Abstract
The reaction of uranium tetrabromide with potassium cyanide in anhydrous liquid ammonia at room temperature leads to the formation of brown crystals of [U2(CN)3(NH3)14]5+ [KBr6]5− · NH3. We determined the crystal structure of the compound by single crystal X-ray diffraction. To the best of our knowledge it contains the unprecedented spatially separated [KBr6]5− anion and presents the first uranium(IV) cyanide compound which forms a layer structure. The compound crystallizes in the trigonal space group P3̅m1 (No. 164) with a = 10.3246(13), c = 8.4255(17) Å, V = 777.8(3) Å3, Z = 1 at T = 100 K and is well described with the Niggli formula
Dedicated to: Professor Dr. rer. nat. Dr. h.c. mult. Arndt Simon on the occasion of his 80th birthday.
1 Introduction
While a multitude of cyanide complexes of the transition metals are known [1], [2], only a few cyanido complexes of uranium(IV) have been reported [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. The first actinoid compound containing cyanide anions was K2[UO2(CN)4] described by Aloy, followed by K2[UO2(CN)2(NO3)2] [11], [12]. However, the existence of both compounds was doubted and literature suggests to regard them as non-existent [13], [14]. Besides uranium compounds containing hexacyanido complexes of group eight elements, such as {[U(H2O)10][M(CN)6]} (MII=Fe, Ru, Os), and some tetracyanidoplatinate(II) complexes like {U2(H2O)10(O)[Pt(CN)4]3}·4H2O, also some CN−-containing compounds with organic ligands are described [15], [16]. These are, for example [UN*3CN] (N*=N(SiMe3)2) or [M][(UN*3)2(μ-CN)] (M=K(18-crown-6), N*=N(SiMe3)2), of which the crystal structures have been determined [8], [9]. Also, some CN−-bridged uranium complexes with sterically demanding ligands are known [6], [7], [9], [17], [18], [19]. To the best of our knowledge a pseudo-binary uranium cyanide, such as U(CN)4, is still unknown. Our attempts and investigations on the synthesis of uranium cyanides in liquid ammonia led to the discovery of the light-green compound [UCl3(CN)·4NH3], obtained from UCl4 and NaCN in liquid NH3 [3], [20]. The reaction of UCl4 with one equivalent of KCN in liquid ammonia at room temperature gave green crystals of [U(CN)(NH3)8]Cl3·NH3 [20]. Uranium tetraiodide, UI4, reacts with one equivalent of KCN leading to a compound with infinite chains of cyanido- and amido-bridged uranium atoms in the crystal structure [20]. Hexaamminetricyanidouranium(IV) iodide [U(CN)3(NH3)6]I can be obtained by increasing the concentration of KCN and heating the reaction mixture [20]. Here we present the synthesis and crystal structure of the cyanido bridged uranium(IV) compound [U2(CN)3(NH3)14]5+[KBr6]5−·NH3 that contains, to the best of our knowledge, an unprecedented spatially separated [KBr6]5− anion.
2 Results and discussion
The reaction of UBr4 with KCN dissolved in liquid ammonia was carried out in a sealed “bomb tube” at room temperature. Over 6 months of storage and crystallization time some dark brown crystals grew of which the composition was evidenced by X-ray diffraction as tetradecaamminetricyanido-κC,κN-diuranium(IV) hexabromidopotassiate(I) ammonia(1/1) [U2(CN)3(NH3)14]5+[KBr6]5−·NH3. The formation of this compound can be described by eq. (1).
The compound crystallizes in the trigonal space group P3̅m1 (No. 164) with a=10.3246(13), c=8.4255(17) Å, V=777.8(3) Å3 and Z=1 at T=100 K. Selected crystallographic data and details of the structure determination are available from Table 1. Table 2 contains Wyckoff positions and atom coordinates. The crystal structure of this compound contains the [KBr6]5− anion and the [U2(CN)3(NH3)14]5+ cation, as well as an ammonia molecule of crystallization. The [KBr6]5− anion and the coordination sphere of the U(IV) cation are shown in Fig. 1.
