Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter March 28, 2013

The perception of corruption as social and institutional pressure: A comparative analysis of cultural biases

Davide Torsello
From the journal Human Affairs

Abstract

This study is an empirical approach to answering the question: are there any universal factors that account for the origin, diffusion and persistence of corruption in human societies? The paper enquires whether the perception of corruption in politics and economics can be tackled as a form of cultural adaptation, driven by exogenous and endogenous forces. These are respectively: freedom of access and management of economic resources, and the pressures towards human grouping. Following the analytical insights of cultural theory, developed by Mary Douglas and later Aaron Wildavsky, variation is introduced through the ways in which corruption is perceived through the different behavioral and cultural biases that prevail in societies. This research introduces a cross-country comparative analysis of 57 countries attempting to test quantitatively whether institutional pressure and emphasis towards social grouping are correlated with corruption perception at country levels.

[1] Chai, S.K., Swedlow, B. (Eds.). (1998). Culture and Social Theory. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Chai, K., Liu, M., Kim, M.S. (2009). Cultural Comparisons of Beliefs and Values: Applying the Grid-Group Analysis Approach to the World Value Survey. Beliefs and Values 1, 193–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/1942-0617.1.2.19310.1891/1942-0617.1.2.193Search in Google Scholar

[3] Doig, A., Theobald, R. (Eds.). (2000). Corruption and Democratisation. London: Frank Cass. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Douglas, M. (1970, 2003). Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology. London: Barrie and Rockliff. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Douglas, M. (1982). In the Active Voice. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Gellner, E., Waterbury, J. (Eds.). (1977). Patron and Clients in Mediterranean Societies. London: Duckworth. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Huntington, S.P. (1968). Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Johnston, M. (2005). Civil Society and Corruption: Mobilizing for Reform. Lanham: University Press of America. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Leff, N.H. (1964). Economic Development through Bureaucratic Corruption. American Behavioral Scientist 8, 8–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00027642640080030310.1177/000276426400800303Search in Google Scholar

[10] Montinola, G.R., Jackman, R.W. (2002). Sources of Corruption: a Cross-national Study. British Journal of Political Science 32, 147–170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S000712340200006610.1017/S0007123402000066Search in Google Scholar

[11] Nujiten, M., Anders, G. (Eds). (2007). Corruption and the Secret of Law: A Legal Anthropological Perspective. Farnham: Ashgate. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Pardo, I. (Ed). (2004). Between Morality and the Law: Corruption, Anthropology and Comparative Society. Farnham: Ashgate. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and Government. Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO978113917509810.1017/CBO9781139175098Search in Google Scholar

[14] Rothstein, B. (1998). Just Institutions Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO978051159844910.1017/CBO9780511598449Search in Google Scholar

[15] Rothstein, B., Teorell, J. (2008). What is Quality of Government: A Theory of Impartial Institutions. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 21,165–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.xSearch in Google Scholar

[16] Sampford, C.A., Shacklock, C., Connors, F., Galtung, F. (Eds.). (2006). Measuring Corruption. Farnham: Ashgate. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Torsello, D. (2011). The Ethnography of Corruption: Research Themes in Political Anthropology. Quality of Government Institute Working Paper, University of Gothenburg, Sweden, 2. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Thompson, M., Ellis, R., Wildavsky, A. (1990). Cultural Theory. Boulder: Westview Press. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Thompson, T., Shah, A. (2005). Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index: Whose Perceptions Are They Anyway. Discussion Draft: http://www.jvi.org/uploads/tx_abaeasydownloads/1.7%20Shah_Thompson_Transparency%20international%20CPI_whose%20perceptions%20are%20they%20anyway.pdf (2005) Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-3-28
Published in Print: 2013-4-1

© 2013 Institute for Research in Social Communication, Slovak Academy of Sciences

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Scroll Up Arrow