Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access May 4, 2015

What Have Economists Been Doing for the Last 50 Years? A Text Analysis of Published Academic Research from 1960–2010

  • Lea-Rachel Kosnik EMAIL logo
From the journal Economics

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a text based exploratory study of over 20,000 academic articles published in seven top research journals from 1960–2010. The goal is to investigate the general research foci of economists over the last fifty years, how (if at all) they have changed over time, and what trends (if any) can be discerned from a broad body of the top academic research in the field. Of the 19 JEL-code based fields studied in the literature, most have retained a constant level of attention over the time period of this study, however, a notable exception is that of macroeconomics which has undergone a significantly diminishing level of research attention in the last couple of decades, across all the journals under study; at the same time, the “microfoundations” of macroeconomic papers appears to be increasing. Other results on co-authorship trends and depth of research articles are also presented.

JEL Classification: A11; B4

References

Antweiler, W., and M.Z. Frank (2004). Is All That Talk Just Noise? The Information Content of Internet Stock Message Boards. The Journal of Finance 59(3): 1259–1294. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00662.x/pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Card, D., and S. DellaVigna (2013). Nine Facts about Top Journals in Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 51(1): 144–161. http://eml.berkeley.edu/~sdellavi/wp/CardDellaVignaTop5PapersJEL2013.pdf.10.3386/w18665Search in Google Scholar

Colander, D. (1989). Research on the Economics Profession. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(4): 137–148. http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.3.4.137.Search in Google Scholar

Cropper, M.L. (2000). Has Economic Research Answered the Needs of Environmental Policy? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39: 328–350. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069600911288.Search in Google Scholar

Dedrick, D. (1998). Naming the Rainbow: Color Language, Color Science, and Culture. Kluwer Academic Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Dershowitz, I., N. Dershowitz, M. Koppel, and N. Akiva (2011). Unsupervised Decomposition of a Document into Authorial Components. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics 1356–1364. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P11-1136.Search in Google Scholar

DeWall, C.N., R.S. Pond, Jr., W.K. Campbell, and J.M. Twenge (2011). Tuning in to Psychological Change: Linguistic Markers of Psychological Traits and Emotions Over Time in Popular U.S. Song Lyrics. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 5(3): 200–207. http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/aca/5/3/200/.Search in Google Scholar

Duncan, D.F. (1991). Health Psychology and Clinical Psychology: A Comparison Through Content Analysis. Psychological Reports 68: 585–586. http://www.amsciepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2466/pr0.1991.68.2.585.Search in Google Scholar

Durden, G.C., and L.V. Ellis (1993). A Method for Identifying the Most Influential Articles in an Academic Discipline. Atlantic Economic Journal 21(4): 1–10. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02302324.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, L.V., and G.C. Durden (1991). Why Economists Rank Their Journals the Way They Do. Journal of Economics and Business 43(3): 265–279. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014861959190024Q.Search in Google Scholar

Eagly, R.V. (1975). Economics Journals as a Communications Network. Journal of Economic Literature 13(3): 878–888. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2722034?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, L., C. Miller, and A. Widmayer (1988). Content Analysis of Biological Approaches in Psychology: 1894–1985. Sociology and Social Research 72(3): 145–149. http://www.worldcat.org/title/sociology-and-social-research/oclc/5088377.Search in Google Scholar

Engemann, K.M., and H.J. Wall (2009). A Journal Ranking for the Ambitious Economist. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 91(3): 127–139. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26181.v1.10.3886/ICPSR26181.v1Search in Google Scholar

Evans, J. A., and J.G. Foster (2011). Metaknowledge. Science 331: 721–725. http://www.knowledgelab.org/docs/Metaknowledge.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Fuchs, V. (2002). Reflections on Economic Research and Public Policy John R. Commons Award Lecture, 2002. The American Economist 46(1): 3–9. http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=2&sid=018acc6f-7745-4121-bc44-eb28b3cf9651%40sessionmgr4002&hid=4207.Search in Google Scholar

Gentzkow, M., and J.M. Shapiro (2010). What Drives Media Slant? Evidence from U.S. Daily Newspapers. Econometrica 78(1): 35–71. http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/matthew.gentzkow/research/biasmeas.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Goyal, S., M.J. van der Leij, and J.L. Moraga-Gonzalez (2006). Economics: An Emerging Small World. Journal of Political Economy 114(2): 403–412. http://dare.uva.nl/document/2/131796.Search in Google Scholar

Granger, C.W.J. (1994). Reducing Self-Interest and Improving the Relevance of Economic Research. In: Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IX: Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science.Search in Google Scholar

Grimmer, J., and G. King (2010). General Purpose Computer-Assisted Clustering and Conceptualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1: 1–8. http://www.pnas.org/content/108/7/2643.abstract.Search in Google Scholar

Hamermesh, D.S. (2013). Six Decades of Top Economics Publishing: Who and How? Journal of Economic Literature 51(1): 162–172. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.51.1.162.Search in Google Scholar

Hamermesh, D.S. (2015). Age, Cohort, and Co-Authorship. NBER Working Paper No. 20938. http://www.nber.org/papers/w20938.10.3386/w20938Search in Google Scholar