Selected crystallographic data and details of the structure determination of [U2(CN)3(NH3)14]5+[KBr6]5−·NH3.
Formula | [U2(CN)3(NH3)14][KBr6]·NH3 |
Molar mass/g·mol−1 | 1328.09 |
Space group (No.) | P3̅m1 (164) |
a/Å | 10.3246(13) |
c/Å | 8.4255(17) |
V/Å3 | 777.8(3) |
Z | 1 |
Pearson symbol | hP108 |
ρcalcd./g·cm−3 | 2.84 |
μ/mm−1 | 18.3 |
Color | Brown |
Crystal habitus | Block |
Crystal size/mm3 | 0.1·0.1·0.05 |
T/K | 100(2) |
Radiation; λ/Å | MoKα; 0.71073 |
No. of reflections | 14745 |
θ range/° | 3.322–29.357 |
Range of Miller indices hkl | ±14, ±14, ±11 |
Absorption correction | multi-scan |
Tmax; Tmin | 0.430; 0.204 |
Completeness of the data set | 0.995 |
No. of unique reflections | 816 |
Rint; Rσ | 0.0556; 0.0572 |
No. of parameters | 39 |
No. of restrains | 0 |
No. of constrains | 0 |
S (all data) | 1.247 |
R(F) (I>2 σ(I); all data) | 0.0555; 0.0571 |
wR(F2) (I>2σ(I); all data) | 0.1360; 0.1413 |
Extinction coefficient | 0.0102(18) |
Δρmax; Δρmin/e·Å−3 | 2.57; −2.53 |
Atomic coordinates and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters Uiso for [U2(CN)3(NH3)14]5+[KBr6]5−·NH3.
Atom | Wyckoff position | x | y | z | Uiso/Å2 | S.O.F. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U(1) | 2d | 1/3 | 2/3 | 0.35808(10) | 0.0188(4) | 1 |
N(1) | 6i | 0.4707(7) | –x | 0.4790(14) | 0.021(2) | 0.5 |
C(1) | 6i | 0.4707(7) | –x | 0.4790(14) | 0.021(2) | 0.5 |
N(2) | 2d | 1/3 | 2/3 | 0.651(2) | 0.020(4) | 1 |
N(3) | 6i | 0.4320(7) | –x | 0.1310(14) | 0.025(2) | 1 |
N(4) | 6i | 0.1870(7) | 2x | 0.3585(16) | 0.028(3) | 1 |
N(5) | 1b | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 0.061(13) | 1 |
K(1) | 1a | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0341(18) | 1 |
Br(1) | 6i | 0.16461(11) | –x | 0.8313(2) | 0.0417(5) | 1 |
![Fig. 1: Section of the crystal structure of [U2(CN)3(NH3)14]5+[KBr6]5−·NH3, showing the octahedron-like [KBr6]5− anion (left) and the coordination of the U(IV) cation (right). The displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 70% probability level at T=100 K. As some of the H atoms show site disorder, only one set of positions is shown.](/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2019-0161/asset/graphic/j_znb-2019-0161_fig_001.jpg)
Section of the crystal structure of [U2(CN)3(NH3)14]5+[KBr6]5−·NH3, showing the octahedron-like [KBr6]5− anion (left) and the coordination of the U(IV) cation (right). The displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 70% probability level at T=100 K. As some of the H atoms show site disorder, only one set of positions is shown.
