Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter (O) February 12, 2020

Band Gap Adjustment in Perovskite-type Eu1−xCaxTiO3 via Ammonolysis

Marc Widenmeyer, Tobias Kohler, Margarita Samolis, Alexandra T. De Denko, Xingxing Xiao, Wenjie Xie, Frank E. Osterloh and Anke Weidenkaff


Perovskite-type oxynitrides AB(O,N)3 are potential candidates for photoelectrode materials in solar water splitting. A drawback of these materials is their low sintering tendency resulting in low electrical conductivities. Typically, they are prepared by ammonia treatment of insulating, wide band gap oxides. In this study, we propose an approach starting from small band gap oxides Eu1−xCaxTiO3−δ and then widen the band gaps in a controlled way by ammonolysis and partial Ca2+ substitution. Both together induced a distortion of the octahedral network and dilution of the Eu4f and N2p levels in the valence band. The effect is the stronger the more Ca2+ is present. Within the series of samples, Eu0.4Ca0.6Ti(O,N)3 had the most suitable optical band gap (EG ≈ 2.2 eV) for water oxidation. However, its higher Eu content compared to Eu0.1Ca0.9Ti(O,N)3 slowed down the charge carrier dynamics due to enhanced trapping and recombination as expressed by large accumulation (τon) and decay (τoff) times of the photovoltage of up to 109 s and 486 s, respectively. In contrast, the highly Ca2+-substituted samples (x ≥ 0.7) were more prone to formation of TiN and oxygen vacancies also leading to Ti3+ donor levels below the conduction band. Therefore, a precise control of the ammonolysis temperature is essential, since even small amounts of TiN can suppress the photovoltage generation by fast recombination processes. Water oxidation tests on Eu0.4Ca0.6Ti(O,N)3 revealed a formation of 7.5 μmol O2 from 50 mg powder together with significant photocorrosion of the bare material. Combining crystal structure, chemical composition, and optical and electronical band gap data, a first simplified model of the electronical band structure of Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 could be proposed.

1 Introduction

Perovskite-type oxynitrides AB(O,N)3 are potential candidates as light absorbers/photocatalysts and photoanodes in the photoelectrolysis of water producing oxygen and hydrogen fuel. Typically, these oxynitrides contain Ca2+, Sr2+, Ba2+ or La3+ on the A-site and Ti4+, Nb5+ or Ta5+ on the B-site of the perovskite-type structure [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32]. Recently, we reported on several new perovskite-type family members with rather unusual cations on the A- and/or B-site position such as Mg2+, Y3+, Zr4+ or Ta4+ providing new opportunities to adjust the optical band gap [33], [34]. An alternative approach to ensure charge compensation during the N incorporation into perovskite-type oxides ABO3 (A = Ca2+, Sr2+, Ba2+; B = Ti4+, Zr4+) was tested. Therefore, a double anionic substitution of F and N3− for O2− was used [35], [36]. For all these materials the synthesis started from insulating, typically white, wide band gap oxides, the band gap was reduced by N incorporation to roughly 2 eV as required for improved solar energy conversion [24], [37]. In many reported cases sophisticated electrode engineering using an adjusted sequence of substrate, light-absorber, necking material, protection layers, and cocatalysts was required to significantly improve the photocurrent of the photoanodes [18], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44]. However, the overall performance is still limited due to the poor compaction and sintering of most oxynitrides. Often a so-called necking procedure, e.g. with TiN, is used to ensure proper electrical contact between the oxynitride grains/particles [39], [41], [45]. These conductive pathways carry the risk to act as recombination centers for the photoinduced charge carriers.

An approach to overcome these limitations is to start with a well-sinterable (semi)-conducting oxide and widen the band gap in a controlled way up to approximately 2 eV. The thermoelectric perovskite-type oxide Eu(+II)Ti(+IV)O3−δ has been identified as an interesting compound for this approach. In contrast to the structurally closely related SrTiO3, EuTiO3 has a small band gap of only EG = 0.98 eV [46], [47], [48], [49], [50] due to the presence of sharp Eu 4f electronic states close to the Fermi level. Unlike the usually observed band gap reduction upon partial substitution of N for O, ammonolysis of EuTiO3 resulted in an unexpected band gap widening. This can be explained by the partial formation of Eu3+ in consequence of compensating for the additional negative charge (N3− vs. O2−). The formation of Eu3+ was confirmed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) on EuTi(O,N)3 [48] and 151Eu Mössbauer spectroscopy on EuTiO2N [51]. The presence of the smaller Eu3+ (r(Eu3+) = 129.5 pm, coordination number (CN) = 12) [52] in comparison to Eu2+ (r(Eu2+) = 144 pm, CN = 12) [52] leads to distortion of the perovskite-type octahedral network in order to maintain the contact between the anions and A-site cations [50]. As with SrTiO3 and CaTiO3, this results in a symmetry reduction from cubic to orthorhombic [53], [54]. As a consequence, the electronic band structure is modified and the Eu 4f states move away from the Fermi level widening the band gap to values of EG = 1.4–1.5 eV [48]. As demonstrated by our previous studies, partial substitution of A2+ (A = Ba2+, Ca2+) for Eu2+ is an effective strategy to further adjust the crystal structure and with it the electronic band structure, the band gap, as well as the charge carrier transport properties [50], [55]. It is well-known that (partial) substitution of a smaller cation on the A-site reduces the overlap of the O/N 2p-orbitals and the typically empty nd-orbitals (n = 3, 4, 5; principal quantum number) of the B-site cations leading to a smaller dispersion of the conduction band and hence a widening of the band gap [33], [56]. The formation of Eu1−xCaxTa(O,N)3 [4] and Eu1−xCaxTiO3−δ [50] solid solutions was demonstrated for the entire Ca2+ concentration range (0 ≤ x ≤ 1). The increased chemical pressure with increasing Ca2+ substitution was revealed in Eu1−xCaxTiO3−δ forcing a stronger distortion of the octahedral network. As the coordination sphere was now more suitable for Eu3+ compared to the larger Eu2+, this had a self-enhancing effect on the Eu3+ content clearly modifying the localization of the Eu 4f levels and the band gaps [50]. Besides the electronic band structure (band edges and gap), also the dynamics of the photogenerated charge carriers are of fundamental interest for photoanode applications. The charge carrier dynamics and recombination behavior are often investigated by surface photovoltage spectroscopy (SPS) providing information about the majority charge carriers, effective band gaps, charge carrier transfer rates and charge carrier trapping [30], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61].

Here, we present a synthesis method for perovskite-type oxynitrides as potential photoanodes for water oxidation. The yellow to green oxynitrides Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 were synthesized via thermal gas flow ammonolysis of the well-sinterable, small band gap, perovskite-type oxides Eu1−xCaxTiO3−δ (0 < x < 1). Their band gap size of 1.6 eV–2.6 eV is suitable for photoinduced water oxidation applications. The effect of TiN and Eu 4f levels on the charge carrier separation was studied. Combining the data of X-ray diffraction (XRD), chemical analysis, diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), surface photovoltage spectroscopy (SPS), and electrical resistivity and Seebeck coefficient measurements, a first simplified model of the electronical band structure of the perovskite-type oxynitrides Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 could be proposed.

