Skip to content
Publicly Available Published by De Gruyter December 10, 2019

A hexaniobate expanded by six [Hg(cyclam)]2+ complexes via Hg–O bonds yields a positively charged polyoxoniobate cluster

  • Philipp Müscher-Polzin , Christian Näther and Wolfgang Bensch EMAIL logo

Abstract

The room temperature reaction of Hg(NO3)2 · H2O, cyclam (cyclam = 1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane) and K8{Nb6O19} · 16 H2O in a mixture of H2O and DMSO led to crystallization of the novel compound {[Hg(cyclam)]6Nb6O19}(NO3)4 · 14 H2O, which is the first mercury containing polyoxoniobate. The structure consists of a {Nb6O19}8− cluster core which is expanded by six [Hg(cyclam)]2+ complexes via Hg–μ2-O–Nb bond formation. The title compound contains a positively charged polyoxoniobate cluster. The crystal water molecules form small aggregates by O–H · · · O hydrogen bonding which are joined into larger aggregates by N–O · · · H–O hydrogen bonding integrating the nitrate anions.

1 Introduction

Polyoxometalates (POMs) of group 5 and group 6 cations are intensively investigated due to their pronounced structural variety, partially unusual properties and potential applications in several scientific and technological areas [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Polyoxoniobates (PONbs) are a sub-class of POMs featuring mainly the Lindqvist {Nb6O19} [12], [13], [14], [15] or Keggin clusters {XNb12O40} (X=Si, Ge) [16], [17], [18], [19]. Using K8{Nb6O19}·16 H2O and K7{HNb6O19}·13 H2O [12], [20] as precursors large PONb clusters were prepared, like, e.g. {Nb12O40} [21], [22], {Nb16O56} [23], {Nb18O54} [19], [24], {Nb24O72} [25], [26], {Nb27O76} [27], {Nb31O93(CO3)} [27], {Nb32O96} [26], {Nb52O150} [28], {Nb114O316} [28] and {Nb288O768(OH)48(CO3)12} [29]. In addition, the PONbs could be chemically modified as observed in [Cu(en)2]2{[Cu(bipy)][Cu(bipy)(H2O)]Nb6O19}·9 H2O [30] (bipy=2,2′-bipyridine), K10[(Nb6O19)Cr(H2O)2]2·28 H2O [31], K5[H2AgNb6O19]·11 H2O [32], K5[Cu(H2O)2(cyclam)]1.5{[Cu-(cyclam)][Cu(H2O)(cyclam)]2HSiNb18O54}(NO3)·30 H2O [33], {[Ni(cyclam)]4 [Ti2Nb9O28]}n·~28n H2O [34] or [Cu(cyclam)(H2O)]{[Cu(cyclam)]2[HTiNb9O28]}·26 H2O [35].

To further chemically modify PONb clusters, transition metal complexes offering free binding sites are attractive components offering functionalities for bond formation to oxygen atoms of the cluster anion. Hence, we hypothesized that complexes with the cyclam ligand are suitable candidates because the axial positions are either unoccupied or often contain labile ligands, that can easily be replaced by other ligands. In a preliminary study we selected [Hg(cyclam)]2+ considering its large stability constant (log β=23.0) [36]. Reacting Hg(NO3)2·H2O, cyclam and K8{Nb6O19}·16 H2O in a H2O-DMSO mixed solvent afforded crystallization of {[Hg(cyclam)]6Nb6O19}(NO3)4·14 H2O which consists of a rarely encountered positively charged PONb cluster. Here we report the synthesis and crystal structure of this compound.

2 Results and discussion

The compound {[Hg(cyclam)]6Nb6O19}(NO3)4·14 H2O crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1̅ with all atoms except one O atom located on a general position. The unique Nb5+ cations are surrounded by six O2− anions to form NbO6 octahedra, which share common edges yielding the well-known Lindqvist cluster anion (Fig. 1). Three types of Nb–O bonds can be distinguished: terminal Nb=Ot bonds between 1.755(6) and 1.779(7) Å, Nb–μ2-O bridging bonds from 1.953(6) to 2.039(6) Å and Nb–μ6-O bridging bonds ranging from 2.3686(8) to 2.3835(7) Å (Table S1; Supporting information available online). The bond valence sum analysis confirms an oxidation state 5+ with values between 5.01 and 5.09 (average: 5.06) for the niobium atom (Table S2). The three crystallographically independent Hg2+ cations are pentacoordinated by four N atoms of the cyclam ligand and one μ2-O atom of the heptaniobate anion (Fig. 2). The resulting polyhedra are severely distorted rectangular pyramids with the Hg2+ cations residing above the plane formed by the four N atoms of the cyclam ligand. This distortion is not unexpected, since the optimal ionic radius to coordinate a cation in a square-planar fashion for this ligand lies between 0.65 and 0.7 Å, which is exceeded by Hg2+ (rHg2+ for CN=4: 1.10 Å) [37], [38].

