Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published online by De Gruyter October 15, 2021

A comprehensive review on the development of probiotic supplemented confectioneries

Eylül Şenöztop, Tuğçe Dokuzlu and Mine Güngörmüşler ORCID logo

Abstract

Probiotics are living organisms that have beneficial effects on host by regulating the microbial balance of the intestinal system. While probiotics are naturally found in yogurt and other fermented foods, they can also be added to many products. Although mostly in dairy products, it is possible to see examples of food products supplemented by probiotics in bakeries, chocolates and confectioneries. Nowadays, the COVID-19 pandemic that the world suffers increased the demand for such functional food products including probiotics. Due to probiotics having potential effects on strengthening the immune system, confectioneries supplemented by probiotics were comprehensively discussed in this review together with the suggestion of a novel gelly composition. The suggested formulation of the product is a gel-like snack contains natural ingredients such as carrot, lemon juice and sugar provided from apples. This research review article provided a guide together with the recommendations for potential probiotic research in candy and confectionery industry.


Corresponding author: Mine Güngörmüşler, Department of Genetics and Bioengineering, Izmir University of Economics, Sakarya Caddesi No: 156, 35330 Balçova, Izmir, Turkey, E-mail:

Funding source: Izmir University of Economics Scientific Research Projects Unit (IEUBAP)

Award Identifier / Grant number: BAP-2021-01

Acknowledgments

Eylül Şenöztop, Tuğçe Dokuzlu, and Mine Güngörmüşler gratefully acknowledge Food Engineer Eylül Naz Aktaş for assistance with the sensory analysis.

  1. Author contributions: Eylül Şenöztop: Investigation, Experimentation, Writing – Original draft preparation. Tuğçe Dokuzlu: Investigation, Experimentation, Writing – Original draft preparation. Mine Güngörmüşler: Project administration, Writing – Reviewing and Editing, Supervision.

  2. Research funding: This research was supported by Izmir University of Economics Scientific Research Projects Unit (IEUBAP) with BAP-2021-01 project number.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: Eylül Şenöztop, Tuğçe Dokuzlu, and Mine Güngörmüşler declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: The questionnaire and methodology for this study was approved by the Science and Engineering Research Ethics committee of Izmir University of Economics (Ethics approval number: B.30.2.IEOFMB.0.05.05-020-040).

  6. Availability of data and material: Please contact the corresponding author for data requests.

References

1. Huys, G, Botteldoorn, N, Delvigne, F, De Vuyst, L, Heyndrickx, M, Pot, B, et al.. Microbial characterization of probiotics-advisory report of the working group “8651 probiotics” of the Belgian Superior Health Council (SHC). Mol Nutr Food Res 2013;57:1479–504. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201300065.Search in Google Scholar

2. Coman, MM, Silvi, S, Verdenelli, MC, Cecchini, C, Orpianesi, C, Cresci, A. Fruit and vegetable juices tested as possible probiotic beverage. Biology 2010:28–31.Search in Google Scholar

3. Lehtoranta, L, Pitkäranta, A, Korpela, R. Probiotics in respiratory virus infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2014;33:1289–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-014-2086-y.Search in Google Scholar

4. Dekker, DJ. Probiotics, immunity & coronavirus (COVID-19); 2020. Available from: [Retrieved 8 Jun 2020].Search in Google Scholar

5. Kechagia, M, Basoulis, D, Konstantopoulou, S, Dimitriadi, D, Gyftopoulou, K, Skarmoutsou, N, et al.. Health benefits of probiotics: a review. Hindaw 2013;481651:1–7.Search in Google Scholar

6. Özbaş, ZY. Bifidobacter’ler ve Lactobacillus acidophilus: Özellikleri, Diyetetik Amaçlar İçin Kullanımları, Yararlı Etkileri ve Ürün Uygulamaları. Gıda 1993;18. Available from: .Search in Google Scholar

7. Barache, N, Ladjouzi, R, Belguesmia, Y, Bendali, F, Drider, D. Abundance of Lactobacillus plantarum strains with beneficial attributes in blackberries (Rubus sp.), fresh figs (Ficus carica), and prickly pears (Opuntia ficus-indica) grown and harvested in Algeria. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 2020;12:1514–23.Search in Google Scholar

