You currently have no access to view or download this content. Please log in with your institutional or personal account if you should have access to this content through either of these.
Showing a limited preview of this publication:
Webshop not currently available
While we are building a new and improved webshop, please click below to purchase this content via our partner CCC and their Rightfind service. You will need to register with a RightFind account to finalise the purchase.
Hunter, Matthew C.. "Conclusion: Art History in/as an Age of Combustion". Painting with Fire, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019, pp. 179-184. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226390390-006
Hunter, M. (2019). Conclusion: Art History in/as an Age of Combustion. In Painting with Fire (pp. 179-184). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226390390-006
Hunter, M. 2019. Conclusion: Art History in/as an Age of Combustion. Painting with Fire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 179-184. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226390390-006
Hunter, Matthew C.. "Conclusion: Art History in/as an Age of Combustion" In Painting with Fire, 179-184. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226390390-006
Hunter M. Conclusion: Art History in/as an Age of Combustion. In: Painting with Fire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2019. p.179-184. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226390390-006
Painting with Fire shows how experiments with chemicals known to change visibly over the course of time transformed British pictorial arts of the long eighteenth century—and how they can alter our conceptions of photography today. As early as the 1670s, experimental philosophers at the Royal Society of London had studied the visual effects of dynamic combustibles. By the 1770s, chemical volatility became central to the ambitious paintings of Sir Joshua Reynolds, premier portraitist and first president of Britain’s Royal Academy of Arts. Valued by some critics for changing in time (and thus, for prompting intellectual reflection on the nature of time), Reynolds’s unstable chemistry also prompted new techniques of chemical replication among Matthew Boulton, James Watt, and other leading industrialists. In turn, those replicas of chemically decaying academic paintings were rediscovered in the mid-nineteenth century and claimed as origin points in the history of photography.
Tracing the long arc of chemically produced and reproduced art from the 1670s through the 1860s, the book reconsiders early photography by situating it in relationship to Reynolds’s replicated paintings and the literal engines of British industry. By following the chemicals, Painting with Fire remaps familiar stories about academic painting and pictorial experiment amid the industrialization of chemical knowledge.