]) and subsequently exposed to an atmospheric pressure of carbon monoxide. Standard work-up, including a purification step by column chromatography, afforded a brownish oil in moderate yield. An investigation by high-resolution electrospray mass spectrometry revealed that a “1:1 product” had been formed from CO and the ADAC. The IR spectrum of the oil showed two bands in the carbonyl region, located at 1675 and 1748 cm−1. While the latter band is in the spectral region typical of β-lactams, the former one is consistent with a γ-lactam [28], indicating that the “1:1 product” in fact is a mixture of constitutional isomers. Attempts to achieve a separation of the isomers on a preparative scale by chromatography, including HPLC, unfortunately were not successful. Nevertheless, all isomers present in the “1:1 product” could be identified by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (XRD), which subsequently helped us to achieve at least a partial assignment of the signals in the complex 1H and 13C NMR spectra recorded from the mixture of isomers. Prolonged storage of the oil at −40°C afforded crystals, which were used for an XRD study. The quality of the results of the structure determination was rather poor due to disorder. Consequently, a detailed discussion of the structure is not meaningful. However, the connectivities and stereochemical features were unequivocally established, revealing a bicyclic γ-lactam (Fig. 1), which was obtained as a racemic compound. The molecule contains two chiral centres, whose exocyclic substituents (iPr2N and Me, respectively) are in a trans arrangement. This product will therefore be denoted as trans-1 in the following. The other diastereomer (cis-1) was obtained in protonated form more or less by serendipity. In the related case of an iPr2N-substituted β-lactam, we had observed that treatment with HCl afforded a nicely crystalline hydrochloride, whose structure was subsequently determined by XRD [19]. This motivated us to layer a toluene solution of the brownish oil obtained as described above from iPr2N–C–TMP and CO with a 2 m solution of HCl in diethyl ether. After several days, crystals of [cis-1H][FeCl4] were obtained, which were suitable for an XRD study. The result is shown in Fig. 2. Again, a racemic compound was obtained. The presence of the tetrachloridoferrate(III) anion in the structure may be explained by the fact that the HCl solution had been transferred with a used, and hence very likely corroded, steel cannula in this experiment. Performing the protonation experiment on a preparative scale by adding a 2 m solution of HCl in diethyl ether with a glass pipette to a solution of the brownish oil in the same solvent resulted in essentially quantitative formation of the corresponding mixture of lactam hydrochlorides, from which the β-lactam hydrochloride [2H]Cl could be obtained by recrystallization from chloroform as single crystals suitable for XRD. The molecular structure of [2H]Cl is shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 1: Molecular structure of trans-1 in the crystal. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg): C1–C2 1.559(8), C1–N1 1.343(5), C2–N2 1.378(11), C1–O1 1.220(5); C2–C1–O1 123.5(4), N1–C1–C2 106.9(4), N1–C1–O1 128.0(4).
Fig. 1:

Molecular structure of trans-1 in the crystal. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg): C1–C2 1.559(8), C1–N1 1.343(5), C2–N2 1.378(11), C1–O1 1.220(5); C2–C1–O1 123.5(4), N1–C1–C2 106.9(4), N1–C1–O1 128.0(4).

Fig. 2: Molecular structure of [cis-1H][FeCl4] and aggregation of its cations in the crystal. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg): C1–N1 1.334(4), C1–O1 1.231(4); N1–C1–O1 128.6(3), C1–O1···H 161.0.
Fig. 2:

Molecular structure of [cis-1H][FeCl4] and aggregation of its cations in the crystal. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg): C1–N1 1.334(4), C1–O1 1.231(4); N1–C1–O1 128.6(3), C1–O1···H 161.0.

Fig. 3: Molecular structure of [2H]Cl in the crystal. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg): C1–C2 1.562(3), C1–N1 1.340(3), C1–O1 1.217(3), C2–N2 1.520(3); C2–C1–N1 91.3(2), C2–C1–O1 136.7(2), N1–C1–O1 131.6(2), N2–H···Cl1 159.8.
Fig. 3:

Molecular structure of [2H]Cl in the crystal. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg): C1–C2 1.562(3), C1–N1 1.340(3), C1–O1 1.217(3), C2–N2 1.520(3); C2–C1–N1 91.3(2), C2–C1–O1 136.7(2), N1–C1–O1 131.6(2), N2–H···Cl1 159.8.

