Other-initiated repair across languages: towards a typology of conversational structures

References

rd, and Joel Sherzer, eds. 1989. Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Benjamin, Trevor. 2012. “When Problems Pass Us By: Using ‘You Mean’ to Help Locate the Source of Trouble.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 45 (1): 82–109. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646742. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646742Search in Google Scholar

———. 2013. “Signaling Trouble: On the Linguistic Design of Other-Initiation of Repair in English Conversation.” PhD dissertation, Groningen: University of Groningen. Search in Google Scholar

Benjamin, Trevor, and Traci Walker. 2012. “Managing Problems of Acceptability Through High Rise-Fall Repetitions.” Discourse Processes 50 (2): 107–38. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2012.739143. 10.1080/0163853X.2012.739143Search in Google Scholar

Besnier, Niko. 1989. “Information Withholding as a Manipulative and Collusive Strategy in Nukulaelae Gossip.” Language in Society 18 (3): 315–41. doi:10.1017/S0047404500013634. 10.1017/S0047404500013634Search in Google Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar. 2008. “A Refined Sampling Procedure for Genealogical Control.” STUF-Language Typology and Universals 61 (3): 221–33. 10.1524/stuf.2008.0022Search in Google Scholar

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper. 1989. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood: Ablex. Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1978. “Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena.” In Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, 56–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 2002. “Sequentiality as the Basis of Constituent Structure.” In The Evolution of Language Out of Pre-Language, edited by Talmy Givón and Bertram F. Malle, 109–32. Typological Studies in Language, v. 53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.53.07bybSearch in Google Scholar

———. 2010. Language, Usage, and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H., and Edward Schaefer. 1987. “Collaborating on Contributions to Conversations.” Language and Cognitive Processes 2 (1): 19–41. doi:10.1080/01690968708406350. 10.1080/01690968708406350Search in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard, Martin Haspelmath, and Balthasar Bickel. 2004. “Leipzig Glossing Rules.” Eva.mpg.de. http://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/files/morpheme.html. Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

———. 2003. Typology and Universals. 2nd ed. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Curl, Traci S. 2005. “Practices in Other-Initiated Repair Resolution: The Phonetic Differentiation of ‘Repetitions.’” Discourse Processes 39 (1): 1–43. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3901_1. 10.1207/s15326950dp3901_1Search in Google Scholar

Cysouw, M. 2004. “Interrogative Words: An Exercise in Lexical Typology.” Presentation presented at the Bantu grammar: description and theory workshop, February 13. Search in Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Blackwell. Search in Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark. 2014. “The Growing Pains of Pragmatic Typology.” Diversity Linguistics Comment. July 10. http://dlc.hypotheses.org/717. Search in Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark, Joe Blythe, and Tyko Dirksmeyer. 2014. “Formats for Other-Initiation of Repair across Languages: An Exercise in Pragmatic Typology.” Studies in Language 38 (1): 5–43. doi:10.1075/sl.38.1.01din. 10.1075/sl.38.1.01dinSearch in Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark, and Simeon Floyd. 2014. “Conversation across Cultures.” In Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology, edited by N. J. Enfield, Paul Kockelman, and Jack Sidnell, 434–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139342872.021Search in Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark, Kobin H. Kendrick, and N. J. Enfield. forthcoming. “A Coding Scheme for Other-Initiated Repair across Languages.” Open Linguistics Search in Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark, Seán G. Roberts, Julija Baranova, Joe Blythe, Paul Drew, Simeon Floyd, Rósa S. Gísladóttir, Kobin H. Kendrick, Stephen C. Levinson, Elizabeth Manrique, Giovanni Rossi, and N. J. Enfield. under review. “Universal Principles in the Repair of Communication Problems” Search in Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark, Francisco Torreira, and N. J. Enfield. 2013. “Is ‘Huh?’ a Universal Word? Conversational Infrastructure and the Convergent Evolution of Linguistic Items.” PLOS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078273. 10.1371/journal.pone.0078273Search in Google Scholar

Drew, Paul. 1997. “‘Open’ Class Repair Initiators in Response to Sequential Sources of Trouble in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 28: 69–101. 10.1016/S0378-2166(97)89759-7Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 1997. “Are Grammatical Relations Universal?” In Essays on Language Function and Language Type, edited by Joan Bybee, John Haiman, and Sandra A. Thompson, 115–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.82.09drySearch in Google Scholar

Durie, Mark. 1987. “Grammatical Relations in Acehnese.” Studies in Language 11 (2): 365–99. 10.1075/sl.11.2.05durSearch in Google Scholar

Egbert, Maria. 1996. “Context-Sensitivity in Conversation: Eye Gaze and the German Repair Initiator Bitte?” Language in Society 25 (04): 587–612. doi:10.1017/S0047404500020820. 10.1017/S0047404500020820Search in Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J. 2013a. “Doing Fieldwork on the Body, Language, and Communication.” In Handbook Body – Language – Communication, edited by Cornelia Müller, E. Fricke, Alan Cienki, David McNeill, and S. Essendorf. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. Search in Google Scholar

———. 2013b. Relationship Thinking: Agency, Enchrony, and Human Sociality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J., Mark Dingemanse, Julija Baranova, Joe Blythe, Penelope Brown, Tyko Dirksmeyer, Paul Drew, Simeon Floyd, Sonja Gipper, Rósa Gísladóttir, Gertie Hoymann, Kobin H. Kendrick, Stephen C. Levinson, Lilla Magyari, Elizabeth Manrique, Giovanni Rossi, Lila San Roque, and Francisco Torreira. 2013. “Huh? What? – A First Survey in 21 Languages.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, edited by Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell, 343–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511757464.012Search in Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J., Kobin H. Kendrick, J. P. de Ruiter, Tanya Stivers, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2011. “Building a Corpus of Spontaneous Interaction.” In Field Manual Volume 14, edited by Kobin H. Kendrick and Asifa Majid, 29–32. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. Search in Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J., and Jack Sidnell. 2014. “Language Presupposes an Enchronic Infrastructure for Social Interaction.” In The Social Origins of Language, edited by Daniel Dor, Chris Knight, and Jerome Lewis, 92–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665327.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J., Tanya Stivers, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2010. “Question-Response Sequences in Conversation across Ten Languages: An Introduction.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (10): 2615–19. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.001. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.001Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas. 2011. “Semantic Typology.” In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, edited by Jae Jung Song, 504–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199281251.013.0024Search in Google Scholar

Floyd, Simeon, Elizabeth Manrique, Giovanni Rossi, and Francisco Torreira. in press. “The Timing of Visual Bodily Behavior in Repair Sequences: Evidence from Three Languages.” Discourse Processes Search in Google Scholar

Fox, Barbara A., Trevor Benjamin, and Harrie Mazeland. 2013. “Conversation Analysis and Repair Organization: Overview.” In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, edited by Carol A. Chapelle. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1314Search in Google Scholar

Fox, Barbara A., Makoto Hayashi, and Robert Jasperson. 1996. “Resources and Repair: A Cross-Linguistic Study of Syntax and Repair.” In Interaction and Grammar, edited by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 185–237. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 13. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.004Search in Google Scholar

Fox, Barbara A., Fay Wouk, Makoto Hayashi, Steven Fincke, Liang Tao, Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Minna Laakso, and Wilfrido Flores Hernandez. 2009. “A Cross-Linguistic Investigation of the Site of Initiation in Same-Turn Self-Repair.” In Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, edited by Jack Sidnell, 60–103. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635670. 10.1017/CBO9780511635670Search in Google Scholar

Fries, Charles C. 1952. The Structure of English; an Introduction to the Construction of English Sentences. New York: Harcourt, Brace. Search in Google Scholar

Fromkin, Victoria A. 1971. “The Non-Anomalous Nature of Anomalous Utterances.” Language 47 (1): 27–52. 10.2307/412187Search in Google Scholar

