Abstract
This paper in applied theory argues that there is a loose chain of reasoning connecting the following three basic links in the economics of climate change: 1) additive disutility damages may be appropriate for analyzing some impacts of global warming; 2) an uncertain feedback-forcing coefficient, which might be near one with infinitesimal probability, can cause the distribution of the future time trajectory of global temperatures to have fat tails and a high variance; 3) when high-variance additive damages are discounted at an uncertain rate of pure time preference, which might be near zero with infinitesimal probability, it can make expected present discounted disutility very large. Some possible implications for welfare analysis and climate-change policy are briefly noted.
References
Allen, M., N. Andronova, B. Booth, S. Dessai, D. Frame, C. Forest, J. Gregory, G. Hegerl, R. Knutti, C. Piani, D. Sexton, and D. Stainforth (2006). “Observational Constraints on Climate Sensitivity.” Chapter 9 in Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change, ed. H. J. Schellnhuber, Cambridge University Press, pp. 281–289.Search in Google Scholar
Allen, Myles R. and David J. Frame (2007). “Call Off the Quest.” Science 318 (October 26): 582–583.Search in Google Scholar
Andrews, David G. and Myles R. Allen (2007). “Diagnosis of Climate Models in Terms of Transient Climate Response and Feedback Response Time.” Mimeo dated July 19.Search in Google Scholar
Archer, David (2007). Global Warming. Blackwell Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Dasgupta, Partha (2007). “Commentary: the Stern Review’s Economics of Climate Change.” National Economic Review 199: 4–7.Search in Google Scholar
James Hansen, Makiko Sato, Puskher Karecha, David Beerling, Valerie Masson-Delmotte, Mark Pagani, Maureen Raymo, Dana L. Royer, James C. Zachos (2008). “Target Atmospheric CO2: Where Should Humanity Aim?” Open Atmos. Sci. J. 2: 217–231.Search in Google Scholar
Dieter Lüthi, Martine Le Floch, Bernhard Bereiter, Thomas Blunier, Jean-Marc Barnola, Urs Siegenthaler, Dominique Raynaud, Jean Jouzel, Hubertus Fischer, Kenji Kawamura & Thomas F. Stocker (2008). “High-Resolution Carbon Dioxide Concentration Record 650,000–800,000 Years before Present.” Nature 453: 379–382 (15 May).Search in Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William (2008). A Question of Balance. Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Roe, Gerard (2007). “Feedbacks, Timescales, and Seeing Red.” Mimeo dated September 2.Search in Google Scholar
Roe, Gerard H., and Marcia B. Baker (2007). “Why is Climate Sensitivity So Unpredictable?” Science 318 (October 26): 629–632.10.1126/science.1144735Search in Google Scholar
Sterner, Thomas, and U. Martin Persson (2008). “An Even Sterner Review: Introducing Relative Prices into the Discounting Debate.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2 (1): 61–76.10.1093/reep/rem024Search in Google Scholar
Weitzman, Martin L. (1998). “Why the Far-Distant Future Should Be Discounted at Its Lowest Possible Rate.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 36 (3, November): 201–208.Search in Google Scholar
Weitzman, Martin L. (2001). “Gamma Discounting.” American Economic Review 91 (1, March): 260–271.Search in Google Scholar
Weitzman, Martin L. (2009a). “On Modeling and Interpreting the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change.” Review of Economics and Statistics 91 (1): 1–19.10.1162/rest.91.1.1Search in Google Scholar
Weitzman, Martin L. (2009b). “Reactions to Nordhaus.” http://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/weitzman/files/ReactionsCritique.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Wigley, Thomas M. L., and Michael E. Schlesinger (1985). “Analytical Solution for the Effect of Increasing CO2 on Global Mean Temperature.” Nature 318: 649–652.Search in Google Scholar
© 2009 Martin L. Weitzman, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