The structure of [2H]Cl is very similar to that of other hydrochlorides of amino-substituted β-lactams [18], [19]. Steric strain in the cation is indicated by the fact that N2 exhibits unusually long bonds to its carbon atoms, ranging from 1.520(3) to 1.572(3) Å (average value 1.554 Å). C–N bonds of ordinary trialkylammonium cations are substantially shorter than that. For example, Me3NH+ exhibits C–N bond lengths ≤1.50 Å, whereas values of ca. 1.53 Å have been reported for sterically congested cases [29]. In the same vein, the C–N2–C angles, which range from 110.2(2) to 116.5(2)° (average value 114.3°), are expanded in comparison to Me3NH+, which exhibits an average C–N–C angle of only 111.4° [29]. Steric strain appears to be slightly lower in the cation of the γ-lactam derivative [cis-1H][FeCl4] than in the cation of the β-lactam derivative [2H]Cl, as is indicated by slightly shorter C–N2 bonds (average value 1.528 Å) and smaller C–N2–C angles (average value 113.7°) determined for the former compound. The chloride anion of [2H]Cl is hydrogen-bonded to the ammonium moiety of [2H]+ (indicated by a broken line in Fig. 3), as has been observed before for closely related compounds [18], [19]. In contrast to this, the tetrachloridoferrate(III) anion of [cis-1H][FeCl4] is not involved in hydrogen bonding. Instead, the [cis-1H]+ cations are associated to dimers in the solid state, held together by hydrogen bonds between the amide and the ammonium units (indicated by broken lines in Fig. 2). This structural motif is not unprecedented for amides bearing a tertiary ammonium unit in α-position to the carbonyl unit [30].

Scheme 1 summarises the outcome of the carbonylation of iPr2N–C–TMP and gives a plausible mechanistic explanation, which is based on our previous work with related bulky ADACs (vide supra) [18], [19], [21]. It is interesting that this carbonylation affords products belonging to two prominent classes of bioactive compounds. The β-lactams are one of the best known and intensively investigated ring systems due to both their utility as synthetic intermediates and their biological activity as antibiotics [31], [32], [33]. In the same vein, γ-lactams are at the heart of a number of medicinally and biologically important compounds, as well as a large collection of natural products, and the synthesis of functionalised γ-lactams is therefore attracting increased attention [34], [35]. Very recently, a palladium-catalysed route to functionalised γ-lactams using carbon monoxide and secondary amines as building blocks was published by Gaunt and co-workers [36]. It is of note that our synthesis of cis-1 and trans-1 is also based on CO and secondary amines (iPr2NH and TMPH, vide supra), but does not require a catalyst.

Scheme 1: Plausible formation mechanism for the lactams formed by carbonylation of in situ-generated iPr2N–C–TMP. The primary carbonylation product is a diaminoketene, whose retro-Wolff rearrangement affords two different (amido)(amino)carbenes, each of which undergoes a final intramolecular C–H insertion step. The C–H bond that suffers the insertion is explicitly indicated. Each lactam was obtained as a racemate. Only one enantiomer is shown in each case.
Scheme 1:

Plausible formation mechanism for the lactams formed by carbonylation of in situ-generated iPr2N–C–TMP. The primary carbonylation product is a diaminoketene, whose retro-Wolff rearrangement affords two different (amido)(amino)carbenes, each of which undergoes a final intramolecular C–H insertion step. The C–H bond that suffers the insertion is explicitly indicated. Each lactam was obtained as a racemate. Only one enantiomer is shown in each case.

