Abstract
It has been claimed by R. Sietmann that the attribution of the discovery of the so-called ‘Auger’ effect to Pierre Auger was a false attribution and that Lise Meitner should have got the credit for that discovery. However Sietmann himself recognised that Meitner's description of this effect was ‘buried in’ two larger papers whose primary concern was nuclear physics. Sietmann only mentioned Auger's 1925 article and did not mention his 1923 article, an omission now found in many places. We examine again L. Meitner's and P. Auger's contributions to the description of the ‘Auger’ effect. Meitner's concern was the exact nature of the (nuclear) beta radiations about which she opposed Ch. D. Ellis, and this had been the subject of an intense Berlin–Cambridge controversy where Ellis' description eventually prevailed. Auger's observations were the central theme of his PhD thesis at the J. Perrin's laboratory on the composed photoelectric effect. We thus believe that while L. Meitner should have shared the Nobel Prize with O. Hahn, the Auger effect has rightly been attributed to Auger.
References
[1] RichardSietmann: False atttribution: Phys. Bull.39 (1988) 316–317.Search in Google Scholar
[2] F.Krafft: Lise Meitner: Eine Biographie, Berlin (1980).Search in Google Scholar
[3] C.Kerner: Lise, Atomphysikerin: Die Lebensgeschichte der Lise Meitner, Beltz, Weinheim, (1987).Search in Google Scholar
[4] R.L.Sime: Lise Meitner: A Life in Physics, University of California Press, Berkeley (1996).Search in Google Scholar
[5] S.E.Watkins: Am. J. Physics51 (1983) 551–553.10.1119/1.13201Search in Google Scholar
[6] A.Pais: Inward Bound. Of Matter and Forces in the Physical World, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1988).Search in Google Scholar
[7] C.Jensen: Controversy and Consensus, Nuclear beta decay: 1911–1934, Ph.D. thesis 1990, posthumously edited by F.Aaserud, H.Kragh, E.Ründinger, R. H.Stuewer, Birkhaüser, Basel (2000).Search in Google Scholar
[8] B.Fernandez: De l'atome au noyau. Une approche historique de la physique atomique et de la physique nucléaire, Ellipses, Paris (2006).Search in Google Scholar
[9] O.B.M.Hardouin Duparc: Z. Metallkd.4 (2005) 398–404.Search in Google Scholar
[10] C.D.Ellis: Proc. Roy. Soc. London A99 (1921) 261–271.10.1098/rspa.1921.0040Search in Google Scholar
[11] C.D.Ellis: Proc. Roy. Soc. London A101 (1922) 1–17.10.1098/rspa.1922.0022Search in Google Scholar
[12] L.Meitner: Z. Physik9 (1922) 131–144.10.1007/BF01326962Search in Google Scholar
[13] L.Meitner: Z. Physik9 (1922) 145–152.10.1007/BF01326963Search in Google Scholar
[14] L.Meitner: Z. Physik17 (1923) 54–66.10.1007/BF01328663Search in Google Scholar
[15] S.Rosseland: Z. Physik14 (1923) 173–181.10.1007/BF01340038Search in Google Scholar
[16] http://picardp1.ivry.cnrs.fr/Auger.html, http://auger.cnrs.fr/pierre_auger.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
[17] P.Auger: Surf. Sci.48 (1975) 1–8.10.1016/0039-6028(75)90306-4Search in Google Scholar
[18] C.T.R.Wilson: Proc. Roy. Soc. London A104 (1923) 1–24.10.1098/rspa.1923.0090Search in Google Scholar
[19] P.Auger: Sur les rayons β secondaires produits dans un gaz par des rayons X, C.R.A.S.177 (1923) 169–171. (C.R.A.S.: Comptes Rendus des séances hebdomadaires de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris).Search in Google Scholar
[20] P.Auger: Sur les rayons β secondaires produits dans un gaz par des rayons X, C.R.A.S.180 (1925) 65–68.Search in Google Scholar
[21] P.Auger: Journal de physique et le Radium6 (1925) 205–208.10.1051/jphysrad:0192500606020500Search in Google Scholar
[22] P.Auger: Annales de Physique, 6 (1926) 183–253.10.1051/anphys/192610060183Search in Google Scholar
[23] P.Auger: Sur le rendement de la fluorescence dans le domaine des rayons X, C.R.A.S.182 (1926) 773–774 + 1215–1216.Search in Google Scholar
[24] L.Meitner: in: H.Geiger, K.Scheel (Eds.), Handbuch der Physik, Vol. XXII/1: Elektronen. Atome. Moleküle, Julius Springer, Berlin (1926) 124–145.Search in Google Scholar
[25] W.Bothe: Absorption und Zerstreuung von Röntgenstrahlen, in: H.Geiger, K.Scheel (Eds.), Handbuch der Physik, Vol. XXIII: Quanten, Julius Springer, Berlin (1926) 307–423.Search in Google Scholar
[26] G.Wentzel: Z. Physik43 (1927) 524–530.10.1007/BF01397631Search in Google Scholar
[27] H.R.Robinson, A.M.Cassie: Proc. Roy. Soc. A113 (1927) 282–301.Search in Google Scholar
[28] H.Kallmann, BorisRosen: Phys. Zeitschrift32 (1931) 521–544, translated in Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk 12 (1931) 105–135, (1932) 293–319.10.3367/UFNr.0012.193201f.0105Search in Google Scholar
[29] L.Meitner: Kernstruktur, in: H.Geiger, K.Scheel (Eds.), Handbuch der Physik, Vol. XXII/1: Elektronen. Atome. Ionen, Julius Springer, Berlin (1933) 118–153.Search in Google Scholar
[30] E.H.S.Burhop: Proc. Roy. Soc. London A148 (1935) 272–284;10.1098/rspa.1935.0018 E.H.S. Burhop: The Auger Effect and Other Radiationless Transitions, Cambridge Monographs on Physics, Cambridge (1952).Search in Google Scholar
[31] K.J.McKay: in: L. Marton (Ed.), Advances in Electronics, Vol.1 (1948) 65–130.Search in Google Scholar
[32] E.J.Sternglass: Phys. Rev.80 (1950) 925–926.10.1103/PhysRev.80.925Search in Google Scholar
[33] J.J.Lander: Phys. Rev.91 (1953) 1382–1387.10.1103/PhysRev.91.1382Search in Google Scholar
[34] P.Auger: L'Homme microscopique. Essai de Monadologie, Flammarion, Paris (1952).Search in Google Scholar
© 2009, Carl Hanser Verlag, München
