You currently have no access to view or download this content. Please log in with your institutional or personal account if you should have access to this content through either of these.
Showing a limited preview of this publication:
Webshop not currently available
While we are building a new and improved webshop, please click below to purchase this content via our partner CCC and their Rightfind service. You will need to register with a RightFind account to finalise the purchase.
Landauer, Matthew. "3. The Accountable Adviser in Herodotus’ Histories". Dangerous Counsel, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019, pp. 83-104. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226653822-005
Landauer, M. (2019). 3. The Accountable Adviser in Herodotus’ Histories. In Dangerous Counsel (pp. 83-104). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226653822-005
Landauer, M. 2019. 3. The Accountable Adviser in Herodotus’ Histories. Dangerous Counsel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 83-104. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226653822-005
Landauer, Matthew. "3. The Accountable Adviser in Herodotus’ Histories" In Dangerous Counsel, 83-104. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226653822-005
Landauer M. 3. The Accountable Adviser in Herodotus’ Histories. In: Dangerous Counsel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2019. p.83-104. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226653822-005
We often talk loosely of the “tyranny of the majority” as a threat to the workings of democracy. But, in ancient Greece, the analogy of demos and tyrant was no mere metaphor, nor a simple reflection of elite prejudice. Instead, it highlighted an important structural feature of Athenian democracy. Like the tyrant, the Athenian demos was an unaccountable political actor with the power to hold its subordinates to account. And like the tyrant, the demos could be dangerous to counsel since the orator speaking before the assembled demos was accountable for the advice he gave.
With Dangerous Counsel, Matthew Landauer analyzes the sometimes ferocious and unpredictable politics of accountability in ancient Greece and offers novel readings of ancient history, philosophy, rhetoric, and drama. In comparing the demos to a tyrant, thinkers such as Herodotus, Plato, Isocrates, and Aristophanes were attempting to work out a theory of the badness of unaccountable power; to understand the basic logic of accountability and why it is difficult to get right; and to explore the ways in which political discourse is profoundly shaped by institutions and power relationships. In the process they created strikingly portable theories of counsel and accountability that traveled across political regime types and remain relevant to our contemporary political dilemmas.