Fig. 1: View of the crystal structure of the cluster {[Hg(cyclam)]6Nb6O19}4+. H atoms are not shown for clarity.
Fig. 1:

View of the crystal structure of the cluster {[Hg(cyclam)]6Nb6O19}4+. H atoms are not shown for clarity.

Fig. 2: Coordination environments of the niobium and mercury atoms; the Hg–O bond lengths of the peripheral complex units are given; hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity and only selected atoms are labelled.
Fig. 2:

Coordination environments of the niobium and mercury atoms; the Hg–O bond lengths of the peripheral complex units are given; hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity and only selected atoms are labelled.

The Hg–N bonds range from 2.294(8) to 2.391(9) Å with corresponding N–Hg–N cis-angles between 77.2(3) and 95.3(3)° and N–Hg–N trans-angles ranging from 126.8(3) to 155.5(3)° (Table S3) matching the values for other [Hg(cyclam)]2+ complexes [38], [39]. The Hg–O bond lengths are between 2.235(6) and 2.259(6) Å (Table S3). The corresponding N–Hg–O angles are between 98.6(3) and 131.4(3)° (Table S3).

Using the minimal bonding ellipsoid approach [40] the calculated volumes of the polyhedra are 52.07 Å3 (Hg1), 50.56 Å3 (Hg2), and 50.61 Å3 (Hg3). The shape parameter S indicating deviations from a sphere are 0.006 (Hg1), 0.078 (Hg2), and 0.027 (Hg3). According to these values all polyhedra are axially stretched, which is most pronounced for the polyhedron containing Hg2. The {Nb6O19}8− anion is expanded by the six Hg2+ centred complexes yielding a {[Hg(cyclam)]6Nb6O19}4+ moiety (Figs. 1 and 2). The positive charge is compensated by NO3 anions. The {[Hg(cyclam)]6Nb6O19}4+ molecules are arranged in a layer like fashion with the stacking sequence ···ABAB··· (Fig. 3, top).

Fig. 3: Top: Crystal structure of the title compound as viewed along the crystallographic c axis. Bottom: Hydrogen bonding network with labelling of selected atoms. Intermolecular N–H···O and O–H···O hydrogen bonding shown as black and intermolecular O···O distances as red dashed lines. Please note that not all O–H hydrogen atoms were located. Symmetry code for the generation of equivalent atoms: *−x, −y+1, −z+1.
Fig. 3:

Top: Crystal structure of the title compound as viewed along the crystallographic c axis. Bottom: Hydrogen bonding network with labelling of selected atoms. Intermolecular N–H···O and O–H···O hydrogen bonding shown as black and intermolecular O···O distances as red dashed lines. Please note that not all O–H hydrogen atoms were located. Symmetry code for the generation of equivalent atoms: *−x, −y+1, −z+1.

The clusters are linked to the water molecules by intermolecular N–H···O hydrogen bonds between the amino hydrogen atoms of the cyclam ligands and the water oxygen atoms that act as acceptors (Fig. 3: bottom and Table S4). These H2O molecules are further connected via additional water molecules to the NO3 anions by intermolecular N–O···H–O hydrogen bonding (Fig. 3: bottom). The O–H···O angles are close to linearity indicative for strong interactions (Table S4). For some of the water molecules not all hydrogen atoms could be located but if O···O distances below 3.04 Å are considered (Table S5), water clusters can be identified that can be described as D6 according to the nomenclature given in Refs. [41], [42], [43]. There are additional intermolecular C–H···O interactions between C–H hydrogen atoms and water molecules but also intramolecular C–H···O and C–H···N hydrogen bonds within the clusters that might stabilize the structure (Table S4).

3 Experimental section

3.1 Single crystal structure determination

Data collection was performed using an IPDS-2 diffractometer from STOE & Cie using Mo radiation. The data was corrected for absorption. The structure was solved with Shelxt [44] and refinement was carried out with Shelxl-2018 [45]. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. The carbon-bound H atoms were positioned with idealized geometry and were refined isotropically with Uiso(H)=1.2 Ueq(C) using a riding model. Some of the oxygen-bound H atoms were located in difference maps, their bond lengths set to ideal values and finally refined isotropically with Uiso(H)=1.5 Ueq(O) using a riding model. The oxygen-bound H atoms that could not be located were considered in the calculation of the formula and the molecular weight. Selected crystal data and details of the structure refinement can be found in Table S6.