2 Experimental

2.1 Sample preparation

Solid solutions with the general formula Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 (x = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9) were synthesized by a soft chemistry route and subsequent annealing in different atmospheres. The samples were produced by taking stoichiometric amounts of europium(III) oxide (Alfa Aesar, ≥99.99%), titanium(IV)bis(ammonium dilactato)dihydroxide (Sigma Aldrich, 50 wt.% solution in water) and calcium nitrate tetrahydrate (Merck, ≥99.9%). Citric acid (Sigma Aldrich, ≥99.5%) and ethylene glycol (Merck, ≥99.5%) were used as complexing and gelling agent, respectively. Detailed information about the synthesis procedure of the nanocrystalline oxide precursors (NCP) have been described previously [50]. Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 with x = 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9 were prepared by directly ammonolyzing the nanocrystalline oxide precursors, while for the samples with x = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 ammonolysis was carried out after crystallizing the perovskite oxide resulting in a microcrystalline precursor (MCP). In the latter case, powders were treated in forming gas (Westfalen, 95 vol.% N2, 5 vol.% H2) at 1273 K for 12 h. Ammonolysis of both sets of samples was carried out in flowing ammonia (Westfalen, ≥99.98%) at 1073 K for 10 h using a gas flow rate of 100 mL ⋅ min−1. For selected samples the ammonolysis temperature was varied between 873 K and 1273 K. To study the influence of TiN on the charge carrier separation and recombination behavior of selected samples, 20 mol.% of titanium(IV)bis(ammonium dilactato)dihydroxide was added to induce the in situ formation of TiN.

In addition to powder samples, pellets with varying A-site compositions (x = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8) containing TiN as sintering aid (w(TiN) ≤3.6(3) wt.%) were produced. For that, the nanocrystalline precursors were pelletized using a uniaxial press (P/O/Weber PW20) prior to crystallization. Subsequently, the pellets were isostatically cold-pressed (P/O/Weber) with a pressure of 1.2 MPa and sintered under the same conditions as for crystallization. The resulting oxide pellets were ammonolyzed at 1173 K for 16 h. In order to measure the electrical transport properties, the pellet was cut in bars of 14 × 3 × 3 mm3 using a diamond wire cutting tool.

2.2 Materials characterization

The structural characterization of the produced oxide and oxynitride materials was carried out using a Rigaku Smartlab Bragg-Brentano diffractometer with Ni-filtered Cu–1,2 radiation. Rietveld refinements were carried out using the FullProf 2.k program suite [62] and pseudo-Voigt functions to describe the reflection profile. All powder X-ray diffraction patterns were refined as oxides reducing the number of parameters due to the virtually equal atomic form factors of N3− and O2−.

The anionic composition was determined by carbothermal fusion using the hot gas extraction technique (Eltra ONH-2000 and LECO ONH836 analyzer). Each sample was measured at least three times. Experimental densities of the compacted disks were determined by He gas pycnometry (AccuPyc II 1340, Micromeritics) and Archimedes principle measurements in deionized water. Microstructural analysis was carried by scanning electron microscopy (Zeiss GeminiSEM 500) with the InLens detector at 1.5 kV and 10 kV acceleration voltage, respectively. The electrical resistivity (ρ) and the Seebeck coefficients (S) were measured simultaneously using a Seebeck coefficient/electric resistance measurement system (ZEM-3, Ulvac Riko) from ambient temperature to 973 K in a nitrogen gas atmosphere.

UV-visible diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) were obtained using a Carry 5000 UV–VIS NIR or an AJ&M TIDAS spectrophotometer. The baseline was measured with BaSO4. The spectra were recorded in the range of 200 nm–800 nm. The Kubelka-Munk conversion [63] was applied to the obtained reflectance spectra. The optical band gaps were determined by extrapolating the onset of absorption to the abscissa [47].

Fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) substrates (12–14 Ω/sq., MTI Corporation) were cleaned by sonication in acetone, methanol, isopropanol, and water (purified to about 18 MΩ ⋅ cm resistivity with a Nano-pure filtration system) for 10 min each, and subsequently dried in air. Suspensions of the Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 powders in water with a concentration of 0.5 mg ⋅ mL−1 were prepared. After sonication for 15 min, 0.05 mL of each suspension was drop-coated onto the FTO substrates. The covered area (0.5 cm × 0.5 cm) was controlled with a polyester masking tape (Cole Parmer). After drying at room temperature, the films were heated on a hot plate at 373 K for 90 min in air. Photos of the films are included in the Supporting Information (s. Figure S1, Supporting Information). The films were between 1.3 μm and 1.7 μm thick as determined with a stylus-type Veeco Dektak profilometer.

Surface photovoltage spectroscopy (SPS) was carried out using a vibrating gold mesh Kelvin probe (3 mm diameter, Delta PHI Besocke) mounted 1 mm above the film samples. Samples were positioned inside a custom-made vacuum chamber (p ≈ 10−4 mbar by a Pfeiffer HiCube 80 Eco turbo pump station). Monochromatic radiation was supplied by a 150 W Xe lamp using an Oriel Cornerstone 130 monochromator (I0 ≈ 1 mW ⋅ cm−2). The measurements were not compensated for the variable light intensity of the Xe lamp. A signal drift in the spectra was corrected by subtracting a dark background from the raw data. Contact Potential Difference (CPD) values were obtained by subtracting the CPD value in the dark. Effective band gaps were obtained based on the major photovoltage signals of the spectra using the tangential method. Reversibility of charge carrier separation was examined with light on/off scans at 3.1 eV monochromatic illumination.

For photocatalytic water oxidation tests of Eu0.4Ca0.6Ti(O,N)3 50 mg powder was suspended in 50 mL demineralized water containing 0.02 M sacrificial reagent. Three different sacrificial agents and pH values were tested: (i) Fe(NO3)3 at pH = 1.85, (ii) AgNO3 at pH = 5.85, and (iii) NaIO4 at pH = 6.54. The flask was sonicated and then connected to an air-tight irradiation setup with a Varian 3800 gas chromatograph. The air in the flask was repeatedly evacuated down to 60 torr and purged five times with Ar before commencing the measurements. The system was continuously irradiated with a 300 W Xe lamp (with an intensity of 273–285 mW ⋅ cm−2) with a 400 nm long-pass filter for 6 h.

3 Results and discussion

The oxide precursor solid solutions Eu1−xCaxTiO3−δ (0 < x < 1) were formed in the entire range of compositions [50]. In a first step, it was evaluated if this also applies to the respective perovskite-type oxynitrides Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3. Ammonolysis of EuTiO3−δ was reported at 1223 K [48], which according to our experience is too high and will lead with our setup to the formation of TiN [33]. Therefore, a first series of samples was ammonolyzed at 1073 K. In order to study the effect of precursor crystallinity (s. Figure S2) on the resulting nitrogen content, the oxynitrides with x = 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9 were prepared from the nanocrystalline precursor (NCP), while the microcrystalline precursor (MCP) was used for the samples with x = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8. All oxide precursors (nano- or microcrystalline) were successfully converted to the orthorhombic oxynitrides Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 (s. Figure 1, Figure S3, and Table S1). The samples prepared from the nanocrystalline precursors had slightly higher nitrogen contents than these from the microcrystalline precursor (s. Figure S5 and Table S4). This is in agreement with the expected easier ammonolysis of the metastable nanocrystalline precursor in comparison to the thermodynamically stable microcrystalline precursor. XRD measurements showed small Eu2O3 impurities in Eu0.9Ca0.1Ti(O,N)3 indicating inadequate mixing of the starting materials during the oxide precursor synthesis. An increasing formation of TiN was observed in oxynitrides with Ca2+ contents higher than x = 0.6 (s. Figure 1 and Figure S3) evidenced by surprisingly high nitrogen contents (s. Figure S5 and Table S4).