Garvey, Catherine. 1977. “The Contingent Query: A Dependent Act in Conversation.” In Interaction, Conversation, and the Development of Language, edited by M. Lewis and L.A. Rosenblum, 63–94. New York: Wiley. Search in Google Scholar

Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel, Martin Haspelmath, and Sebastian Nordhoff. 2014. “Langdoc.” Glottolog 2.3. August. http://glottolog.org/. Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. “Comparative Concepts and Descriptive Categories in Crosslinguistic Studies.” Language 86 (3): 663–87. 10.1353/lan.2010.0021Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin, Matthew S Dryer, David Gil, and Bernard Comrie, eds. 2008. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. Search in Google Scholar

Hayashi, Makoto, and Kaoru Hayano. 2013. “Proffering Insertable Elements: A Study Of Other-Initiated Repair In Japanese.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, edited by Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell, 293–321. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511757464.010Search in Google Scholar

Hayashi, Makoto, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell, eds. 2013. Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Henrich, Joseph, Steven J. Heine, and Ara Norenzayan. 2010. “The Weirdest People in the World?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3): 61–83. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X. 10.1017/S0140525X0999152XSearch in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. “Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse.” Language 56 (2): 251–99. 10.1353/lan.1980.0017Search in Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. 2009. “How (not) to Do Phonological Typology: The Case of Pitch-Accent.” Language Sciences 31 (2-3): 213–38. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2008.12.007. 10.1016/j.langsci.2008.12.007Search in Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell. 1964. “Introduction: Toward Ethnographies of Communication.” American Anthropologist, New Series, 66 (6): 1–34. 10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00010Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 1972. “Side Sequences.” In Studies in Social Interaction, edited by David N. Sudnow, 294–338. New York: MacMillan/The Free Press. Search in Google Scholar

———. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, edited by G.H. Lerner, 43–59. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar

Keenan, Edward L. 1976. “Towards a Universal Definition of Subject.” In Subject and Topic, edited by Charles Li, 305–33. New York: Academic Press. Search in Google Scholar

Kendrick, Kobin H. under review. “The Intersection of Turn-Taking and Repair: The Timing of Other-Initiations of Repair in Conversation.” Frontiers in Language Sciences Search in Google Scholar

Kendrick, Kobin H., Penelope Brown, Mark Dingemanse, Simeon Floyd, Sonja Gipper, Kaoru Hayano, Elliott M. Hoey, Gertie Hoymann, Elizabeth Manrique, Giovanni Rossi, and Stephen C Levinson. 2014. “Sequence Organisation: A Universal Infrastructure for Action.” Talk presented at the 4th International Conference on Conversation Analysis, University of California at Los Angeles, CA. Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Kyu-hyun. 1999. “Other-Initiated Repair Sequences in Korean Conversation: Types and Functions.” Discourse and Cognition 6: 141–68. Search in Google Scholar

Kitzinger, Celia. 2013. “Repair.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 229–56. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch12Search in Google Scholar

Koshik, Irene. 2005. “Alternative Questions Used in Conversational Repair.” Discourse Studies 7 (2): 193–211. doi:10.1177/1461445605050366. 10.1177/1461445605050366Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Winfred P., ed. 1978. Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language. Austin: University of Texas Press. Search in Google Scholar

Lerner, Gene H. 2004. “On the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: Grammar as Action in Prompting a Speaker to Elaborate.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 37 (2): 151–84. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3702_3. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3702_3Search in Google Scholar

Levelt, Willem J. M. 1983. “Monitoring and Self-Repair in Speech.” Cognition 14: 41–104. 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90026-4Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 2006. “On The Human ‘Interaction Engine.’” In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition, and Human Interaction, edited by Nick J. Enfield and Stephen C. Levinson, 39–69. Oxford: Berg. 10.4324/9781003135517-3Search in Google Scholar

———. 2007. “Optimizing Person Reference - Perspectives from Usage on Rossel Island.” In Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives, edited by N. J. Enfield and Tanya Stivers, 29–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486746.004Search in Google Scholar

