Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access August 28, 2015

Field Experimental Evidence on Gender Discrimination in Hiring: Biased as Heckman and Siegelman Predicted?

Stijn Baert
From the journal Economics

Abstract

Correspondence studies are nowadays viewed as the most compelling avenue to test for hiring discrimination. However, these studies suffer from one fundamental methodological problem, as formulated by Heckman and Siegelman (The Urban Institute audit studies: Their methods and findings. In M. Fix, and R. Struyk (Eds.), Clear and convincing evidence: Measurement of discrimination in America, 1993), namely the bias in their results in case of group differences in the variance of unobserved determinants of hiring outcomes. In this study, the authors empirically investigate this bias in the context of gender discrimination. The authors do not find significant evidence for the feared bias.

JEL Classification: J16; J71; M51; J41; C93

References

Albert, R., L. Escot, and J. Fernández-Cornejo (2011). A field experiment to study sex and age discrimination in the Madrid labour market. International Journal of Human Resource Management 22 (2): 351–375. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.540160.10.1080/09585192.2011.540160Search in Google Scholar

Altonji, J., and R. Blank (1999). Race and Gender in the Labor Market. In O. Ashenfelter, and D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar

Azmat, G., and B. Petrongolo (2014). Gender and the Labor Market: What Have We Learned from Field and Lab Experiments? Labour Economics 30 (Special Issue on “What determined the dynamics of labour economics research in the past 25 years?”): 32–40. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2014.06.005.10.1016/j.labeco.2014.06.005Search in Google Scholar

Baert, S. (2014). Career lesbians. Getting hired for not having kids. Industrial Relations 45 (6): 543–561. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irj.12078.10.1111/irj.12078Search in Google Scholar

Baert, S., and P. Balcaen (2013). The Impact of Military Work Experience on Later Hiring Chances in the Civilian Labour Market. Evidence from a Field Experiment. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 7 (2013-37): 1–17. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2013-37.10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2013-37Search in Google Scholar

Baert, S., B. Cockx, N. Gheyle, and C. Vandamme (2015). Is There Less Discrimination in Occupations Where Recruitment Is Difficult? Industrial and Labor Relations Review 68 (3): 467–500. URL: http://ilr.sagepub.com/content/68/3/467.Search in Google Scholar

Baert, S., A. De Pauw, and N. Deschacht (Forthcoming). Do Employer Preferences Contribute to Sticky Floors? Industrial and Labor Relations Review. URL: ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp8447.html.Search in Google Scholar

Bertrand, M., and S. Mullainathan (2004). Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review 94 (4): 991–1013. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/0002828042002561.10.1257/0002828042002561Search in Google Scholar

Carlsson, M., L. Fumarco, and D.-O. Rooth (2014). Does the design of correspondence studies influence the measurement of discrimination? IZA Journal of Migration 2014 (3): 11. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-9039-3-11.10.1186/2193-9039-3-11Search in Google Scholar

Drydakis, N. (2009). Sexual orientation discrimination in the labour market. Labour Economics 16 (4): 364–372. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2008.12.003.10.1016/j.labeco.2008.12.003Search in Google Scholar

Eriksson, S., and D.-O. Rooth (2014). Do Employers Use Unemployment as a Sorting Criterion When Hiring? Evidence from a Field Experiment. American Economic Review 104 (3): 1014–1039. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.3.1014.10.1257/aer.104.3.1014Search in Google Scholar

Heckman, J.J., and P. Siegelman (1993). The Urban Institute audit studies: Their methods and findings. In M. Fix, and R. Struyk (Eds.), Clear and convincing evidence: Measurement of discrimination in America. Washington DC: Urban Institute Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kroft, K., F. Lange, and M.J. Notowidigdo (2013). Duration Dependence and Labor Market Conditions: Evidence from a Field Experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 128 (3): 1123–1167. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjt015.10.1093/qje/qjt015Search in Google Scholar

Neumark, D. (2012). Detecting discrimination with audit and correspondence studies. Journal of Human Resources 47 (4):1128–1157. URL: http://jhr.uwpress.org/content/47/4/1128.abstract.Search in Google Scholar

Petit, P. (2007). The effects of age and family constraints on gender hiring discrimination: A field experiment in the French financial sector. Labour Economics 14 (3): 371–391. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2006.01.006.10.1016/j.labeco.2006.01.006Search in Google Scholar

Riach, P.A., and J. Rich (2002). Field experiments of discrimination in the market place. Economic Journal 112 (November): F480–F518. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00080.10.1111/1468-0297.00080Search in Google Scholar

Riach, P.A., and J. Rich (2006). An Experimental Investigation of Sexual Discrimination in Hiring in the English Labor Market. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy (Advances) 5 (2): 1. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2202/1538-0637.1416.10.2202/1538-0637.1416Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-05-18
Revised: 2015-08-12
Accepted: 2015-08-13
Published Online: 2015-08-28
Published in Print: 2015-12-01

© 2015 Stijn Baert, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Scroll Up Arrow