Fig. 1: Rietveld refinements of the crystal structures of Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 ammonolyzed at 1073 K in the orthorhombic space group-type Pnma. (a) x = 0.1, (b) x = 0.5, and (c) x = 0.7. (d) Unit cell volume depending on the Ca2+ content. The red line is the linear fit according to Vegard’s law. The asterisks indicate residual Cu–Kβ radiation. Further refinement results can be found in Figure S3.

Fig. 1:

Rietveld refinements of the crystal structures of Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 ammonolyzed at 1073 K in the orthorhombic space group-type Pnma. (a) x = 0.1, (b) x = 0.5, and (c) x = 0.7. (d) Unit cell volume depending on the Ca2+ content. The red line is the linear fit according to Vegard’s law. The asterisks indicate residual Cu–Kβ radiation. Further refinement results can be found in Figure S3.

This can be explained by a decrease of the Goldschmidt tolerance factor t with increasing Ca2+ substitution due to the smaller ionic radius of Ca2+ in comparison to Eu2+ [50]. Strongly associated with this is a reduction in the difference between the average bonding energy [ABE s. equation (1)] of the perovskite-type oxides (taken for simplicity) and the formation enthalpy of TiN (s. Figure 2) [65], [66], [64]. Consequently, a higher Ca2+ content facilitates the formation of TiN.

Fig. 2: Calculated average bonding energy (ABE, black squares) of Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 depending on the Ca2+ content together with the standard formation enthalpy of TiN [64]. For simplicity, all samples were treated as oxides Eu1−xCaxTiO3.

Fig. 2:

Calculated average bonding energy (ABE, black squares) of Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 depending on the Ca2+ content together with the standard formation enthalpy of TiN [64]. For simplicity, all samples were treated as oxides Eu1−xCaxTiO3.

where ABE equals the average bonding energy, m, n, k, l the stochiometric coefficients, ΔHAmOn0 and ΔHBkOl0 the standard formation enthalpy of the binary oxides AmOn and BkOl, respectively, ΔHA0 and ΔHB0 the respective standard sublimation enthalpies of the metals A and B, and DO20 the molar dissociation energy of oxygen molecules.

As further adjustment, the ammonolysis temperature for Eu0.1Ca0.9Ti(O,N)3 was systematically lowered to 873 K in 50 K-steps. Indeed, PXRD patterns did not reveal any formation of TiN below 1023 K. Lowering the ammonolysis temperature below 923 K clearly reduced the crystallinity of the samples as expressed by the broadening of the reflections (s. Figure 3 and Table S2). For control purposes, two oxynitrides Eu0.4Ca0.6Ti(O,N)3 were produced at 1048 K and 998 K, respectively. Both samples were TiN-free according to the Rietveld refinements of the PXRD patterns (s. Figure 4 and Table S3) indicating that a difference of more than 7.5% between the standard formation enthalpy of TiN and the average bonding energy of the perovskite phase is sufficient to suppress the formation of TiN in this temperature range.

Fig. 3: Rietveld refinements of the crystal structures of Eu0.1Ca0.9Ti(O,N)3 ammonolyzed at different temperatures in the orthorhombic space group-type Pnma. (a) T = 873 K, (b) T = 923 K, (c) T = 973 K, (d) T = 1023 K, and (e) T = 1073 K. The asterisks indicate residual Cu–Kβ radiation.

Fig. 3:

Rietveld refinements of the crystal structures of Eu0.1Ca0.9Ti(O,N)3 ammonolyzed at different temperatures in the orthorhombic space group-type Pnma. (a) T = 873 K, (b) T = 923 K, (c) T = 973 K, (d) T = 1023 K, and (e) T = 1073 K. The asterisks indicate residual Cu–Kβ radiation.

Fig. 4: Rietveld refinements of the crystal structures of Eu0.4Ca0.6Ti(O,N)3 ammonolyzed at different temperatures in the orthorhombic space group-type Pnma. (a) T = 998 K and (b) T = 1048 K. The asterisks indicate residual Cu–Kβ radiation.

Fig. 4:

Rietveld refinements of the crystal structures of Eu0.4Ca0.6Ti(O,N)3 ammonolyzed at different temperatures in the orthorhombic space group-type Pnma. (a) T = 998 K and (b) T = 1048 K. The asterisks indicate residual Cu–Kβ radiation.

The ammonolysis of Eu1−xCaxTiO3−δ to form Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 requires a charge compensation since N3− has higher negative charge in comparison to O2−. There are three fundamental ways during ammonolysis to do so: (i) aliovalent substitution on the A- or B-site with a cation of higher charge, (ii) oxidation of a cation if possible, e.g. Eu2+ to Eu3+, (iii) formation of oxygen vacancies. The first option does not apply to Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3, since on the precursor level either an isovalent substitution (Ca2+ vs. Eu2+) in the case of MCP or for NCP an aliovalent substitution with a cation of lower charge (Ca2+ vs. Eu3+) was used. As shown by chemical analysis case (iii) plays a minor role and is only active at high Ca2+ contents (x > 0.7) leaving behind just the oxidation of Eu3+ as charge balancing mechanism. As can be seen from Table S4 and Figure S5 for x < 0.5 the Eu content is larger than the nitrogen content (Nmax = 0.55 ± 0.02) requiring the presence of Eu2+ besides Eu3+. However, for all Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 samples the +III state is dominating (Eumax2+=0.42±0.02). For calcium contents 0.5 ≤ x ≤ 0.6 the nitrogen content equals the nitrogen content within experimental uncertainty hence requiring the solely presence of Eu3+ for charge balancing. At higher calcium content (x > 0.6) the situation becomes more complex and the system opens additional sideways during ammonolysis, e.g. at higher temperatures the formation TiN is observed and at lower temperatures the formation of oxygen vacancies happens in addition to compensate the higher nitrogen amount in the sample with respect to the Eu content. However, in both cases predominantly Eu3+ has to be present for charge balancing.

The size of the band gap is an important parameter for the water oxidation ability since it affects the light absorption behavior and the general thermodynamic feasibility of the water oxidation process. The oxynitrides obtained by ammonolysis at 1073 K had a dark color scheme. At low Ca2+ contents (x < 0.5) the samples had a brownish-black tone similar to the color of the oxide precursors. Samples with higher Ca2+ contents (x > 0.5) were dark green lightening with increasing Ca2+ content (s. Figure S7). To obtain stronger DRS signals, the samples were diluted with NaCl. However, light absorption remained high (s. Figure S6), in particular at energies smaller than the optical band gap, indicating the presence of significant amounts of optically active defects. A common explanation for such a behavior in titanates is the presence of Ti3+ species such as TiN [7], [11], [29], [67], [68]. Since the respective PXRD patterns did not show any TiN for x < 0.7 (s. Figure 1 and Figure S3), it might be present as a thin (amorphous) surface layer arising from the rather high ammonolysis temperature. Additionally, an influence of the entropically forced presence of oxygen vacancies on the formation of Ti3+ within Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 cannot be excluded. For oxynitrides with even higher Ca2+ contents (x ≥ 0.7), the contribution of TiN decreased as shown by the clear widening of the optical band gap (s. Figure S6 and Table S7). This can be attributed to an increased distortion of the octahedral network with increasing Ca2+ content as expressed by the larger orthorhombicity and the reduction of the Ti–X(1)–Ti and Ti–X(2)–Ti angles (X = O,N), respectively (s. Figure 5 and Figure S4). The orthorhombicity O is a quantitative measure describing the deviation of the a- and c-axis from a cubic subcell as given by equation (2) [69].

Fig. 5: Average Ti–X–Ti angles (X = O,N; black squares) and orthorhombicity O (blue triangles) of Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 depending on the Ca2+ content.

