Accessible Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 30, 2015

Fe-Mg diffusion in spinel: New experimental data and a point defect model

Katharina Vogt, Ralf Dohmen and Sumit Chakraborty
From the journal American Mineralogist


We have measured Fe-Mg interdiffusion rates (DFe-Mg) in synthetic Mg-Al spinel and a natural (Mg,Fe) aluminous spinel from Sri Lanka (XFe ~ 0.07) at atmospheric pressure over a range of different oxygen fugacities {log10 (fO₂[Pa]) = -14 to -10} and temperatures (750-900 °C). Diffusion couples made of single-crystal spinel and thin films of hercynitic composition (XFe ~ 0.5) were used for the diffusion anneals. The experimentally induced diffusion profiles were analyzed by Rutherford backscattering Spectroscopy to retrieve true depth concentration profiles for Fe. These were fitted numerically by an explicit finite difference scheme that allows compositionally dependent interdiffusion processes to be modeled by relating self- and interdiffusion coefficients. Synthesis of data from the two diffusion couples indicate that: (1) DFe-Mg depends on XMg of spinel, with increasing diffusion rates with increasing XMg. This behavior is opposite of that found in silicates. (2) Self-diffusion coefficients could not be determined from these experiments, but the results indicate that DFe/DMg > 100. (3) DFe-Mg in Mg-spinel is independent of oxygen fugacity, whereas it depends strongly and nonlinearly on oxygen fugacity for the natural spinel. This observation indicates that the mechanisms of diffusion are different in the two kinds of spinel (Fe-bearing vs. Fe-free), which is also seen in the difference in activation energy obtained for these. Moreover, the nonlinear dependence on oxygen fugacity indicates that diffusion occurs by an interstitial mechanism at low-oxygen fugacities and by a vacancy mechanism at highoxygen fugacities in natural, Fe-bearing spinel. (4) Simple Arrhenius relations that describe the data within the range of experimental conditions are: Synthetic magnesium spinel: QFe-Mg = 219 ± 19 kJ/mol, log10DFe-Mg = -7.76 ± 0.90 [m2/s]. Natural Fe-bearing spinel for log10 (fO₂ [Pa]) = -12}: QFe-Mg = 139 ± 18 kJ/mol, log10DFe-Mg = -12.33 ± 0.85 [m2/s]. A model based on point defect considerations that describes the temperature as well as oxygen fugacity dependence of DFe-Mg in Fe-bearing spinel is: D [m2/s] = Dv [m2/s]fO₂ [Pa]mexp{-Qv [J/mol]/RT [K]} + Di [m2/s] fO₂ [Pa]-mexp(-Qi [J/mol]/RT [K]), with Dv = 1.07 × 10-9 ± 1.55 × 10-9 m2/s, Qv = 131 ± 66 kJ/mol, Di = 1.03 × 10-17 ± 7.32 × 10-17 m2/s, Qv = 130 ± 80 kJ/mol and m = 0.34 ± 0.18. Poor coverage of T-fO₂ space by available experimental data results in large uncertainties in the fit parameters. As a result, these expressions are useful for understanding the diffusion behavior in spinels, but not for extrapolation and calculation of diffusion coefficients for cooling rate or other related calculations. Until the parameters can be better constrained through the availability of more data, we recommend that for such calculations, the parameters noted above for Fe-bearing spinels be used for compositions and fO₂ conditions that are close to those of the experiments. (5) DFe-Mg in spinel is faster than DFe-Mg in olivines, pyroxenes, and garnets at most conditions.

Received: 2014-6-27
Accepted: 2015-4-14
Published Online: 2015-9-30
Published in Print: 2015-10-1

© 2015 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston