Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access January 23, 2013

Principal component analysis in interpretation of the results of HPLC-ELC, HPLC-DAD and essential elemental contents obtained for medicinal plant extracts

Pawel Konieczynski
From the journal Open Chemistry


Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to compare its usefulness with cluster analysis (CA), and factorial k-means analysis (fkm), for evaluating the results obtained using HPLC-DAD, HPLC-ELC and spectroscopic techniques (AAS and UV/VIS spectrometry for determining content of N, P, Fe and Cu) in aqueous extracts of seven medicinal plants. These represented the following plant species that are rich in flavonoids: Betula verrucosa Ehrh., Equisetum arvense L., Polygonum aviculare L., Viola tricolor L., Crataegus oxyacantha L., Sambucus nigra L. and Helichrysum arenarium (L.) Moench. The databases analyzed comprised four sets: 1) results obtained by the use of HPLC-DAD detection, 2) results obtained by the use of electrochemical detection (HPLC-ELC), 3) results for determining elements — total and water-extractable species, and 4) all data combined. Application of statistical methods allowed the samples to be classified into four groups: 1) Crataegus, Sambucus, 2) Equisetum, Polygonum and Viola, 3) Betula, and 4) Helichrysum, which were differentiated by characteristic patterns. PCA supported by CA, was the most suitable method, because it simultaneously allowed for reduction of multidimensionality of the databases, grouped the samples into four clusters, and made possible selection of the factors responsible for differentiation of the plant materials studied.

[1] A.R. Coscione, J.C. de Andrade, R.J. Poppi, C. Mello, V. Raij, M.F. de Abreu, Anal. Chim. Acta 423, 31 (2000) in Google Scholar

[2] S. Sinha, A.K. Gupta, K. Bhatt, Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 67, 267 (2007) in Google Scholar

[3] R. Goodacre, E.V. York, J.K. Heald, I.M. Scott, Phytochem. 62, 859 (2003) in Google Scholar

[4] S. Razic, S.M. Dogo, L.J. Slavkovic, Microchem. J. 84, 93 (2006) in Google Scholar

[5] S. Razic, A. Onija, S. Dogo, L. Slavkovic, A. Popovic, Talanta 67, 233 (2005) in Google Scholar

[6] M. Plessi, D. Bertelli, G. Rastelli, A. Albasini, A. Monzani, Fres. J. Anal. Chem. 361, 353 (1998) in Google Scholar

[7] S. Tokalioglu, S. Kartal, J. Trace Micropr. Tech. 20, 127 (2002) in Google Scholar

[8] M. Wesolowski, B. Suchacz, P. Konieczynski, Comb. Chem.High T. Scr. 6, 811 (2003) 10.2174/138620703771826928Search in Google Scholar

[9] P. Konieczynski, M. Wesolowski, I. Radecka, Chem. Anal. (Warsaw) 54, 215 (2009) Search in Google Scholar

[10] Y. He, X. Li, X. Deng, J. Food Eng. 79, 1238 (2007) in Google Scholar

[11] Y. Woo, H. Kim, J. Cho, H. Chung, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 21, 407 (1999) in Google Scholar

[12] M. Otto, Chemometrics, Statistics and Computer Application in Analytical Chemistry (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1999) Search in Google Scholar

[13] J. Yang, L.H. Chen, Q. Zhang, M.X. Lai, Q. Wang, J. Sep. Sci. 30, 1276 (2007) in Google Scholar

[14] R. Tian, P. Xie, H. Liu, J. Chromatogr. A 1216, 2150 (2009) in Google Scholar

[15] G. Weber, P. Konieczynski, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 375, 1067 (2003) 10.1007/s00216-002-1706-zSearch in Google Scholar

[16] S. Kohlmünzer, Farmakognozja (PZWL, Warsaw, 1985) (in Polish) Search in Google Scholar

[17] M. Vichi, H.A.L. Kiers, Comput. Stat. Data An. 37, 49 (2001) in Google Scholar

[18] M.E. Timmerman, E. Ceulemans, H.A.L. Kiers, M. Vichi, Stat. Data An. 54, 1858 (2010) in Google Scholar

[19] G. Fan, L. Tao, Q. Yue, T. Kuang, C. Tang, Y. Yang, W. Luo, X. Zhou, Y. Zhang, Planta Med. 78, 641 (2012) in Google Scholar PubMed

Published Online: 2013-1-23
Published in Print: 2013-4-1

© 2013 Versita Warsaw

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Scroll Up Arrow