Fig. 5:

Average Ti–X–Ti angles (X = O,N; black squares) and orthorhombicity O (blue triangles) of Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 depending on the Ca2+ content.

Fig. 6: DRS measurements of (a) Eu0.4Ca0.6Ti(O,N)3 ammonolyzed at 998 K (blue) and 1048 K (red) and (b) Eu0.1Ca0.9Ti(O,N)3 ammonolyzed at 923 K (black), 973 K (blue), and 1023 K (red), respectively.

Fig. 6:

DRS measurements of (a) Eu0.4Ca0.6Ti(O,N)3 ammonolyzed at 998 K (blue) and 1048 K (red) and (b) Eu0.1Ca0.9Ti(O,N)3 ammonolyzed at 923 K (black), 973 K (blue), and 1023 K (red), respectively.

Tab. 1:

Summary of optical band gaps of selected Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 samples derived from DRS.

MaterialAmmonolysis temperature (K)Optical band gap EG (eV)
Eu0.4Ca0.6Ti(O,N)310732.22 ± 0.05
Eu0.4Ca0.6Ti(O,N)310482.22 ± 0.05
Eu0.4Ca0.6Ti(O,N)39982.25 ± 0.05
Eu0.2Ca0.8Ti(O,N)310732.53 ± 0.05
Eu0.1Ca0.9Ti(O,N)310232.35 ± 0.08
Eu0.1Ca0.9Ti(O,N)39732.46 ± 0.07
Eu0.1Ca0.9Ti(O,N)39232.56 ± 0.08

Among the samples, Eu0.4Ca0.6Ti(O,N)3 (ammonolyzed at 1073 K) had the most promising optical band gap size for photoinduced water oxidation. The Eu0.4Ca0.6Ti(O,N)3 samples ammonolyzed at lower temperatures (998 K and 1048 K) had an intensive yellow to light green color. Accordingly, the DRS measurements (s. Figure 6) revealed a much lower optically active defect concentration and an optical band gap of EG ≈ 2.2 eV. As expected by the increased tilting of the octahedral network, Eu0.2Ca0.8Ti(O,N)3 ammonolyzed at 1073 K and Eu0.1Ca0.9Ti(O,N)3 ammonolyzed in the temperature range of 923 K and 1023 K showed larger optical band gaps. According to the electronic band structure proposed by Sagarna et al. [48] larger Ca2+ contents lead to the dilution of the Eu 4f levels in the valence band. Additionally, the nitrogen content (s. Table S5) of these samples was lower resulting also in a smaller contribution of the N 2p levels to the valence band. Both effects are expected to result in a downward shift of the valence band edge and hence to a widening of the band gap. The optical band gap data are summarized in Table 1. The decreasing optical band gap of Eu0.1Ca0.9Ti(O,N)3 with increasing ammonolysis temperature together with an increasing absorption at energies below the band gap could indicate a beginning and steadily increasing formation of TiN impurities.

Fig. 7:  (a) SPS data of Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 samples with x = 0.6 and 0.9 on FTO substrates. The extrapolated tangents were used to find the effective band gap. ΔCPD values are relative to the CPD in the dark. (b) Transient surface photovoltages using chopped light at 3.10 eV (on: ∼1500 s mark; off: ∼1700–2000 s).

Fig. 7:

(a) SPS data of Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 samples with x = 0.6 and 0.9 on FTO substrates. The extrapolated tangents were used to find the effective band gap. ΔCPD values are relative to the CPD in the dark. (b) Transient surface photovoltages using chopped light at 3.10 eV (on: ∼1500 s mark; off: ∼1700–2000 s).

The separation of photoinduced charge carriers in the materials, was determined by surface photovoltage spectroscopy (SPS) of thin films (1.5 ± 0.5 μm) on FTO substrates under vacuum (s. Figure 7 and Table 2). In SPS, the contact potential difference (CPD) of a sample film is measured under illumination with a semi-transparent Kelvin probe [70], [71], [72], [73]. The photovoltage (ΔCPD) is due to the movement of charge carriers from the light absorbing particles to the conductive substrate, or from trapping of carriers in particle surface states [74], [75]. These spectra give insight into majority carrier type, trap states, and the effective band gap of the semiconductor, without the need for any faradaic processes [61], [74], [75], [76]. As can be seen from Figure 7, all four samples showed a negative photovoltage indicating electron injection into the FTO substrate as seen for n-type semiconductors. The effective band gaps were obtained from the photovoltage spectra by the tangential method. All four samples showed an effective band gap of 2.30 ± 0.05 eV in agreement with their optical band gaps (s. Table 1 and Table S7). The 0.5–0.7 eV redshift of the photoonset for Eu0.1Ca0.9Ti(O,N)3 (973 K) is attributed to sub gap donor levels, likely involving coupled Ti3+ and oxygen vacancy defects. The photovoltage decreased with decreasing Ca content and increasing ammonolysis temperature since both led to a decrease of the optical band gap (s. Table 1) and hence reducing the maximum achievable photovoltage. In particular a higher ammonolysis temperature favor defect formation, which can serve as recombination centers for photogenerated electron/hole pairs. An alternative explanation might be the formation of TiN (below XRD detection limit) with increasing ammonolyis temperature as implied by the slightly higher N contents of these samples determined by HGE. Already less than 1 wt.% TiN added to the material is found to quench the photovoltage entirely (see also below). An additional influencing factor might be the presence of the Eu2+ (4f7)/Eu3+ (4f6) redox couple. However, since chemical analysis of the anionic composition of these four samples revealed nitrogen contents equal (x = 0.6) or even higher (x = 0.9) than the Eu content, a significant presence of Eu2+ in these samples can be neglected for reasons of charge balance. The overstochiometric nitrogen content of Eu0.1Ca0.9Ti(O,N)3 ammonolyzed at 973 K and 1023 K, respectively, require the presence of oxygen vacancies and hence Ti3+ donor levels in the crystal structure and electronical band structure, respectively. The presence of oxygen vacancies was confirmed by hot gas extraction measurements (s. Table S5). Therefore, the influence of potentially remaining traces of Eu2+ on the photovoltage can be considered of secondary importance compared to the effect of Ti3+.

Tab. 2:

Summary of SPS measurement results of selected Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 samples.

MaterialAmmonolysis temperature (K)Photo onset (eV)Effective band gap (eV)Photovoltage (V)τon (s)τoff (s)

Secondly, the reversibility and timescale of carrier separation was evaluated by applying chopped light scans under 3.1 eV monochromatic illumination to the samples (s. Figure 7b). The on- and off-times, τon and τoff, in Table 2 refer to the times needed for the photovoltage to reach 63.2% of the final value after switching the light on or off. For all four samples, τoff was much longer than τon, i.e. the return of the majority carriers into the films is slower than the injection into the substrate (FTO). This SPS result is common for powdered films. It is likely associated with trapping of minority carriers (holes) in defect states that are difficult to access by the electrons [61], [74]. We also note that charge separation is about 5 times faster in Eu0.1Ca0.9Ti(O,N)3 than in Eu0.4Ca0.6Ti(O,N)3, which points to a higher concentration of majority carrier traps in the latter. From the observed increase of the optical band gap and the discussed correlation between photovoltage and TiN an opposite behavior would have been expected. This suggests that charge carrier generation and recombination times are strongly affected by the concentration and position of the Eu 4f levels in the electronic band structure [48]. It seems that the larger the Eu concentration, the slower the charge carrier process, likely due to trapping effects by the Eu 4f levels.

