Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access April 23, 2013

Palomena prasina (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) vibratory signals and their tuning with plant substrates

  • Jernej Polajnar EMAIL logo , Andreja Kavčič , Alenka Kosi and Andrej Čokl
From the journal Open Life Sciences

Abstract

Palomena prasina is interesting for the study of vibrational communication within the Pentatomid subfamily Pentatominae, because its host range is limited to woody plants, unlike the better known Nezara viridula, whose vibrational communication is commonly used as a model for the whole family. The vibrational repertoire of P. prasina was described several decades ago and is redescribed in this paper using modern methods for non-contact vibration recording. Additionally, we hypothesized that this species has retained the capacity for signal frequency variation necessary for tuning to resonance properties of various host plants of Pentatominae, but if the signals are emited in the absence of mechanical feedback, they are tuned more specifically to their native acoustic environment — woody plants. By recording live bugs signalling on different substrates and comparing spectral properties of their signals among substrates, we found that there is a match between the signals emitted on a woody branch and those emitted on a non-resonant surface, while spectral properties of signals emitted on herbaceous plants differ. Our findings provide evidence in support of the signal tuning hypothesis and shed further light on the crucial role of substrate in vibrational communication of insects.

[1] Alford D.V., Pests of fruit crops: a color handbook, Academic Press, Burlington, MA, 2007 10.1201/b15135Search in Google Scholar

[2] Tuncer C., Saruhan İ., Akça İ., The insect pest problem affecting hazelnut kernel quality in Turkey, Acta Hortic., 2005, 686, 367–375 10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.686.51Search in Google Scholar

[3] Čokl A., Gogala A., Blaževič A., Principles of sound recognition in three Pentatomide bug species (Heteroptera), Biol. Vestn., 1978, 26, 81–94 Search in Google Scholar

[4] Čokl A., Virant-Doberlet M., Communication with substrate-borne signals in small plant-dwelling insects, Ann. Rev. Entomol., 2003, 48, 29–50 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.48.091801.11260510.1146/annurev.ento.48.091801.112605Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Čokl A., Stink bug interaction with host plants during communication, J. Insect Physiol., 2008, 54, 1113–1124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2008.06.00410.1016/j.jinsphys.2008.06.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Michelsen A., Flemming F., Gogala M., Traue D., Plants as transmission channels for insect vibrational songs, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 1982, 11, 269–281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF0029930410.1007/BF00299304Search in Google Scholar

[7] Magal C., Schöller M., Tautz J., Casas J., The role of leaf structure in vibration propagation, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2000, 108, 2412–2418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.128609810.1121/1.1286098Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Čokl A., Plants as medium for communication with mechanical vibrations, In: Sapri R.C. (Ed.), Mechanical vibrations: measurement, effects and control, Nova Science Publishers, inc., New York, NY, 2009 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Čokl A., Žunič A., Virant-Doberlet M., Predatory bug Picromerus bidens communicates at different frequency levels, Cent. Eur. J. Biol, 2011, 6, 431–439 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s11535-011-0015-y10.2478/s11535-011-0015-ySearch in Google Scholar

[10] Polajnar J., Svenšek D., Čokl A., Resonance in herbaceous plant stems as a factor in vibrational communication of pentatomid bugs (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), J. R. Soc. Interface, 2012, 9, 1898–1907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2011.077010.1098/rsif.2011.0770Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[11] McVean A., Field L.H., Communication by substratum vibration in the New Zealand tree weta, Hemideina femorata (Stenopelmatidae: Orthoptera), J. Zool., Lond., 1996, 239, 101–122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1996.tb05440.x10.1111/j.1469-7998.1996.tb05440.xSearch in Google Scholar

[12] Virant-Doberlet M., Čokl A., Vibrational Communication in Insects, Neotrop. Entomol., 2004, 33, 121–134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X200400020000110.1590/S1519-566X2004000200001Search in Google Scholar

[13] Todd J.W., Ecology and behavior of Nezara viridula, Ann. Rev. Entomol., 1989, 34, 273–292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.34.010189.00142110.1146/annurev.en.34.010189.001421Search in Google Scholar

[14] Panizzi A.R., McPherson J.E., James D.G., Javahery M., McPherson R.M., Stink bugs (Pentatomidae), In: Schaefer C.W., Panizzi A.R. (Eds.), Heteroptera of economic importance, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2000 10.1201/9781420041859.ch13Search in Google Scholar

[15] McNett G.D., Cocroft R.B., Host shifts favor vibrational signal divergence in Enchenopa binotata treehoppers, Behav. Ecol., 2008, 16, 650–656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn01710.1093/beheco/arn017Search in Google Scholar

[16] Žunič A., Virant-Doberlet M., Čokl A., Species recognition during substrate-borne communication in Nezara viridula (L.) (Pentatomidae: Heteroptera), J. Insect Behav., 2011, 24, 468–487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10905-011-9272-x10.1007/s10905-011-9272-xSearch in Google Scholar