Hawkins, R.G., L.S. Ritter, and I. Walter (1973). What Economists Think of Their Journals. Journal of Political Economy 81(4): 1017–1032. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1831144?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents10.1086/260098Search in Google Scholar

Kagann, S., and K.W. Leeson (1978). Major Journals in Economics: A User Study. Journal of Economic Literature 16(3): 979–1003. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2723472?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contentsSearch in Google Scholar

Kalaitzidakis, P., T.P. Mamuneas, and T. Stengos (2003). Rankings of Academic Journals and Institutions in Economics. Journal of the European Economics Association 1(6): 1346–1366. http://www.jedc.com/bin/eearank.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Kelly, M.A., and S. Bruestle (2011). Trends of Subjects Published in Economics Journals 1969–2007. Economic Inquiry 49(3): 658–673. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00282.x/full.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, E.H., A. Morse, and L. Zingales (2006). What Has Mattered to Economics since 1970. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(4): 189–202. http://webuser.bus.umich.edu/ehkim/articles/whatmattered-jep2006.pdf.10.3386/w12526Search in Google Scholar

Koppel, M., S. Argamon, A.R. Shimoni (2002). Automatically Categorizing Written Texts by Author Gender. Literary & Linguistic Computing 17(4): 401-412. http://llc.oxfordjournals.org/content/17/4/401.abstract.Search in Google Scholar

Kosnik, L.-R. (2014). Determinants of Contract Completeness: An Environmental Regulatory Application. International Review of Law and Economics 37: 198–208. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144818813000811.Search in Google Scholar

Kremer, M., and C. Morcom (2000). Elephants. American Economic Review 90(1): 212–234. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/aer.90.1.212.Search in Google Scholar

Laband, D.N., and R.D. Tollison (2000). Intellectual Collaboration. Journal of Political Economy 108(3): 632–662. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/262132.Search in Google Scholar

Laband, D.N., R.D. Tollison, and G. Karahan (2002). Quality Control in Economics. Kyklos 55: 315–334. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-6435.00189/pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Laver, M., K. Benoit, and J. Garry (2003). Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data. American Political Science Review 97(2): 311–331. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3118211?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.Search in Google Scholar

Medema, S.G., and W.J. Samuels (eds.) (1996). Foundations of Research in Economics: How Do Economists Do Economics? Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar.Search in Google Scholar

Michel, J.-B., Y.K. Shen, A. Presser Aiden, A. Veres, M.K. Gray, The Google Books Team, J.P. Pickett, D. Hoiberg, D. Clancy, P. Norvig, J. Orwant, S. Pinker, M.A. Nowak, and E. Lieberman Aiden (2011). Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books. Science 331: 176–182. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/331/6014/176.Search in Google Scholar

Pardey, P.G., and V.H. Smith (2004). What’s Economics Worth? Valuing Policy Research. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Scroggs, C.L. (1975). The Relevance of University Research and Extension Activities in Agricultural Economics to Agribusiness Firms. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 57(5): 883–888. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1239098?uid=45058&uid=3739744&uid=2&uid=3&uid=67&uid=38239&uid=5912040&uid=62&uid=3739256&sid=21105956361031.Search in Google Scholar

Sen, A. (2008). The Discipline of Economics. Economica 75: 617–628. http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40071787.pdf?acceptTC=true&jpdConfirm=true.Search in Google Scholar

Sexton, J.B., and R.L. Helmreich (1999). Analyzing Cockpit Communication: The Links Between Language, Performance, Error, and Workload. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology 689–695. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, V.H., P.G. Pardey, and C. Chan-Kang (2004). The Economics Research Industry. In What’s Economics Worth? Valuing Policy Research, eds. P.G. Pardey and V.H. Smith. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Spirling, A. (2010). Bargaining Power in Practice: U.S. Treaty-Making with American Indians 1784–1911. Working Paper.Search in Google Scholar

Stephen, T. (1999). Computer-Assisted Concept Analysis of HCR’s First 25 Years. Human Communication Research 25(4): 498–513. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1999.tb00458.x/abstract.Search in Google Scholar

Stephen, T. (2000). Concept Analysis of Gender, Feminist, and Women’s Studies Research in the Communication Literature. Communication Monographs 67(2): 193–214. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03637750009376504#.VSgNh_nF98E.Search in Google Scholar

Stern, D.I. (2013). Uncertainty Measures for Economics Journal Impact Factors. Journal of Economic Literature 51(1): 173–189. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.51.1.173.Search in Google Scholar

Tetlock, P.C. (2007). Giving Content to Investor Sentiment: The Role of Media in the Stock Market. Journal of Finance 62(3): 1139–1168. https://www0.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/ptetlock/papers/Tetlock_JF_07_Giving_Conte nt_to_Investor_Sentiment.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Weiss, S.M., N. Indurkhya, T. Zhang, and F.J. Damerau (2005). Text Mining: Predictive Methods for Analyzing Unstructured Information. New York, New York: Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.10.1007/978-0-387-34555-0Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-01-12
Revised: 2015-04-10
Accepted: 2015-04-20
Published Online: 2015-05-04
Published in Print: 2015-12-01

© 2015 Lea-Rachel Kosnik, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 15.11.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2015-13/html
Scroll to top button