Abstract
The authors explore the link between the systems approach to sustainability and the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which were formally adopted by the UN in 2015. The systems approach depicts sustainable development as the intersection of the goals attributed to three interlinked systems: environmental (or ecological), economic and social. The authors illustrate how each of the 17 SDGs can be characterized as a goal primarily attributed either to the environmental, economic or social system, and as suggested by the systems approach, there may be important tradeoffs in attempting to attain all these goals simultaneously. By adopting standard methods of the theory of choice and welfare under imposed quantities, the authors show that is possible to measure the welfare effects of an increase in the indicator level for one SDG by identifying the tradeoffs that occur with achieving another goal. They present a quantitative assessment of current progress and tradeoffs among the 17 SDGs, using a representative indicator for each goal. They then conduct a preliminary welfare analysis of these tradeoffs through employing the approach developed in this paper. Although this analysis focuses on the potential tradeoffs among SDGs, the approach could also be applied to show complementarities, or “winwins”, in simultaneous progress among two or more SDGs. Such an analysis can help in the design of appropriate policy interventions to achieve specific SDGs, minimizing the potentially negative knock-on effects on some goals whilst capitalizing on the positive win-win impacts on other SDGs.
References
Arrow, K.J., P.S. Dasgupta, L.H. Goulder, K.J. Mumford and K. Oleson (2012). Sustainability and the Measurement of Wealth. Environment and Development Economics 17(3):317–353. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/environment-and-developmenteconomics/article/sustainability-and-the-measurement-ofwealth/DF1D0473AD397311143DB1033B50A7E610.1017/S1355770X12000137Search in Google Scholar
Barbier, E.B (1987). The concept of sustainable economic development. Environmental Conservation 14:101–110. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/environmental-conservation/article/concept-ofsustainable-economic-development/33A3CD3BD12DE8D5B2FF466701A14B4A10.1017/S0376892900011449Search in Google Scholar
Barbier, E.B. (2013). Wealth Accounting, Ecological Capital and Ecosystem Services. Environment and Development Economics 18:133–161. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/environment-anddevelopment-economics/article/wealth-accounting-ecological-capital-and-ecosystemservices/F5871221942AD531F7611AE45180BFBC10.1017/S1355770X12000551Search in Google Scholar
Barbier, E.B. (2016). Sustainability and Development. Annual Review of Resource Economics 8:261–280. http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-resource-100815-09522710.1146/annurev-resource-100815-095227Search in Google Scholar
Barbier, E.B. and A. Markandya (2012). A New Blueprint for a Green Economy. Routledge/Taylor & Francis, London.Search in Google Scholar
Costanza, R., Daly, L., Fioramonti, L., Giovannini, E., Kubiszewskia, I., Mortensen, L.F., Pickett, K.E., Ragnarsdottir, K., De Vogli, R., Wilkinson, R. (2016). Modelling and measuring sustainable wellbeing in connection with the UN Sustainable development Goals. Ecological Economics 130:350–355. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092180091530335910.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.009Search in Google Scholar
Ekins, P.A (1994). The Environmental Sustainability of Economic Processes: A Framework for Analysis. Chapter 2 in J.C.J.M. van den Bergh and J. van der Straaten, eds. Toward Sustainable Development: Concepts, Methods, and Policy. Island Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 25–56.Search in Google Scholar
Elliott, J.A (2006). An Introduction to Sustainable Development, 3rd ed. Routledge, London and New York.Search in Google Scholar
Freeman, A.M. III (2003). The Measurement of Environmental Values: Theory and Methods, 2nd ed. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.Search in Google Scholar
Holling, C.S (1973). Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems, Annual Review of Ecological Systems 4:1–23. http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245?journalCode=ecolsys.1Search in Google Scholar
Holmberg, J. and R. Sandbrook (1992). Sustainable Development: What Is to Be Done? Chapter 1 in J. Holmberg, ed. Policies for a Small Planet: From the International Institute for Environment and Development. Earthscan Publications, London, pp. 19–38.Search in Google Scholar
Lankford, R.H (1988). Measuring Welfare Changes in Settings with Imposed Quantities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15:45–63. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/009506968890027710.1016/0095-0696(88)90027-7Search in Google Scholar
Lenton, T.M. et al (2008). Tipping Elements in the Earth’s Climate System. Proceedings of the National Academies of Science 105:1786–1793. http://www.pnas.org/content/105/6/1786.abstract10.1073/pnas.0705414105Search in Google Scholar
Nilsson, M., D. Griggs and M. Visbeck (2016). Map the Interactions between Sustainable Development Goals. Nature 534:320–322. https://www.nature.com/news/policy-map-the-interactions-betweensustainable-development-goals-1.2007510.1038/534320aSearch in Google Scholar
Pezzey, J. and M.A. Toman (2002). The Economics of Sustainability: A Review of Journal Articles. Discussion Paper 02-03. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C., January 2002. http://www.rff.org/RFF/documents/RFF-DP-02-03.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Rockström, J. et al (2009). A Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Nature. 461:472–475. https://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v461/n7263/full/461472a.html10.1038/461472aSearch in Google Scholar
Smith, V.K (2017). Environmental Economics and the Anthropocene. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.386. http://environmentalscience.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.001.0001/acrefore-9780199389414-e-38610.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.386Search in Google Scholar
Steffen, W. et al (2015). Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet. Science 347:1259855. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/125985510.1126/science.1259855Search in Google Scholar
von Stechow, C. et al (2016). 2oC and SDGs: United They Stand, Divided They Fall? Environmental Research Letters 11 034022. 2%C2%B0C%20and%20SDGs.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
United Nations (UN) (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations, New York. Available at https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publicationSearch in Google Scholar
Weitzman (1976). On the Welfare Significance of National Product in a Dynamic Economy. Quarterly Journal of Economics 90(1): 156–16210.2307/1886092Search in Google Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.Search in Google Scholar
© 2017 Edward B. Barbier et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
