Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter June 29, 2014

Comparison of 905 nm and 1550 nm semiconductor laser rangefinders’ performance deterioration due to adverse environmental conditions

  • J. Wojtanowski EMAIL logo , M. Zygmunt , M. Kaszczuk , Z. Mierczyk and M. Muzal
From the journal Opto-Electronics Review

Abstract

Laser rangefinder performance (i.e., maximum range) is strongly affected by environment due to visibility-dependent laser attenuation in the atmosphere and target reflectivity variations induced by surface condition changes (dry vs. wet). Both factors have their unique spectral features which means that rangefinders operating at different wavelengths are affected by specific environmental changes in a different way. Current state of the art TOF (time of flight) semiconductor laser rangefinders are based mainly on two wavelengths: 905 nm and 1550 nm, which results from atmospheric transmission windows and availability of high power pulsed sources. The paper discusses the scope of maximum range degradation of hypothetical 0.9 μm and 1.5 μm rangefinders due to selected water-related environmental effects. Atmospheric extinction spectra were adapted from Standard Atmosphere Model and reflectance fingerprints of various materials have been measured. It is not the aim of the paper to determine in general which wavelength is superior for laser range finding, since a number of criteria could be considered, but to verify their susceptibility to adverse environmental conditions.

[1] M.C. Amann, T. Bosch, M. Lescure, R. Myllyla, and M. Rioux, “Laser ranging: a critical review of usual techniques for distance measurement”, Opt. Eng. 40, 10–19 (2001). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.133070010.1117/1.1330700Search in Google Scholar

[2] H.N. Burns, C.G. Christodoulou, and G.D. Boreman, “System design of a pulsed laser rangefinder”, Opt. Eng. 30, 323–329 (1991). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.5580110.1117/12.55801Search in Google Scholar

[3] C.J. Willers, Electro-Optical System Analysis. A Radiometry Perspective., SPIE Press, Bellingham, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/3.100196410.1117/3.1001964Search in Google Scholar

[4] M. Zygmunt, “Methods of sub-noise signals detection in time-of-flight laser rangefinders”, Ph.D. Dissertation, Military University of Technology, Warsaw, 2002. Search in Google Scholar

[5] R.D. Richmond and S.C. Cain, Direct-Detection LADAR Systems, SPIE Press, Bellingham, 2010. 10.1117/3.836466Search in Google Scholar

[6] H. Weichel, Laser Beam Propagation Through the Atmosphere, SPIE Press, Bellingham, 1990. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Y. Yang, Y. Zhao, Z. Yuan, Q. Lijie, L. Shigang, and N. Jingda, “Analysis of the Transmittance of laser atmospheric transmission”, Infrared and Laser Engineering 28, 15–20 (1999). Search in Google Scholar

[8] S.A. Twomey, C.F. Bohren, and J.L. Mergenthaler, “Reflectance and albedo differences between wet and dry surfaces”, Appl. Opt. 25, 431–437 (1986). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.25.00043110.1364/AO.25.000431Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] K.F. Palmer and D. Williams, “Optical properties of water in the near-infrared”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 64, 1107–1110 (1974). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.64.00110710.1364/JOSA.64.001107Search in Google Scholar

[10] K. Chrzanowski, “Review of night vision technology”, Opt.-Electron. Rev. 21, 153–181 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s11772-013-0089-310.2478/s11772-013-0089-3Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-6-29
Published in Print: 2014-9-1

© 2014 SEP, Warsaw

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 26.2.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2478/s11772-014-0190-2/html
Scroll to top button