Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access March 21, 2015

Other-initiated repair in Lao

  • N. J. Enfield EMAIL logo
From the journal Open Linguistics

Abstract

This article describes the interactional patterns and linguistic structures associated with otherinitiated repair, as observed in a corpus of video-recorded conversation in the Lao language (a Southwestern Tai language spoken in Laos, Thailand, and Cambodia). The article reports findings specific to the Lao language from the comparative project that is the topic of this special issue. While the scope is general to the overall pattern of other-initiated repair as a set of practices and a system of semiotic resources, special attention is given to (1) the range of repair operations that are elicited by open other-initiators of repair in Lao, especially the subtle changes made when problem turns are repeated, and (2) the use of phrase-final particles—a characteristic feature of Lao grammar—in the marking of both other-initiations of repair and repair solution turns.

References

Cysouw, Michael. 2004. “Interrogative Words: An Exercise in Lexical Typology”. Presentation presented at the Bantu grammar: description and theory workshop, February 13. Search in Google Scholar

———. 2007. “Content Interrogatives in Pichis Ashéninca: Corpus Study and Typological Comparison.” International Journal of American Linguistics 73 (2) (April): 133–163. 10.1086/519056Search in Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark, Francisco Torreira, and N.J. Enfield. 2013. “Is ‘Huh?’ a universal word? Conversational infrastructure and the convergent evolution of linguistic items.” PLOS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078273. 10.1371/journal.pone.0078273Search in Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark et al. under review. “Universal Principles in the Repair of Communication Problems.” Search in Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J. 2007. A Grammar of Lao. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110207538Search in Google Scholar

———. 2010. “Questions and Responses in Lao.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (10): 2649–2665. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.004Search in Google Scholar

———. 2013. Relationship Thinking: Agency, Enchrony, and Human Sociality. New York: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Enfield, N.J., Tanya Stivers, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2010. “Question–response Sequences in Conversation Across Ten Languages: An Introduction.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (10) (October): 2615–2619. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.001Search in Google Scholar

Hayashi, Makoto, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell, ed. 2013. Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511757464Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William and David Fanshel. 1977. Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic. Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action, edited by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Search in Google Scholar

Pomerantz, Anita, and John Heritage. 2012. “Preference.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 210–228. Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch11Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1997. “Practices and Actions: Boundary Cases of Other-Initiated Repair.” Discourse Processes 23 (3): 499–545. 10.1080/01638539709545001Search in Google Scholar

———. 2004. “On Dispensability.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 37 (2): 95–149. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3702_2Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks. 1977. “The Preference for Self-correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53 (2): 361–382. 10.1353/lan.1977.0041Search in Google Scholar

Selting, Margaret. 1996. “Prosody as an Activity-type Distinctive Cue in Conversation: The Case of So-called ‘Astonished’ Questions in Repair Initiation.” In Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies, edited by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Margaret Selting, 231–270. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511597862.008Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-9-26
Accepted: 2014-11-6
Published Online: 2015-3-21

© 2015 N. J. Enfield

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 4.2.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2478/opli-2014-0006/html
Scroll Up Arrow