Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access June 27, 2014

Macroeconomic analysis of road vehicles related environmental pollution in Hungary

  • Árpád Török EMAIL logo and Ádám Török
From the journal Open Engineering


The article aims to examine the relationship between road transport and macro economy, especially the use of fossil energy in transport sector. Nowadays environmental pollution is a key issue on the EU level as well as in Hungary. Lots of effort have been already done in order to decrease emissions in road transport, but a lot more need to be done. The article aims to prove that the only possible solution is technological innovation in order to reach emission reduction target without decline of the GDP. The basic idea is to ensure sustainable development, to decrease environmental pollution in road transport without harming the economy. In the EU and in Hungary road vehicles are powered by fossil fuelled internal combustion engines. This paper aims to analyse the role of the fossil fuel-based road transport sector within the economy with the usage of constant elasticity substitution (CES) production functions. Authors have built CES production function for Hungary. Parameters were calculated based on the validated model.

[1] Solow R. A, Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth, Q J Econ 70, 1956, 65–94 in Google Scholar

[2] Arrow K. J., Chenery H. B., Minhas B. S., and Solow R. M., Capital-Labor Substitution and Economic Efficiency, Rev Econ Stat 43, 1961, 225–250 in Google Scholar

[3] Brown M. and de Carni J. S., Technological Change and the Distribution of Income, Int Econ Rev 3, 1963, 289–309 in Google Scholar

[4] Spence M., Product selection, fixed costs, and monopolistic competition, Rev Econ Stud 43, 1976, 217–35 in Google Scholar

[5] Dixit A. K. and Stiglitz J. E., Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity, Am Econ Rev 67, 1977, 297–308 Search in Google Scholar

[6] Saito: The Algebra of Convergence from CES to Cobb-Douglas and Leontief, Lecture Notes State University of New York at Buffalo, 2011 Search in Google Scholar

[7] Török Á., Theoretical estimation of the environmental impact of biofuel mixtures, Transport 24, 2009, 26–29, DOI: 10.3846/1648-4142.2009.24.26-29 in Google Scholar

[8] Kerepesi K., Romvári E., Economics for Engineers [in Hungarian: Közgazdaságtan mérnököknek], Muegyetemi Press, Budapest 471, 1993 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Saari A., Lettenmeier M., Pusenius K., Hakkarainen E., Influence of vehicle type and road category on natural resource consumption in road transport TRANSPORT RES D-TR E 12, 2007, 23–32, DOI:10.1016/j.trd.2006.10.005 10.1016/j.trd.2006.10.005Search in Google Scholar

[10] Cobb C. W., Douglas P. H., A Theory of Production. American Economic, Review Supplement 18, 1928, 139–165 Search in Google Scholar

[11] Maeda A., Estimating the Impact of GHG Target-Setting on the Macroeconomy, Kyoto Sustainability Initiative, 2010, Kyoto University Search in Google Scholar

[12] Barabás I., Predicting the temperature dependent density of biodiesel-diesel-bioethanol blends, Fuel 109, 2013, 563–574, DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.03.001 in Google Scholar

[13] Temple J., The calibration of CES production functions, J Macroecon 34, 2012, 294–303, DOI: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2011.12.006 in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-6-27
Published in Print: 2014-6-1

© 2014 Versita Warsaw

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 23.2.2024 from
Scroll to top button