Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access August 9, 2011

Superficial mycoses in the Nis region, Southeast-Serbia

  • Suzana Otasevic EMAIL logo , Jovana Đorđević , Gordana Ranđelović , Aleksandra Ignjatović , Predrag Stojanović , Dragan Zdravković and Roberta Marković
From the journal Open Medicine

Abstract

The aim of the study is to investigate the most frequent cause of superficial mycoses in patients from the territory of city Niš Southeast Serbia in the period from 1998 to 2010. A total of 3223 samples from 2887 patients with suspected dermatomycoses were examined. Superficial mycoses were diagnosed using standard microbiology techniques (conventional microscopy and cultivation). Dermatophytes were determined on the basis of their macroscopic and microscopic morphological and morphometric characteristics. Morphometric characteristics were obtained by Laboratory Universal Computer Image Analysis system (Lucia M, 1996). Species of genus Candida were identified using the test of production of germ tube in sera, by growth on comertial chromatogen medium (Chromotogenic Candida, Liofichem/Bacteriology products, Italy) and by using Auxacolor TMBioRad, France. The results were elaborated with the statistical method of descriptive and quantitative analysis (SPSS 14.0 for Windows 2003). The prevalence of superficial mycoses was 25,1%. Dermatophytes were identified in 67.6% of all positive cultures. Microsporum canis was the most prevalent (50.3%) dermatophyte isolated, followed by Trichophyton metagrophytes var. mentagrophytes (35.4%). Yeast genus Candida has become a more frequent cause of superficial fungal infection since 2001. and C. albicans was the dominant yeast (61.1%).

[1] Havilckova B., Czaika V.A., Friedrich M., Epidemiological trends in skin mycoses worldwide, Mycoses, 2008, 51, 2–15 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0507.2008.01606.x10.1111/j.1439-0507.2008.01606.xSearch in Google Scholar

[2] Foulet F., Cremer G., Bourdon-Lanoy E., Frequency of plantar dermatophytosis. A retospective study 2002, Ann. Dermatol. Venereol., 2007, 134, 343–345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0151-9638(07)89188-510.1016/S0151-9638(07)89188-5Search in Google Scholar

[3] Macura A.B., Dermatophyte infections, Int. J. Dermatol., 1993, 32, 313–323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4362.1993.tb01464.x10.1111/j.1365-4362.1993.tb01464.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Ginter-Hanselmayer G., Weger W., Ilkit M., Epidemiology of tinea capitis in Europe: current state and changing patterns, Mycoses, 2007, 50, 6–13 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0507.2007.01424.x10.1111/j.1439-0507.2007.01424.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Koneman E.W. et al., Diagnostic microbiology, V th ed, J. B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, USA, 1997, 456–462 Search in Google Scholar

[6] Tasić S., Pešić S., Fungal infection, diagnosis and treatment options, 1ed., Medical faculty-University of Niš, 2006, 31–51, (in Serbian) Search in Google Scholar

[7] Hay R.J., Clayton Y.M., Besilva N., Tinea capitis in south east London — a new pattern of infection with public health implications, Br. J. Dermatol., 1996, 135, 955–958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.1996.d01-1101.x10.1046/j.1365-2133.1996.d01-1101.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Tietz H.J., Czaika V., Ulbricht H.M., Sterry W., Tinea capitis in Germany. A survey in 1998, Mycoses, 1999, 42,(2), 73–76 10.1111/j.1439-0507.1999.tb00017.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Lehenkari E., Silvennoinen-Kassinen S., Dermatophytes in northen Finland in 1982–90, Mycoses, 1995, 38, 411–414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0507.1995.tb00073.x10.1111/j.1439-0507.1995.tb00073.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Korstanje M.J., Staats C.C.G., Tinea capitis in Northwestern Europe 1963–1993: etiologic agents and their changing prevalence, Int. J. Dermatol., 1994, 32, 548–589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4362.1994.tb02892.x10.1111/j.1365-4362.1994.tb02892.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Panasiti V, Devirgiliis V, Borroni RG. Epidemiology of dermatophytic infections in Rome, Italy: a retrospective study from 2002 to 2004, Med. Mycol., 2007, 45, 57–60 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369378060102868310.1080/13693780601028683Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Nowicki R., Dermatophytoses in the Gdaansk area, Poland a 12-year survey, Mycoses, 1996, 39, 399–402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0507.1996.tb00162.x10.1111/j.1439-0507.1996.tb00162.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Dolenc-Voljc M., Dermatophyte infections in the Ljubljana region, Slovenia, 1995–2002, Mycoses, 2005, 48, 181–186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0507.2005.01122.x10.1111/j.1439-0507.2005.01122.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Prohic A., An epidemiological survey of tinea capitis in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina over 10-years period, Mycoses 2008, 51, 125–129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0507.2007.01451.x10.1111/j.1439-0507.2007.01451.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Tasić S., Miladinović-Tasić N., Zdravković D., Superficial mycoses — analyse of 10 years experience in our centre, presented at 5th Balkan Congress for Microbiology, Budva, Montenegro 24–27 October 2007, Balkan Society of Microbiology&Montenegrin Society for Microbiology, 2007, 2.21 Search in Google Scholar

[16] Faninger A, Kranjčić-Todorović M. Clinical and microbiological study of dermatomycoses. Proceeding of XV Congress of microbiologist and epidemiologist from Yugoslavia (Jun 1973, Pula, Yugoslavia), Yugoslavian Society of Microbiology&Yugoslavian Society of Epidemiology, 1973, 1035–1039, (in Serbian) Search in Google Scholar

[17] Davise H.L., Medically important fungi-a guide to identification. 3d ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, 1995 Search in Google Scholar

[18] Bril M., Prevalence of mycoses in East and South-East Serbia, Medical Review, 1950, 6, 111–119, (in Serbian) Search in Google Scholar

[19] Faninger A., Kranjčić-Todorović M., The soil as a reservoir of dermatophytes-experiences from the territory of city Nis, proceeding of the third week of dermatology (Jun 1966, Beograd, Yugoslavia), Serbian Medical Society, 1966, 4–9, (in Serbian) Search in Google Scholar

[20] Faninger A., Kranjčić-Todorović M., Koteva Lj., Dermatomycoses in the territory of city Nis; Significance of isolation and identification of fungi that cause superficial mycoses, proceeding of X Conference of microbiologist and parasitologist from Yugoslavia (October 1967 Ohrid, Yugoslavia), Serbian Medical Society, 1967, 379–381, (in Serbian) Search in Google Scholar

[21] Faninger A., Kranjčić-Todorović M., Prevalence of Trichophyton rubrum in patients from Niš, proceeding of XV Congress of microbiologist and epidemiologist from Yugoslavia (Jun 1973, Pula, Yugoslavia), Serbian Medical Society, 1973, 1019–1024, (in Serbian). Search in Google Scholar

[22] Faninger A., Kranjčić-Todorović M., Prevalence of dermatophytoses in patients from rural area and possibility of pathogenic fungi isolation from cattle food, proceeding of first Congress of Yugoslavian microbiologist (May 1969, Beograd, Yugoslavia), Serbian Medical Society, 1969, 590–594 (in Serbian). Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2011-8-9
Published in Print: 2011-10-1

© 2011 Versita Warsaw

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 1.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2478/s11536-011-0052-y/html
Scroll to top button