CCDC 1960903 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

3.2 Synthesis

For the syntheses all chemicals were used as purchased without further purification (Nb2O5·x H2O: H. C. Starck; Hg(NO3)2·H2O: Fluka, >97%; cyclam: Acros organics, 98%; KOH: Grüssing, 85%; dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO): Grüssing, 99%). The precursor K8{Nb6O19}·16 H2O was synthesized by adding 13.3 g Nb2O5 slowly to a melt of 26 g KOH in a nickel crucible. After heating for 30 min the mixture was dissolved in 100 mL of water, filtered off and the volume of the filtrate was reduced to 50 mL. This solution was stored at 4°C and within 1 day colourless crystals of K8{Nb6O19}·16 H2O were obtained. For the preparation of the title compound, 6.1 mg cyclam and 10.3 mg Hg(NO3)2·H2O (0.03 mmol) were dissolved in a mixture of 0.1 mL DMSO and 1.9 mL H2O in a 5 mL snap-cap vial. 13.7 mg K8{Nb6O19}·16 H2O (0.009 mmol) were dissolved in 1 mL H2O and added to the first solution. After shaking the mixture the pH value was 11.1. The cap was perforated allowing slow evaporation of the solvents. After a few weeks colourless crystals were obtained in a low yield of about 6% based on Nb. The crystals were filtered, washed with EtOH and dried.


Dedicated to: Professor Dr. h.c. mult. Arndt Simon on the occasion of his 80th birthday.


References

[1] M. T. Pope, A. Müller, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.1991, 30, 34–48.10.1002/anie.199100341Search in Google Scholar

[2] K. Y. Monakhov, W. Bensch, P. Kögerler, Chem. Soc. Rev.2015, 44, 8443–8483.10.1039/C5CS00531KSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] D.-L. Long, R. Tsunashima, L. Cronin, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2010, 49, 1736–1758.10.1002/anie.200902483Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] C. Streb, Dalton Trans.2012, 41, 1651–1659.10.1039/C1DT11220ASearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] A. Bijelic, M. Aureliano, A. Rompel, Chem. Commun.2018, 54, 1153–1169.10.1039/C7CC07549ASearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[6] M. Nyman, Dalton Trans.2011, 40, 8049–8058.10.1039/c1dt10435gSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] M. Ammam, J. Mater. Chem. A2013, 1, 6291.10.1039/c3ta01663cSearch in Google Scholar

[8] N. I. Gumerova, A. Rompel, Nat. Rev. Chem.2018, 2, 4893.Search in Google Scholar

[9] A. Wutkowski, C. Näther, P. Kögerler, W. Bensch, Inorg. Chem.2013, 52, 3280–3284.10.1021/ic302788wSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] U. Warzok, L. K. Mahnke, W. Bensch, Chem. Eur. J.2019, 25, 1405–1419.10.1002/chem.201803291Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] L. K. Mahnke, A. Kondinski, U. Warzok, C. Näther, J. van Leusen, C. A. Schalley, K. Y. Monakhov, P. Kögerler, W. Bensch, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2018, 57, 2972–2975.10.1002/anie.201712417Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] M. Nyman, T. M. Alam, F. Bonhomme, M. A. Rodriguez, C. S. Frazer, M. E. Welk, J. Clust. Sci.2006, 17, 197–219.10.1007/s10876-006-0049-xSearch in Google Scholar

[13] T. Ozeki, T. Yamase, H. Naruke, Y. Sasaki, Inorg. Chem.1994, 33, 409–410.10.1021/ic00081a004Search in Google Scholar

[14] T. M. Anderson, S. G. Thoma, F. Bonhomme, M. A. Rodriguez, H. Park, J. B. Parise, T. M. Alam, J. P. Larentzos, M. Nyman, Cryst. Growth Des.2007, 7, 719–723.10.1021/cg0606904Search in Google Scholar

[15] T. M. Alam, M. Nyman, B. R. Cherry, J. M. Segall, L. E. Lybarger, J. Am. Chem. Soc.2004, 126, 5610–5620.10.1021/ja0398159Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] M. Nyman, F. Bonhomme, T. M. Alam, J. B. Parise, G. M. B. Vaughan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2004, 43, 2787–2792.10.1002/anie.200353410Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] F. Bonhomme, J. P. Larentzos, T. M. Alam, E. J. Maginn, M. Nyman, Inorg. Chem.2005, 44, 1774–1785.10.1021/ic048847+Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] M. Nyman, F. Bonhomme, T. M. Alam, M. A. Rodriguez, B. R. Cherry, J. L. Krumhansl, T. M. Nenoff, A. M. Sattler, Science2002, 297, 996–998.10.1126/science.1073979Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Y. Hou, M. Nyman, M. A. Rodriguez, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2011, 50, 12514–12517.10.1002/anie.201104478Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] M. Filowitz, R. K. C. Ho, W. G. Klemperer, W. Shum, Inorg. Chem.1979, 18, 93–103.10.1021/ic50191a021Search in Google Scholar