3 Experimental section

All reactions involving air-sensitive compounds were performed in an inert atmosphere (argon or dinitrogen) by using standard Schlenk techniques or a conventional glovebox. Starting materials were procured from standard commercial sources and used as received. [(iPr2N)CH(TMP)][PF6] was synthesised according to the published procedure [27]. NMR spectra were recorded at ambient temperature with Varian NMRS-500 and MR-400 spectrometers operating at 500 and 400 MHz, respectively, for 1H. High-resolution (HR) ESI mass spectra were obtained with a micrOTOF time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) using an Apollo™ “ion funnel” ESI source. Mass calibration was performed immediately prior to the measurement with ESI Tune Mix Standard (Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany). IR spectra were obtained with a Bruker ALPHA FT-IR spectrometer (ATR mode). Elemental analyses were carried out with a HEKAtech Euro EA-CHNS elemental analyser at the Institute of Chemistry, University of Kassel, Germany.

3.1 Carbonylation of iPr2N–C–TMP to afford a mixture of cis-1, trans-1 and 2

A 2 m solution of sodium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide in THF (2.50 mL, 5.0 mmol) was added dropwise to a stirred solution of [(iPr2N)CH(TMP)][PF6] (1.60 g, 4.0 mmol) in THF (30 mL) cooled to T=−80°C. The cooling bath was removed and stirring was continued for 10 min. The reaction mixture was rapidly frozen with liquid nitrogen and the inert atmosphere replaced by an atmospheric pressure of carbon monoxide. The mixture was allowed to warm up to room temperature with stirring. Volatile components were removed under reduced pressure after ca. 90 min. The residue was extracted with toluene (3×15 mL). The extracts were combined and the solvent removed under reduced pressure, leaving a dark oil. The mixture of lactams formed as carbonylation products was obtained as a brown oil after column chromatography (silica gel, ethyl acetate-n-hexane 2:1, Rf≈0.8). Yield 471 mg (42%). The isomers are indistinguishable by mass spectrometry. – HRMS ((+)-ESI): m/z=281.25815 [M+H]+ (cald. 281.25929 for [C17H33N2O]+). The 1H and 13C NMR spectra (see Figures S1 and S2 in the Supporting Information) of this mixture are very complex. A complete signal assignment was possible only for the β-lactam 2. The situation is intrinsically more complicated in the γ-lactam case, because two diastereomers (cis-1 and trans-1) are present, giving rise to two sets of signals. Only those signals are listed for which an assignment has been possible. We could not determine with certainty which set belongs to which diastereomer.

3.1.1 γ-Lactam 1

Diastereomer 1: 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ=3.94 (br. m, 1 H, C(O)CH), 3.34, 2.58 (2 m, 2×1 H, C(O)CHCH2). – 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3): δ=166.9 (one of two closely spaced signals, CO), 70.1 (NCMe2CH2), 55.5 (NCMe(CH2)2), 54.2 (C(O)CH), 43.3 (C(O)CHCH2).

Diastereomer 2: 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ=3.82 (br. m, 1 H, C(O)CH), 3.18, 2.47 (2 m, 2×1 H, C(O)CHCH2). – 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3): δ=166.9 (one of two closely spaced signals, CO), 69.4 (NCMe2CH2), 55.7 (NCMe(CH2)2), 54.4 (C(O)CH), 44.7 (C(O)CHCH2).

The two diastereomers are indistinguishable by IR. – IR (ATR): ν(CO)=1748 cm−1.

3.1.2 β-Lactam 2

1H NMR (CDCl3): δ=4.13 (s, 1 H, C(O)CH), 3.39 (sept, 3JHH=6.9 Hz, 1 H, CHMe2), 2.00 (s, 3 H, iPrNCMe2), 1.58 (s, 6 H, TMP Me), 1.50 (s, 3 H, iPrNCMe2), 1.48 (s, 6 H, TMP Me), 1.46 (m, 4 H, CH2), 1.45 (m, 2 H, CH2), 1.33 (d, 3JHH=6.9 Hz, 6 H, CHMe2). – 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3): δ=159.6 (CO), 72.9 (C(O)CH), 63.3 (iPrNCMe2), 58.8 (CH2CMe2), 45.1 (CHMe2), 35.7 (CH2CH2CH2), 29.9 (CH2CMe2), 26.3 (iPrNCMe2 and CH2CMe2), 25.3 (iPrNCMe2), 22.6 (CH2CH2CH2), 21.5, 21.2 (2×CHMe2). – IR (ATR): ν(CO)=1675 cm−1.