8. Roobab, U, Batool, Z, Manzoor, MF, Shabbir, MA, Khan, MR, Aadil, RM. Sources, formulations, advanced delivery and health benefits of probiotics. Curr Opin Food Sci 2020;32:17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2020.01.003.Search in Google Scholar

9. Lebeer, S, Verhoeven, TLA, Vélez, MP, Vanderleyden, J, De Keersmaecker, SCJ. Impact of environmental and genetic factors on biofilm formation by the probiotic strain Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007;73:6768–75. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01393-07.Search in Google Scholar

10. Das, JK, Mishra, D, Ray, P, Tripathy, P, Beuria, TK, Singh, N, et al.. In vitro evaluation of anti-infective activity of a Lactobacillus plantarum strain against Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. Gut Pathog 2013;5:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-4749-5-11.Search in Google Scholar

11. Salva, S, Nuñez, M, Villena, J, Ramón, A, Font, G, Alvarez, S. Development of a fermented goats’ milk containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus: in vivo study of health benefits. J Sci Food Agric 2011;91:2355–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4467.Search in Google Scholar

12. Le, B, Yang, SH. Efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum in prevention of inflammatory bowel disease. Toxicol Rep 2018;5:314–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2018.02.007.Search in Google Scholar

13. Naruszewicz, M, Johansson, ML, Zapolska-Downar, D, Bukowska, H. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum 299v on cardiovascular disease risk factors in smokers. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;76:1249–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/76.6.1249.Search in Google Scholar

14. Patel, AR. Probiotic fruit and vegetable juices-recent advances and future perspective. Int Food Res J 2017;24.Search in Google Scholar

15. Granato, D, Branco, GF, Nazzaro, F, Cruz, AG, Faria, JAF. Functional foods and nondairy probiotic food development: trends, concepts, and products. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2010;9:292–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00110.x.Search in Google Scholar

16. Şengün, İY, Kutlu, C. Pastacılık Ürünlerinde Probiyotiklerin Kullanım Potansiyeli. Akademik Gıda 2019;17:291–9. https://doi.org/10.24323/akademik-gida.613644.Search in Google Scholar

17. King, S, Glanville, J, Sanders, ME, Fitzgerald, A, Varley, D. Effectiveness of probiotics on the duration of illness in healthy children and adults who develop common acute respiratory infectious conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr 2014;112:41–54.Search in Google Scholar

18. Mak, JWY, Chan, FKL, Ng, SC. Probiotics and COVID-19: one size does not fit all. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;5:644–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30122-9.Search in Google Scholar

19. Jayawardena, R, Sooriyaarachchi, P, Chourdakis, M, Jeewandara, C, Ranasinghe, P. Enhancing immunity in viral infections, with special emphasis on COVID-19: a review. Diabetes Metab Syndr: Clin Res Rev 2020;14:367–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.015.Search in Google Scholar

20. Markowiak, P, Ślizewska, K. Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on human health. Nutrients 2017;9. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9091021.Search in Google Scholar

21. Care Bears Probiotic Gummy Vitamin; 2020. Available from: [Retrieved 12 Jun 2020].Search in Google Scholar

22. Jamieson Vitamins; 2020. Available from: [Retrieved 12 Jun 2020].Search in Google Scholar

23. Immu Up Jelly; 2020. Available from: [Retrieved 18 Jul 2020].Search in Google Scholar

24. Özçiçek, CD, Giray, FH, Şahin, A. Raflardaki Yeni Ürün Fonksiyonel Gıdalar ve Getirdikleri. Konya: Ulusal Tarım Ekonomisi Kongresi; 2012:948–55 pp.Search in Google Scholar

25. Laleli, Ş. Fortune Turkey; 2020. Available from: [Retrieved 16 Jul 2020].Search in Google Scholar

26. Cebeci Perker, B, Yalçın, E. Yeni ürünün pazara sunulmasinda Markanın ve probiyotik yoğurt oazarı üzerine bir uygulama. Izmir, Turkey: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi; 2011:243–59 pp.Search in Google Scholar