The spatially separated [KBr6]5− anion is, to the best of our knowledge, not described in the literature to date. However, a inversely comparable species has been observed in the compound [K17(Sb8)2(NH2)]·17.5NH3, where [(H2N)K6] octahedra are present that however form straight, infinite chains through trans-corner connections. Thus, a similarity to the crystal structure of KNH2 was noted [21]. In our case, the [KBr6]5− anion is spatially separated and contains a potassium atom (1a, 3̅m.) as the central atom, which is surrounded by six symmetry-equivalent bromide anions (6i, .m.) in the shape of a distorted octahedron. The K–Br distances of such a moiety are therefore all equal with 3.2684(19) Å. This distance is in good agreement with K–Br distances observed for pure KBr (3.289(6) Å, T=293 K) [22]. Interatomic distances are available from Table 3. In the compound K2ZnBr4, where the coordination polyhedron around K+ is a trigonal prism, the K−Br distances agree with 3.240–3.420 Å (T=125 K) [23], [24]. An octahedral coordination polyhedron for potassium cations and bromide anions is also present in the compound KInBr3 [25]. There, the K–Br distances of 3.182(9) and 3.284(9) Å are also comparable with those in the spatially separated anion presented here. The Br–K–Br angles in the distorted coordination octahedron of the [KBr6]5− anion are 102.52(4) and 77.48(4)°; in good agreement with reported data (KInBr3: 105.09 and 74.01°) [25]. Overall, the shape of the spatially separated [KBr6]5− anion corresponds well to the literature.
Selected interatomic distances d and their multiplicities m for [U2(CN)3(NH3)14]5+[KBr6]5−·NH3.
Atom1 | Atom2 | m | d/Å |
---|---|---|---|
U(1) | N/C(1) | 3 | 2.659(13) |
N(2) | 1 | 2.47(2) | |
N(3) | 3 | 2.603(12) | |
N(4) | 3 | 2.616(13) | |
N/C(1) | N/C(1) | 1 | 1.11(3) |
K(1) | Br(1) | 6 | 3.2684(19) |
The uranium atom occupies the Wyckoff position 2d (3m.) and is surrounded by seven ammine ligands and three cyanido ligands. The coordination polyhedron can be described as a slightly distorted sphenocorona (Johnson solid J86). This sphenocorona, with a mild distortion of its top quadrangle is shown in Fig. 2. The three disordered cyanido ligands are κC,κN-bridging two symmetry-equivalent uranium atoms. The C≡N bond length of the disordered cyanido ligand is 1.11(3) Å and despite the disorder it agrees well with C≡N bond lengths of cyanido ligands described in the literature [26], [27], [28], [29]. Because of space group symmetry, the C and N atoms of the cyanide anion are indistinguishable and a statistical distribution with a 50:50 mixed site occupancy of the atom position 6i (.m.) was applied in the refinement. The cyanide anion resides symmetrically in between the bridged U atoms. The U–N distances for the seven ammine ligands range from 2.47(2) to 2.659(13) Å and are also in good agreement with distances observed for ammine ligands in the uranium-ammonia system [20]. Because of the different distances between the uranium atom and the ten ligands, the sphenocorona is slightly distorted. As the U atoms are bridged by the cyanido ligands, the complex cation forms corrugated infinite layers parallel to the ab plane. This connection can be described by the Niggli formula
![Fig. 2: Section of the crystal structure of [U2(CN)3(NH3)14]5+[KBr6]5−·NH3, showing the coordination sphere of the uranium atom, which is surrounded by ten ligands in the shape of a slightly distorted sphenocorona (Johnson solid J86). A view along the trigonal prism of the sphenocorona is selected. The displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 70% probability level at T=100 K.](/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2019-0161/asset/graphic/j_znb-2019-0161_fig_002.jpg)
Section of the crystal structure of [U2(CN)3(NH3)14]5+[KBr6]5−·NH3, showing the coordination sphere of the uranium atom, which is surrounded by ten ligands in the shape of a slightly distorted sphenocorona (Johnson solid J86). A view along the trigonal prism of the sphenocorona is selected. The displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 70% probability level at T=100 K.