3.2 Synthesis of the hydrochlorides (mixture) of cis-1, trans-1 and 2

The mixture of lactams formed by carbonylation of iPr2N–C–TMP as described above (471 mg, 1.7 mmol) was dissolved in diethyl ether (5 mL). Addition of a 2 m solution of HCl in diethyl ether (0.9 mL, 1.8 mmol) afforded a colourless precipitate, which was filtered off, washed with cold diethyl ether (5 mL) and dried under reduced pressure. Yield 505 mg (94%). – C17H33N2ClO (316.9): calcd. C 64.43, H 10.50, N 8.84; found C 64.76, H 10.63, N 8.80.

3.3 Crystal structure determinations

For each data collection a single crystal was mounted on a micro-mount and all geometric and intensity data were taken from this sample by ω scans with steps of 1°. Data collections were carried out using Mo radiation (λ=0.71073 Å), or, in case of [2H]Cl, with Cu radiation (λ=1.54186 Å); monochromatisation was done with graded multilayer mirrors on a Stoe IPDS2 diffractometer equipped with a 2-circle goniometer and an area detector or on a STOE StadiVari diffractometer equipped with a 4-circle goniometer and a DECTRIS Pilatus 200 K detector. The data sets were corrected for absorption (by integration), Lorentz and polarisation effects. The structures were solved by Direct Methods (Sir 2008) [37] and refined using alternating cycles of least-squares refinements against F2 (Shelxl2014/7) [38]. In the crystals of trans-1 the entire molecule is disordered over at least two positions and the structure model obtained is therefore of poor quality. H atoms were included to the models in calculated positions with the 1.2 fold isotropic displacement parameter of their bonding partner. Experimental details for each diffraction experiment are given in Table 1.

Table 1:

Crystallographic data for the structurally characterised compounds prepared in this study.

[cis-1H][FeCl4][2H]Cltrans-1
Crystal shape and size, mm3Block, 0.32×0.30×0.10Plate, 0.24×0.06×0.04Plate, 0.40×0.22×0.08
Chemical formulaC17H33Cl4FeN2OC17H33ClN2OC17H32N2O
Formula mass479.10316.90280.44
T, K200(2)100(2)100(2)
Crystal systemMonoclinicOrthorhombicMonoclinic
Space groupP21/n (No. 14)P212121 (No. 19)P21/c (No. 14)
a, Å9.9136(6)7.2694(2)10.0636(6)
b, Å22.6936(14)9.6166(5)13.7592(7)
c, Å11.0146(7)26.1788(10)12.8317(8)
β, deg108.567(5)90104.349(5)
Unit cell volume, Å32349.0(3)1830.08(13)1721.3(2)
Z444
Dcalcd, g cm−31.361.151.08
θ range, deg1.795–25.2493.377–68.4542.208–25.499
hkl range−10≤h≤10−8≤h≤8−12≤h≤12
−27≤k≤27−9≤k≤11−16≤k≤14
−13≤l≤13−16≤l≤31−15≤l≤15
μ, mm−11.11.80.1
Absorption correctionIntegrationIntegrationIntegration
Tmin/Tmax0.723/0.8790.721/0.9360.976/0.994
F(000), e1004696624
No. of refl. measured17 27418 1047648
Unique refl./Rint4237/0.02803346/0.02493174/0.0201
Parameters/restraints303/66201/0274/0
Final R1/wR2 (I>2σ(I)]0.0571/0.15160.0311/0.07780.1391/0.4245
Final R1 (wR2) [all data]0.0719 (0.1620)0.0362 (0.0848)0.1605 (0.4567)
Flack parameter0.000(9)
Weighting scheme w1/[σ2(Fo2)+(0.0764P)2]a1/[σ2(Fo2)+(0.0503P)2]a1/[σ2(Fo2)+(0.2000P)2]a
Δρfin (max/min), e Å−30.690/−0.8040.231/−0.1751.003/−0.486
  1. aP=(Fo2+2Fc2)/3.