27. Özden, PDA. Probiyotik Sağlıklı Yaşam İçin Yararlı Dost Bakteriler. Nobel Kitabevi; 2010. Available from: [Retrieved 16 Jul 2020].Search in Google Scholar

28. Saad, N, Delattre, C, Urdaci, M, Schmitter, JM, Bressollier, P. An overview of the last advances in probiotic and prebiotic field. LWT – Food Sci Technol (Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft -Technol) 2013;50:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2012.05.014.Search in Google Scholar

29. Burgain, J, Gaiani, C, Linder, M, Scher, J. Encapsulation of probiotic living cells: from laboratory scale to industrial applications. J Food Eng 2011;104:467–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.12.031.Search in Google Scholar

30. Côté, J, Dion, J, Burguière, P, Casavant, L, Van Eijk, J. Probiotics in bread and baked products: a new product category. Cereal Foods World 2013;58:293–6. https://doi.org/10.1094/CFW-58-6-0293.Search in Google Scholar

31. Lavermicocca, P, Valerio, F, De Bellis, P, Sisto, A, Leguérinel, I. Sporeforming bacteria associated with bread production: spoilage and toxigenic potential. In: Food hygiene and toxicology in ready-to-eat foods. United States: Academic Press; 2016:275–93 pp.Search in Google Scholar

32. Farmiloe, FJ, Cornford, SJ, Coppock, JBM, Ingram, M. The survival of Bacillus subtilis spores in the baking of bread. J Sci Food Agric 1954;5:292–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740050608.Search in Google Scholar

33. Soukoulis, C, Yonekura, L, Gan, HH, Behboudi-Jobbehdar, S, Parmenter, C, Fisk, I. Probiotic edible films as a new strategy for developing functional bakery products: the case of pan bread. Food Hydrocolloids 2014;39:231–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.01.023.Search in Google Scholar

34. Mission Foods; 2020. Available from: [Retrieved 12 Jun 2020].Search in Google Scholar

35. Fine Japan: Bifidobacteria Jelly; 2020. Available from: [Retrieved 12 Jun 12 2020].Search in Google Scholar

36. Olly; 2020. Available from: [Retrieved 12 Jun 2020].Search in Google Scholar

37. Vitamins, Minerals & Supplements|Nature Made®; 2002. Available from: [Retrieved 11 Jun 2020].Search in Google Scholar

38. Probiotic Gummies Belive; 2020. Available from: [Retrieved 12 Jun 2020].Search in Google Scholar

39. Chewy Vites Adult Probiotics; 2020. Available from: [Retrieved 18 Jul 2020].Search in Google Scholar

40. Güneş, R, Palabıyık, İ, Kurultay, Ş. Şekerleme teknolojisinde fonksiyonel ürün üretimi. Gıda 2018;43:984–1001.Search in Google Scholar

41. Jha, M. Modern technology of confectionery industries with formulae & processes, 2nd ed. India: Asia Pacific Business Press Inc; 2012.Search in Google Scholar

42. Hooper, L, Kay, C, Abdelhamid, A, Kroon, PA, Cohn, JS, Rimm, EB, et al.. Effects of chocolate, cocoa, and flavan-3-ols on cardiovascular health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am J Clin Nutr 2012;95:740–51. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.111.023457.Search in Google Scholar

43. Lahtinen, SJ, Ouwehand, AC, Salminen, SJ, Forssell, P, Myllärinen, P. Effect of starch- and lipid-based encapsulation on the culturability of two Bifidobacterium longum strains. Lett Appl Microbiol 2007;44:500–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02110.x.Search in Google Scholar

44. Yonejima, Y, Hisa, K, Kawaguchi, M, Ashitani, H, Koyama, T, Usamikrank, Y, et al.. Lactic acid bacteria-containing chocolate as a practical probiotic product with increased acid tolerance. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 2015;4:773–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2015.09.001.Search in Google Scholar

45. Possemiers, S, Marzorati, M, Verstraete, W, Van de Wiele, T. Bacteria and chocolate: a successful combination for probiotic delivery. Int J Food Microbiol 2010;141:97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.03.008.Search in Google Scholar