Finally, considering the results so far, the Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 samples with 0.4 ≤ x ≤ 0.6 were identified as the most promising candidates for water oxidation photoelectrodes. Photocatalytic water oxidation experiments were carried out on Eu0.4Ca0.6Ti(O,N)3. Using pH values below 2 and Fe(NO3)3 as sacrificial agent resulted within 1 h in the decomposition of the material as indicated by the orange color of the suspension. Using a higher pH value of 5.85 and AgNO3 showed a better materials resistance. However, after 1 h the suspension turned dark grey indicating the deposition of metallic Ag on the material’s surface. Finally, at pH 6.54 and NaIO4 as sacrificial agent 7.5 μmol O2 were produced by 50 mg material within 6 h (s. Figure S8). In all three tested cases the material displayed a significant photocorrosion as expressed by the constant evolution of N2 from the sample. Such material response is not unusual for bare oxynitride photocatalysts without using protection layers and co-catalysts [38], [39], [40] and might be expected from the large τoff times reported in Table 2 pointing to severe hole trapping in the surface-near region of Eu0.4Ca0.6Ti(O,N)3. Further experiments on proper co-catalyst loading and suitable protection layers are required to evaluate the real performance of the material.

The presence of TiN is beneficial to material compaction (s. below), but can hamper the separation of the photoinduced charge carriers. The said samples were prepared with a 20 mol.% excess of Ti precursor and ammonolyzed at 1073 K. The resulting powders were transferred to thin films and analyzed by SPS. None of the TiN-treated samples generated a photovoltage, which is attributed to charge carrier recombination caused by the added TiN.

In order to further analyze the electronical transport properties of Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3, selected samples with x = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 were pressed to pellets as described above. To simulate the “necking” procedure with TiN well-known from the fabrication of Ti-based photoanodes [39], [41], [45], an excess of 20 mol.% Ti precursor was added to the reaction mixture allowing for a homogenous in situ formation of TiN during the compaction process in ammonia. The densities of the samples measured by gas pycnometry after the compaction were in good agreement with the values determined by Rietveld refinements (s. Table S8). Using helium as displacement medium, which is known to penetrate pores down to 1 Å diameter [77], a significant closed porosity of the samples could be excluded. However, control measurements by the Archimedes method in demineralized water revealed the presence of open porosity. This is confirmed by scanning electron microscopy images (s. Figure S9).

Fig. 8: Arrhenius plot of the electrical resistivity of Eu0.6Ca0.4Ti(O,N)3 (black squares), Eu0.4Ca0.6Ti(O,N)3 (red circles), and Eu0.2Ca0.8Ti(O,N)3 (blue triangles).

Fig. 8:

Arrhenius plot of the electrical resistivity of Eu0.6Ca0.4Ti(O,N)3 (black squares), Eu0.4Ca0.6Ti(O,N)3 (red circles), and Eu0.2Ca0.8Ti(O,N)3 (blue triangles).

Tab. 3:

Summary of electronical band gaps of selected samples Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 derived from temperature-dependent electrical resistivity data.

MaterialIntrinsic band gap (eV)Extrinsic band gap (eV)
Eu0.6Ca0.4Ti(O,N)31.84 ± 0.030.67 ± 0.03
Eu0.4Ca0.6Ti(O,N)31.32 ± 0.020.53 ± 0.01
Eu0.2Ca0.8Ti(O,N)31.74 ± 0.040.39 ± 0.01

The determination of the electronic transport properties of Eu0.8Ca0.2Ti(O,N)3 was hampered by contact problems of the sample. All other samples showed negative Seebeck coefficients in the entire temperature range (s. Figure S10) confirming the n-type semiconducting nature of the samples in agreement with the SPS measurements. The semiconducting behavior can also be inferred from Figure 8, since the electrical resistivity of all samples decreases with increasing temperature. At the same temperature, samples with higher Ca2+ contents had lower resistivity. In addition, two areas can be clearly distinguished, namely the extrinsic regime at low temperatures and the intrinsic regime at high temperatures. The extrinsic and intrinsic band gaps of Eu0.6Ca0.4Ti(O,N)3, Eu0.4Ca0.6Ti(O,N)3, and Eu0.2Ca0.8Ti(O,N)3 are calculated according to the Arrhenius equation and summarized in Table 3. In agreement with the 0.5–0.7 eV redshift of the photoonset observed by SPS, the extrinsic conduction points to defect or donor states within the band gap. A donor state (most probably Ti3+) at the bottom of the conduction band as cause for an extrinsic conduction regime has already been reported for pristine EuTi(O,N)3 [48]. As shown in Table 3, the extrinsic band gap decreases with increasing Ca2+ content. A similar trend was observed for the respective oxides, for which both the intrinsic and the extrinsic band gaps were reduced with increasing Ca2+ substitution [50]. For Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3, the situation is more complex as the intrinsic band gap increases while the extrinsic band gap decreases. Chemical analysis indicates that the decrease of the extrinsic band gap can be ascribed to the enhanced formation of oxygen vacancies (s. Table S5) formed for charge balance purposes when the nitrogen content exceeds the respective Eu content. As a consequence, this forces the simultaneous formation of Ti3+ levels expanding the donor levels toward the conduction band and, thus, reducing the extrinsic band gap. The variations of the intrinsic band gaps derived from the electrical resistivity are controlled by several effects: (i) the concentration of Eu4f and N2p levels in the valence band, (ii) the degree of distortion of the octahedral network, (iii) the concentration and distribution of TiN, and (iv) the amount of potentially remaining open porosity. Tracing the intrinsic band gap and the electrical resistivity to a common single origin is complicated by the sophisticated interrelations in this system. In the following, we examine the most obvious relationships.

Fig. 9: Schematic simplified electronical band structure of Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 (x = 0.4, 0.6, 0.8). VB = valence band consisting of Eu4f, and hybridized O2p and N2p levels. CB = conduction band, mainly consisting of empty Ti3d levels. EF = Fermi level. EG = optical band gap (direct band gap). The calculated electronic band structure of EuTi(O,N)3 and Eu1−xCaxTiO3−δ, respectively, can be found in literature [48], [49], [50].

Fig. 9:

Schematic simplified electronical band structure of Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 (x = 0.4, 0.6, 0.8). VB = valence band consisting of Eu4f, and hybridized O2p and N2p levels. CB = conduction band, mainly consisting of empty Ti3d levels. EF = Fermi level. EG = optical band gap (direct band gap). The calculated electronic band structure of EuTi(O,N)3 and Eu1−xCaxTiO3−δ, respectively, can be found in literature [48], [49], [50].

Based on the published electronic band structure of EuTi(O,N)3 [48] the valence band consists of Eu 4f, and hybridized O2p and N2p levels, the top part mainly hosting Eu4f and N2p levels. Consequently, increasing Ca2+ substitution resulted in a dilution of these states and a downwards shift of the valence band edge leading to a widening of the (optical) band gap as observed by DRS (s. Table 1). Reportedly [33], [48], [56], octahedral network tilting resulted in a decrease of the band width of the titanium antibonding levels forming the conduction band. Both effects contributed synergistically to a larger (optical) band gap. In case of the electronical (intrinsic) band gap, this behavior was more difficult to recognize, since it was overlaid by varying concentrations and a potentially deviating distribution of the TiN sintering aid. Besides, an effect of different patterns of open porosity on the electrical resistivity measurements cannot be entirely excluded. Nevertheless, the compositional dependency of the intrinsic band gaps summarized in Table 3 can be explained. Eu0.6Ca0.4Ti(O,N)3 had the largest intrinsic band gap and electrical resistivity within the series of three samples indicating the absence of significant amounts of TiN in agreement with the PXRD data. The value of the intrinsic band gap (s. Table 3) was located well between the optical band gap values of Eu0.8Ca0.2Ti(O,N)3 and Eu0.4Ca0.6Ti(O,N)3 powder samples determined by DRS (s. Table S7). Since TiN is a metallic conductor [78], even small impurities could enhance the electrical conductivity and lower the activation energy, which is in accordance with SPS measurement data of powder samples showing the influence of TiN on the charge carriers. The PXRD patterns of Eu0.4Ca0.6Ti(O,N)3 and Eu0.2Ca0.8Ti(O,N)3 clearly revealed a TiN secondary phase. The refined TiN content of the pellets increased from 0.20(6) wt.% to 3.6(3) wt.% for the samples with x = 0.6 and x = 0.8, respectively. This explains well the decrease of the electrical resistivity with increasing Ca2+ content (s. Figure 8). Associated to this, the intrinsic band gaps from electrical resistivity measurements of the samples with x = 0.6, 0.8 were smaller than that of the sample with x = 0.4 (s. Table 3). An increasing trend as expected from the enhanced octahedral network tilting and the dilution of the Eu4f and N2p levels was observed when increasing the calcium content from x = 0.6 to x = 0.8. This trend agrees with that of the optical band gap, but the obtained intrinsic band gap values were significantly smaller due to the influence of TiN.

Combining the results from PXRD, chemical analysis, SPS, and electrical resistivity measurements with DFT calculation data from literature [48], the following simplified schematic picture of the electronical band structure can be drawn (s. Figure 9): The valence band is composed of Eu4f, and hybridized O2p and N2p levels, while the conduction band consists mainly of empty Ti3d levels. The intrinsic band gap is correlated with the Ca2+ content of the sample in such way that a higher Ca2+ content results in a larger band gap. This is attributed to a synergetic effect of dilution of the Eu4f and N2p states in the valence band and a smaller dispersion of the conduction band caused by the enhanced distortion of the octahedral network. Simultaneously, materials with higher Ca2+ content (x ≥ 0.7) are more susceptible to the formation of Ti3+ donor levels below the conduction band originating either from TiN or the intrinsic formation due to oxygen vacancies in Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N,□)3 for charge balance purposes when the nitrogen content exceeds the europium content of the sample. This leads to broader Ti3+ levels reducing the extrinsic band gap with raising Ca2+ content. The fact that the electronic (intrinsic) band gaps were always smaller than the optical band gaps for Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 is pointing in agreement with common knowledge [79] to an indirect semiconducting behavior of these materials.

4 Conclusion

The series Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.9) was synthesized by a two-step reaction procedure via ammonolysis of microcrystalline or nanocrystalline oxide precursors in the temperature range of 873 K and 1273 K. Increasing the Ca2+ content of the samples increased the tilting of the octahedral network indicated by the enhanced deviation of the Ti–X(1)–Ti and Ti–X(2)–Ti angles from 180° determined by Rietveld refinements of the PXRD patterns. This led to a widening of the optical band gap up to 2.56 eV, but also made the materials more susceptible to the formation of Ti3+ levels either as TiN secondary phase or forced by oxygen vacancies. Therefore, a precise adjustment of the ammonolysis temperature is crucial to control the formation of TiN. The presence of a small amount of TiN (w ≤ 4 wt.%) was identified to be beneficial to the compaction of selected Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 samples. The compaction did not produce measurable amounts of closed porosity, but open porosity was present. These samples enabled the rare investigation of the electrical transport properties of perovskite-type oxynitrides. A negative surface photovoltage and Seebeck coefficient confirmed the n-type semiconducting behavior. However, TiN concentrations even below the PXRD detection limit inhibited photovoltage formation by carrier recombination. Eu0.1Ca0.9Ti(O,N)3 synthesized at 978 K showed the fastest carrier transport and the largest photovoltage (−1.20 V) of all samples. Higher Eu contents (e.g. x = 0.4) and higher ammonolysis temperatures introduced defects acting as trapping and recombination sites for photoinduced charge carriers. Eu0.4Ca0.6Ti(O,N)3 showed a general suitability for water oxidation, but the photocorrosion of the bare material is significant, most probably due to the persistent hole trapping at the surface as indicated by the large τoff time of up to 486 s. For a conclusive judgement of the photocatalytic performance of Eu0.4Ca0.6Ti(O,N)3 further investigations on protection layers and co-catalysts are required. The before-hand mentioned defect states might be related to Ti3+ levels and the internal Eu2+(4f7)/Eu3+(4f6) redox couple. The electronic band gaps were smaller than the optical band gaps, but still in reasonable agreement, most probably caused by the presence of Ti3+ donor states or TiN as sintering aid pointing to an indirect semiconductor. Combing all experimental results allowed the construction of a first schematic electronic band structure model of Eu1−xCaxTi(O,N)3 materials. However, further band structure calculations are required to gain a deeper understanding of the involved interrelations. Overall, the presented approach may be useful for the synthesis of novel visible light-active, transition metal-containing oxynitrides with improved electrical conductivity.


This research study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through the DFG Priority Program SPP 1613 (Funder Id:, Grant WE 2803/7-1). The authors thank M.Sc. Cora Bubeck for collecting SEM images, Samir Hammoud (Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems), Dr. Sandra Nemrava and Prof. Dr. Rainer Niewa (University of Stuttgart, Institute of Inorganic Chemistry) for hot gas extraction measurements, and Dr. Sabine Strobel (University of Stuttgart, Institute of Inorganic Chemistry), M.Sc. Maximilian Hackner, M.Sc. Louise Kaeswurm (Max Planck Institute for Medical Research) and Prof. Dr. Bettina Lotsch (Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research) for their support during DRS measurements. Support for surface photovoltage spectroscopy measurements was provided by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under Award Number DOE-SC0015329. The authors thank Prof. Dr. Adam Moulé (University California, Davis) for providing access to his research group’s profilometer. Finally, we like to acknowledge the fruitful discussions with Dr. Angelika Veziridis and Dr. Songhak Yoon on the manuscript.


1. R. Marchand, F. Pors, Y. Laurent, Ann. Chim. Fr. 16 (1991) 553.Search in Google Scholar

2. E. Günther, R. Hagenmeyer, M. Jansen, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 626 (2000) 1519.10.1002/1521-3749(200007)626:7<1519::AID-ZAAC1519>3.0.CO;2-ISearch in Google Scholar

3. S. G. Ebbinghaus, H. P. Abicht, R. Dronskowski, T. Müller, A. Reller, A. Weidenkaff, Prog. Solid State Chem. 37 (2009) 173.10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2009.11.003Search in Google Scholar

4. T. Motohashi, Y. Hamade, Y. Masubuchi, T. Takeda, K. Murai, A. Yoshiasa, S. Kikkawa, Mater. Res. Bull. 44 (2009) 1899.10.1016/j.materresbull.2009.05.011Search in Google Scholar

5. D. Logvinovich, S. G. Ebbinghaus, A. Reller, I. Marozau, D. Ferri, A. Weidenkaff, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 636 (2010) 905.10.1002/zaac.201000067Search in Google Scholar

6. M. Yang, J. Oró-Solé, J. A. Rodgers, A. Belén Jorge, A. Fuertes, J. P. Attfield, Nat. Chem. 3 (2011) 47.10.1038/nchem.908Search in Google Scholar

7. A. Maegli, S. Yoon, E. Otal, L. Karvonen, P. Mandaliev, A. Weidenkaff, J. Solid State Chem. 184 (2011) 929.10.1016/j.jssc.2011.02.017Search in Google Scholar

