Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter March 28, 2013

Corruption and anti-corruption local discourses and international practices in post-socialist Romania

Filippo Zerilli
From the journal Human Affairs

Abstract

In the past two decades academic and research literature on “corruption” has flourished. During the same period organizations and initiatives fighting against corruption have also significantly expanded, turning “anti-corruption” into a new research subject. However, despite a few exceptions there is a division of labor between scholars who study corruption itself and those who study the global anti-corruption industry. Juxtaposing corruption’s local discourses and anti-corruption international practices, this article is an attempt to bring together these two intertwined research dimensions and explore how an ethnographic approach might contribute to framing them together. Firstly, it describes how corruption in Romania is often conceptualized and explained in terms of national heritage, something related to old and recent cultural history, including traditional folklore. Secondly, it explores how anti-corruption works in practice, focusing on international legal cooperation projects monitoring the progress and shortcomings both prior to and post Romania’s accession to the European Union. Finally, revealing the articulations of these two apparently unrelated research fields, the article argues that corruption’s local explanations and the circular logic of auditing observed within the anti-corruption industry share a common developmental ideology mirroring the crypto-colonialist structure of power relations and dependency among European nation-states emerging out of the Cold War.

[1] Blundo, G. (Ed.). (2000). Monnayer les pouvoirs. Espaces, mécanismes et répresentations de la corruption. Nouveaux Cahiers de l IUED, 9. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. 10.4000/books.iheid.2610Search in Google Scholar

[2] Blundo, G., Olivier de Sardan J.-P. (Eds.). (2006). Everyday Corruption and the State. Citizens and Public Officials in Africa. London: Zed Books. 10.5040/9781350219984Search in Google Scholar

[3] Comaroff, J. and Comaroff, J. (Eds.). (2006). Law and Disorder in the Postcolony. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226114101.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[4] Djuvara, N. (2000). O scurta istorie a romanilor povestita celor tineri. Bucureşti: Humanitas. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Eliade, M. (1997 [1943]). Breve storia della Romania e dei Rumeni. Roma: Settimo Sigillo (originally published in Portuguese). Search in Google Scholar

[6] Fochi, A. (1964). Mioriţa. Tipologie, circulaţie, geneză, texte. Bucureşti: Editura Academiei R.P.R. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Haller, D., Shore, C. (Eds.) (2005). Understanding Corruption: Anthropological Perspectives. London: Pluto Press. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Harrison, E. (2006). Unpacking the Anti-Corruption Agenda: Dilemmas for Anthropologists. Oxford Development Studies 34, 15–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1360081050049591510.1080/13600810500495915Search in Google Scholar

[9] Hartog, F. (2007 [2002]). Regimi di storicit. Presentismo e esperienze del tempo. Palermo: Sellerio (originally published in French). Search in Google Scholar

[10] Hasty, J. (2005). The Pleasures of Corruption. Desire and Discipline in Ghanaian Political Culture”. Cultural Anthropology 20, 271–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/can.2005.20.2.27110.1525/can.2005.20.2.271Search in Google Scholar

[11] Herzfeld, M. (1992). The Social Production of Indifference. Exploring the Symbolic Roots of Western Bureaucracy. New York: Berg. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Herzfeld, M. (1997). Cultural Intimacy. Social Poetics in the Nation-State. New York & London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Herzfeld, M. (2002). The Absent Presence: Discourses of Crypto-Colonialism. South Atlantic Quarterly 101, 899–926. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00382876-101-4-89910.1215/00382876-101-4-899Search in Google Scholar

[14] Hindess, B. (2009). Anti-Corruption as a Risk to Democracy: On the Unintended Consequences of International Anti-Corruption Campaigns. In L. de Sousa, P. Larmour, B. Hindess (Eds.). Governments, NGOs and Anti-Corruption: The New Integrity Warriors, pp. 19–32. Abingdon: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Mattei, U., Nader, L. (2008). Plunder: When the Rule of Law is Illegal. London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Mosse, D. (2005). Cultivating Development: An Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice. London: Pluto Press. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Mrejeru, T. et al. (2000). Infracţiunile de corupţie. Aspecte teoretice şi practice. Bucureşti. All Beck. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Nicolau, I. (2001). Hoţia la romani. Inainte şi după 23 August. Dilema, 448 (thematic issue: Foloasele şi ponoasele corupţiei). Search in Google Scholar

