Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access November 27, 2012

Small Flows, Compliance Costs and Trade Preferences: The Case of EU Imports from African LDCs

Lars Nilsson EMAIL logo and Caroline Dotter
From the journal Economics


Previous work has shown that a significant number of preference eligible goods are imported into the EU from developing countries at relatively small values and that the rate of preference utilisation of these imports are low and in many cases zero. This fact is unobserved in the aggregate figures because large flows have high utilisation rates, thereby pushing up the average preference utilisation rate. This paper examines this phenomenon further by using monthly data on EU imports from African LDCs at the lowest level of (publicly) available aggregation thereby coming close to transaction level data. It identifies the average value of preference eligible imports, utilising and not utilising preferences, by country and product category and test their empirical relevance for explaining the African LDCs’ preference utilisation rates.

JEL Classification: F13; F15


Agostino, M., Demarua, F., and F. Trivieri (2010). Non-Reciprocal Trade Preferences and the Role of Compliance Costs in the Agricultural Sector: Exports to the EU. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(3): 652–679. in Google Scholar

Brenton, P. (2003). Integrating the Least Developed Countries into the World Trading System: the Current Impact of EU Preferences under Everything but Arms. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, No. 3018. in Google Scholar

Brenton, P., and T. Ikezuki (2004). The Initial and Potential Impact of Preferential Access to the U.S. Market under the African Growth and Opportunity Act. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, No. 3262. in Google Scholar

Brenton, P., and M. Manchin (2003). Making EU Trade Agreements Work: The Role of Rules of Origin. The World Economy 26 (5), 755–769. in Google Scholar

CARIS (2010). Mid-term Evaluation of the EU’s Generalised System of Preferences. University of Sussex, in Google Scholar

Carrère, C., and J. de Melo (2004). Are Different Rules of Origin Equally Costly? CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 4436. in Google Scholar

Francois, J., Hoekman, B., and M. Manchin (2006). Preference Erosion and Multilateral Trade Liberalization. The World Bank Economic Review, 20(2): 197–216. in Google Scholar

Inama, S. (2004). Trade Preferences for LDCs: A Quantitative Analysis of their Utilization and Suggestions to Improve it. GTAP 2004 Conference Paper.Search in Google Scholar

Manchin, M (2006). Preference Utilisation and Tariff Reduction in EU Imports from ACP Countries. World Economy, Volume 29, Issue 9. in Google Scholar

Nilsson, L. (2002). Trading Relations: Is the Roadmap from Lomé to Cotonou Correct? Applied Economics, Vol. 34, issue 4, pages 439-452.Search in Google Scholar

Nilsson, L., and N. Matsson (2008). Truths and Myths about the Openness of EU Trade Policy and the Use of EU Trade Preferences. European Commission, DG Trade, mimeo, available at in Google Scholar

Nilsson, L. (2011a). European Union Preferential Trading Arrangements: Evolution, Content and Use. In Salvatici, L and L. De Benedictis (eds.), The Trade Impact of European Union Preferential Policies: An Analysis through Gravity Models, Springer Publishers.10.1007/978-3-642-16564-1_2Search in Google Scholar

Nilsson, L. (2011b). Small Trade Flows and Preference Utilisation: The Case of the European Union. South African Journal of Economics Vol. 79: 4 December. in Google Scholar

Nilsson, L. (2011c). Principles of EU Imports, Tariffs and Tariff Regimes. Journal of World Trade 45, no. 4, pp. 821-835.10.54648/TRAD2011028Search in Google Scholar

Persson, M., and F. Wilhelmsson (2007). Assessing the Effects of EU Trade Preferences for Developing Countries. In Y. Bourdet, J. Gullstrand and K. Olofsdotter (eds.), The European Union and Developing Countries: Trade, Aid, and Growth in an Integrated World, Edward Elgar.Search in Google Scholar

Train, K (2009). Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, Second edition. in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2012-11-27
Published in Print: 2012-12-01

© 2012 Lars Nilsson et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 27.1.2023 from
Scroll Up Arrow