8. A. Fuertes, J. Mater. Chem. 22 (2012) 3293.10.1039/c2jm13182jSearch in Google Scholar

9. Y. Il Kim, Y. Paik, Solid State Sci. 14 (2012) 580.10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2012.02.007Search in Google Scholar

10. P. J. Camp, A. Fuertes, J. P. Attfield, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 (2012) 6762.10.1021/ja300847mSearch in Google Scholar

11. A. E. Maegli, T. Hisatomi, E. H. Otal, S. Yoon, S. Pokrant, M. Grätzel, A. Weidenkaff, J. Mater. Chem. 22 (2012) 17906.10.1039/c2jm32718jSearch in Google Scholar

12. J. P. Attfield, Cryst. Growth Des. 13 (2013) 4623.10.1021/cg4011168Search in Google Scholar

13. M. Jansen, H. P. Letschert, Nature 404 (2000) 980.10.1038/35010082Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. D. Li, W. Li, C. Fasel, J. Shen, R. Riedel, J. Alloys Compd. 586 (2014) 567.10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.10.071Search in Google Scholar

15. A. E. Maegli, S. Pokrant, T. Hisatomi, M. Trottmann, K. Domen, A. Weidenkaff, J. Phys. Chem. C 118 (2014) 16344.10.1021/jp4084162Search in Google Scholar

16. Y. Il Kim, Ceram. Int. 40 (2014) 5275.10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.10.100Search in Google Scholar

17. S. H. Porter, Z. Huang, Z. Cheng, M. Avdeev, Z. Chen, S. Dou, P. M. Woodward, J. Solid State Chem. 226 (2015) 279.10.1016/j.jssc.2015.01.023Search in Google Scholar

18. Y. Masubuchi, S.-K. Sun, S. Kikkawa, Dalt. Trans. 44 (2015) 10570.10.1039/C4DT03811HSearch in Google Scholar

19. D. Chen, D. Habu, Y. Masubuchi, S. Torii, T. Kamiyama, S. Kikkawa, Solid State Sci. 54 (2016) 2.10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2015.08.018Search in Google Scholar

20. S. Kikkawa, S. Sun, Y. Masubuchi, Y. Nagamine, T. Shibahara, Chem. Mater. 28 (2016) 1312.10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04149Search in Google Scholar

21. F. Oehler, S. G. Ebbinghaus, Solid State Sci. 54 (2016) 43.10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2015.09.003Search in Google Scholar

22. D. Habu, Y. Masubuchi, S. Torii, T. Kamiyama, S. Kikkawa, J. Solid State Chem. 237 (2016) 254.10.1016/j.jssc.2016.02.024Search in Google Scholar

23. M. Hojamberdiev, M. F. Bekheet, J. N. Hart, J. J. M. Vequizo, A. Yamakata, K. Yubuta, A. Gurlo, M. Hasegawa, K. Domen, K. Teshima, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19 (2017) 22210.10.1039/C7CP03714GSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

24. A. Kasahara, K. Nukumizu, G. Hitoki, T. Takata, J. N. Kondo, M. Hara, H. Kobayashi, K. Domen, J. Phys. Chem. A 106 (2002) 6750.10.1021/jp025961+Search in Google Scholar

25. N. Cordes, W. Schnick, Chem. A Eur. J. 23 (2017) 11410.10.1002/chem.201702231Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. A. Fuertes, Prog. Solid State Chem. 51 (2018) 63.10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2017.11.001Search in Google Scholar

27. Y.-I. Kim, P. M. Woodward, K. Z. Baba-Kishi, C. W. Tai, Chem. Mater. 16 (2004) 1267.10.1021/cm034756jSearch in Google Scholar

28. F. Cheviré, F. Tessier, R. Marchand, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2006 (2006) 1223.10.1002/ejic.200500743Search in Google Scholar

29. D. Logvinovich, A. Börger, M. Döbeli, S. G. Ebbinghaus, A. Reller, A. Weidenkaff, Prog. Solid State Chem. 35 (2007) 281.10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2007.01.006Search in Google Scholar

30. J. Zhao, F. E. Osterloh, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5 (2014) 782.10.1021/jz500136hSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

31. A. Jorge Belen, J. Oro-Sole, A. M. Bea, N. Mufti, T. T. M. Palstra, J. A. Rodgers, J. P. Attfield, A. Fuertes, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 (2008) 12572.10.1021/ja804139gSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

32. D. Logvinovich, L. Bocher, D. Sheptyakov, R. Figi, S. G. Ebbinghaus, R. Aguiar, M. H. Aguirre, A. Reller, A. Weidenkaff, Solid State Sci. 11 (2009) 1513.10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2009.05.024Search in Google Scholar

33. M. Widenmeyer, C. Peng, A. Baki, W. Xie, R. Niewa, A. Weidenkaff, Solid State Sci. 54 (2016) 7.10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2015.11.016Search in Google Scholar

34. C. Bubeck, M. Widenmeyer, G. Richter, M. Coduri, S. Yoon, A. Weidenkaff, Commun. Chem. 2 (2019) 134.10.1038/s42004-019-0237-xSearch in Google Scholar

35. S. Yoon, A. E. Maegli, L. Karvonen, S. K. Matam, A. Shkabko, S. Riegg, T. Großmann, S. G. Ebbinghaus, S. Pokrant, A. Weidenkaff, J. Solid State Chem. 206 (2013) 226.10.1016/j.jssc.2013.08.001Search in Google Scholar

36. S. Yoon, K. Son, S. G. Ebbinghaus, M. Widenmeyer, A. Weidenkaff, J. Alloys Compd. 749 (2018) 628.10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.221Search in Google Scholar

37. Y. Moriya, T. Takata, K. Domen, Coord. Chem. Rev. 257 (2013) 1957.10.1016/j.ccr.2013.01.021Search in Google Scholar

38. K. Kawashima, M. Hojamberdiev, H. Wagata, K. Yubuta, J. J. M. Vequizo, A. Yamakata, S. Oishi, K. Domen, K. Teshima, J. Phys. Chem. C 119 (2015) 15896.10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b03718Search in Google Scholar

39. S. Landsmann, A. E. Maegli, M. Trottmann, C. Battaglia, A. Weidenkaff, S. Pokrant, ChemSusChem 8 (2015) 3451.10.1002/cssc.201500830Search in Google Scholar PubMed

40. S. Landsmann, Y. Surace, M. Trottmann, S. Dilger, A. Weidenkaff, S. Pokrant, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 (2016) 12149.10.1021/acsami.6b01129Search in Google Scholar PubMed

41. M. Pichler, D. Pergolesi, S. Landsmann, V. Chawla, J. Michler, M. Döbeli, A. Wokaun, T. Lippert, Appl. Surf. Sci. 369 (2016) 67.10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.01.197Search in Google Scholar

42. L. Wan, F.-Q. Xiong, Y. Li, T. Thomas, R. Che, M. Yang, Mater. Lett. 188 (2017) 212.10.1016/j.matlet.2016.11.012Search in Google Scholar

43. M. Hojamberdiev, M. F. Bekheet, E. Zahedi, H. Wagata, Y. Kamei, K. Yubuta, A. Gurlo, N. Matsushita, K. Domen, K. Teshima, Cryst. Growth Des. 16 (2016) 2302.10.1021/acs.cgd.6b00081Search in Google Scholar

44. J. Fu, S. E. Skrabalak, Angew. Chemie 56 (2017) 14357.10.1002/ange.201708645Search in Google Scholar

45. C. M. Leroy, A. E. Maegli, K. Sivula, T. Hisatomi, N. Xanthopoulos, E. H. Otal, S. Yoon, A. Weidenkaff, R. Sanjines, M. Grätzel, Chem. Commun. 48 (2012) 820.10.1039/C1CC16112ASearch in Google Scholar PubMed

