Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter March 28, 2013

Political science approaches to integrity and corruption

Jonathan Rose and Paul Heywood
From the journal Human Affairs

Abstract

Integrity ought logically to be a particularly important concept within political science. If those acting within the political system do not have integrity, our ability to trust them, to have confidence in their actions, and perhaps even to consider them legitimate can be challenged. Indeed, the very concept of integrity goes some way towards underwriting positive views of political actors. Yet, despite this importance, political science as a discipline has perhaps focused too little on questions of integrity. Where political science has looked at the subject of integrity, it has often done so without using the specific linguistic formulation “integrity”. Most commonly, the focus has instead been on “corruption”—a strand of research which has produced results that cannot always be translated into discussions of integrity, by virtue of its narrower focus upon the “negative pole” of public ethics. Other measures, such as “Quality of Government”, focus on positive attributes, notably impartiality, but this also fails fully to capture the notion of integrity: dishonesty can be impartial. Specific formal “codes” used within public life and among political practitioners can be much more nuanced than the most widely used measures, and can be much closer to what we understand—academically—as “integrity”. This paper argues that the hard conceptual and empirical work of elaborating integrity into a fully operationalizable concept offers the potential reward of an analytical concept that is more closely aligned with political reality.

[1] Anechiarico, F., Jacobs, J. (1996). The Pursuit of Absolute Integrity: How Corruption Control Makes Government Ineffective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Andersson, S., Heywood, P. M. (2009). The Politics of Perception: Use and Abuse of Transparency International’s Approach to Measuring Corruption. Political Studies 57, 746–767. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00758.x10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00758.xSearch in Google Scholar

[3] Brooks, R.C. (1970). The Nature of Political Corruption. In A. Heidenheimer (Ed.). Political Corruption: Readings in Comparative Analysis, pp. 56–64. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Civil Service Code (2010). Civil Service Code. [available online: http://resources.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/civil-service-code-2010.pdf] (last accessed 25/7/2012) Search in Google Scholar

[5] Collins, P. (2012). Introduction to the Special Issue: The Global Anti-Corruption Discourse-Towards Integrity Management. Public Administration and Development 32, 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pad.61810.1002/pad.618Search in Google Scholar

[6] della Porta, D., Vannucci, A. (2007). Corruption and Anti-corruption: The Political Defeat of “Clean Hands” in Italy. West European Politics 30, 830–853. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0140238070150032210.1080/01402380701500322Search in Google Scholar

[7] Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Easton, D. (1965). A Systems Analysis of Political Life. London: John Wiley. Search in Google Scholar

[9] van der Eijk, C., Franklin, M. (2009). Elections and Voters. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 10.1007/978-1-137-01363-7Search in Google Scholar

[10] Evrenk, H. (2011). Why a Clean Politician Supports Dirty Politics: A Game-Theoretical Explanation for the Persistence of Political Corruption. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 80, 498–510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.05.00410.1016/j.jebo.2011.05.004Search in Google Scholar

[11] French, R. D. (2012). The Professors on Public Life. The Political Quarterly 83, 532–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2012.02320.x10.1111/j.1467-923X.2012.02320.xSearch in Google Scholar

[12] Global Integrity (2012a). The Global Integrity Report: Methodology [available online: http://www.globalintegrity.org/report/methodology] (last accessed 25/7/2012) Search in Google Scholar

[13] Global Integrity (2012b). Global Integrity Report: 2011. Executive Summary [available online: http://www.globalintegrity.org/files/GIR2011.pdf] (last accessed 25/7/2012] Search in Google Scholar

[14] Grasso, M. (2011). The Research Advisory Board of the Committee on Standards in Public Life; Rose, J. Survey of Public Attitudes Towards Conduct in Public Life 2010. London: Committee on Standards in Public Life. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Hardin, R. (1999). Do We Want Trust in Government? In M. E. Warren (Ed.). Democracy and Trust, pp. 22–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511659959.00210.1017/CBO9780511659959.002Search in Google Scholar

[16] Hawken, A., Munck, G. (2009). Do You Know Your Data? Measurement Validity in Corruption Research. Working Paper, School of Public Policy, Pepperdine University. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Hayward, B. Mortimer, E., Brunwin, T. (2004). Survey of Public Attitudes Towards Conduct in Public Life 2004. London: Committee on Standards in Public Life. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Hayward, B., Brunwin, T., Bassett, C., Elston, D., Lambert, H. (2008). Survey of Public Attitudes Towards Conduct in Public Life 2008. London: Committee on Standards in Public Life. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Hetherington, M. J. (1998). The Political Relevance of Political Trust. American Political Science Review 92, 791–808. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/258630410.2307/2586304Search in Google Scholar

[20] Heywood, P.M. (2012). Integrity Management and the Public Service Ethos in the UK: Patchwork Quilt or Threadbare Blanket? International Review of Administrative Sciences 78, 1–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002085231244517210.1177/0020852312445172Search in Google Scholar

[21] Kenny, C. (2009). Measuring Corruption in Infrastructure: Evidence from Transition and Developing Countries. Journal of Development Studies 45, 314–332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0022038080226506610.1080/00220380802265066Search in Google Scholar

[22] Ipsos-MORI (2006). Survey of Public Attitudes Towards Conduct in Public Life 2006. London: Committee on Standards in Public Life. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Klingemann, H-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., Budge, I., McDonald, M. (2006). Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990–2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

[24] Knack S. 2006. Measuring Corruption in Eastern Europe and Central Asia A Critique of the Cross-Country Indicators. World Bank Working Paper 3968 10.1596/1813-9450-3968Search in Google Scholar

[25] Langbein, L., Knack, S. (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Six, One, or None? Journal of Development Studies 46, 350–370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0022038090295239910.1080/00220380902952399Search in Google Scholar

[26] Levi, M., Stoker, L. (2000). Political Trust and Trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science 3, 475–507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.47510.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475Search in Google Scholar

[27] Miller, A. H. (1974). Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964–1970. American Political Science Review 68, 951–972. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/195914010.2307/1959140Search in Google Scholar

[28] Lord Nolan (1995). Standards in Public Life: First Report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life. Cmnd. 2850-51. London: HMSO. Search in Google Scholar

[29] Olken, B. (2009). Corruption Perceptions vs. Corruption Reality. Journal of Public Economics 93, 950–964. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.03.00110.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.03.001Search in Google Scholar

[30] Philp, M. (2006). Corruption Definition and Measurement. In C. Sampford, A. Shacklock, C. Connors, F. Gatlung. Measuring Corruption, pp.45–79. London: Ashgate. Search in Google Scholar

[31] Powell, G. B. (2000). Elections as Instruments of Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press. Search in Google Scholar

[32] Rothstein, B. (2011). The Quality of Government: Corruption, Social Trust and Inequality in International Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226729589.001.000110.7208/chicago/9780226729589.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[33] Rothstein, B., Eek, D. (2009). Political Corruption and Social Trust: An Experimental Approach. Rationality and Society 21, 81–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104346310809934910.1177/1043463108099349Search in Google Scholar

[34] Rothstein, B., Teorell, J. (2008). What is Quality of Government? A Theory of Impartial Government Institutions. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 21, 165–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.xSearch in Google Scholar

[35] Scott, I., Leung, J. (2012). Integrity Management in Post-1997 Hong Kong: Challenges for a Rule-Based System. Crime, Law and Social Change 58, 39–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10611-012-9368-z10.1007/s10611-012-9368-zSearch in Google Scholar

[36] Stimson, J. (1999). Public Opinion in America. Oxford: Westview. Search in Google Scholar

[37] Transparency International [TI] (2011). National Integrity Systems Assessment: United Kingdom [available online: http://www.transparency.org.uk/our-work/publications/93-corruption-in-the-uk-part-three-nis-study] (last accessed 25/7/2012) Search in Google Scholar

[38] Transparency International [TI] (2012) What is the Corruption Perceptions Index [available online: http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2011/in_detail/] (last accessed 25/7/2012) Search in Google Scholar

[39] UNDP (2008). A Users’ Guide to Measuring Corruption. United Nations Development Program. UNDP Oslo Governance Centre. Search in Google Scholar

[40] Weatherford, M. S. (1992). Measuring Political Legitimacy. American Political Science Review 86, 149–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/196402110.2307/1964021Search in Google Scholar

[41] Webb, W. (2012). Ethical Culture and the Values-Based Approach to Integrity Management: A Case Study of the Department of Correctional Services. Public Administration and Development 32, 96–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pad.160210.1002/pad.1602Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-3-28
Published in Print: 2013-4-1

© 2013 Institute for Research in Social Communication, Slovak Academy of Sciences

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Scroll Up Arrow