[17] Polajnar J., Čokl A., The effect of vibratory disturbance on sexual behaviour of the southern green stink bug Nezara viridula (Heteroptera, Pentatomidae), Centr. Eur. J. Biol., 2008, 3, 189–197 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s11535-008-0008-710.2478/s11535-008-0008-7Search in Google Scholar

[18] Charif R.A., Waack A.M., Strickman L.M., Raven Pro 1.4 User’s Manual, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, 2010 Search in Google Scholar

[19] Čokl A., McBrien H.L., Millar J.G., Comparison of substrate-borne vibrational signals of two stink bug species, Acrosternum hilare and Nezara viridula (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), Ann. Ent. Soc. Am., 2001, 94, 471–479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2001)094[0471:COSBVS]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

[20] R Development Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2011 Search in Google Scholar

[21] Čokl A., Virant-Doberlet M., Stritih N., Structure and function of songs emitted by southern green stink bugs from Brazil, Florida, Italy and Slovenia, Physiol. Entomol., 2000, 25, 196–205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3032.2000.00187.x10.1046/j.1365-3032.2000.00187.xSearch in Google Scholar

[22] Blassioli Moraes M.C., Laumann R.A., Čokl A., Borges M., Vibratory signals of four Neotropical stink bug species, Physiol. Entomol, 2005, 30, 175–188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.2005.00446.x10.1111/j.1365-3032.2005.00446.xSearch in Google Scholar

[23] McBrien H.L., Čokl A., Millar J.G., Comparison of substrate-borne vibrational signals of two congeneric stink bug species, Thyanta pallidovirens and T. custator accera (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), J. Ins. Behav., 2002, 15, 715–738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:102116402148910.1023/A:1021164021489Search in Google Scholar

[24] Pavlovčič P., Čokl A., Songs of Holcostethus strictus (Fabricius): a different repertoire among landbugs (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), Behav. Proc., 2001, 53, 65–73 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(00)00144-310.1016/S0376-6357(00)00144-3Search in Google Scholar

[25] Cavalcante A., Silva C., Laumann R.A., Cavalcante Ferreira J.B., Blassioli Moraes M.C., Borges M., et al., Reproductive biology, mating behavior, and vibratory communication of the Brown-Winged Stink Bug, Edessa meditabunda (Fabr.) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), Psyche, 2012, 2012, 1–9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/97801910.1155/2012/978019Search in Google Scholar

[26] Gogala M., Vibratory signals produced by Heteroptera — Pentatomomorpha and Cimicomorpha, In: Drosopoulos S., Claridge M.F. (Eds.), Insect sounds and communication, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2006 10.1201/9781420039337.pt2Search in Google Scholar

[27] Čokl A., Zorović M., Žunič A., Virant-Doberlet M., Tuning of host plants with vibratory songs of Nezara viridula L (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), J. Exp. Biol., 2005, 208, 1481–1488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.0155710.1242/jeb.01557Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Cocroft R.B., Rodríguez R.L., Hunt R.E., Host shifts and signal divergence: mating signals covary with host use in a complex of specialized plant-feeding insects, Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2012, 99, 60–72 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01345.x10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01345.xSearch in Google Scholar

[29] Rodríguez R.L., Ramaswamy K., Cocroft R.B., Evidence that female preferences have shaped signal evolution in a clade of specialized plantfeeding insects, Proc. R. Soc. B, 2006, 273, 2585–2593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.363510.1098/rspb.2006.3635Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[30] Sullivan-Beckers L., Cocroft R.B., The importance of female choice, male-male competition, and signal transmission as causes of selection on male mating signals, Evolution, 2010, 64, 3158–3171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01073.x10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01073.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] Elias D.O., Mason A.C., Hoy R.R., The effect of substrate on the efficacy of seismic courtship signal transmission in the jumping spider Habronattus dossenus (Araneae: Salticidae), J. Exp. Biol., 2004, 207, 4105–4110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.0126110.1242/jeb.01261Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Henry C.S., Martínez Wells M.L., Adaptation or random change? The evolutionary response of songs to substrate properties in lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla), Anim. Behav., 2004, 68, 879–895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.10.03210.1016/j.anbehav.2003.10.032Search in Google Scholar

[33] Cocroft R.B., Rodríguez R.L., The Behavioral Ecology of Insect Vibrational Communication, BioScience, 2005, 55, 323–334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0323:TBEOIV]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

[34] Endler J.A., Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution, Am. Nat., 1992, 139, S125–S153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/28530810.1086/285308Search in Google Scholar

[35] Endler J.A., Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 1993, 340, 215–225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1993.006010.1098/rstb.1993.0060Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Published Online: 2013-4-23
Published in Print: 2013-7-1

© 2013 Versita Warsaw

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 21.2.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2478/s11535-013-0188-z/html
Scroll to top button