![Fig. 3: Section of the crystal structure showing a corrugated {[U(CN)32(NH3)71]}∞2$\mathop {} \limits_{\infty}^{2}\left\{ {\left[ {{\rm{U}}{{({\rm{CN}})}_{{3 \over 2}}}{{({\rm{N}}{{\rm{H}}_3})}_{{7 \over 1}}}} \right]} \right\}$ layer (left) and a view along the c axis (right).](/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2019-0161/asset/graphic/j_znb-2019-0161_fig_003.jpg)
Section of the crystal structure showing a corrugated
The [KBr6]5− anions fill the octahedral voids, with the potassium atom K(1) occupying the Wyckoff position 1a (3̅m.). The complex anion can be described by the Niggli formula
![Fig. 4: Section of the crystal structure of [U2(CN)3(NH3)14]5+[KBr6]5−·NH3. The [KBr6]5− anions are shown as dark green polyhedra. Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 70% probability level at T=100 K, H atoms isotropic with arbitrary radii. H atoms of the ammonia molecules of crystallization could not be located.](/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2019-0161/asset/graphic/j_znb-2019-0161_fig_004.jpg)
Section of the crystal structure of [U2(CN)3(NH3)14]5+[KBr6]5−·NH3. The [KBr6]5− anions are shown as dark green polyhedra. Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 70% probability level at T=100 K, H atoms isotropic with arbitrary radii. H atoms of the ammonia molecules of crystallization could not be located.
Between the layers of the interconnected uranium atoms and the spatially separated [KBr6]5− anions the only attractive interactions are N–H···Br hydrogen bonds. The hydrogen atoms of the ammine ligands (N(2), N(3) and N(4)) form hydrogen bonds to the bromine atoms Br(1). The donor···acceptor distances of these hydrogen bonds range from 3.377(10) to 3.642(8) Å. This is in good agreement with known N–H···Br hydrogen bonds for example in [Co(NH3)6]Br(S2O3)·H2O (3.509(4) to 3.539(3) Å, T=295 K) or in [CoCO3(NH3)5]Br·H2O (3.41–3.63 Å) [31], [32].
3 Conclusions
Single crystals of [U2(CN)3(NH3)14]5+[KBr6]5−·NH3 (P3̅m1, No. 164) were obtained by the reaction of UBr4 and KCN dissolved in liquid ammonia at room temperature over several months of crystallization time. The crystal structure of this compound has been determined and found to contain two peculiar building units: (i) The uranium atoms are coordinated by ten ligands in total of which seven are ammine and three are cyanido ligands. The coordination sphere of the U atom is described best as a sphenocorona. The connection of the κC,κN-cyanido bridged uranium atoms leads to the formation of infinite corrugated layers of sphenocoronas. (ii) The unprecedented spatially separated, octahedron-like [KBr6]5− anion could be observed for the first time.
4 Experimental section
All work was carried out excluding moisture and air in an atmosphere of dried and purified argon (5.0, Praxair) using high vacuum glass lines and a glovebox (MBraun). The glass vessels were flame dried several times under vacuum before being used. Aluminum bromide (Alfa Aesar, 98%) was purified by sublimation in vacuo. Aluminum (Fluka, purum >99%), as well as uranyl nitrate (Riedel de Haën, zur Analyse), was used as supplied.
4.1 Synthesis of UO2
12.8 g of UO2(NO3)2·6H2O (25.4 mmol) was decomposed to 7.13 g U3O8 (8.47 mmol) by heating to 700°C in air for 12 h inside an open silica test tube. The black product was powdered in air and reduced in a stream of hydrogen at 800°C for 8 h to obtain 6.86 g (24.9 mmol, 98%) of phase pure UO2.
4.2 Synthesis of UBr4
UBr4 was synthesized according to the literature [33]. An ampoule was charged with 1088 mg UO2 (4 mmol) and 2150+65 mg AlBr3 (8 mmol+transport agent) and flame sealed under vacuum (1×10−3 mbar). The starting materials were reacted at 250°C for 12 h before the transport reaction was conducted with a source temperature of 350°C and a sink temperature of 230°C. One thousand nine hundred and seventy-eight milligram (4.3 mmol, 86%) of large brown plate-shaped crystals of UBr4 were obtained after 6 days.