46. J. H. Lee, X. Ke, N. J. Podraza, L. Fitting Kourkoutis, T. Heeg, M. Roeckerath, J. W. Freeland, C. J. Fennie, J. Schubert, D. A. Muller, P. Schiffer, D. G. Schlom, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 (2009) 212509.10.1063/1.3133351Search in Google Scholar

47. T. Kolodiazhnyi, M. Valant, J. R. Williams, M. Bugnet, G. A. Botton, N. Ohashi, Y. Sakka, J. Appl. Phys. 112 (2012) 083719.10.1063/1.4761933Search in Google Scholar

48. L. Sagarna, K. Z. Rushchanskii, A. E. Maegli, S. Yoon, S. Populoh, A. Shkabko, S. Pokrant, M. Lezaic, R. Waser, A. Weidenkaff, J. Appl. Phys. 114 (2013) 033701.10.1063/1.4813098Search in Google Scholar

49. K. Jiang, R. Zhao, P. Zhang, Q. Deng, J. Zhang, W. Li, Z. Hu, H. Yang, J. Chu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17 (2015) 31618.10.1039/C5CP06318CSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

50. X. Xiao, M. Widenmeyer, K. Mueller, M. Scavini, S. Checchia, C. Castellano, D. Ma, S. Yoon, W. Xie, U. Starke, K. Zakharchuk, A. Kovalevsky, Mater. Today Phys. 7 (2018) 96.10.1016/j.mtphys.2018.11.009Search in Google Scholar

51. R. Mikita, T. Aharen, T. Yamamoto, F. Takeiri, T. Ya, W. Yoshimune, K. Fujita, S. Yoshida, K. Tanaka, D. Batuk, A. M. Abakumov, C. M. Brown, Y. Kobayashi, H. Kageyama, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (2016) 3211.10.1021/jacs.6b00088Search in Google Scholar PubMed

52. R. D. Shannon, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 32 (1976) 751.10.1107/S0567739476001551Search in Google Scholar

53. X. Liu, R. C. Liebermann, Phys. Chem. Miner. 20 (1993) 171.10.1007/BF00200119Search in Google Scholar

54. A. Bohre, K. Avashti, O. P. Shrivata, Cryst Rep 59 (2014) 944.10.1134/S1063774514060030Search in Google Scholar

55. X. Xiao, M. Widenmeyer, W. Xie, T. Zou, S. Yoon, M. Scavini, S. Checchia, Z. Zhong, P. Hansmann, S. Kilper, A. Kovalevsky, A. Weidenkaff, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19 (2017) 13469.10.1039/C7CP00020KSearch in Google Scholar

56. D. Logvinovich, A. Weidenkaff, A. Reller, A. Rachel, S. G. Ebbinghaus, R. Aguiar, Dye. Pigment. 76 (2006) 70.10.1016/j.dyepig.2006.08.029Search in Google Scholar

57. L. Kronik, Y. Shapira, Surf. Sci. Rep. 37 (1999) 1.10.1016/S0167-5729(99)00002-3Search in Google Scholar

58. Y. Yang, J. Wang, J. Zhao, B. A. Nail, X. Yuan, Y. Guo, F. E. Osterloh, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7 (2015) 5959.10.1021/acsami.5b00257Search in Google Scholar PubMed

59. G. Sharma, Z. Zhao, P. Sarker, B. A. Nail, J. Wang, M. N. Huda, F. E. Osterloh, J. Mater. Chem. A 4 (2016) 2936.10.1039/C5TA07040FSearch in Google Scholar

60. M. Kodera, J. Wang, B. A. Nail, J. Liu, H. Urabe, T. Hisatomi, M. Katayama, T. Minegishi, F. E. Osterloh, K. Domen, Chem. Phys. Lett. 683 (2017) 140.10.1016/j.cplett.2017.03.012Search in Google Scholar

61. X. Ma, X. Cui, Z. Zhao, M. A. Melo, E. J. Roberts, F. E. Osterloh, J. Mater. Chem. A 6 (2018) 5774.10.1039/C7TA10934BSearch in Google Scholar

62. J. Rodriguez-Carvajal, FullProf2.k, version 5.30 (2012).Search in Google Scholar

63. G. Kortüm, W. Braun, G. Herzog, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2 (1963) 333.10.1002/anie.196303331Search in Google Scholar

64. J. A. Dean, Handbook of Chemistry, McGra-Hill Inc., New York (1999).Search in Google Scholar

65. R. L. Cook, A. F. Sammells, Solid State Ionics 45 (1991) 311.10.1016/0167-2738(91)90167-ASearch in Google Scholar

66. X. Wang, T. Wu, M. R. Zachariah, J. Phys. Chem. C 121 (2017) 147.10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10571Search in Google Scholar

67. A. E. Maegli, E. H. Otal, T. Hisatomi, S. Yoon, C. M. Leroy, N. Schäuble, Y. Lu, M. Grätzel, A. Weidenkaff, Energy Procedia 22 (2011) 61.10.1016/j.egypro.2012.05.218Search in Google Scholar

68. A. E. Maegli, L. Sagarna, S. Populoh, B. Penkala, E. H. Otal, A. Weidenkaff, J. Solid State Chem. 211 (2014) 106.10.1016/j.jssc.2013.12.008Search in Google Scholar

69. P. Thiel, S. Populoh, S. Yoon, G. Saucke, K. Rubenis, A. Weidenkaff, J. Phys. Chem. C 119 (2015) 21860.10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05882Search in Google Scholar

70. H. C. Gatos, J. Lagowski, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 10 (1973) 130.10.1116/1.1317922Search in Google Scholar

71. L. Kronik, Y. Shapira, Surf. Interface Anal. 31 (2001) 954.10.1002/sia.1132Search in Google Scholar

72. D. Heredia, L. Otero, M. Gervaldo, F. Fungo, T. Dittrich, C.-Y. Lin, L.-C. Chi, F.-C. Fang, K.-T. Wong, Thin Solid Films 527 (2013) 175.10.1016/j.tsf.2012.12.025Search in Google Scholar

73. T. Dittrich, A. Gonzáles, T. Rada, T. Rissom, E. Zillner, S. Sadewasser, M. Lux-Steiner, Thin Solid Films 535 (2013) 357.10.1016/j.tsf.2012.12.078Search in Google Scholar

74. M. A. Melo, Z. Wu, B. A. Nail, A. T. De Denko, A. F. Nogueira, F. E. Osterloh, Nano Lett. 18 (2018) 805.10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04020Search in Google Scholar PubMed

75. J. Zhao, B. A. Nail, M. A. Holmes, F. E. Osterloh, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7 (2016) 3335.10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01569Search in Google Scholar PubMed

76. J. Wang, J. Zhao, F. E. Osterloh, Energy Environ. Sci. 8 (2015) 2970.10.1039/C5EE01701GSearch in Google Scholar

77. Micromeritics, ACCUPYC II Gas Displacement Pycnometry System (2015).Search in Google Scholar

78. W. S. Williams, J. Matter 49 (1997) 38.Search in Google Scholar

79. J. Singleton, Band Theory and Electronic Properties of Solids, Oxford University Press Inc., New York (2001).Search in Google Scholar

Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (DOI:

Received: 2019-03-30
Accepted: 2019-10-29
Published Online: 2020-02-12
Published in Print: 2020-05-26

©2020 Marc Widenmeyer, Anke Weidenkaff et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Scroll Up Arrow