Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access March 26, 2012

The Focus Axiom and Poverty: On the Co-existence of Precise Language and Ambiguous Meaning in Economic Measurement

  • Subbu Subramanian EMAIL logo
From the journal Economics


Despite the formal rigour that attends social and economic measurement, the substantive meaning of particular measures could be compromised in the absence of a clear and coherent conceptualization of the phenomenon being measured. A case in point is afforded by the status of a ‘focus axiom’ in the measurement of poverty. ‘Focus’ requires that a measure of poverty ought to be sensitive only to changes in the income-distribution of the poor population of any society. In practice, most poverty indices advanced in the literature satisfy an ‘incomefocus’ but not a ‘population-focus’ axiom. This, it is argued in the present paper, makes for an incoherent underlying conception of poverty. The paper provides examples of poverty measures which either satisfy both income and population focus or violate both, or which effectively do not recognize a clear dichotomization of a population into its poor and non-poor components, and suggests that such measures possess a virtue of consistency, and coherent meaning, lacking in most extant measures of poverty available in the literature.

JEL Classification: B40; D31; D63; I32; O15


Anand, S. (1977). Aspects of Poverty in Malaysia. Review of Income and Wealth 23(1): 1–16. in Google Scholar

Barrientos, A. (2010). Should Poverty Researchers Worry About Inequality? Brooks World Poverty Institute Working Paper 118/2010, University of Manchester, U.K. in Google Scholar

Broome, J. (1996). The Welfare Economics of Population. Oxford Economic Papers 48(2): 177–193. in Google Scholar

Chakravarty, S. R. (1983). ‘A new Index of Poverty’, Mathematical Social Sciences, 6(3): 307-313. in Google Scholar

Chakravarty, S., S. R. Kanbur and D. Mukherjee. 2006: ‘Population Growth and Poverty Measurement’, Social Choice and Welfare 26(3): 471-483. in Google Scholar

Chiappero Martinetti, E. (2000): “A Multidimensional Assessment of Well-Being Based on Sen’s Functioning Approach”, Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali, 108(2): 207-239. in Google Scholar

Hassoun, N. (2010): Another Mere Addition Paradox? A Problem for Some Common Poverty Indexes in Variable Populations. WIDER Working Paper 2010/120. in Google Scholar

Hassoun, N. and S. Subramanian (2011). An Aspect of Variable Population Poverty Comparisons. (forthcoming) Journal of Development Economics. [Available Online 4 August 2011: In Press, Corrected Proof, DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.07.004].10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.07.004Search in Google Scholar

Kundu, A. and T. E. Smith (1983), ‘An Impossibility Theorem on Poverty Indices’, International Economic Review, 24(2): 423-34. in Google Scholar

Parfit, D. (1997). ‘Equality and Priority’, Ratio (new series) 10(3): 202-221. in Google Scholar

Paxton, J. (2003): ‘A Poverty Outreach Index and its Application to Microfinance’, Economics Bulletin,. 9(2): 1-10. in Google Scholar

Qizilbash, M. (2003). ‘Vague Language and Precise Measurement: The Case of Poverty’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 10(1): 41-58. in Google Scholar

Pattanaik, P. K. and M. Sengupta (1995). ‘An Alternative Axiomatization of Sen’s Poverty Measure’, Review of Income and Wealth, 41(1): 73-80. in Google Scholar

Sen, A.K. (1976a): `Poverty: An Ordinal Approach to Measurement’, Econometrica, 44(2): 219-31. in Google Scholar

Sen, A.K. (1976b): `Real National Income’, Review of Economic Studies, 43(1): 19-39. in Google Scholar

Sen, A.K. (1981). Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Oxford: Clarendon.Search in Google Scholar

Shorrocks, A. F. and S. Subramanian (1994): Fuzzy Poverty Indices (mimeo.). University of Essex.Search in Google Scholar

Subramanian, S. (2000). ‘Poverty Measurement and the Repugnant Conclusion’, S. Guhan Memorial Series Discussion Paper 3, Madras Institute of Development Studies, Chennai.Search in Google Scholar

Subramanian, S. (2002): `Counting the Poor: An Elementary Difficulty in the Measurement of Poverty’, Economics and Philosophy, 277-285. in Google Scholar

Subramanian, S. (2009a). ‘Poverty Measurement in the Presence of a “Group Affiliation Externality”’, Journal of Human Development, 10(1): 63-76. in Google Scholar

Subramanian, S. (2009b). ‘A Practical Proposal for Simplifying the Measurement of Income Poverty’. In K. Basu and R. Kanbur (eds.): Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honour of Amartya Sen, Volume 1: Ethics, Welfare, and Measurement. Oxford University Press: Clarendon.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199239115.003.0024Search in Google Scholar

Thon, D. (1979). ‘On Measuring Poverty’, Review of Income and Wealth, 25(4), pp. 429-439. in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2012-03-26
Published in Print: 2012-12-01

© 2012 Subbu Subramanian, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 4.2.2023 from
Scroll Up Arrow