Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access March 6, 2014

Sensitivity of Goce Gradients on Greenland Mass Variation And Changes in Ice Topography

  • M. Herceg EMAIL logo , C. C. Tscherning and J. F. Levinsen


The Gravity field and steady state Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE) maps variations in the gravity field by observing second order derivatives (gradients) of the Earth gravitational potential. Flying in the low altitude of 255 km and having a spatially dense data distribution of short wavelengths of the gravity field, GOCE may be used to enhance the time varying gravity signal coming fromthe GRACE satellites.

The GOCE gradients may potentially be used for the determination of residual masses in local regions. This can be done using Least-Squares Collocation (LSC) or the Reduced Point Mass (RPM) method. In this study, different gravity field solutions are calculated by the use of RPM, LSC and GOCE gradients, respectively. Gravity field time series are created and presented for the six consecutive months of GOCE gradient observations, data being acquired between November 2009 and June 2010. Corresponding gravity anomaly results are used for the calculation of ice mass changes by the use of theRPMmethod. The results are then compared with the computed topographic effect of the ice by the use of a modified topographic correction and the Gravsoft TC program.

The maximal gravity changes at the ground predicted from GOCE gradients are between 2 and 4 mGal for the period considered. The gravity anomaly estimation error arising from the GOCE gradient data using only Tzz with an associated error of 20 mE is 11 mGal. This analysis shows the potential of using GOCE data for observations of ice mass changes although the GOCE dataset is limited to only six months. We expect four years of GOCE gradient observations to be available by mid-2014. This will increase the accuracy and spatial resolution of the GOCE measurements, which may lead to an accuracy necessary for observing ice mass changes.


Floberghagen, R., Muzi, D., De la Feld, F., B., W., Rummel, R., Gruber, T., and Van Hees, R. (2010). GOCE High Level Processing Facility: GOCE Level 2 Product Data Handbook.Search in Google Scholar

Forsberg, R. and Tscherning, C. C. (2008). An overview manual for the GRAVSOFT, Geodetic Gravity Field Modelling Programs, 2 edition.Search in Google Scholar

Herceg, M. (2012). GOCE data for Ocean Modelling. PhD thesis, DTU Space, National Space Institute, Technical University of Denmark.Search in Google Scholar

Howat, I. M., Ahn, Y., Joughin, I., Van den Broeke, M. R., and Lenaerts, J. T. M. and, S. B. (2011). Mass balance of greenland’s three largest outlet glaciers, 2000-2010. Geophysical Researc Letters, 38 (12).10.1029/2011GL047565Search in Google Scholar

Joughin, I., Smith, B., Howat, I. M., Scambos, T., and Moon, T. (2010). Greenland flow variability from ice-sheet-wide velocity mapping. Journal of Glaciology, 56:415-430.Search in Google Scholar

Joughin, I., Smith, B. E., Shean, D. E., and Floricioiu, D., (2014). Brief Communication: Further summer speedup of Jakobshavn Isbræ, The Cryosphere, 8, 209-214, doi:10.5194/tc-8-209-2014.10.5194/tc-8-209-2014Search in Google Scholar

Khan, S. A., Wahr, J., Bevis, M., Velicogna, I., and Kendrick, E. (2010). Spread of ice mass loss into northwest greenland observed by grace and gps. Geophysical Research Letters, 37(6).10.1029/2010GL042460Search in Google Scholar

Knudsen, P. (1987). Estimation and modelling of the local empirical covariance function using gravity and satellite altimeter data. Bulletin Geodesique, vol. 61:pp. 145-160.Search in Google Scholar

Krabill, W., Hanna, E., Huybrechts, P., Abdalati, W., Cappelen, J., Csatho, B., Frederick, E., Manizade, S., Martin, C., Sonntag, J., Swift, R., Thomas, R., and Yungel, J. (2004). Greenland ice sheet: Increased coastal thinning. Geophysical Research Letters, 31(24):n/a-n/a.Search in Google Scholar

Krarup, T. (1969). A Contribution to the Mathematical Foundation of Physical Geodesy. Meddelelse no. 44, Geodaetisk Institut, Koebenhavn.Search in Google Scholar

Levinsen, J. F., Howat, I. M., and Tscherning, C. C. (2013). Improving maps of ice sheet surface elevation change using combined laser altimeter and stereoscopic elevation model data. Journal of Glaciology, 59, no. 215.10.3189/2013JoG12J114Search in Google Scholar

Pavlis, E., Holmes, S., Kenyon, S., and Factor, J. (2012). The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008). Journal of Geophysics Research, 117:38.Search in Google Scholar

Sansó, F., Sideris, M. G., Tscherning, C., Pavlis, N., Tziavos, I., Andersen, O., and Fotopoulos, G. (2013). Geoid Determination - Theory and Methods, volume 110 of Lecture Notes in Earth System Sciences. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar

Sjogren, W., Muller, P., Gottlieb, P., Wong, L., Buechler, G., Downs, W., and Prislin, R. (1971). Lunar surface mass distribution from dynamical point-mass solution. The moon, 2:338-353.Search in Google Scholar

Sørensen, L. S. (2010). Changes of the Greenland ice sheet - derived from ICESat and GRACE data. PhD thesis, DTU Space.Search in Google Scholar

Svendsen, P., Andersen, O., and Nielsen, A. (2013). Acceleration of the greenland ice sheet mass loss as observed by grace: Con- fidence and sensitivity. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 364(0):24 - 29.Search in Google Scholar

Tscherning, C., Forsberg, R., and Knudsen, P. (1992.). GRAVSOFT - A System for Geodetic Gravity Field Modelling. Proc. 1. Continental Workshop on the Geoid in Europe, Research Institute of Geodesy, Topography and Cartography, Prague, pages 327- 334.Search in Google Scholar

Tscherning, C. C. (1976). Covariance Expressions for Second and Lower Order Derivatives of the Anomalous Potential. Reports of the Department of Geodetic Science No. 225, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.Search in Google Scholar

Tscherning, C. C. and Arabelos, D. (2011). Gravity anomaly and gradient recovery from GOCE gradient data using LSC and comparisons with known ground data. Proceedings 4th International GOCE user workshop, ESA Publications Division, Nordwijk, The Netherlands.Search in Google Scholar

Tscherning, C. C. and Rapp, R. H. (1974). Closed Covariance Expressions for Gravity Anomalies, Geoid Undulations, and Deflections of the Vertical Implied by Anomaly Degree-Variance Models. Reports of the Department of Geodetic Science No. 208, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.Search in Google Scholar

Tscherning, C. C., Veicherts, M., and Herceg, M. (2010). Reduced point mass or multipole base functions. Contadakis ME, Kaltsikis C, Spatalas S, Tokmakidis K, Tziavos IN (eds), The Apple of the Knowledge, Honorary Volume to Emeritus Professor Demetrius Arabelos, Ziti Editions, ISBN: 978-960-243-674-5, pages 282-289.Search in Google Scholar

Velicogna, I. and Wahr, J. (2005). Greenland mass balance from grace. Geophysical Research Letters, 32(18).10.1029/2005GL023955Search in Google Scholar

Velicogna, I. and Wahr, J. (2013). Time-variable gravity observations of ice sheet mass balance: Precision and limitations of the grace satellite data. Geophysical Research Letters, 40(12):3055-3063.Search in Google Scholar

Vermeer, M. (1982). The use of mass point models for describing the Finnish gravity field. Proceedings, 9th Meeting Nordic Geodetic Commission, Gaevle, Sweden.Search in Google Scholar

Vermeer, M. (1992). Geoid determination with mass point frequency domain inversion in the Mediterranean. Mare Nostrum 2, GEOMED report, Madrid, pages 109-119. Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-3-6
Published in Print: 2014-4-1

© by M. Herceg

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Downloaded on 28.9.2023 from
Scroll to top button