CCDC 1883204–1883206 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre viawww.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

4 Supporting information

Figures S1 and S2, respectively, showing the 1H and 13C NMR spectrum of the mixture of lactams obtained by carbonylation of iPr2N–C–TMP are given as supplementary material available online (DOI: 10.1515/znb-2018-0255).

Award Identifier / Grant number: SI 429/19-1

Award Identifier / Grant number: 429/19-2

Funding statement: The authors are grateful to the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for generous financial support of this work (SI 429/19-1 and 429/19-2). Support by the Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes is gratefully acknowledged (stipend for T. S.).

References

[1] V. P. Boyarskiy, N. A. Bokach, K. V. Luzyanin, V. Yu. Kukushkin, Chem. Rev.2015, 115, 2698.10.1021/cr500380dSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] M. A. Kinzhalov, V. P. Boyarski, Russ. J. Gen. Chem.2015, 85, 2313.10.1134/S1070363215100175Search in Google Scholar

[3] L. M. Slaughter in N-Heterocyclic Carbenes (Ed.: S. P. Nolan), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2014, p. 499.10.1002/9783527671229.ch16Search in Google Scholar

[4] V. P. Boyarskiy, K. V. Luzyanin, V. Yu. Kukushkin in Advances in Organometallic Chemistry and Catalysis: The Silver/Gold Jubilee International Conference on Organometallic Chemistry Celebratory Book (Ed.: A. J. L. Pombeiro), Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2014, p. 145.Search in Google Scholar

[5] H. G. Raubenheimer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2012, 51, 5042.10.1002/anie.201200739Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] V. P. Boyarskiy, K. V. Luzyanin, V. Yu. Kukushkin, Coord. Chem. Rev.2012, 256, 2029.10.1016/j.ccr.2012.04.022Search in Google Scholar

[7] L. M. Slaughter, ACS Catal.2012, 2, 1802.10.1021/cs300300ySearch in Google Scholar

[8] M. Barbazanges, L. Fensterbank, ChemCatChem2012, 4, 1065.10.1002/cctc.201200224Search in Google Scholar

[9] J. Vignolle, X. Cattoën, D. Bourissou, Chem. Rev.2009, 109, 3333.10.1021/cr800549jSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] M. Melaimi, R. Jazzar, M. Soleilhavoup, G. Bertrand, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2017, 56, 10046.10.1002/anie.201702148Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] U. S. D. Paul, U. Radius, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.2017, 3362.10.1002/ejic.201700397Search in Google Scholar

[12] S. Roy, K. C. Mondal, H. W. Roesky, Acc. Chem. Res.2016, 49, 357.10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00381Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] M. Soleilhavoup, G. Bertrand, Acc. Chem. Res.2015, 48, 256.10.1021/ar5003494Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] D. Martin, M. Soleilhavoup, G. Bertrand, Chem. Sci.2011, 2, 389.10.1039/C0SC00388CSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[15] D. Martin, Y. Canac, V. Lavallo, G. Bertrand, J. Am. Chem. Soc.2014, 136, 5023.10.1021/ja412981xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] G. D. Frey, V. Lavallo, B. Donnadieu, W. W. Schoeller, G. Bertrand, Science2007, 316, 439.10.1126/science.1141474Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] V. Lavallo, Y. Canac, B. Donnadieu, W. W. Schoeller, G. Bertrand, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2006, 45, 3488.10.1002/anie.200600987Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[18] L. Wallbaum, D. Weismann, D. Löber, C. Bruhn, P. Prochnow, J. E. Bandow, U. Siemeling, Chem. Eur. J.2018. DOI: 10.1002/chem.201805307.10.1002/chem.201805307Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] T. Schulz, C. Färber, M. Leibold, C. Bruhn, P. Prochnow, J. E. Bandow, T. Schneider, T. Porsch, M. C. Holthausen, U. Siemeling, Chem. Commun.2014, 50, 2341.10.1039/C3CC48538BSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] T. Schulz, C. Färber, M. Leibold, C. Bruhn, W. Baumann, D. Selent, T. Porsch, M. C. Holthausen, U. Siemeling, Chem. Commun.2013, 49, 6834.10.1039/c3cc42888eSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] U. Siemeling, C. Färber, C. Bruhn, M. Leibold, D. Selent, W. Baumann, M. von Hopffgarten, C. Goedecke, G. Frenking, Chem. Sci.2010, 1, 697.10.1039/c0sc00451kSearch in Google Scholar

[22] C. Goedecke, M. Leibold, U. Siemeling, G. Frenking, J. Am. Chem. Soc.2011, 133, 3557.10.1021/ja109812rSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] V. P. Gupta, A. Sharma, S. G. Agrawal, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc.2006, 27, 1297.10.5012/bkcs.2006.27.9.1297Search in Google Scholar

[24] M. A. McAllister, T. T. Tidwell, J. Org. Chem.1994, 59, 4506.10.1021/jo00095a028Search in Google Scholar

[25] L. Gong, M. A. McAllister, T. T. Tidwell, J. Am. Chem. Soc.1991, 113, 6021.10.1021/ja00016a014Search in Google Scholar

[26] R. W. Alder, P. R. Allen, M. Murray, A. G. Orpen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.1996, 35, 1121.10.1002/anie.199611211Search in Google Scholar

[27] T. Schulz, D. Weismann, L. Wallbaum, R. Guthardt, C. Thie, M. Leibold, C. Bruhn, U. Siemeling, Chem. Eur. J.2015, 21, 14107.10.1002/chem.201502315Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] S. Bienz, L. Bigler, T. Fox, H. Meier, Spektroskopische Methoden in der organischen Chemie (Hesse-Meier-Zeeh), 9. Aufl., Thieme, Stuttgart, 2016, p. 57.10.1055/b-004-129729Search in Google Scholar

[29] Y. Jie, P. Livant, H. Li, M. Yang, W. Zhu, V. Cammarata, P. Almond, T. Sullens, Y. Qin, E. Bakker, J. Org. Chem.2010, 75, 4472.10.1021/jo100628vSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] C. H. Basch, J. A. Brinck, J. E. Ramos, S. A. Habay, G. P. A. Yap, J. Org. Chem.2012, 77, 10416.10.1021/jo301600pSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] S. Hosseyni, A. Jarrahpour, Org. Biomol. Chem.2018, 16, 6840.10.1039/C8OB01833BSearch in Google Scholar

[32] C. R. Pitts, T. Lectka, Chem. Rev.2014, 114, 7930.10.1021/cr4005549Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] G. S. Singh, S. Sudheesh in Natural Lactones and Lactams: Synthesis Occurrence and Biological Activity (Ed.: T. Janecki), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2014, p. 101.Search in Google Scholar

[34] S. Soleimani-Amiri, E. Vessally, M. Babazadeh, A. Hosseinian, L. Edjlali, RSC Adv.2017, 7, 28407.10.1039/C7RA03075DSearch in Google Scholar

[35] F. Rivas, T. Ling, Org. Prep. Proced. Int.2016, 48, 254.10.1080/00304948.2016.1165059Search in Google Scholar

[36] Z. Mao Png, J. R. Cabrera-Pardo, J. Peiró Cadahía, M. J. Gaunt, Chem. Sci.2018, 9, 7628.10.1039/C8SC02855ASearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[37] M. C. Burla, R. Caliandro, M. Camalli, B. Carrozzini, G. L. Cascarano, L. De Caro, C. Giacovazzo, G. Polidori, R. Spagna, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2007, 40, 609.10.1107/S0021889807010941Search in Google Scholar

[38] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.2008, A64, 112.10.1107/S0108767307043930Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/znb-2018-0255).


Received: 2018-12-05
Accepted: 2018-12-14
Published Online: 2019-01-07
Published in Print: 2019-02-25

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 11.12.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2018-0255/html
Scroll to top button