Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter March 26, 2016

Some rape/canola seed oils: fatty acid composition and tocopherols

  • Bertrand Matthaus , Mehmet Musa Özcan EMAIL logo and Fahad Al Juhaimi


Seed samples of some rape and canola cultivars were analysed for oil content, fatty acid and tocopherol profiles. Gas liquid chromotography and high performance liquid chromotography were used for fatty acid and tocopherol analysis, respectively. The oil contents of rape and canola seeds varied between 30.6% and 48.3% of the dry weight (p<0.05). The oil contents of rapeseeds were found to be high compared with canola seed oils. The main fatty acids in the oils are oleic (56.80–64.92%), linoleic (17.11–20.92%) and palmitic (4.18–5.01%) acids. A few types of tocopherols were found in rape and canola oils in various amounts: α-tocopherol, γ-tocopherol, δ-tocopherol, β-tocopherol and α-tocotrienol. The major tocopherol in the seed oils of rape and canola cultivars were α-tocopherol (13.22–40.01%) and γ-tocopherol (33.64–51.53%) accompanied by α-T3 (0.0–1.34%) and δ-tocopherol (0.25–1.86%) (p<0.05). As a result, the present study shows that oil, fatty acid and tocopherol contents differ significantly among the cultivars.

Corresponding author: Mehmet Musa Özcan, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Food Engineering, University of Selcuk, 42031 Konya, Turkey, Phone: +90 332 2232933, Fax: +90 332 2410108, E-mail:


This work was supported by DAAD (Germany). We are grateful to Dr J. Fiebig (Head of Institute). The authors also thank to Mrs E. Claudia and Miss E. Uda for skilful technical assistance with the GLC and HPLC.


1. Przybylski R, Mag T. Canola/rapeseed oil. In: Gunstone FD, editor. Vegetable oils in food technology: composition, properties and uses, CRC Press, 2002:99–127.Search in Google Scholar

2. Iqbal M, Akhtar N, Zafar S, Ali I. Genotypic responses for yield and seed oil quality of two Brassica species under semi-arid environmental conditions. S Afr J Bot 2008;74:567–71.10.1016/j.sajb.2008.02.003Search in Google Scholar

3. Gül MK, Egesel CÖ, Kahriman F, Tayyar Ş. Investigation of some seed quality components in winter rapeseed grown in Çanakkale Province. Akdeniz Univ Agric Fac J 2007;20:87–92.Search in Google Scholar

4. Matthaus B, Brühl L, Amoneit F. The DGF Rapeseed Oil Award – A tool to improve the quality of virgin edible rapeseed oil. Lipid Technol 2008; 20:31–4.10.1002/lite.200800003Search in Google Scholar

5. Mikolajczak KL, Miwa TK, Earle FR, Wolff IA. Search for new industrial oils. V. Oils of Cruciferae. J Am Oil Chem Soc 1961;38:678–81.10.1007/BF02633053Search in Google Scholar

6. Diepenbrock W. Yield analyses of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.): a review. Field Crops Res 2000;67:35–49.10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00082-4Search in Google Scholar

7. Appelqvist LA. Lipids in Cruciferae: VIII. The fatty acid composition of seeds of some wild or partially domesticated species. J Am Oil Chem Soc 1971;48:740–4.10.1007/BF02638533Search in Google Scholar

8. Anonymous. Available at: 2009.Search in Google Scholar

9. Kumar PR, Tsunoda S. Fatty acid spectrum of mediterranean wild cruciferae. J Am Oil Chem Soc 1978;55:320–3.10.1007/BF02669920Search in Google Scholar

10. International Standard ISO 659:1998 – Oilseeds – Determination of hexane extract (or light petroleum extract), called “oil content”. Geneva: ISO, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

11. International Standard ISO 5509:2000 – Animal and vegetable fats and oils – Preparation of methyl esters of fatty acids. Geneva: ISO, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

12. Balz M, Schulte E, Their HP. Trennung von tocopherolen und tocotrienolen durch HPLC. Fat Sci Tehnol 1992;94: 209–13.10.1002/lipi.19920940604Search in Google Scholar

13. Püskülcü H, İkiz F. Introduction to Statistic. Bilgehan Press. p333. Bornova. İzmir, Turkey, 1989. (in Turkish).Search in Google Scholar

14. Tsevegsuren N, Verhe R, Verleyen T, Munkhjargal B. Lipid composition of some rapeseed cultivars from Mongolia. J Oleo Sci 2001;50:19–23.10.5650/jos.50.781Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-1-6
Revised: 2016-2-10
Accepted: 2016-3-6
Published Online: 2016-3-26
Published in Print: 2016-3-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 8.12.2023 from
Scroll to top button