[21] G. Guo, Y. Xu, J. Cao, C. Hu, Chem. Commun.2011, 47, 9411–9413.10.1039/c1cc12329gSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] P. A. Abramov, M. N. Sokolov, J. Struct. Chem.2017, 58, 1411–1417.10.1134/S0022476617070198Search in Google Scholar

[23] P. A. Abramov, A. T. Davletgildeeva, M. N. Sokolov, J. Clust. Sci.2017, 28, 735–744.10.1007/s10876-016-1121-9Search in Google Scholar

[24] Y. Hou, T. M. Alam, M. A. Rodriguez, M. Nyman, Chem. Commun.2012, 48, 6004–6006.10.1039/c2cc31284kSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Z.-L. Wang, H.-Q. Tan, W.-L. Chen, Y.-G. Li, E.-B. Wang, Dalton Trans.2012, 41, 9817–9831.10.1039/c2dt30637aSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] P. Huang, C. Qin, Z.-M. Su, Y. Xing, X.-L. Wang, K.-Z. Shao, Y.-Q. Lan, E.-B. Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc.2012, 134, 14004–14010.10.1021/ja303723uSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] R. Tsunashima, D.-L. Long, H. N. Miras, D. Gabb, C. P. Pradeep, L. Cronin, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2010, 49, 113–116.10.1002/anie.200903970Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] L. Jin, Z.-K. Zhu, Y.-L. Wu, Y.-J. Qi, X.-X. Li, S.-T. Zheng, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2017, 56, 16288–16292.10.1002/anie.201709565Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] Y.-L. Wu, X.-X. Li, Y.-J. Qi, H. Yu, L. Jin, S.-T. Zheng, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2018, 57, 8572–8576.10.1002/anie.201804088Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] J. Niu, X. Fu, J. Zhao, S. Li, P. Ma, J. Wang, Cryst. Growth Des.2010, 10, 3110–3119.10.1021/cg100236cSearch in Google Scholar

[31] Z. Liang, D. Zhang, Q. Liu, P. Ma, J. Niu, J. Wang, Inorg. Chem. Commun.2015, 54, 19–20.10.1016/j.inoche.2015.01.033Search in Google Scholar

[32] H. Wang, Z. Liang, Q. Liu, D. Zhang, J. Wang, Inorg. Chem. Commun.2015, 61, 157–159.10.1016/j.inoche.2015.09.010Search in Google Scholar

[33] J. Dopta, D.-C. Krause, C. Näther, W. Bensch, Cryst. Growth Des.2018, 18, 4130–4139.10.1021/acs.cgd.8b00548Search in Google Scholar

[34] J. Dopta, S. Grzanna, C. Näther, W. Bensch, Dalton Trans.2018, 47, 15103–15113.10.1039/C8DT02835DSearch in Google Scholar

[35] J. Dopta, A.-L. Hansen, N. Pienack, L. K. Mahnke, H. Reinsch, M. Etter, C. Näther, W. Bensch, Cryst. Growth Des.2019, 19, 5743–5750.10.1021/acs.cgd.9b00727Search in Google Scholar

[36] M. Kodama, E. Kimura, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans.1976, 2335–2338.10.1039/dt9760002335Search in Google Scholar

[37] R. D. Shannon, Acta Crystallogr.1976, A32, 751–767.10.1107/S0567739476001551Search in Google Scholar

[38] N. W. Alcock, E. H. Curson, N. Herron, P. Moore, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.1979, 1987–1993.10.1039/dt9790001987Search in Google Scholar

[39] M. R. Burke, M. F. Richardson, Inorg. Chim. Acta1983, 69, 29–35.10.1016/S0020-1693(00)83548-3Search in Google Scholar

[40] J. Cumby, J. P. Attfield, Nat. Commun.2017, 8, 14235.10.1038/ncomms14235Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[41] L. Infantes, S. Motherwell, CrystEngComm2002, 4, 454.10.1039/b204934aSearch in Google Scholar

[42] L. Infantes, J. Chisholm, S. Motherwell, CrystEngComm2003, 5, 480.10.1039/b312846fSearch in Google Scholar

[43] L. Infantes, L. Fábián, W. D. S. Motherwell, CrystEngComm2007, 9, 65–71.10.1039/B612529HSearch in Google Scholar

[44] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.2015, A71, 3–8.Search in Google Scholar

[45] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.2015, C71, 3–8.Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/znb-2019-0171).


Received: 2019-10-28
Accepted: 2019-11-19
Published Online: 2019-12-10
Published in Print: 2020-02-25

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 1.12.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2019-0171/html
Scroll to top button