4.3 Synthesis of [U2(CN)3(NH3)14]5+[KBr6]5−·NH3
Thirty milligram of UBr4 (0.05 mmol) and 13 mg of KCN (0.2 mmol, 4 eq.) were reacted with liquid ammonia in a flame sealed glass ampoule (bomb tube made of borosilicate glass, 6 mm diameter with 1.5 mm wall thickness) at room temperature for 6 months.
4.4 Single-crystal X-ray diffraction
A crystal of the title compound was selected under nitrogen-cooled, pre-dried perfluorinated oil and mounted using a MiTeGen loop. Intensity data of a suitable crystal was recorded with an IPDS 2T diffractometer (STOE & Cie). The diffractometer was operated with MoKα radiation (λ=0.71073 Å, graphite monochromator) and equipped with an image plate detector. Evaluation, integration and reduction of the diffraction data was carried out using the X-Area software suite [34]. A numerical absorption correction was applied with the modules X-Shape and X-Red32 of the X-Area software suite. The structure was solved with dual-space methods (Shelxt-2014/5) and refined against F2 (Shelxl-2014/7) [35], [36]. All atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters. The highest residual electron density after the final refinement was 1.142 Å distant from atom K(1).
CCDC 1959129 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre viawww.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
Acknowledgement
We thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for funding and Dr. Matthias Conrad, Marburg, for helpful discussions.
References
[1] W. P. Griffith, Q. Rev. Chem. Soc.1962, 16, 188.10.1039/qr9621600188Search in Google Scholar
[2] T. P. Hanusa, in Encyclopedia of Inorganic Chemistry (Eds.: R. B. King, R. H. Crabtree, C. M. Lukehart, D. A. Atwood, R. A. Scott), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, 2006, p. 59.Search in Google Scholar
[3] K. W. Bagnall, J. L. Baptista, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem.1970, 32, 2283–2285.10.1016/0022-1902(70)80507-3Search in Google Scholar
[4] J.-C. Berthet, P. Thuéry, M. Ephritikhine, Chem. Commun.2007, 604–606.10.1039/B614226ESearch in Google Scholar
[5] B. Kanellakopulos, E. Dornberger, H. Billich, J. Organomet. Chem.1974, 76, C42–C44.10.1016/S0022-328X(00)87390-8Search in Google Scholar
[6] J. Maynadié, J.-C. Berthet, P. Thuéry, M. Ephritikhine, Organometallics2007, 26, 2623–2629.10.1021/om061131xSearch in Google Scholar
[7] W. J. Evans, T. J. Mueller, J. W. Ziller, Chem. Eur. J.2010, 16, 964–975.10.1002/chem.200901990Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[8] A. Hervé, Y. Bouzidi, J.-C. Berthet, L. Belkhiri, P. Thuéry, A. Boucekkine, M. Ephritikhine, Inorg. Chem.2014, 53, 6995–7013.10.1021/ic500939tSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[9] A. Hervé, Y. Bouzidi, J.-C. Berthet, L. Belkhiri, P. Thuéry, A. Boucekkine, M. Ephritikhine, Inorg. Chem.2015, 54, 2474–2490.10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b00034Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[10] J.-C. Berthet, P. Thuéry, M. Ephritikhine, Dalton Trans.2015, 44, 7727–7742.10.1039/C5DT00692ASearch in Google Scholar
[11] J. Aloy, Ann. Chim. Phys.1901, 24, 412–432.Search in Google Scholar
[12] S. P. McGlynn, J. K. Smith, W. C. Neely, J. Chem. Phys.1961, 35, 105–116.10.1063/1.1731876Search in Google Scholar
[13] C. Musicas, M. Marteau, Ch. Cuillerdier, Radiochem. Radioanal. Lett.1975, 21, 193–203.Search in Google Scholar
