Accessible Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter April 5, 2013

Uncontrolled withdrawal of a control rod without SCRAM

Reaktivitätseintrag bei unkontrolliertem Herausziehen eines Regelstabes ohne SCRAM
T. Abou-El-Maaty
From the journal Kerntechnik


In the present work, the thermal-hydraulic analysis of reactivity-induced transients in a Low Enriched Uranium (LEU) core of a typical material test research reactor is conducted using the previous program developed Khater et al. The analysis was done for the uncontrolled withdrawal of a control rod under scram-disabled conditions. The initiating event reactivity was considered with and without influence of the reactivity efficiency curve (“S” curve). The results of the transient calculations are analyzed and compared with each other. In the transient without the “S” curve influence, a high primary peak power of 406.18 MW is attained and a clad melt down is occurring after 1.85 s. In the transient with the “S” curve influence, a super prompt highly critical situation is produced (1.762 $ at 0.895 s) with a very high primary peak power of 801.05 MW at 0.912 s. A fast clad melt down is resulting in the hot channel at 1.088 s and a stable film boiling is occurring. This study shows that the influence of the reactivity efficiency curve results in higher peaks in power and temperatures (fuel, clad and coolant) with a fast clad melt down than that of a linear assumption.


In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurden die reaktivitäts-induzierten Transienten in einem Kern mit niedrig angereichertem Uran eines typischen Materialtest-Forschungsreaktors mit Hilfe des zuvor entwickelten Rechencodes ETRR2-RIA thermohydraulisch analysiert. Die Analyse wurde für den Fall eines unkontrollierten Herausziehens eines Regelstabes ohne SCRAM durchgeführt. Die bei diesem Ereignis freigesetzte Reaktivität wurde mit und ohne den Einfluss der Reaktivitätsleistungskurve (“S“-Kurve) betrachtet. Die Ergebnisse der Transientenberechnung werden analysiert und miteinander verglichen. Bei der Transiente ohne “S“-Kurven-Einfluss wird eine promptkritischer Zustand (1,762 $ bei 0,895 s) mit einer sehr hohen primären Leistungsspitze von 801,05 MW nach 0,912 s erzeugt. Dies verursacht ein schnelles Schmelzen der Hüllrohre im Heißkanal nach 1,088 s und ein stabiles Filmsieden. Diese Studie zeigt, dass der Einfluss der Reaktivitätsleistungskurve zu höheren Leistungs- und Temperaturspitzen (Brennstoff, Hüllrohre und Kühlmittel) mit einem schnelleren Schmelzen der Hüllrohre führt als dies bei einer linearen Annahme der Fall ist.


1 Woodruff, W. L.: A kinetic and Thermal-Hydraulic Capability for the Analysis of Research Reactors. Nuclear Technology64 (1984) 196 Search in Google Scholar

2 Mirza, A. M.; Khanan, S.; Mirza, N. M.: Simulation of Reactivity Transient Current MTRs. Annals of Nuclear Energy25 (1998) 146510.1016/S0306-4549(98)00020-6 Search in Google Scholar

3 Nasir, R.; Mirza, N. M.; Mirza, S. M.: Sensitivity of Reactivity Insertion Limits with Respect to Safety Parameters in a Typical MTR. Annals of Nuclear Energy26 (1999) 1517 Search in Google Scholar

4 Khater, H.; Abou-EL-Maaty, T.; El-Din EL-Morshdy, S.: Thermal-hydraulic modeling of reactivity accident in MTR reactors. Kerntechnik72 (2007) 44 Search in Google Scholar

5 Sanchez, J.: On the Numerical Solution of the Point Reactor Kinetics Equations by Generalized Runge-Kutta Methods. Nuclear Science and Engineering103 (1989) 94 Search in Google Scholar

6 Meyer, J. E.: Hydrodynamic Models for the Treatment of Reactor Thermal Transients. Nuclear Science and Engineering10 (1961) 269 Search in Google Scholar

7 Zuber, N.; Stube, F. W.; Bijwaard, G.: Vapor Void Fraction in Subcooled-boiling and in saturated Boiling Systems. Proceedings, Third International Heat, Transfer Conference, Chicago, IL, August 7–12, 1966, New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineering, Volume V, 1966, pp. 2438 Search in Google Scholar

8 Munoz-Cobo, J. L.; Chiva, S.; Sekhri, A.: A Reduced Order Model of BWR Dynamics with Subcooled Boiling and Modal Kinetics: Application to Out of Phase Oscillations. Annals of Nuclear Energy31 (2004) 1135 Search in Google Scholar

9 Collier, J. G.; Thome, J. R.: Convective Boiling and Condensation, Oxford Science Publications, 3rd ed.1996 Search in Google Scholar

10 Nobuaki, O.; Kiyomi, I.; Sadanitsu, T.: A Study of Subcooled Film-Boiling Under Reactivity-Initiated Accident Conditions in Light Water Reactors. Nuclear Science and Engineering88 (1984) 331 Search in Google Scholar

11 Dougal, R. S.; Rohsenow, W. M.: Film Boiling on the Inside of Vertical Tubes with Upward Flow of the Fluid at Low Qualities. MIT Report 907926 (1963) Search in Google Scholar

12 McDoough, J. B.; Milich, E.; King, E. C.: An Experimental Study of Partial Film Boiling Region with Water at Elevated Pressure in a Round Vertical Tube. A.I.Ch.E. Preprint No. 29, Fourth National Heat Transfer Conference, 1960 Search in Google Scholar

13 Rohsenow, W. M.; Choi, H. Y.: Heat, Mass, Momentum TransferPrentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N. J., USA. 1961 Search in Google Scholar

14 Tong, L. S.; Currin, H. B.: DNB (Burnout) Studies in an Open Lattice Core. USAEC Report WCAP-3736, 1964 Search in Google Scholar

15 IAEA (1980, 1992): Research Reactor Core Conversion from the use of Highly Enriched Uranium to the use of Low Enriched Uranium Fuels, Guidebook, Reports IAEA-TECDOC-233, IAEA-TECDOC-643 Search in Google Scholar

16 INVAP, 1999, Final Safety Analysis Report, 0767-5325-3IBLI-001-1A Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2007-3-20
Published Online: 2013-04-05
Published in Print: 2007-11-01

© 2007, Carl Hanser Verlag, München