Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access November 21, 2012

Classifying bases for 6D F-theory models

David Morrison EMAIL logo and Washington Taylor
From the journal Open Physics

Abstract

We classify six-dimensional F-theory compactifications in terms of simple features of the divisor structure of the base surface of the elliptic fibration. This structure controls the minimal spectrum of the theory. We determine all irreducible configurations of divisors (“clusters”) that are required to carry nonabelian gauge group factors based on the intersections of the divisors with one another and with the canonical class of the base. All 6D F-theory models are built from combinations of these irreducible configurations. Physically, this geometric structure characterizes the gauge algebra and matter that can remain in a 6D theory after maximal Higgsing. These results suggest that all 6D supergravity theories realized in F-theory have a maximally Higgsed phase in which the gauge algebra is built out of summands of the types su(3), so(8), f4, e6, e8, e8, (g2 ⊕ su(2)); and su(2) ⊕ so(7) ⊕ su(2), with minimal matter content charged only under the last three types of summands, corresponding to the non-Higgsable cluster types identified through F-theory geometry. Although we have identified all such geometric clusters, we have not proven that there cannot be an obstruction to Higgsing to the minimal gauge and matter configuration for any possible F-theory model. We also identify bounds on the number of tensor fields allowed in a theory with any fixed gauge algebra; we use this to bound the size of the gauge group (or algebra) in a simple class of F-theory bases.

Keywords: F-theory

[1] A. Grassi, D.R. Morrison, arXiv:math/0005196 Search in Google Scholar

[2] V. Kumar, W. Taylor, arXiv:0906.0987 [hep-th] Search in Google Scholar

[3] V. Kumar, W. Taylor, arXiv:0910.1586 [hep-th] Search in Google Scholar

[4] V. Kumar, D.R. Morrison, W. Taylor, arXiv:0911.3393 [hep-th] Search in Google Scholar

[5] V. Kumar, D.R. Morrison, W. Taylor, arXiv:1008.1062 [hep-th] Search in Google Scholar

[6] V. Kumar, D. Park, W. Taylor, arXiv:1011.0726 [hepth] Search in Google Scholar

[7] N. Seiberg, W. Taylor, arXiv:1103.0019 [hep-th] Search in Google Scholar

[8] D.R. Morrison, W. Taylor, arXiv:1106.3563 [hep-th] Search in Google Scholar

[9] A. Grassi, D.R. Morrison, arXiv:1109.0042 [hep-th] Search in Google Scholar

[10] V. Braun, arXiv:1110.4883 [hep-th] Search in Google Scholar

[11] D.S. Park, W. Taylor, arXiv:1110.5916 [hep-th] Search in Google Scholar

[12] D.S. Park, arXiv:1111.2351 [hep-th] Search in Google Scholar

[13] F. Bonetti, T.W. Grimm, arXiv:1112.1082 [hep-th] Search in Google Scholar

[14] C. Vafa, arXiv:hep-th/9602022 Search in Google Scholar

[15] D.R. Morrison, C. Vafa, arXiv:hep-th/9602114 Search in Google Scholar

[16] D.R. Morrison, C. Vafa, arXiv:hep-th/9603161 Search in Google Scholar

[17] A. Grassi, Math. Ann. 290, 287 (1991) http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF0145924610.1007/BF01459246Search in Google Scholar

[18] M. Gross, Duke Math. Jour. 74, 271 (1994) http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-94-07414-010.1215/S0012-7094-94-07414-0Search in Google Scholar

[19] M.J. Duff, R. Minasian, E. Witten, arXiv:hep-th/9601036 Search in Google Scholar

[20] N. Seiberg, E. Witten, arXiv:hep-th/9603003 Search in Google Scholar

[21] A. Sagnotti, arXiv:hep-th/9210127 Search in Google Scholar

[22] V. Sadov, arXiv:hep-th/9606008 Search in Google Scholar

[23] P. Candelas, E. Perevalov, G. Rajesh, arXiv:hep-th/9704097 Search in Google Scholar

[24] P. S. Aspinwall, D.R. Morrison, arXiv:hep-th/9705104 Search in Google Scholar

[25] D.R. Morrison, W. Taylor, to appear Search in Google Scholar

[26] D.R. Morrison, arXiv:hep-th/0411120 Search in Google Scholar

[27] F. Denef, arXiv:0803.1194 [hep-th] Search in Google Scholar

[28] W. Taylor, arXiv:1104.2051 [hep-th] Search in Google Scholar

[29] J. de Boer et al., arXiv:hep-th/0103170 Search in Google Scholar

[30] P.S. Aspinwall, D.R. Morrison, arXiv:hep-th/9805206 Search in Google Scholar

[31] K. Kodaira, Ann. Math. 77, 563 (1963) http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/197013110.2307/1970131Search in Google Scholar

[32] K. Kodaira, Ann. Math. 78, 1 (1963) http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/197050010.2307/1970500Search in Google Scholar

[33] M. Bershadsky et al., arXiv:hep-th/9605200 Search in Google Scholar

[34] S. Katz, D.R. Morrison, S. Schafer-Nameki, J. Sully, arXiv:1106.3854 [hep-th] Search in Google Scholar

[35] S.H. Katz, C. Vafa, arXiv:hep-th/9606086 Search in Google Scholar

[36] M. Esole, S.-T. Yau, arXiv:1107.0733 [hep-th] Search in Google Scholar

[37] M. Esole, J. Fullwood, S.-T. Yau, arXiv:1110.6177 [hep-th] Search in Google Scholar

[38] C. Cordova, arXiv:0910.2955 [hep-th] Search in Google Scholar

[39] S. Kachru, C. Vafa, arXiv:hep-th/9505105] Search in Google Scholar

[40] K.A. Intriligator, arXiv:hep-th/9708117] Search in Google Scholar

[41] U.H. Danielsson, P. Stjernberg, arXiv:hep-th/9603082 Search in Google Scholar

[42] M. Demazure, H.C. Pinkham, B. Teissier, eds., Seminaire sur les singularités des surfaces, Lecture Notes in Math. vol. 777 (Springer, 1980) 10.1007/BFb0085872Search in Google Scholar

[43] H.C. Pinkham, Simple elliptic singularities, Del Pezzo surfaces and Cremona transformations, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vol. XXX, Part 1, 69 (Amer. Math. Soc., 1977) 10.1090/pspum/030.1/0441969Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2012-11-21
Published in Print: 2012-10-1

© 2012 Versita Warsaw

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 28.1.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2478/s11534-012-0065-4/html
Scroll Up Arrow