[14] J. I. Bullock, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem.1967, 29, 2257–2264.10.1016/0022-1902(67)80280-XSearch in Google Scholar
[15] V. S. Badik, D. I. Semenyshyn, A. N. Sergeeva, G. Y. Shevchuk, Sov. J. Coord. Chem.1977, 3, 839–842.Search in Google Scholar
[16] B. A. Maynard, K. S. Lynn, R. E. Sykora, A. E. V. Gorden, Inorg. Chem.2013, 52, 4880–4889.10.1021/ic302459zSearch in Google Scholar
[17] M. Falcone, C. E. Kefalidis, R. Scopelliti, L. Maron, M. Mazzanti, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2016, 55, 12290–12294.10.1002/anie.201606796Search in Google Scholar
[18] O. Benaud, J. C. Berthet, P. Thuery, M. Ephritikhine, CCDC 958672: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination 2013, DOI: 10.5517/cc115kxp.Search in Google Scholar
[19] A. Herve, J. C. Berthet, P. Thuery, M. Ephritikhine, CCDC 1057500: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination 2015, DOI: 10.5517/cc14hdxy.10.5517/cc14hdxySearch in Google Scholar
[20] S. S. Rudel, S. A. Baer, P. Woidy, T. G. Müller, H.-L. Deubner, B. Scheibe, F. Kraus, Z. Kristallogr.2018, 233, 817–844.10.1515/zkri-2018-2066Search in Google Scholar
[21] M. Reil, N. Korber, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.2007, 633, 1599–1602.10.1002/zaac.200700272Search in Google Scholar
[22] N. M. Butt, N. Ahmed, M. M. Beg, M. A. Atta, J. Aslam, Q. H. Khan, Acta Crystallogr.1976, A32, 674–675.10.1107/S0567739476001435Search in Google Scholar
[23] K. Endo, M. Kenmotsu, J. Frye, K. Honda, S. Kitagawa, K. Deguchi, J. Phys. Chem. Solids1996, 57, 1609–1614.10.1016/0022-3697(96)00050-9Search in Google Scholar
[24] M. Machida, H. Itho, N. Koyano, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.2003, 72, 2533–2538.10.1143/JPSJ.72.2533Search in Google Scholar
[25] M. Scholten, R. Dronskowski, T. Staffel, G. Meyer, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.1998, 624, 1741–1745.10.1002/(SICI)1521-3749(1998110)624:11<1741::AID-ZAAC1741>3.0.CO;2-WSearch in Google Scholar
[26] F. S. Nielsen, P. Lee, P. Coppens, Acta Crystallogr.1986, B42, 359–364.10.1107/S0108768186098099Search in Google Scholar
[27] A. Sequeira, R. Chidambaram, Acta Crystallogr.1966, 20, 910–914.10.1107/S0365110X66002044Search in Google Scholar
[28] C. M. Kareis, S. H. Lapidus, J.-H. Her, P. W. Stephens, J. S. Miller, J. Am. Chem. Soc.2012, 134, 2246–2254.10.1021/ja209799ySearch in Google Scholar
[29] J.-H. Her, P. W. Stephens, C. M. Kareis, J. G. Moore, K. S. Min, J.-W. Park, G. Bali, B. S. Kennon, J. S. Miller, Inorg. Chem.2010, 49, 1524–1534.10.1021/ic901903fSearch in Google Scholar
[30] H. Ott, H. Seyfarth, Z. Kristallogr.1928, 67, 430–433.10.1524/zkri.1928.67.1.430Search in Google Scholar
[31] R. P. Sharma, R. Bala, L. Pretto, V. Ferretti, Y. Du, J. Yu, J. Mol. Struct.2007, 842, 6–11.10.1016/j.molstruc.2006.12.003Search in Google Scholar
[32] H. C. Freeman, G. Robinson, J. Chem. Soc.1965, 3194–3200.10.1039/jr9650003194Search in Google Scholar
[33] S. S. Rudel, F. Kraus, Dalton Trans.2017, 46, 5835–5842.10.1039/C7DT00726DSearch in Google Scholar
[34] X-Area, STOE & Cie GmbH, Darmstadt (Germany) 2018.Search in Google Scholar
[35] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.2015, A71, 3–8.Search in Google Scholar
[36] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.2015, C71, 3–8.Search in Google Scholar
©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston