Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access July 24, 2011

Determination of 137Cs and 85Sr transport parameters in fucoidic sand columns and groundwater system

Štefan Palágyi and Karel Štamberg
From the journal Open Chemistry

Abstract

The determination is based on the evaluation of experimentally obtained breakthrough curves using the erfc-function. The first method is founded on the assumption of a reversible linear sorption/desorption isotherm of radionuclides on solid phase with constant distribution and retardation coefficients, whereas the second one is based on the assumption of a reversible non-linear sorption/desorption isotherm described with the Freundlich equation, i.e., with non-constant distribution and retardation coefficients. Undisturbed cores of 5 cm in diameter and 10 cm long were embedded in the Eprosin-type cured epoxide resin column. In this study the so-called Cenomanian background groundwater was used as transport medium. The groundwater containing radionuclides was introduced at the bottom of the columns at about 4 mL h−1 constant flow-rate. The results have shown that in the investigated fucoidic sands: (i) the sorption was in principle characterized by linear isotherms and the corresponding retardation coefficients of 137Cs and 85Sr, depending on the type of sample, were approximately 13 or 44 and 5 or 15, respectively; (ii) the desorption was characterized by non-linear isotherms, and the retardation coefficients of the same radionuclides ranged between 23–50 and 5–25, respectively. The values of the hydrodynamic dispersion coefficients of these radionuclides varied between 0.43–1.2 cm2 h−1.

[1] P. Franta et al., In: B.J. Merkel, A. Hasche-Berger (Eds.), Some approaches to the study of contamination in the fucoid sandstone at Stráž pod Ralskem site — Northern Bohemia, Czech Republic Uranium Mining and Hydrogeology (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg 2008) 71 10.1007/978-3-540-87746-2_11Search in Google Scholar

[2] T. Pačes et al., In: W.M. Edmunds, P. Shand (Eds.), The Cenomanian and Turonian Aquifers of the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin, Czech Republic, Natural Groundwater Quality (Blackwell Publishing, Malden-Oxford-Victoria, 2008) Search in Google Scholar

[3] C.G.J. Appello, D. Postma, Geochemistry, groundwater and pollution (Balkema, Rotterdam, 1993) 535 Search in Google Scholar

[4] W.R. Alexander, P.A. Smith, I.G. McKinley, In: E.M. Scott (Ed.), Modeling radionuclide transport in the geological environment, Modeling Radioactivity in the Environment (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003) 109 10.1016/S1569-4860(03)80061-XSearch in Google Scholar

[5] N. Cadelli et al., Performance Assessment of Geological Isolation Systems (PAGIS), (Commission of European Communities, Luxembourg, 1988) EUR 11775, 46 Search in Google Scholar

[6] A.J. Valocchi, Water. Resour. Res. 21, 808 (1985) http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/WR021i006p0080810.1029/WR021i006p00808Search in Google Scholar

[7] J.E. Saiers, G.M. Hornberger, J. Contam. Hydrol 22, 255 (1996) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-7722(95)00094-110.1016/0169-7722(95)00094-1Search in Google Scholar

[8] M. Flury, Sz. Czigány, Gang Chen, J.B. Harsh, J. Contam. Hydrol. 71, 111 (2004) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2003.09.00510.1016/j.jconhyd.2003.09.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] D.J. Sims, W.S. Andrews, K.A.M. Creber, X. Wang, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 263, 619 (2005) http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10967-005-0633-910.1007/s10967-005-0633-9Search in Google Scholar

[10] S. Szenknect, C. Ardois, J.P. Gaudet, V. Barthes, J. Contam. Hydrol. 76, 139 (2005) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2004.08.00310.1016/j.jconhyd.2004.08.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Š. Palágyi, K. Štamberg, Radiochim. Acta 98, 359 (2010) http://dx.doi.org/10.1524/ract.2010.172910.1524/ract.2010.1729Search in Google Scholar

[12] Š. Palágyi, K. Štamberg, H. Vodičková, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 283, 629 (2010) http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10967-009-0393-z10.1007/s10967-009-0393-zSearch in Google Scholar

[13] Š. Palágyi, P. Franta, H. Vodičková, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 286, 317 (2010) http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10967-010-0721-310.1007/s10967-010-0721-3Search in Google Scholar

[14] Š. Palágyi, A. Laciok, Czechoslov. J. Phys. 56, D483 (2006) 10.1007/s10582-006-0540-5Search in Google Scholar

[15] J. Spanier, K.B. Oldham, The Error Function erf(x) and Its Complement erfc(x) (Chapter 40) and The exp(x) and erfc(√x) and Related Functions (Chapter 41). In: An Atlas of Functions (Hemisphere, Washington, DC, 1987) 385 and 395 Search in Google Scholar

[16] E.T. Whittaker, G.N. Watson, A Course in Modern Analysis, 4th edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990) Search in Google Scholar

[17] K. Ebert, H. Ederer, Computeranwendungen in der Chemie (VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Weinheim, 1985) (In German) Search in Google Scholar

[18] A.L. Herbelin, J.C. Westall, FITEQL — A Computer Program for Determination of Chemical Equilibrium Constants from Experimental Data, Version 3.2., Report 94-01 (Department of Chemistry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, 1996) Search in Google Scholar

[19] L. Dvořák, M. Ledvinka, M. Sobotka, Famulus 3.1. (Computer Equipment, Prague, 1991) Search in Google Scholar

[20] P. Germann, In: M.G. Anderson, P.D. Bates (Eds), A hydromechanical approach to Preferential Flow (Chapter 10), Model Validation - Perspectives in Hydrological Sciences (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2001) 233 Search in Google Scholar

[21] V. Brendler, res3T — Rossendorf Expert System for Surface and Sorption Thermodynamics, 2nd Release from January 24, 2006 (Forschungszentrum Rossendorf e.V., Institute of Radiochemistry, Dresden, Germany) Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2011-7-24
Published in Print: 2011-10-1

© 2011 Versita Warsaw

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Scroll Up Arrow