46. Nature’s Way. Kids Smart Probiotic Chocolate Balls 50s; 2017. Available from: : [Retrieved 8 Jun 2020].Search in Google Scholar

47. Ohso Chocolate; 2020. Available from: [Retrieved 16 Jul 2020].Search in Google Scholar

48. Gryph & Ivyrose; 2020. Available from: [Retrieved 16 Jul 2020].Search in Google Scholar

49. Bouchard Chocolate; 1931. Available from: [Retrieved 16 Jul 2020].Search in Google Scholar

50. Sakara; 2020. Available from: [Retrieved 16 Jul 2020].Search in Google Scholar

51. Nature’s Bounty; 2018. Available from: [Retrieved 16 Jul 2020].Search in Google Scholar

52. Talebzadeh, S, Sharifan, A. Developing probiotic jelly desserts with Lactobacillus acidophilus. J Food Process Preserv 2017;41:e13026. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.13026.Search in Google Scholar

53. Fareez, IM, Lim, SM, Zulkefli, NAA, Mishra, RK, Ramasamy, K. Cellulose derivatives enhanced stability of alginate-based beads loaded with Lactobacillus plantarum LAB12 against low pH, high temperature and prolonged storage. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 2018;10:543–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-017-9284-8.Search in Google Scholar

54. Branen, AL, Davidson, PM, Salminen, S, III, JHT, Davidson, PM, Salminen, S, et al.. Food additives, 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press Location; 2001.Search in Google Scholar

55. Ismail, BB, Yusuf, HL. Consumer concerns about the use of additives in processed foods. Int J Curr Res 2014. Available from: .Search in Google Scholar

56. Acidity Regulator Market. Global Industry Analysis; 2020. Available from: [Retrieved 16 Jul 2020].Search in Google Scholar

57. Glazing Agents and Edible Surface Coatings; 2016. Available from: [Retrieved 16 Jul 2020].Search in Google Scholar

58. Kamal, AA, Fawzia, SE-S. Toxicological and safety assessment of tartrazine as a synthetic food additive on health biomarkers: a review. Afr J Biotechnol 2018;17:139–49. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajb2017.16300.Search in Google Scholar

59. (EFSA), E. F. S. A. Scientific opinion on the re-evaluation of quinoline yellow (E 104) as a food additive. EFSA J 2009;7:1329. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1329.Search in Google Scholar

60. Park, W, Ruhul Amin, ARM, Chen, ZG, Shin, DM. New perspectives of curcumin in cancer prevention. Canc Prev Res 2013;6:387–400. https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-12-0410.Search in Google Scholar

61. Opinion, S. Scientific opinion on the re-evaluation of mixed carotenes (E 160a (i)) and beta-carotene (E 160a (ii)) as a food additive. EFSA J 2012;10:1–67. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2593.Search in Google Scholar

62. Vieira Teixeira da Silva, D, dos Santos Baião, D, de Oliveira Silva, F, Alves, G, Perrone, D, Mere Del Aguila, E, et al.. Betanin, a natural food additive: stability, bioavailability, antioxidant and preservative ability assessments. Molecules 2019;24:458. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24030458.Search in Google Scholar

63. Carocho, M, Barreiro, MF, Morales, P, Ferreira, ICFR. Adding molecules to food, pros and cons: a review on synthetic and natural food additives. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2014;13:377–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12065.Search in Google Scholar

64. Younes, M, Aquilina, G, Castle, L, Engel, K, Fowler, P, Frutos Fernandez, MJ, et al.. Re‐evaluation of l(+)‐tartaric acid (E 334), sodium tartrates (E 335), potassium tartrates (E 336), potassium sodium tartrate (E 337) and calcium tartrate (E 354) as food additives. EFSA J 2020;18. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6030.Search in Google Scholar

65. Kanauchi, O, Andoh, A, AbuBakar, S, Yamamoto, N. Probiotics and paraprobiotics in viral infection: clinical application and effects on the innate and acquired immune systems. Curr Pharmaceut Des 2018;24. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612824666180116163411.Search in Google Scholar

66. Painter Frank, M. Probiotics effective against viral infections; 2001. Available from: [Retrieved 8 Jun 2020].Search in Google Scholar