[19] Nuijten, M., Anders, G. (Eds.). (2007). Corruption and the Secret of Law: a Legal Anthropological Perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Panaite, V. (2000). The Ottoman Law of War and Peace. New York: Columbia University Press. Search in Google Scholar

[21] Pardo, I. (Ed.). (2006). Between Morality and the Law. Corruption, Anthropology and Comparative Society. Aldershot: Ashgate. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Polzer, T. (2001). Corruption: Deconstructing the World Bank Discourse. Development Studies Institute, Working Paper Series, LSE, n.01-18. Available at http://www2.lse.ac.uk/internationalDevelopment/pdf/WP/WP18.pdf (Accessed July 2012). Search in Google Scholar

[23] Renzi, L. (1995). Cele mai vechi versiuni ale “Mioriţei. Dacoromania, n.s., 1(1994–1995), 87–102. Search in Google Scholar

[24] Riles, Annelise (1998). Infinity within the Brackets. American Ethnologist 25, 378–398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/ae.1998.25.3.37810.1525/ae.1998.25.3.378Search in Google Scholar

[25] Sampford, C., Shacklock, A., Connors, C., Galtung, F. (Eds.). (2006). Measuring Corruption. Aldershot: Ashgate. Search in Google Scholar

[26] Sampson, S. (2002). Weak States, Uncivil Societies and Thousands of NGOs. Western Democracy Export as Benevolent Colonialism in the Balkans. In S. Recic (Ed.). Cultural Boundaries of the Balkans. Lund: Lund University Press. Available at http://www.anthrobase.com/Txt/S/Sampson_S_01.htm (Accessed June 2011). Search in Google Scholar

[27] Sampson, S. (2005). Integrity Warriors: Global Morality and the Anticorruption Movement in the Balkans. In D. Haller, C. Shore (Eds.). Understanding Corruption: Anthropological Perspectives, pp. 103–130. London: Pluto Press. Search in Google Scholar

[28] Sampson, S. (2009). Corruption and Anti-Corruption in Southeast Europe: Landscapes and Sites. In L. de Sousa, P. Larmour, B. Hindess (Eds.). Governments, NGOs and Anti-Corruption: The New Integrity Warriors, pp. 168–186. Abingdon: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

[29] Sampson, S. (2010). The Anti-Corruption Industry: From Movement to Institution. Global Crime 11, 261–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1744057100366925810.1080/17440571003669258Search in Google Scholar

[30] Santos, Boaventura de Sousa (2007). Beyond Abyssal Thinking. From Global Lines to Ecologies of Knowledges. Review. A Journal of the Fernand Braudel Center XXX-1, 45–89. Available at http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2007-06-29-santos-en.html (Accessed June 2011). Search in Google Scholar

[31] Sharma, A. (2006). Crossbreeding Institutions, Breeding Struggle: Women’s Employment, Neoliberal Governmentality, and State (Re)Formation in India. Division II Faculty Publications. Paper 40. Available at http://wesscholar.wesleyan.edu/div2facpubs/40 (Accessed July 2012) 10.1525/can.2006.21.1.60Search in Google Scholar

[32] Shore, C. (2008). Audit culture and Illiberal Governance: Universities and the Politics of Accountability. Anthropological Theory 8, 278–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146349960809381510.1177/1463499608093815Search in Google Scholar

[33] Strathern, M. (Ed.). (2000). Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics, and the Academy. London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

[34] Verdery, K. (1983). Transylvanian Villagers. Three Centuries of Political, Economic and Ethnic Change. Berkeley: University of California Press. Search in Google Scholar

[35] Zafiu, R. (2002). Şpaga. România literară 30, 15. Search in Google Scholar

[36] Zerilli, F. M. (2003). Playing (with) Bribery. Ethnographic Images of Corruption in Romania. In C. Papa, G. Pizza, F.M. Zerilli (Eds.). La ricerca antropologica in Romania. Prospettive storiche ed etnografiche, pp. 275–308. Naples: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane. Search in Google Scholar

[37] Zerilli, F. M. (2010). The Rule of Soft Law: An Introduction. Focaal. Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology 56(Spring), 3–18. Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-3-28
Published in Print: 2013-4-1

© 2013 Institute for Research in Social Communication, Slovak Academy of Sciences

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Scroll Up Arrow