Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access February 17, 2011

Assessment of river water quality in the South Baltic coast by multivariate techniques

  • Monika Cieszynska EMAIL logo , Marek Wesolowski , Maria Bartoszewicz and Malgorzata Michalska
From the journal Open Chemistry


The paper presents an example of using multivariate techniques to interpret a large data set obtained during a 4-year water quality monitoring program in the Gdansk Municipality region, on the southern coast of the Baltic Sea. From 2004 to 2007, 11 physicochemical water parameters were analyzed monthly at 15 sites within eight watercourses. Principal-components analysis and cluster analysis were used to explore the data. Spatio-temporal trends in water quality were evaluated, the variables that determined the data set’s structure and the factors that affected the water’s physicochemical composition identified, with the goal of helping to optimize future monitoring. To reduce the number of analyzed variables, relationships between the analyzed parameters were also identified. The results revealed that the differences in physicochemical water properties among stations were generally smaller than those between the warmer and cooler seasons. It was determined that seasonal intrusions of brackish water from the Gulf of Gdansk can modify the water properties of some watercourses in the study area, but that dissolved oxygen, chemical oxygen demand, and total phosphorus were the main parameters responsible for the overall variation in the observed data. These parameters are related to pollution of anthropogenic origin.

[1] A.J. Bates, Food Chem. Toxicol. 38, S29 (2000) in Google Scholar

[2] S. Dolnicar, A.I. Schäfer, J. Environ. Manage. 90, 888 (2009) in Google Scholar

[3] V.V Goncharuk, J. Water Chem. Technol. 30, 129 (2008) in Google Scholar

[4] M.S. Holt, Food Chem. Toxicol. 38, S21 (2000) 10.1016/S0278-6915(99)00136-2Search in Google Scholar

[5] L. Petraccia, G. Liberati, S.G Masciullo, M. Grassi, A. Fraioli, Clin. Nutr. 25, 377 (2006) in Google Scholar

[6] F.X. R. Van Leeuwen, Food Chem. Toxicol. 38, S51 (2000) 10.1016/S0278-6915(99)00140-4Search in Google Scholar

[7] S.W. Liao, H.S. Gau, W.L Lai, J.J Chen, C.G. Lee, J. Environ. Manage. 88, 286 (2008) in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] K.P. Singh, A. Malik, V.K. Singh, Water Air Soil Pollut. 170, 383 (2005) in Google Scholar

[9] S. Han, E. Kim, S. Kim, KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 13(2), 97 (2009) in Google Scholar

[10] V. Simeonov, J.W. Einax, I. Stanimirova, J. Kraft, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 374, 898 (2002) in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] A. Astel, S. Tsakovski, P. Barbieri, V. Simeonov, Water Res. 41, 4566 (2007) in Google Scholar

[12] V. Simeonov, J.A. Stratis, C. Samara, G. Zachariadis, D. Voutsa, A. Anthemidis, M. Sofoniou, T. Kouimtzis, Water Res. 37, 4119 (2003) in Google Scholar

[13] G.P. Glasby, P. Szefer, Sci. Total Environ. 212, 49 (1998) in Google Scholar

[14] P.M Castañé, M.G Rovedatti, M.L Topalián, A. Salibián, Environ. Monit. Assess. 117, 135 (2006) in Google Scholar

[15] P.R. Kannel, S. Lee, Y.S Lee, J. Environ. Manage. 86, 595 (2008) in Google Scholar

[16] M. Vega, R. Pardo, E. Barrado, L. Debán, Water Res. 32, 3581 (1998) in Google Scholar

[17] J.R. King, D.A. Jackson, Environmetrics 10, 67 (1999)<67::AID-ENV336>3.0.CO;2-010.1002/(SICI)1099-095X(199901/02)10:1<67::AID-ENV336>3.0.CO;2-0Search in Google Scholar

[18] APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water & Wastewater (American Public Health Association, Washington D.C., 2005) Search in Google Scholar

[19] E.M. Andrade, H.A.Q Palácio, I.H. Souza, R.A.O. Leão, M.J. Guerreiro, Environ. Res. 106, 170 (2008) in Google Scholar

[20] T. Hill, P. Lewicki, Statistics, methods and applications: A comprehensive reference for science, industry, and data mining (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, 2006) Search in Google Scholar

[21] M. Otto, Chemometrics: Statistics and computer application in analytical chemistry (Wiley-VCH, New York, 1999) Search in Google Scholar

[22] S. Shrestha, F. Kazama, Environ. Modell. Softw. 22, 464 (2007) in Google Scholar

[23] U.C. Panda, S.K. Sundaray, P. Rath, B.B. Nayak, D. Bhatta, J. Hydrol. 331, 434 (2006) in Google Scholar

[24] E. Marengo, M.C. Gennaro, D. Giacosa, C. Abrigo, G. Saini, M.T. Avignone, Anal. Chim. Acta. 317, 53 (1995) in Google Scholar

[25] D. Bellos, T. Sawidis, J. Environ. Manage. 76, 282 (2005) in Google Scholar

[26] E. Perona, I. Bonilla, P. Mateo, Sci. Total Environ. 241, 75 (1999) in Google Scholar

[27] T.G. Kazi, M.B. Arain, M.K. Jamali, N. Jalbani, H.I. Afridi, R.A. Sarfraz, J.A. Baig, A.Q. Shah, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 72, 301 (2009) in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] H. Chang, Water Air Soil Poll. 161, 267 (2005) in Google Scholar

[29] A.J. M. Yunus, N. Nakagoshi, Chin. Geogr. Sci. 14, 153 (2004) in Google Scholar

[30] C.A. Almeida, S. Quintar, P. González, M.A. Mallea, Environ. Monitor. Assess. 133, 459 (2007) in Google Scholar PubMed

Published Online: 2011-2-17
Published in Print: 2011-4-1

© 2011 Versita Warsaw

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 11.12.2023 from
Scroll to top button