Abstract
I discuss some aspects of a recent frame-dragging test performed by exploiting the Root-Mean-Square (RMS) orbit-overlap differences of the out-of-plane component (N) of the Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) spacecraft’s orbit in the gravitational field of Mars. A linear fit to the complete time series for the entire MGS data set (4 February 1999–14 January 2005) yields a normalized slope 1.03 ± 0.41 (with 95% confidence bounds). Other linear fits to different data sets confirm agreement with general relativity. Huge systematic effects induced by mismodeling the martian gravitational field which have been claimed by some authors are absent in the MGS out-of-plane record. The same level of effect is seen for both the classical non-gravitational and relativistic gravitomagnetic forces on the in-plane MGS orbital components; this is not the case for the out-of-plane components. Moreover, the non-conservative forces experience high-frequency variations which are not important in the present case where secular effects are relevant.
[1] L. Iorio, In: L. Iorio (Ed.) The Measurement of Gravito-magnetism: A Challenging Enterprise (NOVA, Hauppauge, 2007) 183 Search in Google Scholar
[2] L. Iorio, Classical Quant. Grav. 23, 5451 (2006) http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/23/17/N0110.1088/0264-9381/23/17/N01Search in Google Scholar
[3] A. S. Konopliv, C. F. Yoder, E. M. Standish, D.-N. Yuan, W. L. Sjogren, Icarus 182, 23 (2006) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2005.12.02510.1016/j.icarus.2005.12.025Search in Google Scholar
[4] B. Mashhoon, In: L. Iorio (Ed.) The Measurement of Gravitomagnetism: A Challenging Enterprise (NOVA, Hauppauge, 2007) 29 Search in Google Scholar
[5] L. Iorio, Space Sci. Rev., DOI:10.1007/s11214-008-9478-1 10.1007/s11214-008-9478-1Search in Google Scholar
[6] J. Lense, H. Thirring, Phys. Z. 19, 156 (1918) Search in Google Scholar
[7] K. Krogh, Classical Quant. Grav. 24, 5709 (2007) http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/24/22/N0110.1088/0264-9381/24/22/N01Search in Google Scholar
[8] G. Sindoni, C. Paris, P. Ialongo, arXiv:gr-qc/0701141v1 Search in Google Scholar
[9] G. Felici, arXiv:gr-qc/0703020v2 Search in Google Scholar
[10] M. Soffel et al., Astron. J. 126, 2687 (2003) http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/37816210.1086/378162Search in Google Scholar
[11] A. Tartaglia, Europhys. Lett. 57, 167 (2002) http://dx.doi.org/10.1209/epl/i2002-00334-510.1209/epl/i2002-00334-5Search in Google Scholar
[12] R. P. Kerr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 237 (1963) http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.11.23710.1103/PhysRevLett.11.237Search in Google Scholar
[13] B. D. Tapley, B. E. Schutz, G. H. Born, Statistical Orbit Determination (Elsevier, Burlington, 2004) 10.1016/B978-012683630-1/50020-5Search in Google Scholar
[14] D. M. Lucchesi, G. Balmino, Planet. Space Sci. 54, 581 (2006) 10.1016/j.pss.2006.03.001Search in Google Scholar
[15] F. G. Lemoine et al., J. Geophys. Res. 106, 23359 (2001) http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000JE00142610.1029/2000JE001426Search in Google Scholar
[16] D. C. Christodoulidis, D. E. Smith, R. G. Williamson, S. M. Klosko, J. Geophys. Res. 93, 6216 (1988) http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JB093iB06p0621610.1029/JB093iB06p06216Search in Google Scholar
[17] A. Milani, A. M. Nobili, P. Farinella, Non-gravitational perturbations and satellite geodesy (Adam Hilger, Bristol, 1987) Search in Google Scholar
[18] J. M. Forbes, S. Bruinsma, F. G. Lemoine, B. R. Bowman, A. S. Konopliv, In: American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2006, abstract #SA22A-04 Search in Google Scholar
[19] N. Yuan et al., J. Geophys. Res. 106, 23377 (2001) http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000JE00130210.1029/2000JE001302Search in Google Scholar
© 2010 Versita Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
