Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access September 1, 2006

A virtual instrumentation based protocol for the automated implementation of the inner field compensation method

  • Loredana Mereuta EMAIL logo and Tudor Luchian
From the journal Open Physics


One influential parameter which mediates interactions between many types of molecules and biological membranes stems from the lumped contributions of the transmembrane potential, dipole potential and the difference in the surface potentials on both sides of a membrane. With relevance to cell physiology, such electrical features of a biomembrane are prone to undergoing changes as a result of interactions with the aqueous surrounding. Among the most useful tools devoted to exploring changes of electrical parameters of a lipid membrane induced by certain extracellular ions, lipid composition, and embedded membrane peptides and proteins, are spectroscopic imaging and the inner field compensation (IFC) method. In this work we layout the principles of a fully computerized version of the IFC method, which makes it more readily available to users. As a direct application, we deployed this improved version of the IFC method to time-resolve changes induced by alamethicin monomers upon membrane dipole potential, following their aggregation within an artificial lipid membrane. Intriguingly, even prior crossing the membrane core, the membrane-bound alamethicin monomers are shown to significantly increase the dipole potential of the monolayer they reside in. Such data further emphasize the yet less-explored interplay between membrane-based protein and peptides, and the membrane dipole potential.

[1] D.L. Nelson and M.M. Cox: “Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry, Fourth Edition”, W. H. Freeman, 2004. Search in Google Scholar

[2] J.C. Franklin and D.S. Cafiso: “Internal electrostatic potentials in bilayers: measuring and controlling dipole potentials in lipid vesicles”, Biophys. J., Vol. 65, (1993), pp. 289–299. Search in Google Scholar

[3] G. Cevc: “Membrane electrostatics”, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Vol. 1031, (1990), pp. 311–382. Search in Google Scholar

[4] C. Zheng and G. Vanderkooi: “Molecular origin of the internal dipole potential in lipid bilayers: calculation of the electrostatic potential”, Biophys. J., Vol. 63, (1992), pp. 935–941. Search in Google Scholar

[5] K. Gawrisch, D. Ruston, J. Zimmerberg, A. Parsegian, R.P. Rand and N. Fuller: “Membrane dipole potentials, hydration forces, and the ordering of water at membrane surfaces”, Biophys. J., Vol. 61, (1992), pp. 1213–1223. Search in Google Scholar

[6] S. McLaughlin: “The electrostatic properties of membranes”, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem., Vol. 18, (1989), pp. 113–136. in Google Scholar

[7] S.H. White, A.S. Ladokhin, S. Jayasinghe and K. Hristova: “How membranes shape protein structure”, J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, (2001), pp. 32395–32398. in Google Scholar

[8] T.L. Rokitskaya, Y.N. Antonenko and E.A. Kotova: “Effect of the dipole potential of a bilayer lipid membrane on gramicidin channel dissociation kinetics”, Biophys. J., Vol. 73, (1997), pp. 850–854. Search in Google Scholar

[9] B. Maggio: “Modulation of phospholipase A2 by electrostatic fields and dipole potential of glycosphingolipids in monolayers”, J. Lipid Res., Vol. 40, (1999), pp. 930–939. Search in Google Scholar

[10] I. Tatyana, T.Y. Rokitskaya, E.A. Kotova and Y.N. Antonenko: “Membrane Dipole Potential Modulates Proton Conductance through Gramicidin Channel: Movement of Negative Ionic Defects inside the Channel”, Biophys. J., Vol. 82, (2002), pp. 865–873. Search in Google Scholar

[11] J. Cladera and P. O’shea: “Intramembrane molecular dipoles affect the membrane insertion and folding of a model amphiphilic peptide”, Biophys. J., Vol. 74, (1998), pp. 2434–2442. Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. Cladera, I. Martin, J.M. Ruysschaert and P. O’shea: “Characterization of the sequence of interactions of the fusion domain of the simian immunodeficiency virus with membranes. Role of the membrane dipole potential”, J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 274, (1999), pp. 29951–29959. in Google Scholar

[13] G. Beschiaschvili and J. Seelig: “Melittin binding to mixed phosphatidylglycerol/phosphatidylcholine membranes”, Biochemistry, Vol. 29, (1990), pp. 52–58. in Google Scholar

[14] C.E. Dempsey and A. Watts: “A deuterium and phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance study of the interaction of melittin with dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine bilayers and the effects of contaminating phospholipase A2”, Biochemistry, Vol. 18, (1987), pp. 5803–5811. in Google Scholar

[15] S. Leonor, S. Bandyopadhyay and M.L. Klein: “Effect of the Pore Region of a Transmembrane Ion Channel on the Physical Properties of a Simple Membrane”, J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 108, (2004), pp. 2608–2613. in Google Scholar

[16] T. Hianik and V.I. Passechnik: Bilayer Lipid Membranes: Structure and Mechanical Properties, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1995. Search in Google Scholar

[17] S.O. Hagge, A. Wiese, U. Seydel and T. Gutsmann: “Inner Field Compensation as a Tool for the Characterization of Asymmetric Membranes and Peptide-Membrane Interactions”, Biophys. J., Vol. 86, (2004), pp. 913–922. Search in Google Scholar

[18] W. Carius: “Voltage dependence of bilayer membrane capacitance harmonic response to ac excitation with dc bias”, J. Colloid Interface Sci., Vol. 57, (1976), pp. 301–307. in Google Scholar

[19] V.S. Sokolov and V.G. Kuzmin: “Measurement of differences in the surface potentials of bilayer membranes according to the second harmonic of a capacitance current”, Biofizika, Vol. 25(1), (1980), pp. 170–172. Search in Google Scholar

[20] P. Pohl, T.I. Rokitskaya, E.E. Pohl and S.M. Saparov: “Permeation of phloretin across bilayer lipid membranes monitored by dipole potential and microelectrode measurements”, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Vol. 1323, (1997), pp. 163–172. in Google Scholar

[21] T. Luchian, S.H. Shin and H. Bayley: “Single-molecule chemistry with spatially separated reactants”, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., Vol. 42, (2003), pp. 3766–3771. in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] T. Luchian: “An automated method for generating analogic signals that embody the Markov kinetics of model ionic channels”, J. Neuroscience Meth., Vol. 147, (2005), pp. 8–14. in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] O.S. Andersen, A. Finkelstein, I. Katz and A. Cass: “Effect of phloretin on the permeability of thin lipid membranes”, J.Gen.Physiol., Vol. 67, (1976), pp. 749–771. in Google Scholar

[24] R. Yantorno, S. Takashima and P. Mueller: “Dipole moments of alamethicin as related to voltage-dependent conductance in lipid bilayers”, Biophys. J., Vol. 38, (1982), pp. 105–110. Search in Google Scholar

[25] M.S. Sansom, I.D. Kerr and I.R. Mellor: “Ion channels formed by amphipathic helical peptides, a molecular modeling study”, Eur. Biophys. J., Vol. 20, (1991), pp. 229–240. in Google Scholar

[26] M. Madhusoodanan and T. Lazaridis: “Voltage-dependent energetics of alamethicin monomers in the membrane”, Biophysical Chem., Vol. 122, (2006), pp. 50–57. in Google Scholar

[27] S.D. Zakharov, T.I. Rokitskaya, V.L. Shapovalov, Y.N. Antonenko and W.A. Cramer: “Tuning the membrane surface potential for efficient toxin import”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Vol. 99, (2002), pp. 8654–8659. Search in Google Scholar

[28] L. Saiz and M.L. Klein: “Electrostatic interactions in a neutral model phospholipid bilayer by molecular dynamics simulations”, J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 116, (2002), pp. 3052–3057. in Google Scholar

[29] V.L. Shapovalov, E.A. Kotova, T.I. Rokitskaya and Y.N. Antonenko: “Effect of Gramicidin A on the Dipole Potential of Phospholipid Membranes”, Biophys. J., Vol. 77, (1999), pp. 299–305. in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2006-9-1
Published in Print: 2006-9-1

© 2006 Versita Warsaw

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 21.3.2023 from
Scroll Up Arrow