Skip to content
Open Access Published by De Gruyter Mouton October 21, 2009

A Typology of the Path of Deictic Motion Verbs as Path-Conflating Verbs: The Entailment of Arrival and the Deictic Center

  • Tsuneko Nakazawa

A Typology of the Path of Deictic Motion Verbs as Path-Conflating Verbs: The Entailment of Arrival and the Deictic Center

This paper analyzes deictic motion verbs in various languages using Talmy's framework, and isolates the Path of motion expressed by these verbs. It is argued that the different interpretations of the Path so discovered are attributable to the lexical meaning of deictic motion verbs as well as locative phrases. Furthermore, deictic motion verbs are claimed to be lexically specified for the entailment of arrival only if they express the Path eventually directed to the deictic center. The arrival-time and departure-time interpretations of cooccurring point-of-time expressions are shown to coincide with the entailment of arrival, or the lack thereof, which is inherent to the semantics of deictic motion verbs.

References

Aske, J. 1989. "Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look". In: Hall, K., M. Meacham, and R. Shapiro (eds.), Proceedings of the fifth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 1-14.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, G. 1972. "Fillmore's semantics of ‘come’ revisited". Lingua e Stile 7. 575-599.Search in Google Scholar

Dowty, D. 1979. Word meaning and Montague Grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague's PTQ. (Synthese language library 7.) Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, C.J. 1975. "Coming and going". Santa Cruz lectures on deixis, 1971, by Charles J. Fillmore. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club. 50-69. (Reprinted as Fillmore 1997.)Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, C.J. 1997. "Coming and going". Lectures on deixis. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 77-102.Search in Google Scholar

Hoopert, D.A. and V. Warkentin. 1977. "Tila Chol ‘come’, and ‘go’, and ‘arrive’". Notes on Linguistics 4. 11-16.Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, R. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, R. 1996. "The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps even quantification in English". Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14(2). 305-354.Search in Google Scholar

Kuiper, A. and W.R. Merrifield. 1975. "Diuxi Mixtec verbs of motion and arrival". International Journal of American Linguistics 41(1). 32-45.10.1086/465336Search in Google Scholar

Kuno, S. 1987. Functional syntax: Anaphora, discourse and empathy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kuno, S. and E. Kaburaki. 1977. "Empathy and syntax." Linguisic Inquiry 8(4). 627-672.Search in Google Scholar

McCawley, J.D. 1971. "Pre-lexical syntax". In: O'Brien, R. J. (ed.) Report of the twenty-second annual roundtable meeting on linguistics and language studies. Washington: Georgetown University Press. 19-33.Search in Google Scholar

Nakazawa, T. 2007. "A typology of the Ground of deictic motion verbs as Path-conflating verbs: the speaker, the addressee, and beyond". Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 43(2). 59-82.10.2478/v10010-007-0014-3Search in Google Scholar

Pickett, V.B. 1976. "Further comments on Zapotec motion verbs". International Journal of American Linguistics 42(2). 162-164.10.1086/465406Search in Google Scholar

Pustejovsky, J. 1991. "The syntax of event structure". Cognition 41. 47-81.10.1016/0010-0277(91)90032-YSearch in Google Scholar

Pustejovsky, J. 1995. The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rauh, G. 1981. "On coming and going in English and German". Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics 13. 53-68.Search in Google Scholar

Slobin, D.I. and N. Hoiting. 1994. "Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations". In: Gahl, S., A. Dolbey and C. Johnson (eds.), Proceedings of the twentieth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 487-505.Search in Google Scholar

Speck, C.H. and V.B. Pickett. 1976. "Some properties of the Texmelucan Zapotec verbs go, come and arrive". International Journal of American Linguistics 42(1). 58-64.Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, L. 1975. "Semantics and syntax of motion". In: Kimball, J.P. (ed.), Syntax and semantics 4. New York: Academic Press. 181-238.Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, L. 1985. "Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms". In: Shopen, T. (ed.), Grammatical categories and the lexicon. (Language typology and syntactic description III.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 57-149.Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, L. 2000. Typology and process in concept structuring. Toward a cognitive semantics (Vol. 2.) Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6848.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Vendler, Z. 1957. "Verbs and times". The Philosophical Review LXVI(2) (whole number 378). 143-160. (Reprinted as Vendler 1967.)Search in Google Scholar

Vendler, Z. 1967. "Verbs and times". Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. 97-121.Search in Google Scholar

Watanabe, S. 1994. "‘Kommen’-no daikusisu-to imi" [Deicsis and semantics of kommen]. Doitu Bungaku [German Literature] 93. Nihon Dokubun Gakkai [Japanese Society of German Literature]. 125-133.Search in Google Scholar

Wilkins, D.P. and D. Hill. 1995. "When ‘go’ means ‘come’: Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs". Cognitive Linguistics 6(2-3). 209-259.10.1515/cogl.1995.6.2-3.209Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2009-10-21
Published in Print: 2009-9-1

This content is open access.

Downloaded on 28.5.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2478/v10010-009-0022-6/html
Scroll to top button