Accessible Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 6, 2013

In-Process R eometry Studies of LDPE Compounds

Part I: Unfilled esin

A.L. Kelly, M. Woodhead, P.D. Coates, D. Barnwell and K. Martin

Abstract

The initial part of a comprehensive study into the investigation and validation of in-process measurements on a low density polyethylene (LDPE) compound during extrusion is reported. An unfilled, commercial grade of low density polyethylene was processed using fully instrumented, computer monitored, single and twin screw extruders in the Interdisciplinary Research Centre (IRC) laboratories, University of Bradford. Three in-process rheometers were used; a prototype Rosand capillary on-line rheometer (OLR), a four sensor slit die in-line rheometer (ILR) and a six sensor slit die ILR. Off-line comparisons were carried out using a Rosand RH twin bore capillary rheometer. All devices allowed shear ow characterisation at a range of processing rates, and the capillary rheometers also provided a measurement of entry pressure drop through the use of orifice dies. The six-sensor ILR also allowed measurement of entry pressure drop into the slit, although the differences in ow geometry meant these measurements were not directly comparable with the capillary devices, and exit pressures were extrapolated from ILR pressure drops. The in-process devices exhibited very good agreement with measurements made off-line, in both shear ow and entry pressures. In-line slit die measurements were very close to those made using capillary dies, despite the in-line tests being non-isothermal and employing a different geometry of measurement section. Differences in melt rheology between single and twin extrusion were observed, due to the amount of mechanical work input by each extruder. Overall, good agreement was observed from the four different routes to measurement, for the LDPE examined.


* Mail address: P.D. Coates, Dept. of Mech. and Med. Eng., University of Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD7 1DP, England

Received: 2000-9-11
Accepted: 2000-9-11
Published Online: 2013-06-06
Published in Print: 2000-12-01

© 2000, Carl Hanser Verlag, Munich