Li, Charles N., ed. 1976. Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press. Search in Google Scholar

Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Univ of California Press. Search in Google Scholar

Lüpke, Friederike. 2009. “Data Collection Methods for Field-Based Language Documentation.” Language Documentation and Description 6: 53–100. Search in Google Scholar

Majid, Asifa. 2012. “A Guide to Stimulus-Based Elicitation for Semantic Categories.” In Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, 54–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199571888.013.0003Search in Google Scholar

Majid, Asifa, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2010. “WEIRD Languages Have Misled Us Too.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 10.1017/S0140525X1000018XSearch in Google Scholar

Moerman, Michael. 1977. “The Preference for Self-Correction in a Tai Conversational Corpus.” Language 53 (4): 872–82. 10.2307/412915Search in Google Scholar

Moerman, Michael, and Harvey Sacks. 1988. “On ‘Understanding’ in the Analysis of Natural Conversation.” In Talking Culture: Ethnography and Conversation Analysis, by Michael Moerman, 180–86. University of Pennsylvania Publications in Conduct and Communication. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Search in Google Scholar

Nettle, Daniel. 1999. Linguistic Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Nisbett, Richard E., and Timothy D. Wilson. 1977. “Telling More than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes.” Psychological Review 84 (3): 231–59. 10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231Search in Google Scholar

Obeng, Samuel Gyasi. 1992. “A Phonetic Description of Some Repair Sequences in Akan Conversation.” Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 12 (1): 59–80. doi:10.1515/text.1.1992.12.1.59. 10.1515/text.1.1992.12.1.59Search in Google Scholar

Ochs, Elinor. 1984. “Clarification and Culture.” In GURT’84: Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, edited by Deborah Schiffrin. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Ochs, Elinor, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, eds. 1996. Interaction and Grammar. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 13. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Pederson, Eric, Eve Danziger, David Wilkins, Stephen Levinson, Sotaro Kita, and Gunter Senft. 1998. “Semantic Typology and Spatial Conceptualization.” Language 74 (3): 557–89. 10.1353/lan.1998.0074Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, Jeffrey D. 2006. “Managing Trouble Responsibility and Relationships During Conversational Repair.” Communication Monographs 73 (June): 137–61. doi:10.1080/03637750600581206. 10.1080/03637750600581206Search in Google Scholar

———. 2014. “What ‘What?’ Tells Us About How Conversationalists Manage Intersubjectivity.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 47 (2): 109–29. doi:10.1080/08351813.2014.900214. 10.1080/08351813.2014.900214Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. 2 vols. London: Blackwell. Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010Search in Google Scholar

Schachter, Paul. 1976. “The Subject in Philippine Languages: Topic, Actor, Actor-Topic or None of the Above?” In Subject and Topic, edited by Charles N. Li, 493–518. New York: Academic Press. Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1982. “Discourse as Interactional Achievement: Some Uses of ‘Uh Huh’ and Other Things That Come Between Sentences.” In Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, edited by Deborah Tannen, 71–93. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press. Search in Google Scholar

———. 1987. “Between Macro and Micro: Contexts and Other Connections.” In The Micro-Macro Link, edited by Jeffrey C. Alexander, Bernhard Giesen, Richard Munch, and Neil J. Smelser, 207–34. Los Angeles: University of California Press. Search in Google Scholar

———. 1992. “Repair After Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation.” The American Journal of Sociology 97 (5): 1295–1345. 10.1086/229903Search in Google Scholar

———. 1993. “Reflections on Quantification in the Study of Conversation.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 26 (1): 99–128. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi2601_5. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2601_5Search in Google Scholar

———. 1997a. “Practices and Actions: Boundary Cases of Other-Initiated Repair.” Discourse Processes 23 (3): 499–545. doi:10.1080/01638539709545001. 10.1080/01638539709545001Search in Google Scholar

———. 1997b. “Third Turn Repair.” In Towards a Social Science of Language. Volume 2: Social Interaction and Discourse Structures, edited by Gregory R. Guy, Crawford Feagin, Deborah Schiffrin, and John Baugh, 31–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar

———. 2000. “When ‘Others’ Initiate Repair.” Applied Linguistics 21 (2): 205–43. doi:10.1093/applin/21.2.205. 10.1093/applin/21.2.205Search in Google Scholar

———. 2004. “On Dispensability.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 37 (2): 95–149. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3702_2Search in Google Scholar

———. 2005. “On Complainability.” Social Problems 52 (4): 449–76. 10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.449Search in Google Scholar

———. 2006. “Interaction: The Infrastructure for Social Institutions, the Natural Ecological Niche for Language, and the Arena in Which Culture Is Enacted.” In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition, and Human Interaction, edited by Nick J. Enfield and Stephen C. Levinson, 70–96. Oxford: Berg. Search in Google Scholar

———. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks. 1977. “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53 (2): 361–82. 10.1353/lan.1977.0041Search in Google Scholar

Selting, Margret. 1996. “Prosody as an Activity-Type Distinctive Cue in Conversation: The Case of so-Called ‘astonished’ Questions in Repair Initiation.” In Prosody in Conversation : Interactional Studies, edited by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Margret Selting, 231–70. Cambridge / New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511597862.008Search in Google Scholar

Selting, Margret, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, eds. 2001. Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Studies in Discourse and Grammar 10. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.10Search in Google Scholar

Sidnell, Jack. 2007. “Comparative Studies in Conversation Analysis.” Annual Review of Anthropology 36 (1): 229–44. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094313. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094313Search in Google Scholar

———. 2009a. “Language-Specific Resources in Repair and Assessments.” In Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, edited by Jack Sidnell, 304–25. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511635670.011Search in Google Scholar

———. , ed. 2009b. Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

———. 2010. Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Chichester, U.K: Wiley-Blackwell. Search in Google Scholar

Sidnell, Jack, and N. J. Enfield. 2012. “Language Diversity and Social Action.” Current Anthropology 53 (3): 302–33. doi:10.1086/665697. 10.1086/665697Search in Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 1981. The Limits of Awareness. Sociolinguistic Working Papers 84. Austin: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. Search in Google Scholar

Stivers, Tanya, N. J. Enfield, Penelope Brown, C. Englert, Makoto Hayashi, Trine Heinemann, Gertie Hoymann, Federico Rossano, J. P. de Ruiter, Kyung-Eun Yoon, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. “Universals and Cultural Variation in Turn-Taking in Conversation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (26): 10587–92. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903616106. 10.1073/pnas.0903616106Search in Google Scholar

Suzuki, Kana. 2010. “Other-Initiated Repair in Japanese: Accomplishing Mutual Understanding in Conversation.” PhD dissertation, Kobe: Kobe University. Search in Google Scholar

Svennevig, Jan. 2008. “Trying the Easiest Solution First in Other-Initiation of Repair.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (2): 333–48. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.11.007. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.11.007Search in Google Scholar

Ten Have, Paul. 2007. Doing Conversation Analysis. SAGE. 10.4135/9781849208895Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, Sandra A., Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Barbara A. Fox. in press. Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Ultan, Russell. 1978. “Some General Characteristics of Interrogative Systems.” In Universals of Human Language, 4:211–48. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna. 1991. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783112329764Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina. 2006. “Initiating Repair and beyond: The Use of Two Repeat-Formatted Repair Initiations in Mandarin Conversation.” Discourse Processes 41 (1): 67–109. 10.1207/s15326950dp4101_5Search in Google Scholar

———. 2009. “Repetition in the Initiation of Repair.” In Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, edited by Jack Sidnell, 31–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511635670.003Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Wei. 1999. “Repair in Chinese Conversation.” PhD dissertation, University of Hong Kong. Search in Google Scholar

Zimmerman, Don H. 1999. “Horizontal and Vertical Comparative Research in Language and Social Interaction.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 32 (1-2): 195–203. doi:10.1080/08351813.1999.9683623. 10.1080/08351813.1999.9683623Search in Google Scholar