67. Eguchi, K, Fujitani, N, Nakagawa, H, Miyazaki, T. Prevention of respiratory syncytial virus infection with probiotic lactic acid bacterium Lactobacillus gasseri SBT2055. Sci Rep 2019;9:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39602-7.Search in Google Scholar

68. Dong, E, Du, H, Gardner, L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect Dis 2020;20:533–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1.Search in Google Scholar

69. Eskici, G. Covid-19 Karantinası: Beslenme, Ağırlık Kontrolü ve Bağışıklığa Yönelik Öneriler Gündem: Karantinada Ramazan Ayı Beslenme Önerileri. Çanakkale, Türkiye: Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi, Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi; 2020.Search in Google Scholar

70. Farnworth, ER, Champagne, C. Production of probiotic cultures and their incorporation into foods. In: Bioactive foods in promoting health. Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States: Academic Press; 2010:3–17 pp.Search in Google Scholar

71. Balthazar, CF, Silva, HL, Esmerino, EA, Rocha, RS, Moraes, J, Carmo, MA, et al.. The addition of inulin and Lactobacillus casei 01 in sheep milk ice cream. Food Chem 2018;246:464–72.Search in Google Scholar

72. Önal Darilmaz, D, Sönmez, Ş, Beyatli, Y. The effects of inulin as a prebiotic supplement and the synbiotic interactions of probiotics to improve oxalate degrading activity. Int J Food Sci Technol 2019;54:121–31.Search in Google Scholar

73. Huang, S, Vignolles, ML, Chen, XD, Le Loir, Y, Jan, G, Schuck, P, et al.. Spray drying of probiotics and other food-grade bacteria: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 2017;63:1–17.Search in Google Scholar

74. Ferrando, V, Quiberoni, A, Reinhemer, J, Suárez, V. Resistance of functional Lactobacillus plantarum strains against food stress conditions. Food Microbiol 2015;48:63–71.Search in Google Scholar

75. Bustamante, M, Laurie-Martínez, L, Vergara, D, Campos-Vega, R, Rubilar, M, Shene, C. Effect of three polysaccharides (inulin, and mucilage from chia and flax seeds) on the survival of probiotic bacteria encapsulated by spray drying. Appl Sci 2020;10:4623.Search in Google Scholar

76. Perdana, J, Fox, MB, Siwei, C, Boom, RM, Schutyser, MA. Interactions between formulation and spray drying conditions related to survival of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Food Res Int 2014;56:9–17.Search in Google Scholar

77. Huang, S, Méjean, S, Rabah, H, Dolivet, A, Le Loir, Y, Chen, XD, et al.. Double use of concentrated sweet whey for growth and spray drying of probiotics: towards maximal viability in pilot scale spray dryer. J Food Eng 2017;196:11–7.Search in Google Scholar

78. Liu, H, Gong, J, Chabot, D, Miller, SS, Cui, SW, Ma, J, et al.. Protection of heat-sensitive probiotic bacteria during spray-drying by sodium caseinate stabilized fat particles. Food Hydrocolloids 2015;51:459–67.Search in Google Scholar

79. Barbosa, J, Borges, S, Teixeira, P. Effect of different conditions of growth and storage on the cell counts of two lactic acid bacteria after spray drying in orange juice. Beverages 2016;2:8.Search in Google Scholar

80. Ye, Q, Georges, N, Selomulya, C. Microencapsulation of active ingredients in functional foods: from research stage to commercial food products. Trends Food Sci Technol 2018;78:167–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.05.025.Search in Google Scholar

81. Rovinaru, C, Pasarin, D. Application of microencapsulated synbiotics in fruit-based beverages. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 2019;12:764–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-019-09579-w.Search in Google Scholar

82. Gandomi, H, Abbaszadeh, S, Misaghi, A, Bokaie, S, Noori, N. Effect of chitosan-alginate encapsulation with inulin on survival of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG during apple juice storage and under simulated gastrointestinal conditions. LWT – Food Sci Technol (Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft -Technol) 2016;69:365–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.01.064.Search in Google Scholar

83. Abbaszadeh, S, Gandomi, H, Misaghi, A, Bokaei, S, Noori, N. The effect of alginate and chitosan concentrations on some properties of chitosan‐coated alginate beads and survivability of encapsulated Lactobacillus rhamnosus in simulated gastrointestinal conditions and during heat processing. J Sci Food Agric 2014;94:2210–6.Search in Google Scholar

84. Afzaal, M, Saeed, F, Arshad, MU, Nadeem, MT, Saeed, M, Tufail, T. The effect of encapsulation on the stability of probiotic bacteria in ice cream and simulated gastrointestinal conditions. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 2019;11:1348–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-018-9485-9.Search in Google Scholar

85. Reale, A, Di Renzo, T, Rossi, F, Zotta, T, Iacumin, L, Preziuso, M, et al.. Tolerance of Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus paracasei and Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains to stress factors encountered in food processing and in the gastro-intestinal tract. LWT – Food Sci Technol 2015;60:721–8.Search in Google Scholar

86. Waśko, A, Polak-Berecka, M, Gustaw, W. Increased viability of probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus after osmotic stress. Acta Aliment 2013;42:520–8.Search in Google Scholar

87. Tripathi, MK, Giri, SK. Probiotic functional foods: survival of probiotics during processing and storage. J Funct Foods 2014;9:225–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2014.04.030.Search in Google Scholar

88. Dinkçi, N, Akdeniz, V, Akalin, AS. Survival of probiotics in functional foods during shelf life. In: Food quality and shelf life. Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States: Academic Press; 2019:201–33 pp.Search in Google Scholar

89. Călinoiu, LF, Vodnar, DC, Precup, G. The probiotic bacteria viability under different conditions. Bull UASVM Food Sci Technol 2016;73:55–60.Search in Google Scholar

90. Ballester-Costa, C, Sendra, E, Fernández-López, J, Viuda-Martos, M. Evaluation of the antibacterial and antioxidant activities of chitosan edible films incorporated with organic essential oils obtained from four Thymus species. J Food Sci Technol 2016;53:3374–9.Search in Google Scholar

91. Rouhi, M, Sohrabvandi, S, Mortazavian, AM. Probiotic fermented sausage: viability of probiotic microorganisms and sensory characteristics. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2013;53:331–48.Search in Google Scholar

92. Nematollahi, A, Sohrabvandi, S, Mortazavian, AM, Jazaeri, S. Viability of probiotic bacteria and some chemical and sensory characteristics in cornelian cherry juice during cold storage. Electron J Biotechnol 2016;21:49–53.Search in Google Scholar

93. Donaldson, GP, Lee, SM, Mazmanian, SK. Gut biogeography of the bacterial microbiota. Nat Rev Microbiol 2015;14:20–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3552.Search in Google Scholar

94. Yao, M, Xie, J, Du, H, McClements, DJ, Xiao, H, Li, L. Progress in microencapsulation of probiotics: a review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2020;19:857–74.Search in Google Scholar

95. Oberoi, K, Tolun, A, Sharma, K, Sharma, S. Microencapsulation: an overview for the survival of probiotic bacteria. J Microbiol Biotechnol Food Sci 2021;2021:280–7.Search in Google Scholar

96. Bamidele, OP, Emmambux, MN. Encapsulation of bioactive compounds by “extrusion” technologies: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2020;61:3100–18.Search in Google Scholar

97. Krasaekoopt, W, Bhandari, B, Deeth, H. Evaluation of encapsulation techniques of probiotics for yoghurt. Int Dairy J 2003;13:3–13.Search in Google Scholar

98. Zhao, M, Wang, Y, Huang, X, Gaenzle, M, Wu, Z, Nishinari, K, et al.. Ambient storage of microencapsulated Lactobacillus plantarum ST-III by complex coacervation of type-A gelatin and gum arabic. Food Funct 2018;9:1000–8.Search in Google Scholar

99. Ranadheera, RDCS, Baines, SK, Adams, MC. Importance of food in probiotic efficacy. Food Res Int 2010;43:1–7.Search in Google Scholar

100. do Espirito Santo, AP, Perego, P, Converti, A, Oliveira, MN. Influence of food matrices on probiotic viability – a review focusing on the fruity bases. Trends Food Sci Technol 2011;22:377–85.Search in Google Scholar

101. Buriti, FC, Freitas, SC, Egito, AS, dos Santos, KM. Effects of tropical fruit pulps and partially hydrolysed galactomannan from Caesalpinia pulcherrima seeds on the dietary fibre content, probiotic viability, texture and sensory features of goat dairy beverages. LWT – Food Sci Technol 2014;59:196–203.Search in Google Scholar

102. Sah, BNP, Vasiljevic, T, McKechnie, S, Donkor, ON. Physicochemical, textural and rheological properties of probiotic yogurt fortified with fibre-rich pineapple peel powder during refrigerated storage. LWT – Food Sci Technol 2016;65:978–86.Search in Google Scholar

103. Sheehan, VM, Ross, P, Fitzgerald, GF. Assessing the acid tolerance and the technological robustness of probiotic cultures for fortification in fruit juices. Innovat Food Sci Emerg Technol 2007;8:279–84.Search in Google Scholar

104. Cruz, AG, Cadena, RS, Walter, EH, Mortazavian, AM, Granato, D, Faria, JA, et al.. Sensory analysis: relevance for prebiotic, probiotic, and synbiotic product development. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2010;9:358–73.Search in Google Scholar

105. Laličić-Petronijević, J, Popov-Raljić, J, Obradović, D, Radulović, Z, Paunović, D, Petrušić, M, et al.. Viability of probiotic strains Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM® and Bifidobacterium lactis HN019 and their impact on sensory and rheological properties of milk and dark chocolates during storage for 180 days. J Funct Foods 2015;15:541–50.Search in Google Scholar

106. Charalampopoulos, D, Pandiella, SS. Survival of human derived Lactobacillus plantarum in fermented cereal extracts during refrigerated storage. LWT – Food Sci Technol 2010;43:431–5.Search in Google Scholar

107. Akan, E, Kınık, Ö. Gıda Üretimi ve Depolanması Sırasında Probiyotiklerin Canlılıklarını Etkileyen Faktörler – factors effecting probiotic viability during processing and storage of food. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 2015;11. https://doi.org/10.18466/cbujos.83380.Search in Google Scholar

108. Azom. Polyvinylidenechloride (PVDC) – Properties and applications – Supplier data by Goodfellow; 2003. Available from: [Retrieved 8 Jun 2020].Search in Google Scholar

109. Apack Packaging Technologies. Bariyerli Filmler; 2017. Available from: [Retrieved 8 Jun 2020].Search in Google Scholar

110. Aktuğ, ZB, İri, R, Aktuğ Demir, N. COVID-19 immune system and exercise. J Hum Sci 2020;17:513–20. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v17i2.6005.Search in Google Scholar

111. Gavin Van De Walle. What is citric acid, and is it bad for you? 2019. Available from: [Retrieved 9 Jun 2020].Search in Google Scholar

112. Soccol, CR, Vandenberghe, LPS, Rodrigues, C, Pandey, A. New perspectives for citric acid production and application. Food Technol Biotechnol 2006;44:141–9.Search in Google Scholar

113. Tosun, G. Minimum İşlem Görmüş Sebze ve Meyvelerde Mikrobiyal Güvenlik. Akademik Gıda 2005;3. Available from: .Search in Google Scholar

114. Kligler, B, Cohrssen, A. Probiotics. Am Fam Physician 2008; 78:1073–78 pp.Search in Google Scholar

115. Net, MESM, Hill, C, Guarner, F, Reid, G, Gibson, GR, Merenstein, DJ, et al.. The International Scientific Association for probiotics and prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;11:506–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66.Search in Google Scholar

116. Nile, SH, Baskar, V, Selvaraj, D, Nile, A, Xiao, J, Kai, G. Nanotechnologies in food science: applications, recent trends, and future perspectives. Nano-Micro Lett 2020;12:1–34.Search in Google Scholar

117. Spacova, I, Dodiya, HB, Happel, AU, Strain, C, Vandenheuvel, D, Wang, X, et al.. Future of probiotics and prebiotics and the implications for early career researchers. Front Microbiol 2020;11:1400.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-03-18
Accepted: 2021-09-25
Published Online: 2021-10-15

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston